Fall PatientsNCT06339125
Predictive Analytics and Computer Visualization Enhances Patient Safety to Prevent Falls
A study testing Fall prevention algorithm and Inspiren camera visualization in people with Fall Patients and Fall Injury, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Annually, in the United States there are 700,000 - 1,000,000 inpatient falls reported, and one-third of patients sustain an injury. The average estimated cost per fall is $6,694, resulting in over $1.4 -1.9 billion dollars in losses each year (AHRQ, 2017). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Fall Patients, Fall Injury
- What is being tested?
- Fall prevention algorithm and Inspiren camera visualization
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 5,350 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 24 Sep 2024to 24 Sep 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult medical patients admitted to the study units
- All nurses working on the study units
Who cannot join
- None
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
About this study
Official title: Predictive Analytics Combined With Computer Visualization Enhances Patient Safety and Eases Nurse Burden for Preventing Falls
Annually, in the United States there are 700,000 - 1,000,000 inpatient falls reported, and one-third of patients sustain an injury. The average estimated cost per fall is $6,694, resulting in over $1.4 -1.9 billion dollars in losses each year (AHRQ, 2017). This study aims to compare the impact of different fall prevention strategies on the rate of occurrence of falls and falls with injury in an academic medical center on three adult medical units. While maintaining the usual standard of care for fall prevention, each unit will add one of the following: (1) use of a fall risk alert to nurses using an algorithm based on electronic health record data or (2) computerized camera visualization or (3) a combination of both.
Read the detailed description
To decrease falls in the hospital setting, and building on previous nursing fall research, as well as the MFS and the Fall TIPS program, a decision support algorithm was developed to identify changes in clinical factors as they occur to alert nurses to the need to adjust fall prevention interventions. Nurses, through a collaboration with RGI Informatics, then deployed the an algorithm on one clinical general care unit. The RGI software uses the algorithm live streaming EHR data from Epic to identify patients whose risk of falling may have increased and provide clinical decision support to nurses through an alert on their hospital issued cell phones. Preliminary results demonstrated feasibility and a statistically significant reduction (p <0.01) in falls with injury over an 11-month period.
Mutually exclusive preliminary work, on a second inpatient general care unit, involving a computerized patient visualization system also yielded reduction in falls. Combined usage of the two technologies may yield a synergistic effect thereby further reducing the incidence of falls in the acute care setting. To date, there is no evidence derived from evaluation of patient outcomes from simultaneous testing of the two technologies. Thus, the purpose of this study is to determine the impact of three different fall prevention interventions (RGI/MGH Algorithm only, Inspiren only and combined RGI Algorithm and Inspiren) on patients at risk for falls and falls with injury on three adult general care units in a large academic medical center.
The proposed solution is the only known strategy that extracts and synthesizes physiologic and physical data from multiple sources, to create a dimensional view of a patient's safety profile related to fall risk. Timely alerts will inform nurses of patient's fall risk, reason for risk and their clinical decisions regarding fall prevention strategies. This initial proposal focuses on patients at risk for falls and the investigators are confident that this innovative approach is adaptable to address other critical safety issues for example, pressure injuries and catheter associated urinary tract infections. Detailed information about RGI Analytics and Inspiren is provided below.
