AzTrials
AzTrials

Emergence DeliriumPhase 3NCT06306040

Effect of Intravenous Nalbuphine and Magnesium Sulfate on Emergence Agitation in Pediatric

A Phase 3 study testing Nalbuphine Versus Magnesium Sulfate in people with Emergence Delirium, run by Assiut University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Primary outcome: Measure The incidence of EA in children undergoing to hypospadias repair under general anesthesia is considered using Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scales. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 to 7 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Emergence Delirium
What is being tested?
Nalbuphine Versus Magnesium Sulfate
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
105 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
2 Apr 2024to 30 Jan 2025
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 to 7 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • • Weight: 10 - 38 kg.
  • Age: 3-7 years.
  • ASA physical status: I-II.
  • Operation: elective hypospadias repair under general anesthesia

Who cannot join

  • • Parent's refusal.
  • Anticipated difficult airway.
  • Active respiratory illness (cough, fever, rhinorrhea) on the day of anesthesia.
  • History of developmental delay or mental retardation or any neurological disease.
  • Known hypersensitivity to any drug used in this study.
  • Children with co-morbid conditions like congenital heart disease, respiratory pathology, central nervous system disorders or renal pathology

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Fatma Alzahraa M Mustafa Abdulbari, resident contact

00201014363853

zahraamustafa22@yahoo.com

Abualauon Mohamed M Abdelmohsen Rashwan, Lecturer contact

01094131398

abualauon@aun.edu.eg

About this study

Official title: Effect of Intravenous Nalbuphine Versus Magnesium Sulfate on Emergence Agitation in Pediatric Patients Scheduled for Hypospadias Repair

  • Primary outcome: Measure The incidence of EA in children undergoing to hypospadias repair under general anesthesia is considered using Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scales.
  • Secondary outcome:
  • Therefore, we designed a prospective, randomized, double-blind, single center study to investigate whether nalbuphine and/or magnesium sulphate can prevent EA after hypospadias repair in children under general anesthesia. In addition, the characteristics of anesthesia recovery and the incidence of adverse effects will also be evaluated in this study. Post-operative extubating time, interaction time, open eye time and emergence time. incidence of post-operative vomiting (PONV), laryngospasm, breath-holding, coughing, oxygen desaturation, and cardiac arrhythmias.
  • Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consola Bility (FLACC) scale is used to determine post-operative pain score
  • Parental satisfaction scores
Read the detailed description

Emergence agitation (EA), also referred to as emergence delirium, emergence excitement or inadequate emergence, is a frequent post-operative complication in pediatric patients receiving inhalational anesthetics. It's defined as an acute and fluctuating alteration of mental state and manifesting as agitation, confusion, disorientation, and hyperactivity during the transition from unconsciousness to full wakefulness. The incidence of EA is reported to be up to 20% in adult patients and up to 80% in children.

Although EA is self-limiting, it can induce potential problems in children, such as self-injury, bleeding and cracking of the wound, falling off of the indwelling catheter, and falling off of the bed, which can cause some difficulties for medical staff and serious anxiety for family members. In addition, children with EA are at a higher risk of post-hospitalization behavioral changes, which may last longer. Furthermore, EA treatment increases the burden on healthcare providers and increases the medical expenses of patients. EA commonly occurs after the most common surgeries in children like adenoidectomy, tonsillectomy, hernioplasty and hypospadias repair. Therefore, implementing effective measures to prevent EA in children undergoing these types of surgeries is crucial. Although the underlying mechanisms of EA remain unclear, the mechanisms may be related to pre-operative anxiety, inhaled anesthetics (sevoflurane or desflurane), surgery type (ophthalmology or otolaryngology procedure), and younger age.

Some pharmacological interventions have been used to prevent and treat EA. Previous studies have demonstrated that propofol, benzodiazepines, α2 agonists, and opioids can prevent EA in children to varying degrees. However, these medications may lead to respiratory depression, delay in anesthesia recovery and post-anesthesia care unit stay, and other adverse reactions. Thus, the most favorable prophylactic treatment to decrease such an incidence remains unknown, and the ideal approaches to prevent EA merit further exploration.

