Multisensory StimulationNCT06291519
The Effect of Multisensory Stimulus Method on Pain and Physiological Parameters in Infants
A study testing Multi-sensory Stimulation Method-Mother Applying the Method to the Baby, Multi-sensory Stimulation Method-Nurse Applying the Method to the Baby and Breastfeeding Applied Group in people with Multisensory Stimulation, run by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This study aimed to investigate the impact of employing the multi-sensory stimulation technique by both the mother and the nurse on the pain and physiological responses of infants aged 2-6 months during vaccination. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 to 6 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Multisensory Stimulation
- What is being tested?
- Multi-sensory Stimulation Method-Mother Applying the Method to the Baby, Multi-sensory Stimulation Method-Nurse Applying the Method to the Baby and Breastfeeding Applied Group
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 96 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2023to 30 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 to 6 months
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Being healthy
- Parental consent to participate in the study
- Born between 38-42 weeks of gestation
- To take part in the routine vaccination programme of the Ministry of Health
Who cannot join
- - Having taken analgesic, muscle relaxant or sedation within the last 4 hours
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa
Istanbul, None Selected, 34381
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Multisensory Stimulus Method Used During Immunisation on Pain and Physiological Parameters in Infants: A Randomised Controlled Study
This study aimed to investigate the impact of employing the multi-sensory stimulation technique by both the mother and the nurse on the pain and physiological responses of infants aged 2-6 months during vaccination. The significance of pain experienced during vaccination in children is emphasized, potentially leading to avoidance behaviors toward healthcare services. There is growing evidence supporting the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions. Multi-sensory stimulation, which integrates various stimuli such as taste, touch, and speech, alleviates infant pain. However, there has been a lack of studies assessing the effectiveness of this approach during vaccination administered by different healthcare providers. Hence, this study sought to explore the effects of multi-sensory stimulation by both mother and nurse applied to pain and physiological parameters. It is anticipated that the findings of this study will contribute to both pain management strategies and healthcare practices.
Read the detailed description
The emergence of needle phobia in childhood often precipitates avoidance behaviors toward vaccinations (McLenon \& Rogers, 2019). Mitigating vaccine-induced pain holds promise in alleviating healthcare avoidance inclinations (Komaroff \& Forest, 2020). An expanding body of evidence substantiates the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions in ameliorating acute procedural pain in neonates and infants (Aydın \& İnal, 2019; Reece-Stremtan \& Gray, 2016).
One such auspicious non-pharmacological approach to pain management is multisensory stimulation, also recognized as sensory saturation. Multisensory stimulation constitutes a non-pharmacological strategy employed to diminish infant pain during acute procedures. Grounded in gate control theory, it postulates that administering both a sweet taste and a spectrum of stimuli to infants may yield heightened analgesic effects (Bellini et al., 2012). The amalgamation of various interventions such as massage, auditory stimuli, olfactory cues, and eye contact via multisensory stimulation engages broader cortical regions and saturates sensory pathways, thereby attenuating nociceptive inputs (Zeraati et al., 2017).
A review of the literature underscores the efficacy of multisensory stimulation as a non-pharmacological modality to alleviate painful procedures in preterm neonates (Anand et al., 2011). Moreover, it demonstrates superior efficacy compared to single pain relief modalities in mitigating pain during venipuncture in infants (Fitri et al., 2020). Despite the demonstrated efficacy of multisensory stimulation as a straightforward, effective, and safe analgesic method during painful neonatal examinations, studies evaluating its effectiveness during vaccine administration are notably absent. Furthermore, scant research has explored the influence of the practitioner (whether mother, nurse, or physician) on the efficacy of this method.
Hypotheses : Babies who underwent the multi-sensory stimulation method; the Pain scale score is lower than the control group, the crying duration is shorter than the control group, the heart rate is lower than the control group, and the saturation (SPO2) is higher than the control group. In the group where the mother is the practitioner of the Multi-sensory stimulation method, compared to the group where the nurse is the practitioner; the pain scale score is low, the crying duration is low, the heart rate is low, saturation level (SPO2) is high.
Aim:
Hence, this study aims to investigate the impact of multisensory stimulation administered by both mothers and nurses on pain perception and physiological parameters during vaccine administration.
