periOperativeNCT06266676
Mobile Micro-course Impact on Perioperative RNs in Heart Surgery Nursing.
A study testing micro-course and slide presentation in people with periOperative and Cardiac Surgical Procedures, run by Ting-Fang Yeh at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trialis to compare in learning effectiveness of nurses. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Can the "Micro-course" teaching enhance the awareness of cardiac surgery nursing among operating room nurses? 2. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- periOperative, Cardiac Surgical Procedures
- What is being tested?
- micro-course and slide presentation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 74 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2024to 30 Aug 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Currently engaged in clinical surgical nursing and possess a valid nursing license.
- Individuals who have not received training for cardiac surgery scrub nursing or who have received such training but have not worked as a cardiac surgery scrub nurse for more than two years.
- Nurses involved in the collaborative use of personnel during operating room duty.
Who cannot join
- Nursing supervisors at the level of charge nurse or higher.
- Nurses exclusively engaged in local anesthesia surgical nursing.
- Nurses primarily engaged in waiting room, recovery room, and anesthesia nursing.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effects of Heart Surgery Nursing Mobile Micro-course in Perioperative Registered Nurse.
The goal of this clinical trialis to compare in learning effectiveness of nurses. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Can the "Micro-course" teaching enhance the awareness of cardiac surgery nursing among operating room nurses?
- Can the "Micro-course" teaching boost the learning motivation and engagement of operating room nurses?
- What is the satisfaction level of nurses regarding the use of "Micro-course" in cardiac surgery nursing?
- What are the relevant factors influencing the effectiveness of the "Micro-course" teaching intervention?
Participants will be divided into two groups. The control group will receive online presentations, while the experimental group will engage in mobile learning combined with micro-courses. Both groups of participants will undergo instruction through asynchronous online courses.
- Conditions
- periOperative, Cardiac Surgical Procedures
- Being tested
- micro-course, slide presentation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
micro-courseOther
The experimental group adopts micro-course instruction, providing self-directed learning through online asynchronous courses, with instructional content delivered through short videos created by the researcher.
slide presentationOther
Provide online presentations.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| micro-course | Experimental | The experimental group adopts micro-course instruction, providing self-directed learning through online asynchronous courses, with instructional content delivered through short videos created by the researcher. Receives: Other: micro-course |
| slide presentation | Active comparator | The control group, on the other hand, employs a unidirectional teaching method by the instructor, offering self-directed learning through online asynchronous courses, primarily using researcher-created online presentations. Receives: Other: slide presentation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cognitive scale
The cognitive scale was self-designed by the author after referencing textbooks and journal articles. It is divided into four dimensions based on teaching topics, with a total of 15 single-choice questions to assess nurses' cognition of cardiac surgery. Each correct answer earns 1 point, with higher scores indicating higher levels of cognition.
Measured: Before the experiment commenced, all participants underwent a uniform pre-test. A post-test was administered one week after the conclusion of the course. A second post-test was conducted four weeks after the course concluded (this served as a delayed ass
motivation scale
The scale consists of 12 items and employs a four-point Likert scale for scoring, ranging from 4 points for "strongly agree" to 1 point for "strongly disagree." Higher scores indicate stronger learning motivation.
Measured: Before the experiment started, all participants underwent a standardized pre-test. A post-test was conducted one week after the conclusion of the course
Engagement Scale
This scale comprises a total of 10 items, scored using a four-point Likert scale, ranging from 4 points for "strongly agree" to 1 point for "strongly disagree." Higher scores indicate a higher level of learning engagement among the research subjects.
Measured: One week after the course concluded, measurements were taken.
Secondary outcomes (1)
learning satisfaction
There are a total of 10 questions, along with 2 open-ended questions. Scoring for this scale is based on a four-point Likert scale, ranging from 4 points for "strongly agree" to 1 point for "strongly disagree." Higher scores indicate higher levels of satisfaction with learning among nurses.
