AzTrials
AzTrials

Airway RemodelingNCT06236971

Effect of Lateral Positions on the Shape of Upper Airway

An observational study of Airway Remodeling and Radiography in Otolaryngology, run by First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The severity and frequency of respiratory events is increased in the supine body posture compared with the lateral position in emergency, difficult airway patients. The mechanism responsible is not clear but may relate to the effect of position on upper airway shape and size. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
MRI scanning first at supine position and then turn into lateral position
How many people
31 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
5 Feb 2024to 29 Mar 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Healthy subjects aged over 18 years old, ASA 1~II without serious cardiopulmonary disease, scheduled for magnetic resonance imaging scan in the supine position and followed lateral position at a tertiary hospital from January 2024 to February 2024 were enrolled in this study.

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects aged over than 18 years and less than 100 years
  • The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was grade I to II
  • There was no serious cardiopulmonary disease

Who cannot join

  • Unable to maintain oxygenation before or during the examination and requiring intervention
  • Those with preoperative arrhythmia requiring intervention
  • Thosewith severe hematological diseases, severe metabolic diseases, severe liver and kidney organ insufficiency
  • Those do not consent to participate in the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Effect of Lateral Positions on the Shape of Upper Airway Under Sedation

The severity and frequency of respiratory events is increased in the supine body posture compared with the lateral position in emergency, difficult airway patients. The mechanism responsible is not clear but may relate to the effect of position on upper airway shape and size. 3D finite element model of upper airway filling based on MRI image reconstruction can effectively reflect the anatomy of the upper airway. This study compared the effect of body position on upper airway shape and size in individuals with lateral position among sedated subjects.

Read the detailed description

Anesthesiologists may encounter situations in which a accidental loss of airway patency occurs in patients in a lateral patient position during surgery. Intubation is required in the lateral position in cases of oropharyngeal bleeding to reduce the risk of aspiration, or in airway management in some patients with limited posture. The severity and frequency of respiratory events is increased in the supine body posture compared with the lateral position in emergency, difficult airway patients. The mechanism responsible is not clear but may relate to the effect of position on upper airway shape and size secondary to gravitational effects. Lateral positioning decreases upper airway obstruction in sleeping individuals, children breathing spontaneously, and adults during general anesthesia. The mechanical upper airway properties may become the dominant factor governing upper airway collapsibility during sedation due to the significant depression of consciousness and the impairment of neural mechanisms controlling compensatory neuromuscular responses. Anesthesiologists and surgeons who are responsible for airway management during procedures under sedation and the perioperative period should be well versed with the physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms affecting upper airway patency. 3D finite element model of upper airway filling based on MRI image reconstruction can effectively reflect the anatomy of the upper airway.

The primary aim of this study was to determine the changes in upper airway shape and size that occur when sedated, spontaneously breathing adults are placed in the lateral position. These findings may provide new guidance for the evaluation and prediction of difficult airway during clinical anesthesia.

Being tested
MRI scanning first at supine position and then turn into lateral position
Medical subject headings
Airway Remodeling

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MRI scanning first at supine position and then turn into lateral positionBehavioural

    Magnetic resonance imaging was used to scan the upper airway of sedated subjects, first at supine position and then turn into lateral position.

Study groups in NCT06236971
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
MRI scanningThe subjects are receiving MRI scanning first in the supine position, and then in the lateral position. The field of view was determined from the length and girth of each patient's head, at least including the skull base to the level of tracheal bifurcation.
Receives: Behavioral: MRI scanning first at supine position and then turn into lateral position

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. minimum cross-sectional area (MCSA)

    minimum cross-sectional area (MCSA) of upper airway-related sagittal, cross-sectional, and coronal planes