Methodology: An observational cohort, mixed-methods study design will be conducted to determine the impact and effectiveness of usual care and three different fall prevention strategies that exceed the standard of care on three inpatient units over one year. Unit 1 will employee streaming analytics and the algorithm only, Unit 2 will employee Inspiren's AUGI computer visualization only and Unit 3 will employee the combined streaming analytic/algorithm and Inspiren's AUGI device. Unit 4, the control unit, will serve as an internal comparison group from the same institution. In addition to the study interventions all four units will continue to maintain usual evidence-based practice, standards of care for fall prevention. Patient, unit, and nurse demographic data collected for the study currently can be accessed from or calculated from existing sources. Sources include the ADT, financial, acuity, and quality data stored in a Datawarehouse. Unit patient demographic data in the aggregate will include age, gender, and race. Nurse demographic data will include the number of fulltime equivalents, years of experience as a nurse, years of experience at the academic medical center, and highest level of education. Unit data will include counts of patient admissions, patient days, length of stay, nursing acuity, patient type by gender, age, race, ethnicity, number of unit falls and unit falls with injuries, and nurse staffing indicators. Nurse perceptions of the three interventions units will be measured in association with the intervention using real time feedback from cell phone alerts (helpful/not helpful), nurse feedback, and quarterly surveys. The Fall Prevention Efficiency Scale (Dykes, et al., 2021) is a peer reviewed 13-item tool that focuses on four key areas: saves time, does not waste time, is worth the time and is helpful in preventing falls. The survey questions will be adapted to meet the needs of this study and will be administered via REDCap, a Harvard Catalyst secure, web application for managing on-line survey tools.
Research questions
- In the acute care, inpatient hospital setting, is there a difference in rate of occurrence of falls and injurious falls, comparing three distinct methods of alerting nurses at the point of care to a change in a patients risk of falling while maintaining all other current standards of care for fall prevention and adding these new standards during the study: (1) use of streaming analytics and a fall risk algorithm that alerts nurses to a change in fall risk, (2) computer visualization and artificial intelligence interpretation of patient movement and (3) a combination of both technologies?
- What are the perceptions of nurses related to:
- The impact of three study technologies implemented to assist with the identification of increased fall risk.
- The reduction of nurse burden on the assessment of fall risk and the recommendation for additional interventions to prevent falls.
Research aims:
- Compare the impact of the three fall prevention innovations, within and between units and to one control unit (all four units using same usual standard of care) on falls and falls with injury.
- Determine the perceived effectiveness of fall prevention innovations and alerts on clinical decision support and nurse burden using nurse surveys, responses to alerts and focus groups.
- Conditions
- Fall Patients, Fall Injury
- Being tested
- Fall prevention algorithm, Inspiren camera visualization
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fall prevention algorithmOther
Also called RGI fall prevention algorithm
Algorithm generates fall prevention alerts to nurses in real time, using evidenced based electronic health record information regarding changes in care that may suggest the need for additional fall prevention strategies
Inspiren camera visualizationOther
Also called Computerized camera visualization
The Inspiren computer camera visualization is an additional strategy for nurses to employ when there is a change in a patient's fall risk.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Unit 1 | Experimental | Usual care and live streaming electronic health record driven Algorithm alerts nurses to possible increase in fall risk for review of interventions in place. Receives: Other: Fall prevention algorithm |
| Unit 2 | Experimental | Usual care and computer camera visualization detects and anticipates patient movement for patients at risk for falls and alerts nurses with fall risk potential. Receives: Other: Inspiren camera visualization |
| Unit 3 | Experimental | Usual care and live streaming electronic health record driven Algorithm alerts nurses to possible increase in fall risk for review of interventions in place. AND Computer camera visualization detects and anticipates patient movement for patients at risk for falls and alerts nurses with fall risk potential. Receives: Other: Fall prevention algorithm; Other: Inspiren camera visualization |
