Chronic PainNCT06241820
The Success of Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglion Block Using Lower Extremity Perfusion Index
A study testing Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglion Block in people with Chronic Pain and Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, run by Jeongsoo Kim at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
The patient, who is experiencing chronic pain in the lower extremities persisting for more than three months, is scheduled to undergo lumbar sympathetic ganglion block. To evaluate the technical success of the sympathetic blockade, temperature and perfusion index (PI) will be measured at one-minute intervals over a… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Pain, Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, Peripheral Neuropathy
- What is being tested?
- Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglion Block
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 13 Feb 2024to 30 May 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Lower extremity pain
- Pain for more than 3 months
- 19 - 85 years
Who cannot join
- If the patient refuses to undergo the procedure
- In the presence of vascular disorders in the lower extremities
- If the patient has previously undergone lumbar sympathetic ganglion removal or neurolysis
- When there are abnormalities in blood coagulation tests
- If there is a systemic infection or infection at the injection site
- In the presence of anatomical deformities at the injection site
- If the patient has allergies to the injected medication
- In other cases where the researcher deems the patient unsuitable for participation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Success of Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglion Block Using Lower Extremity Perfusion Index: A Prospective Observational Study
The patient, who is experiencing chronic pain in the lower extremities persisting for more than three months, is scheduled to undergo lumbar sympathetic ganglion block. To evaluate the technical success of the sympathetic blockade, temperature and perfusion index (PI) will be measured at one-minute intervals over a 20-minute period before and after the procedure on the treated side and the opposite side foot. Additionally, other variables related to the procedure will be assessed before the procedure, after the procedure, before discharge, and during follow-up outpatient visits or phone surveys at 1 week and 1 month after the procedure.
Read the detailed description
Patients aged 19 to 85 experiencing lower limb pain and scheduled to undergo lumbar sympathetic ganglion block at the Seoul National University Hospital Pain Center will be directly informed about the study, and their participation will be sought and registered. Continuous monitoring of electrocardiography, blood pressure, and pulse oximetry will be conducted before and after the procedure.
Upon admission to the pain center's operating room, the patient will assume a prone position. Thermometers will be attached to the soles of both feet, and perfusion index probes will be attached to the second toe on both sides. Using fluoroscopy guidance, a needle will be inserted at the painful side, either right or left, at the L3. After confirming the needle's position in front of the desired vertebral body using contrast medium in lateral and anteroposterior (AP) views, 7 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine will be injected. Baseline temperature and PI values will be recorded before drug administration, followed by recording every minute for 20 minutes after injection.
Other variables related to the procedure will be assessed before and after the procedure, before discharge, and through outpatient visits or phone surveys at one week after the procedure.
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain, Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, Peripheral Neuropathy, Post Herpetic Neuralgia
- Being tested
- Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglion Block
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Pain, Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, Peripheral Nervous System Diseases, Neuralgia, Postherpetic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglion BlockProcedure or surgery
A needle will be inserted at the L3 on the side experiencing pain, either right or left, under fluoroscopy guidance. Once the needle is positioned in front of the desired vertebral body, its location is confirmed using a contrast medium. If the position is well visualized in lateral and anteroposterior (AP) views, 7 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine will be injected.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglion Block (LSGB) | Other | FS-guided LSGB at L3 level. Receives: Procedure: Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglion Block |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Difference of perfusion index (%)
Difference of perfusion index (%) between ipsilateral foot and contralateral foot