Nalbuphine is a synthetic opioid receptor agonist-antagonist (agonist К receptor, antagonistic part μ receptor) that can produce a central analgesic effect and partial sedation. Nalbuphine is a medication that is indicated for moderate to severe pain where the patient requires an opioid agent, and other alternative treatments have been insufficient. The inhibitory effect of nalbuphine on respiration is slight and it has a capping effect. Owing to these advantages, it is widely used in pediatric surgical analgesia.

Magnesium sulphate, an antagonist of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptors, has been reported to improve hypo-magnesia and pre-eclampsia. Recently, magnesium sulphate has been gradually used as an adjuvant for sedation and analgesia during general anesthesia. Magnesium sulphate is a medication used to manage and treat multiple clinical conditions.

Being tested
Nalbuphine Versus Magnesium Sulfate
Medical subject headings
Emergence Delirium

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Nalbuphine Versus Magnesium SulfateDrug

    Also called analgesic effect on emergency agitation

    Nalbuphine is a synthetic opioid receptor agonist-antagonist (agonist К receptor, antagonistic part μ receptor) that can produce a central analgesic effect and partial sedation. Nalbuphine is a medication that is indicated for moderate to severe pain where the patient requires an opioid agent, and other alternative treatments have been insufficient. The inhibitory effect of nalbuphine on respiration is slight and it has a capping effect. Owing to these advantages, it is widely used in pediatric surgical analgesia.

    Magnesium sulphate, an antagonist of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptors, has been reported to improve hypo-magnesia and pre-eclampsia. Recently, magnesium sulphate has been gradually used as an adjuvant for sedation and analgesia during general anesthesia. Magnesium sulphate is a medication used to manage and treat multiple clinical conditions.

Study groups in NCT06306040
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
• Group N (Nalbuphine group n=35 )Experimentaladministrate nalbuphine 0.1 mg/kg nalbuphine diluted to 10 ml isotonic saline will be injected intravenously before 30 min from end of surgery (injected once) dose
Receives: Drug: Nalbuphine Versus Magnesium Sulfate
• Group M (Magnesium sulfate group n=35 )Experimentaladministrate magnesium sulfate once 30 mg/kg Magnesium sulphate diluted to 10 ml isotonic saline will be injected intravenously before 30 min from end of surgery
Receives: Drug: Nalbuphine Versus Magnesium Sulfate
Group C (Control group n=35 ):Experimentaladministrate 10 ml isotonic saline will be injected intravenously before 30 min from end of surgery
Receives: Drug: Nalbuphine Versus Magnesium Sulfate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. compare between analgesia effect on pediatric patient

    Measure The incidence of EA in children undergoing to hypospadias repair under general anesthesia is considered using Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scales.

    Measured: baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Mar 2024
  2. Study start2 Apr 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion3 Nov 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jan 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
* Group C (Control group n=35 ): 10 ml isotonic saline will be injected intravenously before 30 min from end of surgery * Group M (Magnesium sulfate group n=35 ): 30 mg/kg Magnesium sulphate diluted to 10 ml isotonic saline will be injected intravenously before 30 min from end of surgery * Group N (Nalbuphine group n=35 ): 0.1 mg/kg nalbuphine diluted to 10 ml isotonic saline will be injected intravenously before 30 min from end of surgery
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
105 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06306040
Sponsor's protocol ID
Analgesia effect as on EA
Status last verified
Mar 2024
First submitted
28 Feb 2024
Last updated
12 Mar 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Lee SJ, Sung TY. Emergence agitation: current knowledge and unresolved questions. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2020 Dec;73(6):471-485. doi: 10.4097/kja.20097. Epub 2020 Mar 25.

    PubMed 32209961
  • Dahmani S, Stany I, Brasher C, Lejeune C, Bruneau B, Wood C, Nivoche Y, Constant I, Murat I. Pharmacological prevention of sevoflurane- and desflurane-related emergence agitation in children: a meta-analysis of published studies. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Feb;104(2):216-23. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep376. Epub 2010 Jan 3.