Place and Time of the Research:
The data were collected at the Healthy Child Vaccination Unit of a university hospital by visiting the institution two days a week, on Thursdays and Fridays, between January 2023 and December 2023.
Universe and Sample After obtaining the necessary legal permissions (ethics committee approval and institutional permission), the population of the study consisted of infants between the ages of 2-6 months who were applied to the Istanbul University Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty vaccination room by their mothers for routine vaccination on the dates of the study.
The research sample consisted of 96 infants between the ages of 2-6 months who were brought to the vaccination room between January 2023 and October 2023, met the inclusion criteria, and whose parents gave written informed consent. According to the power analysis, a total of 96 babies were kept safe, 24 babies per group.
Randomization Babies who met the research selection criteria were the group in which the multi-sensory stimulation method was applied, the approved group of the multi-sensory stimulation method, the experimental group, the breastfeeding group, and the control group according to age (2 months, 4 months, 6 months) in which the block randomization method was mostly applied.
Independent variables: Multi-sensory stimulation method Dependent variables: Duration of infant crying, FLACC pain scale score, peak heart rate, saturation (SPO2) level.
Data Collection Method The data were collected by the researcher in the unit where the research was conducted
Data Collection Tools
- Data Collection Form prepared by the researcher to determine the demographic characteristics of the baby. Some information (such as gestational week, gender, and anthropometric measurements at birth) was obtained from the child's personal records.
- FLACC scale to determine the pain score before, during, and after vaccination of infants,
- Pulse Oximetry Device to detect oxygen saturation (SPO2) and heart rate before, during and after immunization of infants,
- Weighing Instrument for determining the current weight of infants,
- Height Measuring Tape for determining the current height of babies,
- Multi-sensory stimulation method
Procedure The babies included in the study were divided into 4 groups by block randomization method after obtaining ethical and institutional permission. Multi-sensory stimulation method was applied by the mother to the 1st experimental group and by the nurse to the 2nd experimental group. In the breastfeeding group, the mother only breastfed, and no application was applied to the control group.
In all groups, FLACC pain scale, oxygen saturation, and pulse oximetry were evaluated and recorded 5 minutes and 2 minutes before the vaccination process, just before the vaccination, immediately after the vaccination (pain during the procedure), and at the 2nd and 5th minutes after the procedure. Post-vaccination crying duration was recorded in all groups.
- Conditions
- Multisensory Stimulation
- Being tested
- Multi-sensory Stimulation Method-Mother Applying the Method to the Baby, Multi-sensory Stimulation Method-Nurse Applying the Method to the Baby, Breastfeeding Applied Group
- Keywords
- Infant baby, Multisensory stimulation, newborns, vaccine, pain, nursing
- Medical subject headings
- Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Multi-sensory Stimulation Method-Mother Applying the Method to the BabyOther
In the multisensory stimulus method;
- st stimulus (sense of taste): The mother breastfed the baby for 20 minutes. Breastfeeding was terminated before vaccination.
- nd stimulus (sense of touch),: The mother applied touch - a light massage for 5 min until the vaccination process. There was a break just before the vaccination. The application was continued for another 5 min after the vaccination.
- rd stimulus: Speech-Sound (sense of hearing): The mother spoke to the baby in a soft tone for 5 minutes until the vaccination (words, lullabies, songs, etc.). There was a break just before the vaccination. The practice was continued for 5 minutes immediately after the vaccination.
- Stimulus Eye contact (sense of sight): The mother made eye contact with the baby in the mother's field of vision for 5 minutes until the vaccination. There was a break just before the vaccination. The application continued for another 5 minutes after the vaccination.
Multi-sensory Stimulation Method-Nurse Applying the Method to the BabyOther
In the multisensory stimulus method;
- st stimulus (sense of taste): The mother breastfed the baby for 20 minutes. Breastfeeding was terminated 5 min before vaccination.
- nd stimulus (sense of touch),: The nurse applied touch - a light massage for 5 minutes until the vaccination. There was a break just before the vaccination. The application was continued for another 5 min after the vaccination.