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 2 months

  2. minimum anteroposterior

    minimum anteroposterior diameters

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 2 months

  3. lateral diameters

    lateral diameters

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 2 months

  4. pharyngeal volume

    pharyngeal volume

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 2 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. three-dimensional geometrical modeling of the upper airway

    three-dimensional geometrical modeling of the upper airway by MATALAB software

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 2 months

  2. Change of heart rates (HR) in beats per minute

    compared the change of HR in beats per minute between different position

    Measured: before examination, immediately after examination at supine position, immediately before examination at lateral position, immediately after examination at lateral position

  3. Change of oxygenation (SpO2, %)

    compared the change of SpO2 (%)

    Measured: before examination, immediately after examination at supine position, immediately before examination at lateral position, immediately after examination at lateral position

  4. Change of respiratory rates (RR) in respirations per minute

    compared the change of RR in respirations per minute between different position

    Measured: before examination, immediately after examination at supine position, immediately before examination at lateral position, immediately after examination at lateral position

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Feb 2024
  2. Study start5 Feb 2024
  3. Primary completion29 Mar 2024
  4. Study completion29 Mar 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
31 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06236971
Sponsor's protocol ID
airway
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
13 Jan 2024
Last updated
28 May 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Lin CY, Chen CN, Kang KT, Hsiao TY, Lee PL, Hsu WC. Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Upper Airway Structures in Children With Obstructive Sleep Apnea. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Oct 1;144(10):897-905. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.1809.

    PubMed 30242332
  • Campos LD, Trindade IEK, Trindade SHK, Pimenta LAF, Kimbell J, Drake A, Marzano-Rodrigues MN, Trindade-Suedam IK. Effects of 3D Airway Geometry on the Airflow of Adults with Cleft Lip and Palate and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Functional Imaging Study. Sleep Sci. 2023 Nov 22;16(4):e430-e438. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1776868. eCollection 2023 Dec.

    PubMed 38197022
  • Chen W, Ma L, Shao J, Bi C, Xie Y, Zhao S. Morphological specificity analysis of an image-based 3D model of airway filling in a difficult airway. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Nov 3;22(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01880-6.

    PubMed 36329383
  • Martinez A, Muniz AL, Soudah E, Calvo J, Suarez AA, Cobo J, Cobo T. Physiological and geometrical effects in the upper airways with and without mandibular advance device for sleep apnea treatment. Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 24;10(1):5322. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61467-4.

    PubMed 32210246
  • Dollinger M, Jakubass B, Cheng H, Carter SJ, Kniesburges S, Aidoo B, Lee CH, Milstein C, Patel RR. Computational fluid dynamics of upper airway aerodynamics for exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction: A feasibility study. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2023 Aug 19;8(5):1294-1303. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1140. eCollection 2023 Oct.

    PubMed 37899858
  • Li H, Wang W, Lu YP, Wang Y, Chen LH, Lei LP, Fang XM. Evaluation of Endotracheal Intubation with a Flexible Fiberoptic Bronchoscope in Lateral Patient Positioning: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Sep 5;129(17):2045-9. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.189069.

    PubMed 27569229
  • Hyldmo PK, Vist GE, Feyling AC, Rognas L, Magnusson V, Sandberg M, Soreide E. Is the supine position associated with loss of airway patency in unconscious trauma patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Jul 1;23:50. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0116-0.

    PubMed 26129809
  • Litman RS, Wake N, Chan LM, McDonough JM, Sin S, Mahboubi S, Arens R. Effect of lateral positioning on upper airway size and morphology in sedated children. Anesthesiology. 2005 Sep;103(3):484-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200509000-00009.

    PubMed 16129971
  • Litman RS, Weissend EE, Shrier DA, Ward DS. Morphologic changes in the upper airway of children during awakening from propofol administration. Anesthesiology. 2002 Mar;96(3):607-11. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200203000-00016.

    PubMed 11873035

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Airway Remodeling and Radiography in Otolaryngology, run by First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

minimum cross-sectional area (MCSA) (time frame: through study completion, an average of 2 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06236971, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in