AzTrials
AzTrials

Nurse-Patient RelationsNCT06257173

Peer Education Impact on Student Nurse Patient Safety

A study testing Education in people with Nurse-Patient Relations, run by Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The World Health Organisation (WHO) and the Ministry of Health define patient safety as the prevention of errors and adverse effects. Medical errors are a global problem and one out of every 10 patients is seriously harmed. The importance of education and attitudes of health personnel for patient safety is emphasised. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Nurse-Patient Relations
What is being tested?
Education
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
62 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
22 Feb 2024to 4 Jul 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Volunteering to participate in the research
  • To be a 3rd year student of SBÜ Gülhane Faculty of Nursing in 2023-2024 academic year
  • No visual or hearing impairment

Who cannot join

  • Voluntary withdrawal from the research
  • Not participating in the research phases

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • University of Health Sciences

    Ankara, Etlik, 06010

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Impact of Patient Safety Education Through Peer Education Model on Patent Safety Competence and Medical Error Attitudes of Student Nurses: A Randomized Controlled Study

The World Health Organisation (WHO) and the Ministry of Health define patient safety as the prevention of errors and adverse effects. Medical errors are a global problem and one out of every 10 patients is seriously harmed. The importance of education and attitudes of health personnel for patient safety is emphasised. Providing patient safety education to nursing students is important to provide quality health care. Peer education model stands out as an effective method to increase the patient safety competence of students. The study was planned as a randomised controlled study to evaluate the effect of patient safety education given according to the peer education model on the patient safety competence of student nurses and their attitudes towards medical errors.

Read the detailed description

The World Health Organisation (WHO) defines patient safety as "the prevention of errors related to health services and negative effects on patients". In our country, within the scope of the Ministry of Health Quality Standards in Health, patient safety is defined as "measures and improvement activities that can be taken to keep all foreseeable hazards that may cause harm to all stakeholders receiving services at an acceptable level of risk".Patient safety is a global problem that concerns many countries around the world. This problem stems from the large number of reported patient outcomes related to medical errors . Medical errors can cause permanent injuries and prolonged hospital stays and even death in patients. According to the World Health Organisation, one in 10 patients is seriously harmed by medical errors. Prevention of medical errors and their effects is the main goal of patient safety. ICN has stated that in order to increase patient safety, comprehensive measures should be taken in recruitment, training and retention of professional health care personnel, fight against infection, safe use of drugs, improvement of their performance, device safety, healthy practice and care environment, environmental safety and risk management, and scientific knowledge on patient safety and the infrastructure that will enable its development should be combined as a whole.

It is the responsibility of all healthcare professionals to prevent and prevent medical errors and to ensure patient safety. In this context, considering the time nurses spend with patients, it is also indispensable for nursing care. For this reason, it is of great importance to determine the attitudes of health professionals in medical errors in order to reduce medical error rates, thus ensuring patient safety and increasing trust in health institutions.

Medical errors caused by healthcare professionals are preventable errors, and patient safety can be ensured by creating an effective and strong patient safety culture through trainings. Medical errors and risks can be minimised by establishing and developing a patient safety culture and adopting it by all healthcare professionals and future healthcare professionals (students). It is very important to educate nursing students, who will be the health professionals of the future, about patient safety in order to provide safe and quality health care. Encountering a new patient in the practice area and performing any application to this patient for the first time may cause anxiety and fear in students, which may lead students to make medical errors. Teaching the basic concept of patient safety through patient safety education in nursing undergraduate programmes is an important step towards ensuring patient safety and quality in clinical practice, in addition to helping nursing students see the "big picture" for safer care and to have a good knowledge of basic principles before providing nursing care in the clinical field.

Nursing students in recent years are more present in clinics and learn how to communicate with patients and work with other health professionals, which can increase their patient safety competence. To effectively improve student patient safety competence, it is necessary to develop and implement a range of teaching methods such as clinical practice as well as laboratory/simulation sessions . It is also recommended to create actionable strategies that bring together administrators, educators, students and patients to coordinate teaching with the clinic by evaluating whether there is a change in students' knowledge, skills and behaviours in quality and patient safety with objective methods. In line with these recommendations, it is very important that the courses given in undergraduate education are given with an innovative approach to increase patient safety and quality of care.