| Unit 4 | No intervention | Control group, no intervention and usual care. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Fall patient
Rate of patient falls per 1000 patient days, National Database Nurse Sensitive Indicators
Measured: Measured monthly/quarterly over one year
Fall injury
Rate of falls with injury per 1000 patient days, National Database Nurse Sensitive Indicators
Measured: Measured monthly/quarterly over one year
Secondary outcomes (2)
Nurse perceptions
Questionnaire of Nurse perceptions of fall prevention strategies
Measured: three, six, and 12 months
Nurse perceptions
Focus groups of nurse perceptions
Measured: three, six, and twelve months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Apr 2024
- Study start24 Sep 2024
- Primary completion23 Sep 2025
- Study completion24 Sep 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Fall PatientsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Massachusetts General HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- An observational cohort, mixed-methods study design will be conducted to determine the impact and effectiveness of usual care and three different fall prevention strategies that exceed the standard of care on three inpatient units at MGH over one year. Unit 1 will employ streaming analytics and the MGH algorithm only, Unit 2 will employee Inspiren's AUGI computer visualization only and Unit 3 will employ the combined streaming analytic/MGH algorithm and Inspiren's AUGI device. Unit 4, the control unit, will serve as an internal comparison group from the same institution. In addition to the study interventions all four units will continue to maintain usual MGH evidence-based practice, standards of care for fall prevention.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 5,350 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Crico
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Colleen Snydeman PhD, RN, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Investigators
- Colleen K Snydeman, PhD, Principal investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06339125
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2023p003637
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 25 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 4 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Data will collected in the aggregate at the unit level as rates per 1000 patient days, not patient specific
Publications
Dykes PC, Carroll DL, Hurley A, Lipsitz S, Benoit A, Chang F, Meltzer S, Tsurikova R, Zuyov L, Middleton B. Fall prevention in acute care hospitals: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2010 Nov 3;304(17):1912-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1567.
PubMed 21045097Morse, JM, Morse R.M., Tylko, S.J. (1989). Development of a scale to identify the fall-prone patient. Can J Aging, 8:366-7.
Seibert K, Domhoff D, Bruch D, Schulte-Althoff M, Furstenau D, Biessmann F, Wolf-Ostermann K. Application Scenarios for Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Care: Rapid Review. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 29;23(11):e26522. doi: 10.2196/26522.
PubMed 34847057Fehlberg EA, Cook CL, Bjarnadottir RI, McDaniel AM, Shorr RI, Lucero RJ. Fall Prevention Decision Making of Acute Care Registered Nurses. J Nurs Adm. 2020 Sep;50(9):442-448. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000914.
PubMed 32826513Dykes PC, Burns Z, Adelman J, Benneyan J, Bogaisky M, Carter E, Ergai A, Lindros ME, Lipsitz SR, Scanlan M, Shaykevich S, Bates DW. Evaluation of a Patient-Centered Fall-Prevention Tool Kit to Reduce Falls and Injuries: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2025889. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25889.
PubMed 33201236Costantinou E, Spencer JA. Analysis of Inpatient Hospital Falls with Serious Injury. Clin Nurs Res. 2021 May;30(4):482-493. doi: 10.1177/1054773820973406. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
PubMed 33190509Pierce JR Jr, Shirley M, Johnson EF, Kang H. Narcotic administration and fall-related injury in the hospital: implications for patient safety programs and providers. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2013;25(4):229-34. doi: 10.3233/JRS-130603.
PubMed 24305561Quigley PA, Hahm B, Collazo S, Gibson W, Janzen S, Powell-Cope G, Rice F, Sarduy I, Tyndall K, White SV. Reducing serious injury from falls in two veterans' hospital medical-surgical units. J Nurs Care Qual. 2009 Jan-Mar;24(1):33-41. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0b013e31818f528e.
PubMed 19092477Zhao YL, Bott M, He J, Kim H, Park SH, Dunton N. Evidence on Fall and Injurious Fall Prevention Interventions in Acute Care Hospitals. J Nurs Adm. 2019 Feb;49(2):86-92. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000715.
