Irreversible PulpitisNCT06240130
Outcome Following Use of NaOCl and Chlorhexidine as Wound Lavage Agents
A study testing Partial pulpotomy in people with Irreversible Pulpitis, run by Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak at 1 site in India.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to to compare effect of wound lavage agents NaOCl and Chlorhexidine on the outcome of partial pulpotomy in mature permanent posterior teeth with signs and symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis in. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Irreversible Pulpitis
- What is being tested?
- Partial pulpotomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 142 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndia
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2022to 1 May 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Mature permanent mandibular posterior teeth with extreme deep caries and clinical diagnosis of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis
- Patients having normal periapical status with periapical index (PAI) score ≤ 2 and periodontally healthy teeth
- Patients having physical status of class 1 or 2 according to ASA classification
- Pulpal bleeding can be controlled within 10 minutes
Who cannot join
- Necrotic pulp upon exposure
- Presence of sinus tract or soft tissue swelling Pregnant patients Radiographic signs of internal or external root resorption
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Outcome Following Use of NaOCl and Chlorhexidine as Wound Lavage Agents During Partial Pulpotomy in Mature Permanent Teeth With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to to compare effect of wound lavage agents NaOCl and Chlorhexidine on the outcome of partial pulpotomy in mature permanent posterior teeth with signs and symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis in.
The main question it aims to answer are:
Does wound lavage using chlorhexidine have equal effect as NaOCl on the outcome of partial pulpotomy in mature permanent mandibular posterior teeth with clinical signs of irreversible pulpitis?
Participants will of age group 18 to 45 years will be included and divided into two groups:
Pulp wound lavage in partial pulpotomy using 3% NaOCl as control and using 2% Chlorhexidine as experiment
Read the detailed description
Title- Outcome following use of NaOCl and chlorhexidine as wound lavage agents during partial pulpotomy in mature permanent teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: A randomized clinical trial Research Question Does wound lavage using chlorhexidine have equal effect as NaOCl on the outcome of partial pulpotomy in mature permanent mandibular posterior teeth with clinical signs of irreversible pulpitis? PICO
- P (Population) - Mature permanent posterior teeth with clinical signs of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis
- I (Intervention) - 2% Chlorhexidine lavage during Partial pulpotomy
- C (Comparison) - 3% Sodium hypochlorite lavage during Partial pulpotomy
- O (Outcome) -Assessment of clinical and radiographic success at 12 months follow up To evaluate reduction in post operative pain experience at every 24 hours till 1 week
- T (time frame)- 18 months Aim-The aim of the study is to compare effect of wound lavage agents NaOCl and Chlorhexidine on the outcome of partial pulpotomy in mature permanent posterior teeth with signs and symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis.
Objective- Primary objective- To evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of partial pulpotomy using NaOCl or chlorhexidine as wound lavage agents in mature permanent posterior teeth with clinical signs and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis.
Secondary objective- To assess postoperative pain after partial pulpotomy using NaOCl or chlorhexidine wound lavage.
Setting: Dept. Of Conservative Dentistry \& Endodontics, PGIDS, Rohtak. FINER F (feasible)= Adequate number of subjects for sample size and technical expertise are available to conduct the study I (Interesting)= The study aims to compare the effect of lavage agents (NaOCl and Chlorhexidine) on the outcome of partial pulpotomy in patients diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis N(Novel)= No clinical trial study has compared the effect of wound lavage agents on the outcome of partial pulpotomy in mature permanent mandibular posterior teeth E(Ethical)= Ethical issues have been taken care of during the planning of the study. Subjects will be provided with information sheet and consent form. Once the study is approved by the ethical committee of the institution, it will be conducted and followed up R (Relevant)= This study will help formulate evidence-based guidelines for use of different lavage agents during partial pulpotomy in mature permanent mandibular posterior teeth.
S= Specific- yes M= Measurable- yes A= Achievable- yes R= Relevant- yes T= Time frame- 18 months
Study subjects:
Subjects of age group 18 to 45 years will be included and divided into two groups:
Pulp wound lavage in partial pulpotomy using 3% NaOCl as control and using 2% Chlorhexidine as experiment Inclusion Criteria 1) Mature permanent mandibular posterior teeth with extreme deep caries and clinical diagnosis of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis 2) Patients having normal periapical status with periapical index (PAI) score ≤ 2 and periodontally healthy teeth 3) Patients having physical status of class 1 or 2 according to ASA classification 4) Pulpal bleeding can be controlled within 10 minutes Exclusion Criteria
- Necrotic pulp upon exposure
- Presence of sinus tract or soft tissue swelling
- Pregnant patients
- Radiographic signs of internal or external root resorption Sample Size The current study is planned as an equivalent study and sample size calculated using website software www.sealedenvelope.com, which revealed that a minimum of 39 participants will be required in each group. Considering 20% loss to follow up, 49 patients will be included per group.
