DysphagiaNCT06312371
Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube on Feeding Hesitancy in Stroke Patients
A study testing Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding and Nasogastric Tube Feeding in people with Dysphagia, run by Muhammad.
Trial summary
The aim of this clinical trial is to compare Feeding Hesitancy of ischemic stroke patients who receive enteral nutrition support through either Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube or Nasogastric Tube. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Dysphagia
- What is being tested?
- Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding and Nasogastric Tube Feeding
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Mar 2024to Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- age ≥ 18 years;
- meeting the diagnostic criteria of stroke;
- any degree of dysphagia at admission;
- steady vital signs.
Who cannot join
- complicated with other neurological diseases;
- tracheostomy tube plugged;
- unfeasible to the support of parenteral nutrition;
- simultaneously suffering from liver, kidney failure, tumors, or hematological diseases.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube on Feeding Hesitancy in Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study
The aim of this clinical trial is to compare Feeding Hesitancy of ischemic stroke patients who receive enteral nutrition support through either Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube or Nasogastric Tube. Patients will be randomly assigned to either an observation group or a control group, with both groups receiving routine rehabilitation treatment. The observation group will receive enteral nutrition support through Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube, while the control group will receive it through Nasogastric Tube. Researchers will then compare Feeding Hesitancy of the two groups.
Read the detailed description
The study will last 15 days for each participant. The aim of this clinical trial is to compare Feeding Hesitancy of ischemic stroke patients who receive enteral nutrition support through either Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube or Nasogastric Tube. Patients will be randomly assigned to either an observation group or a control group, with both groups receiving routine rehabilitation treatment. The observation group will receive enteral nutrition support through Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube, while the control group will receive it through Nasogastric Tube. Researchers will then compare Feeding Hesitancy of the two groups.
- Conditions
- Dysphagia
- Being tested
- Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding, Nasogastric Tube Feeding
- Medical subject headings
- Deglutition Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube FeedingDevice
Before each feeding, inside and outside of the tube was cleaned with water. During feeding, the patient should maintain a semi-reclining or sitting position with mouth opened, and the tube was inserted slowly and smoothly into the upper part of the esophagus by medical staffs while the appropriate depth of intubation was checked with the calibration markings on the tube wall. The distance from the incisors to the head part of the tube should be between 22-25 cm.
Nasogastric Tube FeedingDevice
Within 4 hours after admission, the placement of the feeding tube was conducted by professional medical staffs and after intubation, the tube was secured to the patient's cheek with medical tape. The feeding was conducted once every 3-4 hours, with 200-300ml each time.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding | Experimental | The group was given enteral nutritional support with Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube according to the following procedure. The feeding content was formulated by the nutritionists based on the condition and relevant guidelines to reach the energy demand as 20-25 kcal/kg/day and protein supplementation of 1.2-2.0 g/kg/day for both two groups Receives: Device: Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding |
| Nasogastric Tube Feeding | Active comparator | the group was given enteral nutritional support with Nasogastric Tube according to the relevant guidelines. Within 4 hours after admission, the placement of the feeding tube was conducted by professional medical staffs and after intubation, the tube was secured to the cheek with medical tape. The feeding was conducted once every 3-4 hours, with 200-300ml each time. The total feeding volume was determined based on daily requirements. Receives: Device: Nasogastric Tube Feeding |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Swallowing Quality of Life questionnaire
Swallowing Quality of Life questionnaire was used to evaluate the quality of life, which consists of 44 items and divided into 11 main domains, including: overall satisfaction, understanding, diet, hydration, communication, respiratory issues, postoperative recovery, social impact, mental health, saliva control, and appearance. The maximum rough score was 220 points, which was converted into a standard percentage system in our study. As the scores increased, the quality of life was better.