Measured: before and 1 - 20 minutes after FS-guided lumbar sympathetic ganglion block
Secondary outcomes (6)
Difference of temperature change (°C)
Difference of temperature change (°C) between ipsilateral foot and contralateral foot
Measured: before and 1 - 20 minutes after FS-guided lumbar sympathetic ganglion block
Severity of pain
11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10)
Measured: Time before block and 20 minutes, 1 week, 4 weeks after FS-guided lumbar sympathetic ganglion block ( The higher the score, the more severe the pain)
Proportion of patients reaching ≥ 1.5°C rise
Proportion of patients reaching ≥ 1.5°C rise of temperature in the ipsilateral foot compared to the contralateral foot
Measured: 20 minutes after FS-guided lumbar sympathetic ganglion block
Proportion of patients reaching ≥ 2.0°C rise
Proportion of patients reaching ≥ 2.0°C rise of temperature in the ipsilateral foot compared to initial temperature in the ipsilateral foot
Measured: 20 minutes after FS-guided lumbar sympathetic ganglion block
Proportion of patients reaching ≥ 100% rise of perfusion index (%)
Proportion of patients reaching ≥ 100% rise of perfusion index (%) in the ipsilateral foot compared to the initial perfusion index (%) in the ipsilateral foot
Measured: 1 - 20 minutes after FS-guided lumbar sympathetic ganglion block
Patient satisfaction
Patient Global Impression of Change (1-5)
Measured: Time 20 minutes, 1 week, 4 weeks after FS-guided lumbar sympathetic ganglion block (The higher the score, the higher the satisfaction)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Feb 2024
- Study start13 Feb 2024
- Primary completion30 Apr 2024
- Study completion30 May 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Jeongsoo Kim
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Jeongsoo Kim, Seoul National University Hospital
- Investigators
- Jeongsoo Kim, MD, Principal investigator, Seoul National University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06241820
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2308-014-1455
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 28 Jan 2024
- Last updated
- 11 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Day M. Sympathetic blocks: the evidence. Pain Pract. 2008 Mar-Apr;8(2):98-109. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00177.x.
PubMed 18366465Joo EY, Kong YG, Lee J, Cho HS, Kim SH, Suh JH. Change in pulse transit time in the lower extremity after lumbar sympathetic ganglion block: an early indicator of successful block. J Int Med Res. 2017 Feb;45(1):203-210. doi: 10.1177/0300060516681398. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
PubMed 28222636Stevens RA, Stotz A, Kao TC, Powar M, Burgess S, Kleinman B. The relative increase in skin temperature after stellate ganglion block is predictive of a complete sympathectomy of the hand. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998 May-Jun;23(3):266-70. doi: 10.1016/s1098-7339(98)90053-0.
PubMed 9613538Kim ED, Yoo WJ, Lee YJ, Park HJ. Perfusion index as a tool to evaluate the efficacy of stellate ganglion block for complex regional pain syndrome. Clin Auton Res. 2019 Apr;29(2):257-259. doi: 10.1007/s10286-018-00585-6. Epub 2019 Jan 1. No abstract available.
PubMed 30600407Lee JY, Kim ED, Kim YN, Kim JS, Sim WS, Lee HJ, Park HJ, Park HJ. Correlation of Perfusion Index Change and Analgesic Efficacy in Transforaminal Block for Lumbosacral Radicular Pain. J Clin Med. 2019 Jan 7;8(1):51. doi: 10.3390/jcm8010051.
PubMed 30621004Abdelnasser A, Abdelhamid B, Elsonbaty A, Hasanin A, Rady A. Predicting successful supraclavicular brachial plexus block using pulse oximeter perfusion index. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Aug 1;119(2):276-280. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex166.
PubMed 28854539Yamazaki H, Nishiyama J, Suzuki T. Use of perfusion index from pulse oximetry to determine efficacy of stellate ganglion block. Local Reg Anesth. 2012;5:9-14. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S30257. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
PubMed 22915896Ginosar Y, Weiniger CF, Meroz Y, Kurz V, Bdolah-Abram T, Babchenko A, Nitzan M, Davidson EM. Pulse oximeter perfusion index as an early indicator of sympathectomy after epidural anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Sep;53(8):1018-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.01968.x. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
PubMed 19397502Huang B, Sun K, Zhu Z, Zhou C, Wu Y, Zhang F, Yan M. Oximetry-derived perfusion index as an early indicator of CT-guided thoracic sympathetic blockade in palmar hyperhidrosis. Clin Radiol. 2013 Dec;68(12):1227-32. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
PubMed 23969155Cheng J, Salmasi V, You J, Grille M, Yang D, Mascha EJ, Cheng OT, Zhao F, Rosenquist RW. Outcomes of Sympathetic Blocks in the Management of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Anesthesiology. 2019 Oct;131(4):883-893. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002899.