Randomisation Study subjects will be stratified according to age and will be randomly allocated in equal proportion to either 3% NaOCl lavage or 2% Chlorhexidine lavage group using concealed envelopes to know whether the subject would receive NaOCl rinse or Chlorhexidine rinse.
PROCEDURE After pulp exposure, amputation of superficial pulpal tissue to a depth of 2-3 mm will be done using a sterile round bur in the high-speed handpiece.
The pulp wound will be irrigated
with 3% NaOCl in with 2% Chlorhexidine in control group experimental group
Haemostasis will be achieved by placing the cotton pellet soaked with 3% NaOCl and 2% chlorhexidine in respective groups
In both groups, MTA will be and will be placed to a thickness of 2-3 mm and a layer of RMGI liner will be placed over the MTA. Then the tooth will be permanently restored with composite resin followed by immediate post operative radiograph
FOLLOW UP Patient will be recalled after 1 week, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year for clinical evaluation. Radiographic evaluation will be done after 6 months and 1 year using the same digital imaging system with standard exposure parameters as used during immediate postoperative radiograph.
Outcome Measures Primary outcome- Clinical and radiographic success rate Secondary outcome- postoperative pain experience Pain Assessment Visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 100 will be used to record preoperative and post -operative pain.
Clinical Success Criteria
- Absence of signs and symptoms of spontaneous pain or pain on stimulus and discomfort, soft tissue swelling, sinus or fistula
- No tenderness to palpation or percussion and no periodontal probing depth
- Positive response on EPT and cold testing Radiographic Success Criteria
- Periapical Index (PAI) score ≤ 2 according to Orstavick 2) Absence of internal or external root resorption Statistical analysis Statistical analysis will be done using suitable statistical method
- Conditions
- Irreversible Pulpitis
- Being tested
- Partial pulpotomy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Partial pulpotomyProcedure or surgery
after caries removal and pulp exposure pulp tissue is amputated and wound lavage done with 3% NaOCl in partial pulpotomy
Partial pulpotomyProcedure or surgery
after caries removal and pulp exposure pulp tissue is amputated and wound lavage done with 2% Chlorhexidine in partial pulpotomy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sodium hypochlorite lavage group | Active comparator | 3% sodium hypochlorite lavage will be done after pulp amputation Receives: Procedure: Partial pulpotomy |
| Chlorhexidine lavage group | Experimental | 2% Chlorhexidine lavage will be done after pulp amputation Receives: Procedure: Partial pulpotomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical Success and Radiographic Success
CLINICAL SUCCESS CRITERIA:
Absence of spontaneous pain, discomfort, swelling, sinus tract or tenderness to palpation or percussion.
RADIOGRAPHIC SUCCESS CRITERIA:
No pathosis evident on the radiograph such as root resorption, furcal pathosis or new periapical pathosis.
Periapical Index score 1 or 2 according to Orstavic et al.
Evaluation of both clinical and radiographic outcome is must for analyzing the actual success of therapeutic technique. Number of participants fulfilling both clinical as well as radiographic success criteria will be considered in success category.
Measured: Base line to 12 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Post operative pain
To assess incidence and intensity of pain postoperatively at every 24 hours till 7 days using Visual analogue Scale of 0 to 100 millimeter line. Score 0 means no pain and Score 100 means maximum pain To assess incidence and intensity of pain postoperatively at every 24 hours till 7 days using Visual analogue Scale of 0 to 100 millimeter line. Score 0 means no pain and Score 100 means maximum pain
Measured: Base line to 7 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Feb 2024
- Study start1 Jul 2022
- Primary completion1 Mar 2023
- Study completion1 May 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Irreversible PulpitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences RohtakThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 142 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- DR. Sanjay Tewari, MDS, Study director, PGIDS,Rohtak, Haryana, 124001
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06240130
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Soumyashree Mishra
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 13 Jan 2024
- Last updated
- 16 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Mishra S, Sangwan P, Duhan J, Arora M, Mittal S, Kumar V, Ramani A. Outcome of Partial Pulpotomy in Mature Permanent Molars After Lavage With Chlorhexidine or Sodium Hypochlorite: A Randomised Clinical Trial. Int Endod J. 2026 Jan;59(1):80-90. doi: 10.1111/iej.70043. Epub 2025 Sep 30.
