Cancer SurvivorsNCT06230679
Effectiveness of NESA in the Treatment of Cancer Survivors
A study testing Non-invasive Neuromodulation in people with Cancer Survivors, run by Aníbal Báez Suárez at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Cancer is a disease, or a set of diseases, that increased in our society. However, improvements in their detection and treatment increase the number of patients who survive. Every year 2.6 million people are diagnosed in the European Union and 1.4 million become cancer survivors. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer Survivors
- What is being tested?
- Non-invasive Neuromodulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 19 Jan 2024to 19 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Be a cancer survivor (5 years after discharge)
- Have 1 of the 3 symptoms of the most common cluster: sleep problems, chronic fatigue, chronic neuro-muscular pain.
Who cannot join
- Not have an active oncological process
- Present any of the contraindications of the NESA-XSignal device: pacemaker, internal bleeding, skin in poor condition (ulcerations or wounds), acute febrile processes, acute thrombophlebitis, pregnancy, phobia of electricity.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of NESA in the Treatment of Sleep Problems, Fatigue, and Neuromuscular Pain in Cancer Survivors.
Cancer is a disease, or a set of diseases, that increased in our society. However, improvements in their detection and treatment increase the number of patients who survive. Every year 2.6 million people are diagnosed in the European Union and 1.4 million become cancer survivors. However, these people suffer the late adverse effects of treatment that can seriously affect their quality of life.
the most common late effects are pain, fatigue, and sleeping difficulties. These are estimated between 58-90%. The autonomic nervous system (ANS) appears to play an important role in the manifestation and perpetuation of these symptoms.
Read the detailed description
This study aims to evaluate NESA (or NESA non-invasive neuromodulation) to treat the most common long-term side effects in cancer survivors, due to the most used treatments.
It will be compared between two groups of cancer survivors. The intervention group, with electrical stimulation, and the sham group, without electrical stimulation emission. The subjects will be assigned randomly. Neither the patient, the therapist, nor the analysts/researchers will know the assignment.
Finally, this project aims to add a passive tool to the therapeutic arsenal of health professionals in the oncology field for the treatment of late side effects.
- Conditions
- Cancer Survivors
- Being tested
- Non-invasive Neuromodulation, Placebo Non-invasive Neuromodulation
- Keywords
- cancer, physical therapy modality, Electric Stimulation Therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Non-invasive NeuromodulationDevice
Patients receive non-invasive neurostimulation through the Nesa device
Placebo Non-invasive NeuromodulationDevice
The same protocol described for the experimental group will be applied, but electrical stimulation device which will be previously manipulated and tested with an oscilloscope so that they do not emit electrical currents.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Non-invasive Neuromodulation | Experimental | Intervention with electrical stimulation: application of 6 electrodes per extremity and an adhesive electrode at C7 level. Receives: Device: Non-invasive Neuromodulation |
| Placebo Non-invasive Neuromodulation | Placebo comparator | Intervention with electrical stimulation: application of 6 electrodes per extremity and an adhesive electrode at C7 level. Receives: Device: Placebo Non-invasive Neuromodulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in sleep quality assessed by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
The investigators want to see if there are improvements in the quality, efficiency, and quantity of sleep. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) will be combined to report changes in the patient's sleep quality.
Each of the sleep components yields a score ranging from 0 to 3, with 3 indicating the greatest dysfunction. The sleep component scores are summed to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 21 with the higher total score (referred to as global score) indicating worse sleep quality.
Adding up the average scores of the seven factors gives a global PSQI score from 0 to 21, with 0-4 indicating "good" sleep and 5-21 indicating "poor" sleep
Measured: Measurement of change: before treatment (baseline), at two months (end of treatment), and at 1 months of treatment (follow-up period).
Change in quality of life assessed by The Short Form 36 (SF-36) health questionnaire
The Short Form 36 (SF-36) health questionnaire will be used. It is a generic scale that provides a profile of health status and is applicable to both patients and the general population.
It is composed of 36 questions (items) that assess both positive and negative states of health. The scores for each of the 8 dimensions of the SF-36 range from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating optimal health and 0 reflecting very poor health.
Measured: Measurement of change: before treatment (baseline), at two months (end of treatment), and at 1 months of treatment (follow-up period).