PubMed 31365367Samen CDK, Sutton OM, Rice AE, Zaidi MA, Siddarthan IJ, Crimmel SD, Cohen SP. Correlation Between Temperature Rise After Sympathetic Block and Pain Relief in Patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Pain Med. 2022 Sep 30;23(10):1679-1689. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnac035.
PubMed 35234922Kim J, Yun M, Han AH, Pauzi MF, Jeong JH, Yoo Y, Moon JY. Thoracic sympathetic ganglion blocks: real-world outcomes in 207 chronic pain patients. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Jul 8;49(7):528-535. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104624.
PubMed 37726196
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Success of Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglion Block Using Lower Extremity Perfusion Index: A Prospective Observational Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06241820
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2308-014-1455
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain, Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, Peripheral Neuropathy, Post Herpetic Neuralgia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Jeongsoo KimUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 May 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The patient, who is experiencing chronic pain in the lower extremities persisting for more than three months, is scheduled to undergo lumbar sympathetic ganglion block. To evaluate the technical success of the sympathetic blockade, temperature and perfusion index (PI) will be measured at one-minute intervals over a 20-minute period before and after the procedure on the treated side and the opposite side foot. Additionally, other variables related to the procedure will be assessed before the procedure, after the procedure, before discharge, and during follow-up outpatient visits or phone surveys at 1 week and 1 month after the procedure.
Detailed description
Patients aged 19 to 85 experiencing lower limb pain and scheduled to undergo lumbar sympathetic ganglion block at the Seoul National University Hospital Pain Center will be directly informed about the study, and their participation will be sought and registered. Continuous monitoring of electrocardiography, blood pressure, and pulse oximetry will be conducted before and after the procedure.
Upon admission to the pain center's operating room, the patient will assume a prone position. Thermometers will be attached to the soles of both feet, and perfusion index probes will be attached to the second toe on both sides. Using fluoroscopy guidance, a needle will be inserted at the painful side, either right or left, at the L3. After confirming the needle's position in front of the desired vertebral body using contrast medium in lateral and anteroposterior (AP) views, 7 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine will be injected. Baseline temperature and PI values will be recorded before drug administration, followed by recording every minute for 20 minutes after injection.
Other variables related to the procedure will be assessed before and after the procedure, before discharge, and through outpatient visits or phone surveys at one week after the procedure.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglion Block (LSGB) | Other | Procedure: Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglion BlockFS-guided LSGB at L3 level. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Lower extremity pain
- Pain for more than 3 months
- 19 - 85 years
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- If the patient refuses to undergo the procedure
- In the presence of vascular disorders in the lower extremities
- If the patient has previously undergone lumbar sympathetic ganglion removal or neurolysis
- When there are abnormalities in blood coagulation tests
- If there is a systemic infection or infection at the injection site
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglion BlockA needle will be inserted at the L3 on the side experiencing pain, either right or left, under fluoroscopy guidance. Once the needle is positioned in front of the desired vertebral body, its location is confirmed using a contrast medium. If the position is well visualized in lateral and anteroposterior (AP) views, 7 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine will be injected. | Procedure or surgery | Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglion Block (LSGB) |
Primary outcome
Difference of perfusion index (%)
Time frame: before and 1 - 20 minutes after FS-guided lumbar sympathetic ganglion block
Difference of perfusion index (%) between ipsilateral foot and contralateral foot
6 secondary outcomes
Difference of temperature change (°C)
Time frame: before and 1 - 20 minutes after FS-guided lumbar sympathetic ganglion block
Severity of pain
Time frame: Time before block and 20 minutes, 1 week, 4 weeks after FS-guided lumbar sympathetic ganglion block ( The higher the score, the more severe the pain)
Proportion of patients reaching ≥ 1.5°C rise
Time frame: 20 minutes after FS-guided lumbar sympathetic ganglion block
Proportion of patients reaching ≥ 2.0°C rise
Time frame: 20 minutes after FS-guided lumbar sympathetic ganglion block
Proportion of patients reaching ≥ 100% rise of perfusion index (%)
Time frame: 1 - 20 minutes after FS-guided lumbar sympathetic ganglion block
Patient satisfaction
Time frame: Time 20 minutes, 1 week, 4 weeks after FS-guided lumbar sympathetic ganglion block (The higher the score, the higher the satisfaction)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Jul 2024.