PubMed 41026352
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Outcome Following Use of NaOCl and Chlorhexidine as Wound Lavage Agents During Partial Pulpotomy in Mature Permanent Teeth With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06240130
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Soumyashree Mishra
- Conditions
- Irreversible Pulpitis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 142 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences RohtakUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to to compare effect of wound lavage agents NaOCl and Chlorhexidine on the outcome of partial pulpotomy in mature permanent posterior teeth with signs and symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis in.
The main question it aims to answer are:
Does wound lavage using chlorhexidine have equal effect as NaOCl on the outcome of partial pulpotomy in mature permanent mandibular posterior teeth with clinical signs of irreversible pulpitis?
Participants will of age group 18 to 45 years will be included and divided into two groups:
Pulp wound lavage in partial pulpotomy using 3% NaOCl as control and using 2% Chlorhexidine as experiment
Detailed description
Title- Outcome following use of NaOCl and chlorhexidine as wound lavage agents during partial pulpotomy in mature permanent teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: A randomized clinical trial Research Question Does wound lavage using chlorhexidine have equal effect as NaOCl on the outcome of partial pulpotomy in mature permanent mandibular posterior teeth with clinical signs of irreversible pulpitis? PICO
- P (Population) - Mature permanent posterior teeth with clinical signs of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis
- I (Intervention) - 2% Chlorhexidine lavage during Partial pulpotomy
- C (Comparison) - 3% Sodium hypochlorite lavage during Partial pulpotomy
- O (Outcome) -Assessment of clinical and radiographic success at 12 months follow up To evaluate reduction in post operative pain experience at every 24 hours till 1 week
- T (time frame)- 18 months Aim-The aim of the study is to compare effect of wound lavage agents NaOCl and Chlorhexidine on the outcome of partial pulpotomy in mature permanent posterior teeth with signs and symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis.
Objective- Primary objective- To evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of partial pulpotomy using NaOCl or chlorhexidine as wound lavage agents in mature permanent posterior teeth with clinical signs and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis.
Secondary objective- To assess postoperative pain after partial pulpotomy using NaOCl or chlorhexidine wound lavage.
Setting: Dept. Of Conservative Dentistry \& Endodontics, PGIDS, Rohtak. FINER F (feasible)= Adequate number of subjects for sample size and technical expertise are available to conduct the study I (Interesting)= The study aims to compare the effect of lavage agents (NaOCl and Chlorhexidine) on the outcome of partial pulpotomy in patients diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis N(Novel)= No clinical trial study has compared the effect of wound lavage agents on the outcome of partial pulpotomy in mature permanent mandibular posterior teeth E(Ethical)= Ethical issues have been taken care of during the planning of the study. Subjects will be provided with information sheet and consent form. Once the study is approved by the ethical committee of the institution, it will be conducted and followed up R (Relevant)= This study will help formulate evidence-based guidelines for use of different lavage agents during partial pulpotomy in mature permanent mandibular posterior teeth.
S= Specific- yes M= Measurable- yes A= Achievable- yes R= Relevant- yes T= Time frame- 18 months
Study subjects:
Subjects of age group 18 to 45 years will be included and divided into two groups:
Pulp wound lavage in partial pulpotomy using 3% NaOCl as control and using 2% Chlorhexidine as experiment Inclusion Criteria 1) Mature permanent mandibular posterior teeth with extreme deep caries and clinical diagnosis of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis 2) Patients having normal periapical status with periapical index (PAI) score ≤ 2 and periodontally healthy teeth 3) Patients having physical status of class 1 or 2 according to ASA classification 4) Pulpal bleeding can be controlled within 10 minutes Exclusion Criteria
- Necrotic pulp upon exposure
- Presence of sinus tract or soft tissue swelling
- Pregnant patients
- Radiographic signs of internal or external root resorption Sample Size The current study is planned as an equivalent study and sample size calculated using website software www.sealedenvelope.com, which revealed that a minimum of 39 participants will be required in each group. Considering 20% loss to follow up, 49 patients will be included per group.
Randomisation Study subjects will be stratified according to age and will be randomly allocated in equal proportion to either 3% NaOCl lavage or 2% Chlorhexidine lavage group using concealed envelopes to know whether the subject would receive NaOCl rinse or Chlorhexidine rinse.
PROCEDURE After pulp exposure, amputation of superficial pulpal tissue to a depth of 2-3 mm will be done using a sterile round bur in the high-speed handpiece.
