Membranous NephropathyPROMENADENCT06242327
An Outcome Analysis of Primary Membranous Nephropathy
An observational study of Membranous Nephropathy, run by Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research at 2 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
This is an observational study intended to track the course of the primary membranous nephropathy disease in real-world clinical practice. The study will primarily assess the long-term outcomes of patients with primary membranous nephropathy in the context of advances in treatment options. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Membranous Nephropathy
- How many people
- 500 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- 29 Nov 2024to Jun 2054
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study will enrol all patients with a diagnosis of primary membranous nephropathy and the nephrotic syndrome (proteinuria >3.5 g/24-h) treated with rituximab or other monoclonal antibodies (including, among others, ofatumumab, obinutuzumab, felzartamab).
Who may be able to join
- Adults (≥18 years old) on the day of signing informed consent.
- Diagnosis of primary membranous nephropathy
- Nephrotic syndrome (proteinuria >3.5 g/24 hours)
- Written informed consent to the use of recorded data for research purposes.
Who cannot join
- Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity.
- Any contraindication to treatment with rituximab or other monoclonal antibody
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Piero L Ruggenenti, MD contact
Italy2 sites, 1 recruiting
- Active, not recruiting
ASST HPG23 - Unità di Nefrologia
Bergamo, BG, 24127
- Recruiting
Centro di Ricerche Cliniche per le Malattie Rare "Aldo e Cele Daccò"
Ranica, BG, 24020
Matias Trillini, MD, 0039 035 45351, matias.trillini@marionegri.it
About this study
Official title: An Observational, Longitudinal Study to Describe the Outcome, and Outcome Predictors, of Patients With Primary Membranous Nephropathy, and the Nephrotic Syndrome Treated With Rituximab, or Other Monoclonal Antibodies
This is an observational study intended to track the course of the primary membranous nephropathy disease in real-world clinical practice.
The study will primarily assess the long-term outcomes of patients with primary membranous nephropathy in the context of advances in treatment options.
Read the detailed description
Primary Membranous Nephropathy (PMN) is an autoimmune disease caused by the deposition of Immunoglobulin G and complement components on the subepithelial layer of the glomerular capillary wall. It affects 5-10 patients per million population and is the second cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults after diabetic kidney disease. For decades steroids and non-specific immunosuppressive medications have been advocated as a therapeutic option for patients with membranous nephropathy at increased risk of kidney failure because of persistent nephrotic syndrome. These medications, however, have major and potentially fatal adverse effects that offset their potential benefits and should be abandoned. Patients with PMN and non-nephrotic proteinuria (<3.5 g per 24 h) have a good prognosis with a supportive therapy based on optimized inhibition of the Renin-Angiotensin-System with Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and/or Angiotensin-Receptor-Blockers (ARBs). Without immunosuppression, however, approximately one-third of patients with PMN and nephrotic syndrome (NS) (proteinuria >3.5 g per 24 h and/or hypoalbuminemia) progress to end stage kidney disease (ESKD). Steroids and non-specific immunosuppressive medications may achieve remission of the NS more effectively than placebo and supportive therapy but are associated with serious and potentially fatal complications that may offset the potential benefits of therapy. Thus, the 2012 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines recommended that the use of non- specific immunosuppressive therapy should be restricted to patients with persistent NS because, in this context, the reduced risk of ESKD could offset the risks of serious adverse events. The discovery of nephritogenic autoantibodies against podocyte M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) and thrombospondin type-1 domaincontaining protein 7A (THSD7A) antigens provided a clear pathophysiological rationale for interventions specifically targeting B cell lineages to prevent antibody production and subepithelial deposition. Anti-PLA2R antibody titer correlates with disease activity and patient outcome. Low autoantibody levels at diagnosis predict spontaneous remission, whereas high baseline anti-PLA2R antibody levels correlate with a reduced probability of spontaneous remission, are associated with progression to NS in patients with initial non-nephrotic proteinuria, and predict a high risk of relapse and progressive loss of kidney function. Moreover, decreasing anti-PLA2R antibody levels strongly predicts remission of proteinuria and response to various traditional and novel immunosuppressive treatments. Conceivably, in PLA2R-negative disease, PMN can be sustained by other nephritogenic autoantibodies such as anti-THSD7A antibodies that, similarly to anti-PLA2R antibodies, have been reported to predict disease activity and response to therapy.