Measured: day 1 and day 15
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Mar 2024
- Study startMar 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completionDec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for DysphagiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Muhammad
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Muhammad, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital
- Investigators
- Nieto Luis, Study director, Site Coordinator of United Medical Group
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06312371
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Feeding Hesitancy
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 8 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 15 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube on Feeding Hesitancy in Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06312371
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Feeding Hesitancy
- Conditions
- Dysphagia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- MuhammadUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this clinical trial is to compare Feeding Hesitancy of ischemic stroke patients who receive enteral nutrition support through either Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube or Nasogastric Tube. Patients will be randomly assigned to either an observation group or a control group, with both groups receiving routine rehabilitation treatment. The observation group will receive enteral nutrition support through Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube, while the control group will receive it through Nasogastric Tube. Researchers will then compare Feeding Hesitancy of the two groups.
Detailed description
The study will last 15 days for each participant. The aim of this clinical trial is to compare Feeding Hesitancy of ischemic stroke patients who receive enteral nutrition support through either Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube or Nasogastric Tube. Patients will be randomly assigned to either an observation group or a control group, with both groups receiving routine rehabilitation treatment. The observation group will receive enteral nutrition support through Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube, while the control group will receive it through Nasogastric Tube. Researchers will then compare Feeding Hesitancy of the two groups.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding | Experimental | Device: Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube FeedingThe group was given enteral nutritional support with Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube according to the following procedure. The feeding content was formulated by the nutritionists based on the condition and relevant guidelines to reach the energy demand as 20-25 kcal/kg/day and protein supplementation of 1.2-2.0 g/kg/day for both two groups |
| Nasogastric Tube Feeding | Active comparator | Device: Nasogastric Tube Feedingthe group was given enteral nutritional support with Nasogastric Tube according to the relevant guidelines. Within 4 hours after admission, the placement of the feeding tube was conducted by professional medical staffs and after intubation, the tube was secured to the cheek with medical tape. The feeding was conducted once every 3-4 hours, with 200-300ml each time. The total feeding volume was determined based on daily requirements. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- age ≥ 18 years;
- meeting the diagnostic criteria of stroke;
- any degree of dysphagia at admission;
- steady vital signs.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- complicated with other neurological diseases;
- tracheostomy tube plugged;
- unfeasible to the support of parenteral nutrition;
- simultaneously suffering from liver, kidney failure, tumors, or hematological diseases.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube FeedingBefore each feeding, inside and outside of the tube was cleaned with water. During feeding, the patient should maintain a semi-reclining or sitting position with mouth opened, and the tube was inserted slowly and smoothly into the upper part of the esophagus by medical staffs while the appropriate depth of intubation was checked with the calibration markings on the tube wall. The distance from the incisors to the head part of the tube should be between 22-25 cm. | Device | Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding |
| Nasogastric Tube FeedingWithin 4 hours after admission, the placement of the feeding tube was conducted by professional medical staffs and after intubation, the tube was secured to the patient's cheek with medical tape. The feeding was conducted once every 3-4 hours, with 200-300ml each time. | Device | Nasogastric Tube Feeding |
Primary outcome
Swallowing Quality of Life questionnaire
Time frame: day 1 and day 15
Swallowing Quality of Life questionnaire was used to evaluate the quality of life, which consists of 44 items and divided into 11 main domains, including: overall satisfaction, understanding, diet, hydration, communication, respiratory issues, postoperative recovery, social impact, mental health, saliva control, and appearance. The maximum rough score was 220 points, which was converted into a standard percentage system in our study. As the scores increased, the quality of life was better.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Mar 2024.
Related trials for Dysphagia
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Long-term Administration of K-CAB Tab./K-CAB ODT(Tegoprazan) 25 mg as Maintenance Therapy Following the Treatment of GERD
Maintenance Therapy Following Treatment for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(GERD)
Recruiting
The Esophageal String Test as a Diagnostic Screening Tool for Eosinophilic Esophagitis Among Africans With Dysphagia in Mali and the United States
Dysphagia, Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Recruiting
taVNS in Infants Severe Dysphagia
Dysphagia, Swallowing Disorders
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Early Feeding TL Trial
Total Laryngectomy
Active, not recruitingObservational study
RETHINK REFLUX Registry
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nieto Luis study director
Site Coordinator of United Medical Group
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding and Nasogastric Tube Feeding in people with Dysphagia, run by Muhammad.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Lavie Ce (15038177099, zenghongjixx@qq.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Swallowing Quality of Life questionnaire (time frame: day 1 and day 15). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Mar 2024.