- rd stimulus: Speech-Sound (sense of hearing): The nurse spoke to the baby in a soft tone for 5 minutes until the vaccination (words, lullabies, songs, etc.). There was a break just before the vaccination. The practice was continued for 5 minutes immediately after the vaccination.
- Stimulus Eye contact (sense of sight): The nurse made eye contact with the baby in the mother's field of vision for 5 minutes until the vaccination. There was a break just before the vaccination. The application continued for another 5 minutes after the vaccination.
Breastfeeding Applied GroupOther
Multisensory stimulus method not applied:
The baby was breastfed by its mother for 20 minutes. Breastfeeding was stopped just before the vaccination.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group 1 | Experimental | In this group, the mother applied multiple sensory stimuli. In this group, the mothers of the babies to be vaccinated applied multiple sensory stimuli such as breastfeeding, mother's voice, touch-light massage, and eye contact. The mother breastfed her baby for a total of 20 minutes. Breastfeeding was terminated before vaccination. Other applications were applied for 5 minutes before vaccination and 5 minutes after vaccination. FLACC pain scale, SPO2, and pulse oximetry were evaluated and recorded 5 min before and 2 min after vaccination, immediately before vaccination, immediately after vaccination (pain during the procedure), and 2 and 5 min after the procedure. Receives: Other: Multi-sensory Stimulation Method-Mother Applying the Method to the Baby |
| Experimental Group 2 | Experimental | In this group, the nurse applied multiple sensory stimuli. In this group, the mothers of the babies to be vaccinated breastfed the baby for 20 minutes. The mother stopped breastfeeding before the vaccination procedure. The nurse started to give multisensory stimuli. The nurse administered multisensory stimuli including soft tone of voice, touch-light massage, and eye contact 5 minutes before the vaccination. Other applications were applied 5 minutes before and 5 minutes after vaccination. FLACC pain scale, SPO2, and pulse oximetry were evaluated and recorded 5 min before and 2 min after vaccination, immediately before vaccination, immediately after vaccination (pain during the procedure), and 2 and 5 min after the procedure. Receives: Other: Multi-sensory Stimulation Method-Nurse Applying the Method to the Baby |
| Experimental Group 3 | Experimental | In this group, the mother breastfed her baby for 20 minutes before vaccination. Breastfeeding was terminated before vaccination. FLACC pain scale, SPO2, and pulse oximetry were evaluated and recorded 5 min before and 2 min after vaccination, immediately before vaccination, immediately after vaccination (pain during the procedure), and 2 and 5 min after the procedure. Receives: Other: Breastfeeding Applied Group |
| Control Group | No intervention | Babies in this group did not receive any treatment. A light touch was applied for ethical reasons. FLACC pain scale, SPO2, and pulse oximetry were evaluated and recorded 5 min before and 2 min after vaccination, immediately before vaccination, immediately after vaccination (pain during the procedure), and 2 and 5 min after the procedure. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The Effect of Multiple Sensory Stimulus Method
The FLACC pain scale score decreased, the oxygen saturation value measured by pulse oximetry was measured higher, the heart rate measured by pulse oximetry was measured lower, and the crying time measured by stopwatch was measured lower in the infants who underwent multisensory stimulus method compared to the control group.
Measured: Measured 5 minutes before, 2 minutes before, immediately before, immediately after, 2 minutes after and 5 minutes after vaccination in all groups
Secondary outcomes (1)
Comparison of the group in which the mother applied multiple sensory stimuli and the group in which the nurse applied multiple sensory stimuli
The pain score measured with the FLACC pain scale was lower, the oxygen saturation value measured with pulse pulse oximetry was higher, there was no statistically significant difference between the heart rate values, and the crying time measured with a stopwatch was less in the group in which the mother applied multiple sensory stimuli during the vaccination procedure compared to the nurse group.