Whether progression and response to treatment of patients with PMN can be affected not only by the overall titer of circulating anti-PLA2R autoantibodies, but also by their nature is matter of a lively debate. After almost 40 years of empirical treatment, the discovery of anti-PLA2R and anti-THSD7A autoantibodies provided the first clear pathophysiological rationale for interventions specifically aimed at preventing antibody production or their binding to specific antigens with subepithelial deposition of antibody-antigen immunocomplexes. The first-in-class anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab is safe and achieves remission in approximately two-thirds of patients with nephrotic membranous nephropathy. In PLA2R-related disease, remission is invariably preceded by depletion of anti PLA2R autoantibodies and relapse by their re-emergence into the circulation. Because of its superior risk/benefit profile as compared to non-specific immunosuppressive therapy, rituximab is now first-line therapy for patients with membranous nephropathy at risk of kidney failure. Novel monoclonal antibodies targeting CD20 cells (such as ofatumumab and obinutuzumab) and their differentiation (belimumab) or targeting long-living antibody producing CD38 memory cells (daratumumab, felzartamab) along with proteasome inhibitors such as bortezomib are being evaluated for the treatment of nephrotic patients with membranous nephropathy who are resistant or intolerant to rituximab. Complement inhibitor therapy might serve to stop the glomerular inflammatory process until the benefits of these medication become effective.
Researchers from the Department of Renal Medicine of Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, together with doctors from the Bergamo Hospital, were the first to document in 2002 that rituximab can recover totally or partially from the disease.
During the last twenty years, the Nephrology Unit of ASST-PG 23 (formerly, Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo) become one of the most important disease specific Centers of excellence in the care of patients with PMN, more than 300 subjects were followed and treated with rituximab or other novel monoclonal antibodies in collaboration with "Centro di Ricerche Cliniche per le Malattie Rare Aldo e Cele Daccò", Ranica (BG) (Istituto Mario Negri IRCCS). The data collected at the routine visits of these patients represent an invaluable and unique source of information to describe the natural history of this rare disease and the evolution of the treatments. For this reason, we aim to create a data bank with the follow-up data of all the patients followed by the physicians of the Nephrology Unit in Bergamo and the Centro Daccò in Ranica who will agree to participate in the study and provide their consent to the use of their data for the research. Long-term data collection from a large patient sample may provide important insights regarding prognostic factors, characteristics of best responders to therapies, and estimation of the duration of unsuccessful treatment after which a patient can be considered a non-responder.
The variables evaluated in this study will complement and extend existing unknowledges on PMN, including provision of important information about the clinical course of the disease in patients receiving new treatments.
- Conditions
- Membranous Nephropathy
- Keywords
- Primary Membranous Nephropathy, Nephrotic Syndrome
- Medical subject headings
- Glomerulonephritis, Membranous, Nephrotic Syndrome
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluation of disease remission
Combined endpoint of complete (proteinuria < 0.3 g/24-hours) or partial (proteinuria <3 g/24-hours with >50% change vs proteinuria at baseline that is the time of the first rituximab or other monoclonal antibody administration) remission
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Evaluation of disease progression
Assessment of disease progression and identification of the relevant disease outcome
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Rate of GFR decline
Rate of measured and estimated (CKD-Epi) GFR decline (or improvement)
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Blood parameter levels
Assessment of blood parameter levels considered as continuous variables
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Incidence of adverse events
Incidence of adverse events, as assessed and recorded in every-day clinical practice
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Incidence of drug related adverse events
Incidence of drug related adverse events, as assessed, and recorded in every-day clinical practice
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Feb 2024
- Study start29 Nov 2024
- Primary completionJun 2029 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2054 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Membranous NephropathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological ResearchThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Giuseppe Remuzzi, MD, Study director, Istituto Di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06242327
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PROMENADE
- Acronym
- PROMENADE
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 25 Jan 2024
- Last updated
- 23 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Schieppati A, Mosconi L, Perna A, Mecca G, Bertani T, Garattini S, Remuzzi G. Prognosis of untreated patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jul 8;329(2):85-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199307083290203.
PubMed 8510707Remuzzi G, Chiurchiu C, Abbate M, Brusegan V, Bontempelli M, Ruggenenti P. Rituximab for idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Lancet. 2002 Sep 21;360(9337):923-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11042-7.
PubMed 12354476Ruggenenti P, Cravedi P, Chianca A, Perna A, Ruggiero B, Gaspari F, Rambaldi A, Marasa M, Remuzzi G. Rituximab in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Aug;23(8):1416-25. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012020181. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
PubMed 22822077Ruggenenti P, Debiec H, Ruggiero B, Chianca A, Pelle T, Gaspari F, Suardi F, Gagliardini E, Orisio S, Benigni A, Ronco P, Remuzzi G. Anti-Phospholipase A2 Receptor Antibody Titer Predicts Post-Rituximab Outcome of Membranous Nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Oct;26(10):2545-58. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014070640. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
PubMed 25804280Ruggenenti P, Fervenza FC, Remuzzi G. Treatment of membranous nephropathy: time for a paradigm shift. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017 Sep;13(9):563-579. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2017.92. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
PubMed 28669992Perna A, Ruggiero B, Podesta MA, Perico L, Orisio S, Debiec H, Remuzzi G, Ruggenenti P. Sexual dimorphic response to rituximab treatment: A longitudinal observational study in a large cohort of patients with primary membranous nephropathy and persistent nephrotic syndrome. Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 2;13:958136. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.958136. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 36120314
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Observational, Longitudinal Study to Describe the Outcome, and Outcome Predictors, of Patients With Primary Membranous Nephropathy, and the Nephrotic Syndrome Treated With Rituximab, or Other Monoclonal Antibodies
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06242327
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PROMENADE / PROMENADE
- Conditions
- Membranous Nephropathy
- Keywords
- Primary Membranous Nephropathy, Nephrotic Syndrome
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological ResearchUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 29 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2054 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is an observational study intended to track the course of the primary membranous nephropathy disease in real-world clinical practice.