The pulp wound will be irrigated
with 3% NaOCl in with 2% Chlorhexidine in control group experimental group
Haemostasis will be achieved by placing the cotton pellet soaked with 3% NaOCl and 2% chlorhexidine in respective groups
In both groups, MTA will be and will be placed to a thickness of 2-3 mm and a layer of RMGI liner will be placed over the MTA. Then the tooth will be permanently restored with composite resin followed by immediate post operative radiograph
FOLLOW UP Patient will be recalled after 1 week, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year for clinical evaluation. Radiographic evaluation will be done after 6 months and 1 year using the same digital imaging system with standard exposure parameters as used during immediate postoperative radiograph.
Outcome Measures Primary outcome- Clinical and radiographic success rate Secondary outcome- postoperative pain experience Pain Assessment Visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 100 will be used to record preoperative and post -operative pain.
Clinical Success Criteria
- Absence of signs and symptoms of spontaneous pain or pain on stimulus and discomfort, soft tissue swelling, sinus or fistula
- No tenderness to palpation or percussion and no periodontal probing depth
- Positive response on EPT and cold testing Radiographic Success Criteria
- Periapical Index (PAI) score ≤ 2 according to Orstavick 2) Absence of internal or external root resorption Statistical analysis Statistical analysis will be done using suitable statistical method
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sodium hypochlorite lavage group | Active comparator | Procedure: Partial pulpotomy3% sodium hypochlorite lavage will be done after pulp amputation |
| Chlorhexidine lavage group | Experimental | Procedure: Partial pulpotomy2% Chlorhexidine lavage will be done after pulp amputation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Mature permanent mandibular posterior teeth with extreme deep caries and clinical diagnosis of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis
- Patients having normal periapical status with periapical index (PAI) score ≤ 2 and periodontally healthy teeth
- Patients having physical status of class 1 or 2 according to ASA classification
- Pulpal bleeding can be controlled within 10 minutes
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Necrotic pulp upon exposure
- Presence of sinus tract or soft tissue swelling Pregnant patients Radiographic signs of internal or external root resorption
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Partial pulpotomyafter caries removal and pulp exposure pulp tissue is amputated and wound lavage done with 3% NaOCl in partial pulpotomy | Procedure or surgery | Sodium hypochlorite lavage group |
| Partial pulpotomyafter caries removal and pulp exposure pulp tissue is amputated and wound lavage done with 2% Chlorhexidine in partial pulpotomy | Procedure or surgery | Chlorhexidine lavage group |
Primary outcome
Clinical Success and Radiographic Success
Time frame: Base line to 12 months
CLINICAL SUCCESS CRITERIA: Absence of spontaneous pain, discomfort, swelling, sinus tract or tenderness to palpation or percussion. RADIOGRAPHIC SUCCESS CRITERIA: No pathosis evident on the radiograph such as root resorption, furcal pathosis or new periapical pathosis. Periapical Index score 1 or 2 according to Orstavic et al. Evaluation of both clinical and radiographic outcome is must for analyzing the actual success of therapeutic technique. Number of participants fulfilling both clinical as well as radiographic success criteria will be considered in success category.
1 secondary outcome
Post operative pain
Time frame: Base line to 7 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Aug 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41026352Mishra S, Sangwan P, Duhan J, Arora M, Mittal S, Kumar V, Ramani A. Outcome of Partial Pulpotomy in Mature Permanent Molars After Lavage With Chlorhexidine or Sodium Hypochlorite: A Randomised Clinical Trial. Int Endod J. 2026 Jan;59(1):80-90. doi: 10.1111/iej.70043. Epub 2025 Sep 30.
Related trials for Irreversible Pulpitis
Recruiting
Effect of Cryotherapeutic and Nanotherapeutic Sodium Hypochlorite on Post-Operative Endodontic Pain.
Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis, Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis
Not yet recruiting
Post-operative Pain and Clinical Outcome After Single-cone Obturation With a Calcium Silicate-based Versus Epoxy Resin Sealer
Post Operative Pain, Acute, Irreversible Pulpitis (Toothache)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Submucosal Cryotherapy and Anti-inflammatory Drugs for Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Treatment in Maxillary Molars
Pulpitis
Recruiting
Intraligamentary vs Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis (SIP), Dental Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Cost-Effectiveness of Upfront Supplemental Anaesthesia in Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis
Irreversible Pulpitis, Anesthesia, Local
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
DR. Sanjay Tewari, MDS study director
PGIDS,Rohtak, Haryana, 124001
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Partial pulpotomy in people with Irreversible Pulpitis, run by Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak at 1 site in India.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical Success and Radiographic Success (time frame: Base line to 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06240130, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Aug 2024.