Measured: Measured 5 minutes before, 2 minutes before, immediately before, immediately after, 2 minutes after and 5 minutes after vaccination in all groups
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Mar 2024
- Study start1 Jan 2023
- Primary completion30 Dec 2023
- Study completion30 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Multisensory StimulationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Istanbul University - CerrahpasaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized controlled experimental design
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 96 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kadriye Sahin, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
- Investigators
- Suzan Yıldız, PhD, Principal investigator, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06291519
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SHN50343434
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 6 Feb 2024
- Last updated
- 4 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
McLenon J, Rogers MAM. The fear of needles: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2019 Jan;75(1):30-42. doi: 10.1111/jan.13818. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
PubMed 30109720Komaroff A, Forest S. Implementing a clinical protocol using breastfeeding to mitigate vaccination pain in infants. J Pediatr Nurs. 2020 Sep-Oct;54:50-57. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2020.05.017. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
PubMed 32534408Aydin D, Inal S. Effects of breastfeeding and heel warming on pain levels during heel stick in neonates. Int J Nurs Pract. 2019 Jun;25(3):e12734. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12734. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
PubMed 30993840Reece-Stremtan S, Gray L. ABM Clinical Protocol #23: Nonpharmacological Management of Procedure-Related Pain in the Breastfeeding Infant, Revised 2016. Breastfeed Med. 2016 Nov;11:425-429. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2016.29025.srs. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
PubMed 27623411Bellieni CV, Tei M, Coccina F, Buonocore G. Sensorial saturation for infants' pain. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Apr;25 Suppl 1:79-81. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.663548. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
PubMed 22339420Zeraati H, Shahinfar J, Behnam Vashani H, Reyhani T. Effect of Multisensory Stimulation on Pain of Eye Examination in Preterm Infants. Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Dec 7;7(1):e42561. doi: 10.5812/aapm.42561. eCollection 2017 Feb.
PubMed 28920044Anand KJS, Berqvist L, Hall RW, Carbajal R. (2011). Acute pain management in newborn infants. Pain:Clin Updat.;19(6):1 -6. 11 .
Fitri SYR, Lusmilasari L, Juffrie M, Bellieni CV. Modified Sensory Stimulation Using Breastmilk for Reducing Pain Intensity in Neonates in Indonesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pediatr Nurs. 2020 Jul-Aug;53:e199-e203. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 May 10.
PubMed 32402558Sahin K, Yildiz S, Gur E. The effect of multi-sensory stimuli used during vaccination on pain and physiological parameters in infants: A randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr Nurs. 2026 Mar-Apr;87:20-30. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2025.11.051. Epub 2026 Jan 6.
PubMed 41500000
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Multisensory Stimulus Method Used During Immunisation on Pain and Physiological Parameters in Infants: A Randomised Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06291519
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SHN50343434
- Conditions
- Multisensory Stimulation
- Keywords
- Infant baby, Multisensory stimulation, newborns, vaccine, pain, nursing
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 96 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul University - CerrahpasaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aimed to investigate the impact of employing the multi-sensory stimulation technique by both the mother and the nurse on the pain and physiological responses of infants aged 2-6 months during vaccination. The significance of pain experienced during vaccination in children is emphasized, potentially leading to avoidance behaviors toward healthcare services. There is growing evidence supporting the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions. Multi-sensory stimulation, which integrates various stimuli such as taste, touch, and speech, alleviates infant pain. However, there has been a lack of studies assessing the effectiveness of this approach during vaccination administered by different healthcare providers. Hence, this study sought to explore the effects of multi-sensory stimulation by both mother and nurse applied to pain and physiological parameters. It is anticipated that the findings of this study will contribute to both pain management strategies and healthcare practices.
Detailed description
The emergence of needle phobia in childhood often precipitates avoidance behaviors toward vaccinations (McLenon \& Rogers, 2019). Mitigating vaccine-induced pain holds promise in alleviating healthcare avoidance inclinations (Komaroff \& Forest, 2020). An expanding body of evidence substantiates the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions in ameliorating acute procedural pain in neonates and infants (Aydın \& İnal, 2019; Reece-Stremtan \& Gray, 2016).
One such auspicious non-pharmacological approach to pain management is multisensory stimulation, also recognized as sensory saturation. Multisensory stimulation constitutes a non-pharmacological strategy employed to diminish infant pain during acute procedures. Grounded in gate control theory, it postulates that administering both a sweet taste and a spectrum of stimuli to infants may yield heightened analgesic effects (Bellini et al., 2012). The amalgamation of various interventions such as massage, auditory stimuli, olfactory cues, and eye contact via multisensory stimulation engages broader cortical regions and saturates sensory pathways, thereby attenuating nociceptive inputs (Zeraati et al., 2017).
