AzTrials
AzTrials

DiastasisNCT06302816

Effects of Tupler and Scoop Exercises in Diastasis Recti

A study testing TUPLER exercises and SCOOP EXERCISES in people with Diastasis, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To compare the effects of tupler and scoop exercises on inter recti distance, low back pain, abdominal strength and urogynecological symptoms in diastasis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Diastasis
What is being tested?
TUPLER exercises and SCOOP EXERCISES
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
23 Feb 2023to 1 Sep 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • BMI 25kg|m^2 to 30kg\m^2or greater
  • multiparous women
  • Participants included will be 3 months post-partum females
  • Caesarean delivery who will have with the presence of DRA >2 finger width and >2cm

Who cannot join

  • patients who had hernia
  • trauma to bowel or bladder
  • malignancies
  • neurologic disease and its associated balance disorders,
  • pelvic or abdominal surgery (except for a caesarean section) were considered as the exclusion criteria of this study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Innovative Health Concepts

    Lahore, 05499

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: Comparative Effects of Tupler and Scoop Exercises on Inter-recti-distance, Low Back Pain, Abdominal Strength and Urogynecological Symptoms in Diastasis Recti

To compare the effects of tupler and scoop exercises on inter recti distance, low back pain, abdominal strength and urogynecological symptoms in diastasis.

Conditions
Diastasis
Being tested
TUPLER exercises, SCOOP EXERCISES
Keywords
Diastasis recti abdominis, low back pain, Muscle strength, Pilates-Based Exercises, Static stretching.
Medical subject headings
Low Back Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TUPLER exercisesOther

    will be conducting tupler exercises, exercises that are designed to target core muscles in order to improve posture, regain core strength and reducing discomfort.

    Each exercise will be repeated 10reps for 3 times on 3 days a week for 8 weeks.

  • SCOOP EXERCISESOther

    will be required to complete scoop exercises basically deals with Pilates which is deep core and hip strengthening and stability through breathing patterns with the utilization of transversus abdominis muscle majorly. In each exercise participant will be asked to hold pelvic floor muscles for 8sec, then relax the muscles and count to 10, repeat I for 10 times each day for 3 days a week for 8weeks. Basic commands about the positing, activation and engagement of core along with breathing control were given to the subjects.

Study groups in NCT06302816
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TUPLER exercisesExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: TUPLER exercises
SCOOP EXERCISESActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: SCOOP EXERCISES

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Digital nylon calipers for inter recti distance

    Digital nylon calipers for inter recti distance (IRD) used for the evaluatiopn of the DRA using tracing paper can be used preliminary assessment tool as well as a method for documentation of measurements of the inter recti in both males and females above the umbilicus with the abdominal muscles during contraction i.e in hook lying position. Digital Nylon Calipers demonstrated excellent inter-rater (ICC = 0.80 to 0.99) and It is the strongest tool for the assessment of the distasis recti

    Measured: 8th week

  2. Numeric pain rating scale

    Numeric pain scale is an objective tool for the assessment of pain, rating from 0 to 10 according to the severity of pain. It is categorized as mild(1to3), moderate (4to6) and severe (7to10). It reliability is ICCs for the test-retest reliability were over 0.75

    Measured: 8th week

  3. Manual muscle testing for intra-abdominal strength

    Manual muscle testing (MMT) is the objective assessment tool for the muscular strength measurement having grading of 0 to 5 according to the muscle response to an active resistance applied passively by some external force that can be therapist's hand. The intra-rater (ICC=0.95) and inter-rater (0.99) reliability (20) . 0 3 4 5 None Fair Good Normal No visible or palpable contraction Full ROM against gravity Full ROM against gravity, moderate resistance Full ROM against gravity, maximal resistance

    Measured: 8th week

  4. Short form Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory for Urogynaecological symptoms

    Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) is a reliable instrument for evaluating the quality of life in women with pelvic dysfunction. They have been translated and validated in many languages. The study was aimed at validating the Estonian translations of the PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 tools. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.765-0.969, p < 0.001

    Measured: 8th week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Mar 2024
  2. Study start23 Feb 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Aug 2024
  4. Study completion1 Sep 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06302816
Sponsor's protocol ID
REC/RCR&AHS/23/0580
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
4 Mar 2024
Last updated
27 Dec 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Gluppe S, Engh ME, Bo K. What is the evidence for abdominal and pelvic floor muscle training to treat diastasis recti abdominis postpartum? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Braz J Phys Ther. 2021 Nov-Dec;25(6):664-675. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.06.006. Epub 2021 Jul 21.

    PubMed 34391661
  • Tung RC, Towfigh S. Diagnostic techniques for diastasis recti. Hernia. 2021 Aug;25(4):915-919. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02469-7. Epub 2021 Jul 27.

    PubMed 34313855
  • Cavalli M, Aiolfi A, Bruni PG, Manfredini L, Lombardo F, Bonfanti MT, Bona D, Campanelli G. Prevalence and risk factors for diastasis recti abdominis: a review and proposal of a new anatomical variation. Hernia. 2021 Aug;25(4):883-890. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02468-8. Epub 2021 Aug 6.

    PubMed 34363190
  • Laframboise FC, Schlaff RA, Baruth M. Postpartum Exercise Intervention Targeting Diastasis Recti Abdominis. Int J Exerc Sci. 2021 Apr 1;14(3):400-409. doi: 10.70252/GARZ3559. eCollection 2021.

    PubMed 34055160
  • Kaufmann RL, Reiner CS, Dietz UA, Clavien PA, Vonlanthen R, Kaser SA. Normal width of the linea alba, prevalence, and risk factors for diastasis recti abdominis in adults, a cross-sectional study. Hernia. 2022 Apr;26(2):609-618. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02493-7. Epub 2021 Oct 5.

    PubMed 34609664
  • Sułkowski L, Matyja A. Diastasis recti abdominis (DRA): review of risk factors, diagnostic methods, conservative and surgical treatment. 2022.

  • Radhakrishnan M, Ramamurthy K. Efficacy and Challenges in the Treatment of Diastasis Recti Abdominis-A Scoping Review on the Current Trends and Future Perspectives. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Aug 24;12(9):2044. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12092044.

    PubMed 36140446

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing TUPLER exercises and SCOOP EXERCISES in people with Diastasis, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Digital nylon calipers for inter recti distance (time frame: 8th week). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06302816, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Dec 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in