Measured: One week after the course concluded, measurements were taken.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Feb 2024
- Study start1 Feb 2024
- Primary completion30 Jun 2024
- Study completion30 Aug 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for periOperativeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 74 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ting-Fang Yeh
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Ting-Fang Yeh, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06266676
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 202301775B1
- Status last verified
- Sep 2024
- First submitted
- 13 Jan 2024
- Last updated
- 5 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effects of Heart Surgery Nursing Mobile Micro-course in Perioperative Registered Nurse.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06266676
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 202301775B1
- Conditions
- periOperative, Cardiac Surgical Procedures
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 74 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ting-Fang YehUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Aug 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trialis to compare in learning effectiveness of nurses. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Can the "Micro-course" teaching enhance the awareness of cardiac surgery nursing among operating room nurses?
- Can the "Micro-course" teaching boost the learning motivation and engagement of operating room nurses?
- What is the satisfaction level of nurses regarding the use of "Micro-course" in cardiac surgery nursing?
- What are the relevant factors influencing the effectiveness of the "Micro-course" teaching intervention?
Participants will be divided into two groups. The control group will receive online presentations, while the experimental group will engage in mobile learning combined with micro-courses. Both groups of participants will undergo instruction through asynchronous online courses.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| micro-course | Experimental | Other: micro-courseThe experimental group adopts micro-course instruction, providing self-directed learning through online asynchronous courses, with instructional content delivered through short videos created by the researcher. |
| slide presentation | Active comparator | Other: slide presentationThe control group, on the other hand, employs a unidirectional teaching method by the instructor, offering self-directed learning through online asynchronous courses, primarily using researcher-created online presentations. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Currently engaged in clinical surgical nursing and possess a valid nursing license.
- Individuals who have not received training for cardiac surgery scrub nursing or who have received such training but have not worked as a cardiac surgery scrub nurse for more than two years.
- Nurses involved in the collaborative use of personnel during operating room duty.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Nursing supervisors at the level of charge nurse or higher.
- Nurses exclusively engaged in local anesthesia surgical nursing.
- Nurses primarily engaged in waiting room, recovery room, and anesthesia nursing.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| micro-courseThe experimental group adopts micro-course instruction, providing self-directed learning through online asynchronous courses, with instructional content delivered through short videos created by the researcher. | Other | micro-course |
| slide presentationProvide online presentations. | Other | slide presentation |
Primary outcome
Cognitive scale
Time frame: Before the experiment commenced, all participants underwent a uniform pre-test. A post-test was administered one week after the conclusion of the course. A second post-test was conducted four weeks after the course concluded (this served as a delayed ass
The cognitive scale was self-designed by the author after referencing textbooks and journal articles. It is divided into four dimensions based on teaching topics, with a total of 15 single-choice questions to assess nurses' cognition of cardiac surgery. Each correct answer earns 1 point, with higher scores indicating higher levels of cognition.
motivation scale
Time frame: Before the experiment started, all participants underwent a standardized pre-test. A post-test was conducted one week after the conclusion of the course
The scale consists of 12 items and employs a four-point Likert scale for scoring, ranging from 4 points for "strongly agree" to 1 point for "strongly disagree." Higher scores indicate stronger learning motivation.
Engagement Scale
Time frame: One week after the course concluded, measurements were taken.
This scale comprises a total of 10 items, scored using a four-point Likert scale, ranging from 4 points for "strongly agree" to 1 point for "strongly disagree." Higher scores indicate a higher level of learning engagement among the research subjects.
1 secondary outcome
learning satisfaction
Time frame: One week after the course concluded, measurements were taken.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Sep 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for periOperative
Not yet recruiting
Prediction and Prevention of Postoperative Mortality and Morbidity
Dementia, Postoperative Delirium (POD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Association of POCD With Circulating Biomarkers in Patients Undergoing TUR of Bladder Tumor
Cognitive Decline, Urinary Bladder Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Prehabilitation in Pancreatic Surgery
Pancreatic Cancer, Periampullary Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Intranasal Dexmedetomidine-esketamine Combination and Postoperative Cognitive Recovery in Older Patients
Older Patients, Noncardiac Surgery
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Laryngeal Mask Airway vs Endotracheal Tube on Hypothermia in Laparoscopic Hernia Surgery
Perioperative Hypothermia, Hernia, Inguinal
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing micro-course and slide presentation in people with periOperative and Cardiac Surgical Procedures, run by Ting-Fang Yeh at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cognitive scale (time frame: Before the experiment commenced, all participants underwent a uniform pre-test. A post-test was administered one week after the conclusion of the course. A second post-test was conducted four weeks after the course concluded (this served as a delayed ass). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Sep 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.