A review of the literature underscores the efficacy of multisensory stimulation as a non-pharmacological modality to alleviate painful procedures in preterm neonates (Anand et al., 2011). Moreover, it demonstrates superior efficacy compared to single pain relief modalities in mitigating pain during venipuncture in infants (Fitri et al., 2020). Despite the demonstrated efficacy of multisensory stimulation as a straightforward, effective, and safe analgesic method during painful neonatal examinations, studies evaluating its effectiveness during vaccine administration are notably absent. Furthermore, scant research has explored the influence of the practitioner (whether mother, nurse, or physician) on the efficacy of this method.
Hypotheses : Babies who underwent the multi-sensory stimulation method; the Pain scale score is lower than the control group, the crying duration is shorter than the control group, the heart rate is lower than the control group, and the saturation (SPO2) is higher than the control group. In the group where the mother is the practitioner of the Multi-sensory stimulation method, compared to the group where the nurse is the practitioner; the pain scale score is low, the crying duration is low, the heart rate is low, saturation level (SPO2) is high.
Aim:
Hence, this study aims to investigate the impact of multisensory stimulation administered by both mothers and nurses on pain perception and physiological parameters during vaccine administration.
Place and Time of the Research:
The data were collected at the Healthy Child Vaccination Unit of a university hospital by visiting the institution two days a week, on Thursdays and Fridays, between January 2023 and December 2023.
Universe and Sample After obtaining the necessary legal permissions (ethics committee approval and institutional permission), the population of the study consisted of infants between the ages of 2-6 months who were applied to the Istanbul University Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty vaccination room by their mothers for routine vaccination on the dates of the study.
The research sample consisted of 96 infants between the ages of 2-6 months who were brought to the vaccination room between January 2023 and October 2023, met the inclusion criteria, and whose parents gave written informed consent. According to the power analysis, a total of 96 babies were kept safe, 24 babies per group.
Randomization Babies who met the research selection criteria were the group in which the multi-sensory stimulation method was applied, the approved group of the multi-sensory stimulation method, the experimental group, the breastfeeding group, and the control group according to age (2 months, 4 months, 6 months) in which the block randomization method was mostly applied.
Independent variables: Multi-sensory stimulation method Dependent variables: Duration of infant crying, FLACC pain scale score, peak heart rate, saturation (SPO2) level.
Data Collection Method The data were collected by the researcher in the unit where the research was conducted
Data Collection Tools
- Data Collection Form prepared by the researcher to determine the demographic characteristics of the baby. Some information (such as gestational week, gender, and anthropometric measurements at birth) was obtained from the child's personal records.
- FLACC scale to determine the pain score before, during, and after vaccination of infants,
- Pulse Oximetry Device to detect oxygen saturation (SPO2) and heart rate before, during and after immunization of infants,
- Weighing Instrument for determining the current weight of infants,
- Height Measuring Tape for determining the current height of babies,
- Multi-sensory stimulation method
Procedure The babies included in the study were divided into 4 groups by block randomization method after obtaining ethical and institutional permission. Multi-sensory stimulation method was applied by the mother to the 1st experimental group and by the nurse to the 2nd experimental group. In the breastfeeding group, the mother only breastfed, and no application was applied to the control group.