One of the effective educational methods that facilitate health promotion and create an appropriate learning environment is peer education. A peer is an individual who belongs to the same social group as the learner and is believed to have similar abilities to the learner and can act as a strong motivator in learning. Peers can communicate better, share their experiences and encourage each other to adopt appropriate health behaviours. Peer teaching, an effective educational approach for nursing students, is based on Bandura's social learning theory, which assumes that learning alone restricts the person to observe the attitudes of others. Recently, the peer education model has been proposed as an alternative to traditional educational approaches as it is recognised to have many advantages.

The success of the peer education model is closely related to the fact that peers support each other, express themselves more comfortably, perform their skills that they cannot reveal under the supervision of an authority more easily, and learn less stressful. From this point of view, it is expected that the patient safety education to be given to nursing students using the peer education module will contribute positively to students' patient safety competence and attitudes towards medical errors. In addition, it is thought to contribute to the studies examining the effect of patient safety education, which is limited in the literature. The study was planned as a randomised controlled study to evaluate the effect of patient safety education given according to the peer education model on student nurses' patient safety competence and attitudes towards medical errors.

Being tested
Education
Keywords
Patient Safety, Medical Errors, Nurse, Students

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EducationBehavioural

    The experimental group will receive 2 hours of patient safety training with a peer educator.

Study groups in NCT06257173
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental groupsExperimentalThe experimental group will be selected among the students who do not take the "Patient and Employee Safety" course and who volunteer to participate in the study.The experimental group will receive 2 hours of patient safety training with a peer educator. Data collection forms will be applied at the end of the training, and data collection forms will be applied again 6 weeks after the training.
Receives: Behavioral: Education
Control groupsNo interventionThe control group will be selected among the students taking the "Patient and Employee Safety" course who volunteer to participate in the studyThe control group will be given 2 hours of patient safety training in the curriculum by the researcher. Data collection forms will be applied at the end of the training, and data collection forms will be applied again 6 weeks after the training.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient Safety Competency Self-Assessment Tool

    The Patient Safety Competency Self-Assessment Tool consists of 41 items in three dimensions: knowledge (six items), skills (21 items) and attitudes (14 items). The total mean scores of the instrument and each of the three subscales range from one to five, with higher scores indicating higher overall competence and competence in knowledge, skills and attitudes.

    Measured: six weeks

  2. Attitude Scale on Medical Errors

    The Attitude Towards Medical Errors Scale (ATMS) consists of 16 items and 3 subscales (medical error perception, medical error approach, and reasons for medical errors). The 10th and 13th items are reverse scored. In the scale calculation, the scale total score is taken and the scale score is obtained by dividing the raw score obtained by the number of scale items. In the sub-dimension score calculation, the sub-dimension score is totalled and divided by the number of sub-dimension items. is divided and the score obtained is evaluated between 1-5. The cut-off point of the scale was determined as 3. Medical error attitudes of those who score below 3 on the scale are evaluated as negative, and medical error attitudes of those who score 3 and above are evaluated as positive.

    Measured: six weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. The Descriptive Information Form

    The Introductory Information Form is a form consisting of 8 questions designed by the researchers to define the students' age, gender, reason for choosing the profession, status of receiving education on patient safety, patient safety education and knowledge about medical errors.

    Measured: six weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Feb 2024
  2. Study start22 Feb 2024
  3. Primary completion4 Apr 2024
  4. Study completion4 Jul 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This research will be conducted as an experimental study with pretest-posttest randomised control group design.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
62 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06257173
Sponsor's protocol ID
SBU-HEM-MA-01
Status last verified
Sep 2024
First submitted
5 Feb 2024
Last updated
19 Sep 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Education in people with Nurse-Patient Relations, run by Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient Safety Competency Self-Assessment Tool (time frame: six weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in