PubMed 30633063Dykes PC, Khasnabish S, Adkison LE, Bates DW, Bogaisky M, Burns Z, Carroll DL, Carter E, Hurley AC, Jackson E, Kurian SS, Lindros ME, Ryan V, Scanlan M, Spivack L, Walsh MA, Adelman J. Use of a perceived efficacy tool to evaluate the FallTIPS program. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Dec;69(12):3595-3601. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17436. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
PubMed 34460098
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Predictive Analytics Combined With Computer Visualization Enhances Patient Safety and Eases Nurse Burden for Preventing Falls
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06339125
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2023p003637
- Conditions
- Fall Patients, Fall Injury
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 5,350 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Crico
- Study start
- 24 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Sep 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Annually, in the United States there are 700,000 - 1,000,000 inpatient falls reported, and one-third of patients sustain an injury. The average estimated cost per fall is $6,694, resulting in over $1.4 -1.9 billion dollars in losses each year (AHRQ, 2017). This study aims to compare the impact of different fall prevention strategies on the rate of occurrence of falls and falls with injury in an academic medical center on three adult medical units. While maintaining the usual standard of care for fall prevention, each unit will add one of the following: (1) use of a fall risk alert to nurses using an algorithm based on electronic health record data or (2) computerized camera visualization or (3) a combination of both.
Detailed description
To decrease falls in the hospital setting, and building on previous nursing fall research, as well as the MFS and the Fall TIPS program, a decision support algorithm was developed to identify changes in clinical factors as they occur to alert nurses to the need to adjust fall prevention interventions. Nurses, through a collaboration with RGI Informatics, then deployed the an algorithm on one clinical general care unit. The RGI software uses the algorithm live streaming EHR data from Epic to identify patients whose risk of falling may have increased and provide clinical decision support to nurses through an alert on their hospital issued cell phones. Preliminary results demonstrated feasibility and a statistically significant reduction (p <0.01) in falls with injury over an 11-month period.
Mutually exclusive preliminary work, on a second inpatient general care unit, involving a computerized patient visualization system also yielded reduction in falls. Combined usage of the two technologies may yield a synergistic effect thereby further reducing the incidence of falls in the acute care setting. To date, there is no evidence derived from evaluation of patient outcomes from simultaneous testing of the two technologies. Thus, the purpose of this study is to determine the impact of three different fall prevention interventions (RGI/MGH Algorithm only, Inspiren only and combined RGI Algorithm and Inspiren) on patients at risk for falls and falls with injury on three adult general care units in a large academic medical center.
The proposed solution is the only known strategy that extracts and synthesizes physiologic and physical data from multiple sources, to create a dimensional view of a patient's safety profile related to fall risk. Timely alerts will inform nurses of patient's fall risk, reason for risk and their clinical decisions regarding fall prevention strategies. This initial proposal focuses on patients at risk for falls and the investigators are confident that this innovative approach is adaptable to address other critical safety issues for example, pressure injuries and catheter associated urinary tract infections. Detailed information about RGI Analytics and Inspiren is provided below.
Methodology: An observational cohort, mixed-methods study design will be conducted to determine the impact and effectiveness of usual care and three different fall prevention strategies that exceed the standard of care on three inpatient units over one year. Unit 1 will employee streaming analytics and the algorithm only, Unit 2 will employee Inspiren's AUGI computer visualization only and Unit 3 will employee the combined streaming analytic/algorithm and Inspiren's AUGI device. Unit 4, the control unit, will serve as an internal comparison group from the same institution. In addition to the study interventions all four units will continue to maintain usual evidence-based practice, standards of care for fall prevention. Patient, unit, and nurse demographic data collected for the study currently can be accessed from or calculated from existing sources. Sources include the ADT, financial, acuity, and quality data stored in a Datawarehouse. Unit patient demographic data in the aggregate will include age, gender, and race. Nurse demographic data will include the number of fulltime equivalents, years of experience as a nurse, years of experience at the academic medical center, and highest level of education. Unit data will include counts of patient admissions, patient days, length of stay, nursing acuity, patient type by gender, age, race, ethnicity, number of unit falls and unit falls with injuries, and nurse staffing indicators. Nurse perceptions of the three interventions units will be measured in association with the intervention using real time feedback from cell phone alerts (helpful/not helpful), nurse feedback, and quarterly surveys. The Fall Prevention Efficiency Scale (Dykes, et al., 2021) is a peer reviewed 13-item tool that focuses on four key areas: saves time, does not waste time, is worth the time and is helpful in preventing falls. The survey questions will be adapted to meet the needs of this study and will be administered via REDCap, a Harvard Catalyst secure, web application for managing on-line survey tools.