Change in Pain assessed by McGill Pain questionnaire
It is a self-report questionnaire that allows to give a good description of the quality and intensity of the pain they are experiencing. of the quality and intensity of the pain they are experiencing. It consists of a list of 78 words in 20 sections related to pain. Users mark the words that best describe their pain. users mark the words that best describe their pain. These words correlate with different aspects of pain different aspects of pain, including a sensory section (sections 1 to 10), an affective section (sections 11 to 15), an evaluative section (sections 11 to 15), and a 10), an affective section (sections 11 to 15), an evaluative section (section 16), and finally a miscellaneous section (section 16). and, finally, a miscellaneous section (sections 17 to 20).
The main component of the McGill Pain questionnaire consists of 15 descriptors (11 sensory; 4 affective) which are rated on an intensity scale as 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate or 3 = severe
Measured: Measurement of change: before treatment (baseline), at two months (end of treatment), and at 1 months of treatment (follow-up period).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jan 2024
- Study start19 Jan 2024
- Primary completion19 Sep 2025
- Study completion19 Dec 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cancer SurvivorsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aníbal Báez Suárez
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Aníbal Báez Suárez, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
- Investigators
- Gabriel Amengual Jaume, MSc, Principal investigator, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06230679
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NESABiel
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 19 Jan 2024
- Last updated
- 16 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Rick O, Dauelsberg T, Kalusche-Bontemps EM. Oncological Rehabilitation. Oncol Res Treat. 2017;40(12):772-777. doi: 10.1159/000481709. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
PubMed 29183040Paltrinieri S, Fugazzaro S, Bertozzi L, Bassi MC, Pellegrini M, Vicentini M, Mazzini E, Costi S. Return to work in European Cancer survivors: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2018 Sep;26(9):2983-2994. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4270-6. Epub 2018 May 29.
PubMed 29845421Boland EG, Ahmedzai SH. Persistent pain in cancer survivors. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2017 Sep;11(3):181-190. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000292.
PubMed 28700361Kline-Quiroz C, Nori P, Stubblefield MD. Cancer Rehabilitation: Acute and Chronic Issues, Nerve Injury, Radiation Sequelae, Surgical and Chemo-Related, Part 1. Med Clin North Am. 2020 Mar;104(2):239-250. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
PubMed 32035566
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of NESA in the Treatment of Sleep Problems, Fatigue, and Neuromuscular Pain in Cancer Survivors.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06230679
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NESABiel
- Conditions
- Cancer Survivors
- Keywords
- cancer, physical therapy modality, Electric Stimulation Therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Aníbal Báez SuárezUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 19 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Dec 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cancer is a disease, or a set of diseases, that increased in our society. However, improvements in their detection and treatment increase the number of patients who survive. Every year 2.6 million people are diagnosed in the European Union and 1.4 million become cancer survivors. However, these people suffer the late adverse effects of treatment that can seriously affect their quality of life.
the most common late effects are pain, fatigue, and sleeping difficulties. These are estimated between 58-90%. The autonomic nervous system (ANS) appears to play an important role in the manifestation and perpetuation of these symptoms.
Detailed description
This study aims to evaluate NESA (or NESA non-invasive neuromodulation) to treat the most common long-term side effects in cancer survivors, due to the most used treatments.
It will be compared between two groups of cancer survivors. The intervention group, with electrical stimulation, and the sham group, without electrical stimulation emission. The subjects will be assigned randomly. Neither the patient, the therapist, nor the analysts/researchers will know the assignment.
Finally, this project aims to add a passive tool to the therapeutic arsenal of health professionals in the oncology field for the treatment of late side effects.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Non-invasive Neuromodulation | Experimental | Device: Non-invasive NeuromodulationIntervention with electrical stimulation: application of 6 electrodes per extremity and an adhesive electrode at C7 level. |
| Placebo Non-invasive Neuromodulation | Placebo comparator | Device: Placebo Non-invasive NeuromodulationIntervention with electrical stimulation: application of 6 electrodes per extremity and an adhesive electrode at C7 level. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Be a cancer survivor (5 years after discharge)
- Have 1 of the 3 symptoms of the most common cluster: sleep problems, chronic fatigue, chronic neuro-muscular pain.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Not have an active oncological process
- Present any of the contraindications of the NESA-XSignal device: pacemaker, internal bleeding, skin in poor condition (ulcerations or wounds), acute febrile processes, acute thrombophlebitis, pregnancy, phobia of electricity.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Non-invasive NeuromodulationPatients receive non-invasive neurostimulation through the Nesa device | Device | Non-invasive Neuromodulation |
| Placebo Non-invasive NeuromodulationThe same protocol described for the experimental group will be applied, but electrical stimulation device which will be previously manipulated and tested with an oscilloscope so that they do not emit electrical currents. | Device | Placebo Non-invasive Neuromodulation |
Primary outcome
Change in sleep quality assessed by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time frame: Measurement of change: before treatment (baseline), at two months (end of treatment), and at 1 months of treatment (follow-up period).