The study will primarily assess the long-term outcomes of patients with primary membranous nephropathy in the context of advances in treatment options.
Detailed description
Primary Membranous Nephropathy (PMN) is an autoimmune disease caused by the deposition of Immunoglobulin G and complement components on the subepithelial layer of the glomerular capillary wall. It affects 5-10 patients per million population and is the second cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults after diabetic kidney disease. For decades steroids and non-specific immunosuppressive medications have been advocated as a therapeutic option for patients with membranous nephropathy at increased risk of kidney failure because of persistent nephrotic syndrome. These medications, however, have major and potentially fatal adverse effects that offset their potential benefits and should be abandoned. Patients with PMN and non-nephrotic proteinuria (<3.5 g per 24 h) have a good prognosis with a supportive therapy based on optimized inhibition of the Renin-Angiotensin-System with Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and/or Angiotensin-Receptor-Blockers (ARBs). Without immunosuppression, however, approximately one-third of patients with PMN and nephrotic syndrome (NS) (proteinuria >3.5 g per 24 h and/or hypoalbuminemia) progress to end stage kidney disease (ESKD). Steroids and non-specific immunosuppressive medications may achieve remission of the NS more effectively than placebo and supportive therapy but are associated with serious and potentially fatal complications that may offset the potential benefits of therapy. Thus, the 2012 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines recommended that the use of non- specific immunosuppressive therapy should be restricted to patients with persistent NS because, in this context, the reduced risk of ESKD could offset the risks of serious adverse events. The discovery of nephritogenic autoantibodies against podocyte M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) and thrombospondin type-1 domaincontaining protein 7A (THSD7A) antigens provided a clear pathophysiological rationale for interventions specifically targeting B cell lineages to prevent antibody production and subepithelial deposition. Anti-PLA2R antibody titer correlates with disease activity and patient outcome. Low autoantibody levels at diagnosis predict spontaneous remission, whereas high baseline anti-PLA2R antibody levels correlate with a reduced probability of spontaneous remission, are associated with progression to NS in patients with initial non-nephrotic proteinuria, and predict a high risk of relapse and progressive loss of kidney function. Moreover, decreasing anti-PLA2R antibody levels strongly predicts remission of proteinuria and response to various traditional and novel immunosuppressive treatments. Conceivably, in PLA2R-negative disease, PMN can be sustained by other nephritogenic autoantibodies such as anti-THSD7A antibodies that, similarly to anti-PLA2R antibodies, have been reported to predict disease activity and response to therapy.
Whether progression and response to treatment of patients with PMN can be affected not only by the overall titer of circulating anti-PLA2R autoantibodies, but also by their nature is matter of a lively debate. After almost 40 years of empirical treatment, the discovery of anti-PLA2R and anti-THSD7A autoantibodies provided the first clear pathophysiological rationale for interventions specifically aimed at preventing antibody production or their binding to specific antigens with subepithelial deposition of antibody-antigen immunocomplexes. The first-in-class anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab is safe and achieves remission in approximately two-thirds of patients with nephrotic membranous nephropathy. In PLA2R-related disease, remission is invariably preceded by depletion of anti PLA2R autoantibodies and relapse by their re-emergence into the circulation. Because of its superior risk/benefit profile as compared to non-specific immunosuppressive therapy, rituximab is now first-line therapy for patients with membranous nephropathy at risk of kidney failure. Novel monoclonal antibodies targeting CD20 cells (such as ofatumumab and obinutuzumab) and their differentiation (belimumab) or targeting long-living antibody producing CD38 memory cells (daratumumab, felzartamab) along with proteasome inhibitors such as bortezomib are being evaluated for the treatment of nephrotic patients with membranous nephropathy who are resistant or intolerant to rituximab. Complement inhibitor therapy might serve to stop the glomerular inflammatory process until the benefits of these medication become effective.
Researchers from the Department of Renal Medicine of Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, together with doctors from the Bergamo Hospital, were the first to document in 2002 that rituximab can recover totally or partially from the disease.