- Background: PubMed 18366465Day M. Sympathetic blocks: the evidence. Pain Pract. 2008 Mar-Apr;8(2):98-109. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00177.x.
- Background: PubMed 28222636Joo EY, Kong YG, Lee J, Cho HS, Kim SH, Suh JH. Change in pulse transit time in the lower extremity after lumbar sympathetic ganglion block: an early indicator of successful block. J Int Med Res. 2017 Feb;45(1):203-210. doi: 10.1177/0300060516681398. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
- Background: PubMed 9613538Stevens RA, Stotz A, Kao TC, Powar M, Burgess S, Kleinman B. The relative increase in skin temperature after stellate ganglion block is predictive of a complete sympathectomy of the hand. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998 May-Jun;23(3):266-70. doi: 10.1016/s1098-7339(98)90053-0.
- Background: PubMed 30600407Kim ED, Yoo WJ, Lee YJ, Park HJ. Perfusion index as a tool to evaluate the efficacy of stellate ganglion block for complex regional pain syndrome. Clin Auton Res. 2019 Apr;29(2):257-259. doi: 10.1007/s10286-018-00585-6. Epub 2019 Jan 1. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 30621004Lee JY, Kim ED, Kim YN, Kim JS, Sim WS, Lee HJ, Park HJ, Park HJ. Correlation of Perfusion Index Change and Analgesic Efficacy in Transforaminal Block for Lumbosacral Radicular Pain. J Clin Med. 2019 Jan 7;8(1):51. doi: 10.3390/jcm8010051.
- Background: PubMed 28854539Abdelnasser A, Abdelhamid B, Elsonbaty A, Hasanin A, Rady A. Predicting successful supraclavicular brachial plexus block using pulse oximeter perfusion index. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Aug 1;119(2):276-280. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex166.
- Background: PubMed 22915896Yamazaki H, Nishiyama J, Suzuki T. Use of perfusion index from pulse oximetry to determine efficacy of stellate ganglion block. Local Reg Anesth. 2012;5:9-14. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S30257. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
- Background: PubMed 19397502Ginosar Y, Weiniger CF, Meroz Y, Kurz V, Bdolah-Abram T, Babchenko A, Nitzan M, Davidson EM. Pulse oximeter perfusion index as an early indicator of sympathectomy after epidural anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Sep;53(8):1018-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.01968.x. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
- Background: PubMed 23969155Huang B, Sun K, Zhu Z, Zhou C, Wu Y, Zhang F, Yan M. Oximetry-derived perfusion index as an early indicator of CT-guided thoracic sympathetic blockade in palmar hyperhidrosis. Clin Radiol. 2013 Dec;68(12):1227-32. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
- Background: PubMed 31365367Cheng J, Salmasi V, You J, Grille M, Yang D, Mascha EJ, Cheng OT, Zhao F, Rosenquist RW. Outcomes of Sympathetic Blocks in the Management of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Anesthesiology. 2019 Oct;131(4):883-893. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002899.
- Background: PubMed 35234922Samen CDK, Sutton OM, Rice AE, Zaidi MA, Siddarthan IJ, Crimmel SD, Cohen SP. Correlation Between Temperature Rise After Sympathetic Block and Pain Relief in Patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Pain Med. 2022 Sep 30;23(10):1679-1689. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnac035.
- Background: PubMed 37726196Kim J, Yun M, Han AH, Pauzi MF, Jeong JH, Yoo Y, Moon JY. Thoracic sympathetic ganglion blocks: real-world outcomes in 207 chronic pain patients. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Jul 8;49(7):528-535. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104624.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Pain
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Pectoral Nerve Block (PECS) Using Magnesium Sulfate Added to Dexamethasone on Quality of Recovery and Chronic Post-Mastectomy Pain
Breast Cancer, Postoperative Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jeongsoo Kim, MD principal investigator
Seoul National University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglion Block in people with Chronic Pain and Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, run by Jeongsoo Kim at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Difference of perfusion index (%) (time frame: before and 1 - 20 minutes after FS-guided lumbar sympathetic ganglion block). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06241820, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jul 2024.