The investigators want to see if there are improvements in the quality, efficiency, and quantity of sleep. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) will be combined to report changes in the patient's sleep quality. Each of the sleep components yields a score ranging from 0 to 3, with 3 indicating the greatest dysfunction. The sleep component scores are summed to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 21 with the higher total score (referred to as global score) indicating worse sleep quality. Adding up the average scores of the seven factors gives a global PSQI score from 0 to 21, with 0-4 indicating "good" sleep and 5-21 indicating "poor" sleep
Change in quality of life assessed by The Short Form 36 (SF-36) health questionnaire
Time frame: Measurement of change: before treatment (baseline), at two months (end of treatment), and at 1 months of treatment (follow-up period).
The Short Form 36 (SF-36) health questionnaire will be used. It is a generic scale that provides a profile of health status and is applicable to both patients and the general population. It is composed of 36 questions (items) that assess both positive and negative states of health. The scores for each of the 8 dimensions of the SF-36 range from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating optimal health and 0 reflecting very poor health.
Change in Pain assessed by McGill Pain questionnaire
Time frame: Measurement of change: before treatment (baseline), at two months (end of treatment), and at 1 months of treatment (follow-up period).
It is a self-report questionnaire that allows to give a good description of the quality and intensity of the pain they are experiencing. of the quality and intensity of the pain they are experiencing. It consists of a list of 78 words in 20 sections related to pain. Users mark the words that best describe their pain. users mark the words that best describe their pain. These words correlate with different aspects of pain different aspects of pain, including a sensory section (sections 1 to 10), an affective section (sections 11 to 15), an evaluative section (sections 11 to 15), and a 10), an affective section (sections 11 to 15), an evaluative section (section 16), and finally a miscellaneous section (section 16). and, finally, a miscellaneous section (sections 17 to 20). The main component of the McGill Pain questionnaire consists of 15 descriptors (11 sensory; 4 affective) which are rated on an intensity scale as 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate or 3 = severe
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jan 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 29183040Rick O, Dauelsberg T, Kalusche-Bontemps EM. Oncological Rehabilitation. Oncol Res Treat. 2017;40(12):772-777. doi: 10.1159/000481709. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
- Results publication: PubMed 29845421Paltrinieri S, Fugazzaro S, Bertozzi L, Bassi MC, Pellegrini M, Vicentini M, Mazzini E, Costi S. Return to work in European Cancer survivors: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2018 Sep;26(9):2983-2994. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4270-6. Epub 2018 May 29.
- Results publication: PubMed 28700361Boland EG, Ahmedzai SH. Persistent pain in cancer survivors. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2017 Sep;11(3):181-190. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000292.
- Results publication: PubMed 32035566Kline-Quiroz C, Nori P, Stubblefield MD. Cancer Rehabilitation: Acute and Chronic Issues, Nerve Injury, Radiation Sequelae, Surgical and Chemo-Related, Part 1. Med Clin North Am. 2020 Mar;104(2):239-250. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cancer Survivors
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
Recruiting
Study of a Support Program for Quality of Life in Chinese Cancer Patients and Survivors
Cancer, Survivorship
RecruitingPhase 3
Evaluating Whether an Educational Website Called Current Together After Cancer (CTAC) Improves Follow-up Care for Colorectal Cancer Survivors
Colorectal Cancer Stage II, Colorectal Cancer Stage III
Recruiting
Facial Expression Awareness Training to Understand and Recognize Emotions
Survivors of Pediatric Brain Tumors, Pediatric Cancer
Recruiting
High-Intensity Interval Exercise in Young Adult Survivors of Pediatric Brain Tumors: A Pilot Feasibility Study
Pediatric Brain Tumor
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gabriel Amengual Jaume, MSc principal investigator
University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Non-invasive Neuromodulation in people with Cancer Survivors, run by Aníbal Báez Suárez at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in sleep quality assessed by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) (time frame: Measurement of change: before treatment (baseline), at two months (end of treatment), and at 1 months of treatment (follow-up period).). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06230679, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jan 2026.