Research questions
- In the acute care, inpatient hospital setting, is there a difference in rate of occurrence of falls and injurious falls, comparing three distinct methods of alerting nurses at the point of care to a change in a patients risk of falling while maintaining all other current standards of care for fall prevention and adding these new standards during the study: (1) use of streaming analytics and a fall risk algorithm that alerts nurses to a change in fall risk, (2) computer visualization and artificial intelligence interpretation of patient movement and (3) a combination of both technologies?
- What are the perceptions of nurses related to:
- The impact of three study technologies implemented to assist with the identification of increased fall risk.
- The reduction of nurse burden on the assessment of fall risk and the recommendation for additional interventions to prevent falls.
Research aims:
- Compare the impact of the three fall prevention innovations, within and between units and to one control unit (all four units using same usual standard of care) on falls and falls with injury.
- Determine the perceived effectiveness of fall prevention innovations and alerts on clinical decision support and nurse burden using nurse surveys, responses to alerts and focus groups.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
- Model description
- An observational cohort, mixed-methods study design will be conducted to determine the impact and effectiveness of usual care and three different fall prevention strategies that exceed the standard of care on three inpatient units at MGH over one year. Unit 1 will employ streaming analytics and the MGH algorithm only, Unit 2 will employee Inspiren's AUGI computer visualization only and Unit 3 will employ the combined streaming analytic/MGH algorithm and Inspiren's AUGI device. Unit 4, the control unit, will serve as an internal comparison group from the same institution. In addition to the study interventions all four units will continue to maintain usual MGH evidence-based practice, standards of care for fall prevention.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Unit 1 | Experimental | Other: Fall prevention algorithmUsual care and live streaming electronic health record driven Algorithm alerts nurses to possible increase in fall risk for review of interventions in place. |
| Unit 2 | Experimental | Other: Inspiren camera visualizationUsual care and computer camera visualization detects and anticipates patient movement for patients at risk for falls and alerts nurses with fall risk potential. |
| Unit 3 | Experimental | Other: Fall prevention algorithm, Other: Inspiren camera visualizationUsual care and live streaming electronic health record driven Algorithm alerts nurses to possible increase in fall risk for review of interventions in place. AND Computer camera visualization detects and anticipates patient movement for patients at risk for falls and alerts nurses with fall risk potential. |
| Unit 4 | No intervention | –Control group, no intervention and usual care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Adult medical patients admitted to the study units
- All nurses working on the study units
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fall prevention algorithmAlso: RGI fall prevention algorithmAlgorithm generates fall prevention alerts to nurses in real time, using evidenced based electronic health record information regarding changes in care that may suggest the need for additional fall prevention strategies | Other | Unit 1, Unit 3 |
| Inspiren camera visualizationAlso: Computerized camera visualizationThe Inspiren computer camera visualization is an additional strategy for nurses to employ when there is a change in a patient's fall risk. | Other | Unit 2, Unit 3 |
Primary outcome
Fall patient
Time frame: Measured monthly/quarterly over one year
Rate of patient falls per 1000 patient days, National Database Nurse Sensitive Indicators
Fall injury
Time frame: Measured monthly/quarterly over one year
Rate of falls with injury per 1000 patient days, National Database Nurse Sensitive Indicators
2 secondary outcomes
Nurse perceptions
Time frame: three, six, and 12 months
Nurse perceptions
Time frame: three, six, and twelve months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 May 2026.
- Background: PubMed 21045097Dykes PC, Carroll DL, Hurley A, Lipsitz S, Benoit A, Chang F, Meltzer S, Tsurikova R, Zuyov L, Middleton B. Fall prevention in acute care hospitals: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2010 Nov 3;304(17):1912-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1567.