    PubMed 20047899
  • Yu D, Chai W, Sun X, Yao L. Emergence agitation in adults: risk factors in 2,000 patients. Can J Anaesth. 2010 Sep;57(9):843-8. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9338-9. Epub 2010 Jun 5.

    PubMed 20526708
  • Choi EK, Park S, Park KB, Kwak KH, Park S. Postoperative emergence agitation and intraoperative sevoflurane sedation under caudal block in children: a randomized comparison of two sevoflurane doses. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2019 Oct 31;14(4):434-440. doi: 10.17085/apm.2019.14.4.434.

    PubMed 33329774
  • Zhang YZ, Wei XL, Tang B, Qin YY, Ou M, Jiang XH, Tan YF, Ye MY. The Effects of Different Doses of Alfentanil and Dexmedetomidine on Prevention of Emergence Agitation in Pediatric Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy Surgery. Front Pharmacol. 2022 Feb 2;13:648802. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.648802. eCollection 2022.

    PubMed 35185554
  • Kim J, Byun SH, Kim JW, Kim JY, Kim YJ, Choi N, Lee BS, Yu S, Kim E. Behavioral changes after hospital discharge in preschool children experiencing emergence delirium after general anesthesia: A prospective observational study. Paediatr Anaesth. 2021 Oct;31(10):1056-1064. doi: 10.1111/pan.14259. Epub 2021 Aug 6.

    PubMed 34309126
  • Voepel-Lewis T, Malviya S, Tait AR. A prospective cohort study of emergence agitation in the pediatric postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg. 2003 Jun;96(6):1625-1630. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000062522.21048.61.

    PubMed 12760985
  • Mason KP. Paediatric emergence delirium: a comprehensive review and interpretation of the literature. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1;118(3):335-343. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew477.

    PubMed 28203739
  • Kanaya A. Emergence agitation in children: risk factors, prevention, and treatment. J Anesth. 2016 Apr;30(2):261-7. doi: 10.1007/s00540-015-2098-5. Epub 2015 Nov 24.

    PubMed 26601849
  • Jalili S, Esmaeeili A, Kamali K, Rashtchi V. Comparison of effects of propofol and ketofol (Ketamine-Propofol mixture) on emergence agitation in children undergoing tonsillectomy. Afr Health Sci. 2019 Mar;19(1):1736-1744. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v19i1.50.

    PubMed 31149004
  • Kawai M, Kurata S, Sanuki T, Mishima G, Kiriishi K, Watanabe T, Ozaki-Honda Y, Yoshida M, Okayasu I, Ayuse T, Tanoue N, Ayuse T. The effect of midazolam administration for the prevention of emergence agitation in pediatric patients with extreme fear and non-cooperation undergoing dental treatment under sevoflurane anesthesia, a double-blind, randomized study. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019 May 17;13:1729-1737. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S198123. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 31190751
  • Kim SY, Kim JM, Lee JH, Song BM, Koo BN. Efficacy of intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion on emergence agitation and quality of recovery after nasal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Aug;111(2):222-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet056. Epub 2013 Mar 22.

    PubMed 23524149
  • Cravero JP, Beach M, Thyr B, Whalen K. The effect of small dose fentanyl on the emergence characteristics of pediatric patients after sevoflurane anesthesia without surgery. Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):364-367. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000070227.78670.43.

    PubMed 12873918
  • Kubica-Cielinska A, Zielinska M. The use of nalbuphine in paediatric anaesthesia. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015;47(3):252-6. doi: 10.5603/AIT.2015.0036.

    PubMed 26165241
  • Shin D, Kim S, Kim CS, Kim HS. Postoperative pain management using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pediatric patients. J Craniofac Surg. 2001 Mar;12(2):129-33. doi: 10.1097/00001665-200103000-00007.

    PubMed 11314621

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Nalbuphine Versus Magnesium Sulfate in people with Emergence Delirium, run by Assiut University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Fatma Alzahraa M Mustafa Abdulbari, resident (00201014363853, zahraamustafa22@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

compare between analgesia effect on pediatric patient (time frame: baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06306040, which also lists 24 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Mar 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in