During the last twenty years, the Nephrology Unit of ASST-PG 23 (formerly, Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo) become one of the most important disease specific Centers of excellence in the care of patients with PMN, more than 300 subjects were followed and treated with rituximab or other novel monoclonal antibodies in collaboration with "Centro di Ricerche Cliniche per le Malattie Rare Aldo e Cele Daccò", Ranica (BG) (Istituto Mario Negri IRCCS). The data collected at the routine visits of these patients represent an invaluable and unique source of information to describe the natural history of this rare disease and the evolution of the treatments. For this reason, we aim to create a data bank with the follow-up data of all the patients followed by the physicians of the Nephrology Unit in Bergamo and the Centro Daccò in Ranica who will agree to participate in the study and provide their consent to the use of their data for the research. Long-term data collection from a large patient sample may provide important insights regarding prognostic factors, characteristics of best responders to therapies, and estimation of the duration of unsuccessful treatment after which a patient can be considered a non-responder.
The variables evaluated in this study will complement and extend existing unknowledges on PMN, including provision of important information about the clinical course of the disease in patients receiving new treatments.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Other
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study will enrol all patients with a diagnosis of primary membranous nephropathy and the nephrotic syndrome (proteinuria >3.5 g/24-h) treated with rituximab or other monoclonal antibodies (including, among others, ofatumumab, obinutuzumab, felzartamab).
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adults (≥18 years old) on the day of signing informed consent.
- Diagnosis of primary membranous nephropathy
- Nephrotic syndrome (proteinuria >3.5 g/24 hours)
- Written informed consent to the use of recorded data for research purposes.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity.
- Any contraindication to treatment with rituximab or other monoclonal antibody
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Evaluation of disease remission
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Combined endpoint of complete (proteinuria < 0.3 g/24-hours) or partial (proteinuria <3 g/24-hours with >50% change vs proteinuria at baseline that is the time of the first rituximab or other monoclonal antibody administration) remission
5 secondary outcomes
Evaluation of disease progression
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Rate of GFR decline
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Blood parameter levels
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Incidence of adverse events
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Incidence of drug related adverse events
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Mar 2026.
- Background: PubMed 8510707Schieppati A, Mosconi L, Perna A, Mecca G, Bertani T, Garattini S, Remuzzi G. Prognosis of untreated patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jul 8;329(2):85-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199307083290203.
- Background: PubMed 12354476Remuzzi G, Chiurchiu C, Abbate M, Brusegan V, Bontempelli M, Ruggenenti P. Rituximab for idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Lancet. 2002 Sep 21;360(9337):923-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11042-7.
- Background: PubMed 22822077Ruggenenti P, Cravedi P, Chianca A, Perna A, Ruggiero B, Gaspari F, Rambaldi A, Marasa M, Remuzzi G. Rituximab in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Aug;23(8):1416-25. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012020181. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
- Background: PubMed 25804280Ruggenenti P, Debiec H, Ruggiero B, Chianca A, Pelle T, Gaspari F, Suardi F, Gagliardini E, Orisio S, Benigni A, Ronco P, Remuzzi G. Anti-Phospholipase A2 Receptor Antibody Titer Predicts Post-Rituximab Outcome of Membranous Nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Oct;26(10):2545-58. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014070640. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
- Background: PubMed 28669992Ruggenenti P, Fervenza FC, Remuzzi G. Treatment of membranous nephropathy: time for a paradigm shift. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017 Sep;13(9):563-579. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2017.92. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
- Background: PubMed 36120314Perna A, Ruggiero B, Podesta MA, Perico L, Orisio S, Debiec H, Remuzzi G, Ruggenenti P. Sexual dimorphic response to rituximab treatment: A longitudinal observational study in a large cohort of patients with primary membranous nephropathy and persistent nephrotic syndrome. Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 2;13:958136. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.958136. eCollection 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Membranous Nephropathy
Not yet recruiting
MYTP01 for Immune-Mediated Diseases
IgA Nephropathy, Kidney Transplant Recipients
RecruitingPhase 2
An Open-Label Phase 2 Study of N-Acetyl-D-Mannosamine (ManNAc) in Subjects With Podocyte Diseases
Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis, Minimal Change Disease
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Evaluation of Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Povetacicept in Participants With Primary Membranous Nephropathy (pMN)
Primary Membranous Nephropathy
RecruitingPhase 2
Rituximab Plus Cyclosporine in Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy
Nephrotic Syndrome, Proteinuria
Not yet recruitingObservational study
MENA/Levant Epidemiological, Registry of Immunological & Clinical Traits (MERIT)
Antiphospholipid (aPL)-Positive, Rheumatic Arthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Piero L Ruggenenti, MD contact
Giuseppe Remuzzi, MD study director
Istituto Di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Membranous Nephropathy, run by Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research at 2 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Matias Trillini, MD (+3903545351, matias.trillini@marionegri.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluation of disease remission (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06242327, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2026.