- BackgroundMorse, JM, Morse R.M., Tylko, S.J. (1989). Development of a scale to identify the fall-prone patient. Can J Aging, 8:366-7.
- Background: PubMed 34847057Seibert K, Domhoff D, Bruch D, Schulte-Althoff M, Furstenau D, Biessmann F, Wolf-Ostermann K. Application Scenarios for Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Care: Rapid Review. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 29;23(11):e26522. doi: 10.2196/26522.
- Background: PubMed 32826513Fehlberg EA, Cook CL, Bjarnadottir RI, McDaniel AM, Shorr RI, Lucero RJ. Fall Prevention Decision Making of Acute Care Registered Nurses. J Nurs Adm. 2020 Sep;50(9):442-448. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000914.
- Background: PubMed 33201236Dykes PC, Burns Z, Adelman J, Benneyan J, Bogaisky M, Carter E, Ergai A, Lindros ME, Lipsitz SR, Scanlan M, Shaykevich S, Bates DW. Evaluation of a Patient-Centered Fall-Prevention Tool Kit to Reduce Falls and Injuries: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2025889. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25889.
- Background: PubMed 33190509Costantinou E, Spencer JA. Analysis of Inpatient Hospital Falls with Serious Injury. Clin Nurs Res. 2021 May;30(4):482-493. doi: 10.1177/1054773820973406. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
- Background: PubMed 24305561Pierce JR Jr, Shirley M, Johnson EF, Kang H. Narcotic administration and fall-related injury in the hospital: implications for patient safety programs and providers. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2013;25(4):229-34. doi: 10.3233/JRS-130603.
- Background: PubMed 19092477Quigley PA, Hahm B, Collazo S, Gibson W, Janzen S, Powell-Cope G, Rice F, Sarduy I, Tyndall K, White SV. Reducing serious injury from falls in two veterans' hospital medical-surgical units. J Nurs Care Qual. 2009 Jan-Mar;24(1):33-41. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0b013e31818f528e.
- Background: PubMed 30633063Zhao YL, Bott M, He J, Kim H, Park SH, Dunton N. Evidence on Fall and Injurious Fall Prevention Interventions in Acute Care Hospitals. J Nurs Adm. 2019 Feb;49(2):86-92. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000715.
- Results publication: PubMed 34460098Dykes PC, Khasnabish S, Adkison LE, Bates DW, Bogaisky M, Burns Z, Carroll DL, Carter E, Hurley AC, Jackson E, Kurian SS, Lindros ME, Ryan V, Scanlan M, Spivack L, Walsh MA, Adelman J. Use of a perceived efficacy tool to evaluate the FallTIPS program. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Dec;69(12):3595-3601. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17436. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
- American Hospital Association 2022Link provided by the sponsor.
- Institute for Healthcare Improvement (2020). A national action plan to advance patient safety.Link provided by the sponsor.
- United States Census Bureau (2018).Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Data will collected in the aggregate at the unit level as rates per 1000 patient days, not patient specific
Related trials for Fall Patients
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Repeat Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With Sickle Cell Disease and Falling Donor Myeloid Chimerism Levels
Myeloid Chimerism
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Vision Care in Preventing Falls in Hospitalized Patients
Falls, Ulcer, Pressure
Not yet recruiting
Lumbar Spinal Manipulation in Stroke
Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
Whole-Body Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Older Adults Presenting to the Emergency Department After a Fall
Accidental Falls, Aged
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Turkish Adaptation of the Multidimensional Falls Efficacy Scale in Older Adults
Balance Control in Elderly, Falls (Accidents) in Old Age
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Colleen K Snydeman, PhD principal investigator
Massachusetts General Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Fall prevention algorithm and Inspiren camera visualization in people with Fall Patients and Fall Injury, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Fall patient (time frame: Measured monthly/quarterly over one year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06339125, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 May 2026.