AzTrials
AzTrials

HypertensionC-RISIMANCT06302127

County Medical Community-based, Cardiovascular Risk Stratified Integrated Care Model: a Pragmatic Cluster Randomised Control Trial

A study testing Team-based care, Risk-stratified care pathway and Strengthened health education in people with Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, run by Peking University at 3 sites in China.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this cluster randomized trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the RISIMA model based on an integrated county healthcare consortium implemented by multi-level family health teams (FHTs)on patients with diabetes and/or hypertension, including CVD risk assessment, treatment, and management. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 70 years
What is being tested?
Team-based care, Risk-stratified care pathway and Strengthened health education
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2,560 participants
Where
3 sitesChina
Study dates
20 May 2024to 20 Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged between 40 and 70 years old;
  • Patients with hypertension or diabetes;
  • Permanent residents of the county where the research is conducted;
  • Already signed up with the family doctor team in the township where the research is located.

Who cannot join

  • Unable to independently carry out the interventions required for the study;
  • Residing far from the village or township health center where the research is located, making it difficult to cooperate with visits;
  • Patients who refuse to participate;
  • Patients with comorbidities such as cancer that may interfere with the study visits or intervention effects;
  • Pregnant or lactating women

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Jin Prof. Xu, PhD contact

0086-82805701

xujin@hsc.pku.edu.cn

China3 sites, 3 recruiting
  • Luzhai County People's hospital

    Liuzhou, Guangxi

    Pengfei Liu, +86 18177251898, lzxygb@126.com

    Recruiting
  • Luzhai County Traditional Medicine hospital

    Liuzhou

    Pengfei Liu, +86 18177251898, lzxygb@126.com

    Recruiting
  • Shaxian County General Hospital

    Sanming, Fujian

    Xiaohong Xie, +86 13860506137, lilylwj@live.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

The goal of this cluster randomized trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the RISIMA model based on an integrated county healthcare consortium implemented by multi-level family health teams (FHTs)on patients with diabetes and/or hypertension, including CVD risk assessment, treatment, and management.

Being tested
Team-based care, Risk-stratified care pathway, Strengthened health education, Financial incentives for integration of care, Supporting health information system
Medical subject headings
Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Cardiovascular Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Team-based careOther

    The RISIMA model is provided by a family healthcare team composed of one village doctor, one general physician at township health centers and one specialist including cardiologists, neurologists or endocrinologists from county hospital. For villages without village doctor, public health professionals from township health centers would join the service team as the supplement. Within the team, three team members carry the different function. Village doctor is responsible for regular home visits, CVD risk measurement and organizing health education course. GP as the core service provider in the team is responsible for CVD risk monitoring, providing health education course for middle-high risk participants, and generating integrated care plans for each participant. Specialist is responsible for providing guidance particularly for high-risk population management to township and village doctors within the team.

  • Risk-stratified care pathwayProcedure or surgery

    Based on WHO/ISH score, baseline population will be divided into three groups-low risk (10-year CVD risk: \<10%), middle risk (10-year CVD risk: 10%~20%) and high risk (10-year risk: \>20%). With the support from experts and health care professionals, study had developed a risk-stratified care pathway on the basis of clinical guidance. According to the pathway, participants at different risk tertile are provided with differentiated management plan especially in terms of health education, follow-up frequency and treatment plan.

  • Strengthened health educationBehavioural

    The education comprised 8 monthly sessions developed by GP and village doctors. At the 4th month, individual health counseling by village doctors will be done to encourage the imitation and maintenance of self-management behaviors, and to identify any potential problems in the program. It took half an hour per each participant. At the 8th month, self-management evaluation will be done to assess personal self-management ability. High risk participants are required to take the education course, and middle risk participants are only encouraging to take. All participants would receive the education messages twice a month, which introduce tips about the management of hypertension, diabetes and CVD risk factors.