In all groups, FLACC pain scale, oxygen saturation, and pulse oximetry were evaluated and recorded 5 minutes and 2 minutes before the vaccination process, just before the vaccination, immediately after the vaccination (pain during the procedure), and at the 2nd and 5th minutes after the procedure. Post-vaccination crying duration was recorded in all groups.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
- Model description
- Randomized controlled experimental design
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group 1 | Experimental | Other: Multi-sensory Stimulation Method-Mother Applying the Method to the BabyIn this group, the mother applied multiple sensory stimuli. In this group, the mothers of the babies to be vaccinated applied multiple sensory stimuli such as breastfeeding, mother's voice, touch-light massage, and eye contact. The mother breastfed her baby for a total of 20 minutes. Breastfeeding was terminated before vaccination. Other applications were applied for 5 minutes before vaccination and 5 minutes after vaccination. FLACC pain scale, SPO2, and pulse oximetry were evaluated and recorded 5 min before and 2 min after vaccination, immediately before vaccination, immediately after vaccination (pain during the procedure), and 2 and 5 min after the procedure. |
| Experimental Group 2 | Experimental | Other: Multi-sensory Stimulation Method-Nurse Applying the Method to the BabyIn this group, the nurse applied multiple sensory stimuli. In this group, the mothers of the babies to be vaccinated breastfed the baby for 20 minutes. The mother stopped breastfeeding before the vaccination procedure. The nurse started to give multisensory stimuli. The nurse administered multisensory stimuli including soft tone of voice, touch-light massage, and eye contact 5 minutes before the vaccination. Other applications were applied 5 minutes before and 5 minutes after vaccination. FLACC pain scale, SPO2, and pulse oximetry were evaluated and recorded 5 min before and 2 min after vaccination, immediately before vaccination, immediately after vaccination (pain during the procedure), and 2 and 5 min after the procedure. |
| Experimental Group 3 | Experimental | Other: Breastfeeding Applied GroupIn this group, the mother breastfed her baby for 20 minutes before vaccination. Breastfeeding was terminated before vaccination. FLACC pain scale, SPO2, and pulse oximetry were evaluated and recorded 5 min before and 2 min after vaccination, immediately before vaccination, immediately after vaccination (pain during the procedure), and 2 and 5 min after the procedure. |
| Control Group | No intervention | –Babies in this group did not receive any treatment. A light touch was applied for ethical reasons. FLACC pain scale, SPO2, and pulse oximetry were evaluated and recorded 5 min before and 2 min after vaccination, immediately before vaccination, immediately after vaccination (pain during the procedure), and 2 and 5 min after the procedure. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 to 6 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Being healthy
- Parental consent to participate in the study
- Born between 38-42 weeks of gestation
- To take part in the routine vaccination programme of the Ministry of Health
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- - Having taken analgesic, muscle relaxant or sedation within the last 4 hours
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-sensory Stimulation Method-Mother Applying the Method to the BabyIn the multisensory stimulus method; 1. st stimulus (sense of taste): The mother breastfed the baby for 20 minutes. Breastfeeding was terminated before vaccination. 2. nd stimulus (sense of touch),: The mother applied touch - a light massage for 5 min until the vaccination process. There was a break just before the vaccination. The application was continued for another 5 min after the vaccination. 3. rd stimulus: Speech-Sound (sense of hearing): The mother spoke to the baby in a soft tone for 5 minutes until the vaccination (words, lullabies, songs, etc.). There was a break just before the vaccination. The practice was continued for 5 minutes immediately after the vaccination. 4. Stimulus Eye contact (sense of sight): The mother made eye contact with the baby in the mother's field of vision for 5 minutes until the vaccination. There was a break just before the vaccination. The application continued for another 5 minutes after the vaccination. | Other | Experimental Group 1 |
| Multi-sensory Stimulation Method-Nurse Applying the Method to the BabyIn the multisensory stimulus method; 1. st stimulus (sense of taste): The mother breastfed the baby for 20 minutes. Breastfeeding was terminated 5 min before vaccination. 2. nd stimulus (sense of touch),: The nurse applied touch - a light massage for 5 minutes until the vaccination. There was a break just before the vaccination. The application was continued for another 5 min after the vaccination. 3. rd stimulus: Speech-Sound (sense of hearing): The nurse spoke to the baby in a soft tone for 5 minutes until the vaccination (words, lullabies, songs, etc.). There was a break just before the vaccination. The practice was continued for 5 minutes immediately after the vaccination. 4. Stimulus Eye contact (sense of sight): The nurse made eye contact with the baby in the mother's field of vision for 5 minutes until the vaccination. There was a break just before the vaccination. The application continued for another 5 minutes after the vaccination. | Other | Experimental Group 2 |
| Breastfeeding Applied GroupMultisensory stimulus method not applied: The baby was breastfed by its mother for 20 minutes. Breastfeeding was stopped just before the vaccination. | Other | Experimental Group 3 |
Primary outcome
The Effect of Multiple Sensory Stimulus Method
Time frame: Measured 5 minutes before, 2 minutes before, immediately before, immediately after, 2 minutes after and 5 minutes after vaccination in all groups
The FLACC pain scale score decreased, the oxygen saturation value measured by pulse oximetry was measured higher, the heart rate measured by pulse oximetry was measured lower, and the crying time measured by stopwatch was measured lower in the infants who underwent multisensory stimulus method compared to the control group.