  • Financial incentives for integration of careOther

    Specialists receive reimbursement for case discussion and high risk population management; GP receive reimbursement for providing education program and risk monitoring; Village doctor receive reimbursement for assisting education program, risk measurement and home visits. And overall services quality will be measured, and taken into account for annual performance evaluation.

  • Supporting health information systemOther

    A dynamic patient risk monitoring information system is established for simplifying the risk data collection and entry for village doctors, meanwhile, GP and specialist can receive the updates of risk scores simultaneously. Apart from the function of risk monitoring, this system also incorporates the e-records of home visits, health education attendance as well as medical records including outpatient visits and hospitalizations. The upgraded information systems not only can support the healthcare professionals with comprehensive and real-time data, but also provide the performance evaluation data for policymakers.

Study groups in NCT06302127
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlNo interventionDuring the study, control participant will be provided with existing essential public health service including quarterly follow-ups and annual physical examination, and be advised to see their usual provider for care, as appropriate.
InterventionExperimentalIntervention group will receive the risk-stratified integrated CVD management (RISIMA) model consisting of 5 core elements provided as a package: (1) Team-based care; (2) Risk-stratified care pathway; (3) Strengthened health education; (4) Financial incentives for integration of care; (5) Supporting health information system.
Receives: Other: Team-based care; Procedure: Risk-stratified care pathway; Behavioral: Strengthened health education; Other: Financial incentives for integration of care; Other: Supporting health information system

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 10-year CVD risk score

    This study intervention is designed to address CVD risk by introducing an integrated care package. Therefore, a validated risk score is required to properly evaluate the effect of interventions. The WHO/ISH score is a tool to estimate the risk of CVD development based on age, sex, BP, total cholesterol, smoking and diabetes. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether or not the intervention can substantially lower the risk at 1 year. The primary outcome is the mean difference in WHO/ISH risk score change from baseline to 12 months between the intervention and control townships. The WHO/ISH risk score will be calculated using the lab-based measurements, but if there are missing, a nonlaboratory measurements will be used.

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. 10-year CVD risk score changes

    change in 10-year CVD risk score changes between the intervention and control FDTs at 6 months

    Measured: 6 months

  2. blood pressure control rate

    change in blood pressure control rate between the intervention and control FDTs at 12 months

    Measured: 12 months

  3. systolic blood pressure

    change in SBP between the intervention and control FHTs at 12 months

    Measured: 12 months

  4. systolic blood pressure

    change in SBP between the intervention and control FHTs at 6 months

    Measured: 6 months

  5. total cholesterol

    change in total cholesterol between the intervention and control FHTs at 12 months.

    Measured: 12 months

  6. fasting blood glucose

    change in fasting blood glucose between the intervention and control FDTs at 12 months

    Measured: 12 months

  7. CVD incidence rate

    difference of incidence rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (including acute myocardial infarction, stroke, angina, and sudden cardiac death) between the intervention and control FDTs at 12 months

    Measured: 12 months

  8. cost-effectiveness outcome

    a health economic evaluation to assess the cost-effectiveness of the intervention compared with usual care at 12 months

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Mar 2024
  2. Study start20 May 2024
  3. Primary completion20 Oct 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion20 Dec 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
2,560 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06302127
Sponsor's protocol ID
CCHDS
Acronym
C-RISIMA
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
4 Mar 2024
Last updated
16 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Lu W, Xia X, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Lin Y, Xie W, Xu J. Effectiveness of a Primary-Care-Centered Integrated Care Intervention for Stratified Cardiovascular Risk Control in China: Study Protocol for a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Health Care Sci. 2026 Sep 27:10.1002/hcs2.70105. doi: 10.1002/hcs2.70105. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42807163

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Team-based care, Risk-stratified care pathway and Strengthened health education in people with Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, run by Peking University at 3 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jin Prof. Xu, PhD (0086-82805701, xujin@hsc.pku.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

10-year CVD risk score (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06302127, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in