1 secondary outcome
Comparison of the group in which the mother applied multiple sensory stimuli and the group in which the nurse applied multiple sensory stimuli
Time frame: Measured 5 minutes before, 2 minutes before, immediately before, immediately after, 2 minutes after and 5 minutes after vaccination in all groups
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Mar 2024.
- Results publication: PubMed 30109720McLenon J, Rogers MAM. The fear of needles: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2019 Jan;75(1):30-42. doi: 10.1111/jan.13818. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 32534408Komaroff A, Forest S. Implementing a clinical protocol using breastfeeding to mitigate vaccination pain in infants. J Pediatr Nurs. 2020 Sep-Oct;54:50-57. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2020.05.017. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 30993840Aydin D, Inal S. Effects of breastfeeding and heel warming on pain levels during heel stick in neonates. Int J Nurs Pract. 2019 Jun;25(3):e12734. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12734. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
- Results publication: PubMed 27623411Reece-Stremtan S, Gray L. ABM Clinical Protocol #23: Nonpharmacological Management of Procedure-Related Pain in the Breastfeeding Infant, Revised 2016. Breastfeed Med. 2016 Nov;11:425-429. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2016.29025.srs. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
- Results publication: PubMed 22339420Bellieni CV, Tei M, Coccina F, Buonocore G. Sensorial saturation for infants' pain. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Apr;25 Suppl 1:79-81. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.663548. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
- Results publication: PubMed 28920044Zeraati H, Shahinfar J, Behnam Vashani H, Reyhani T. Effect of Multisensory Stimulation on Pain of Eye Examination in Preterm Infants. Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Dec 7;7(1):e42561. doi: 10.5812/aapm.42561. eCollection 2017 Feb.
- Results publicationAnand KJS, Berqvist L, Hall RW, Carbajal R. (2011). Acute pain management in newborn infants. Pain:Clin Updat.;19(6):1 -6. 11 .
- Results publication: PubMed 32402558Fitri SYR, Lusmilasari L, Juffrie M, Bellieni CV. Modified Sensory Stimulation Using Breastmilk for Reducing Pain Intensity in Neonates in Indonesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pediatr Nurs. 2020 Jul-Aug;53:e199-e203. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 May 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41500000Sahin K, Yildiz S, Gur E. The effect of multi-sensory stimuli used during vaccination on pain and physiological parameters in infants: A randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr Nurs. 2026 Mar-Apr;87:20-30. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2025.11.051. Epub 2026 Jan 6.
Related trials for Multisensory Stimulation
Not yet recruiting
Parent-Facilitated Early Oral-Sensory Experience in the NICU for Feeding Outcomes
Premature Birth, Infant, Premature
Recruiting
Multisensory Approaches for Managing Pediatric Dental Anxiety
Pediatric Dental Anxiety, Dental Anxiety
Active, not recruiting
Rapid Entrainment and Signal-guided Neuromodulation for Behavioral Health
Anxiety, PTSD
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Multisensory Stimulation Administered Before Clinical Encounters at the Pediatric Surgery Outpatient Clinic on Children's Anxiety and Fear Levels and Parental Anxiety
Anxiety, Fear
Not yet recruiting
Multisensory 40-Hz Stimulation for Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Suzan Yıldız, PhD principal investigator
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Multi-sensory Stimulation Method-Mother Applying the Method to the Baby, Multi-sensory Stimulation Method-Nurse Applying the Method to the Baby and Breastfeeding Applied Group in people with Multisensory Stimulation, run by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The Effect of Multiple Sensory Stimulus Method (time frame: Measured 5 minutes before, 2 minutes before, immediately before, immediately after, 2 minutes after and 5 minutes after vaccination in all groups). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06291519, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2024.