AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1NOELLENCT06230276

Managing of Missed Meal Bolus by HCL Systems

A study testing enteral nutrition (Resource Fibre, 2 kcal/ml) for breakfast in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, run by Zdeněk Šumník at 1 site in Czechia.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this interventional study is to compare glycemic outcomes after missed meal bolus in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (CwD) treated by one of the three most common used types of hybrid closed loop (HCL) systems - Medtronic MiniMed 780G, Tandem Control-IQ, Ypsomed CamAPS. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 9 to 19 years
Conditions the study is for
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
What is being tested?
enteral nutrition (Resource Fibre, 2 kcal/ml) for breakfast
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
45 participants
Where
1 siteCzechia
Study dates
1 Jan 2024to 1 Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 9 to 19 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • children with type 1 diabetes (CwD) 9.00-18.99 years old
  • use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) >70% of the time 14 days before a regular check-up in the outpatient clinic
  • HCL use (MiniMed 780G, Tandem Control-IQ or Ypsomed CamAPS) >3 months
  • duration of T1D >2 years
  • baseline HbA1c level <58 mmol/mol (7.5%)
  • weight > 30 kilograms
  • without any medication influencing glycemia (f.e. gliflozins, systemic corticosteroids…)
  • signed informed consent form with the study

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Alžbeta Šantová, MD contact

+420 773 707 270

alzbetkasantova@gmail.com

Czechia1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Motol University Hospital

    Prague, 15006

    Alžbeta Šantová, MD, +420773707270, alzbetkasantova@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Czechia

About this study

Official title: How do the Currently Available HCL Systems Manage Missed Meal Bolus? The Comparison of Glycemic Outcomes After Missed Meal Bolus Between MiniMed 780G, Tandem Control-IQ and Ypsomed CamAPS

The goal of this interventional study is to compare glycemic outcomes after missed meal bolus in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (CwD) treated by one of the three most common used types of hybrid closed loop (HCL) systems - Medtronic MiniMed 780G, Tandem Control-IQ, Ypsomed CamAPS. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Do the glycemic outcomes (area under the curve of glucose concentration change, maximal glucose rise from baseline, time to maximal glucose rise from baseline, CGM parameters) vary after missed meal bolus among different types of HCL systems?
  • Does the type of insulin analog influence glycemic outcomes after a missed meal bolus?

Participants will have a precisely defined amount of enteral nutrition (Resource Fibre, 2 kcal/ml) for breakfast during eight different days under predetermined conditions. They will administer premeal bolus only for half of these meals.

Being tested
enteral nutrition (Resource Fibre, 2 kcal/ml) for breakfast
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • enteral nutrition (Resource Fibre, 2 kcal/ml) for breakfastOther

    Participants who are already treated by one of the HCL systems (MiniMed 780G, Tandem Control-IQ, Ypsomed CamAPS) will have a precisely defined amount of enteral nutrition (Resource Fibre, 2 kcal/ml) for breakfast during eight different days under predetermined conditions. They will administer premeal bolus only for half of these meals.

Study groups in NCT06230276
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention with and without premeal bolusExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: enteral nutrition (Resource Fibre, 2 kcal/ml) for breakfast

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Difference in an area under the curve of a glucose concentration change 4 hours after a meal (30 g and 50 g of carbohydrates) with a missed premeal bolus between individual HCL systems.

    Measured: 4 hour after a meal

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Difference in a maximal glucose rise from baseline after a meal (30 g and 50 g of carbohydrates) with a missed premeal bolus between individual HCL systems.

    Measured: 4 hours after a meal

  2. Difference in time to maximal glucose rise from baseline after a meal (30 g and 50 g of carbohydrates) with a missed premeal bolus between individual HCL systems.

    Measured: 4 hours after a meal

  3. Difference in CGM parameters 4 hours after a meal (30 g and 50 g of carbohydrates) with a missed premeal bolus between individual HCL systems.

    time in range TIR (3.9-10.0 mmol/L; 70-180 mg/dL) time above range level 1 TAR1 (10.1-13.9 mmol/L; 181-250 mg/dL) time above range level 2 TAR2 (> 13.9 mmol/L; >250 mg/dL) time below range level 1 TBR1 (3.0-3.8 mmol/L; 54-69 mg/dL) time below range level 2 TBR2 (< 3.0 mmol/L; <54 mg/dL) time in tight range TITR (3.9-7.8 mmol/L; 70-140 mg/dL)

    Measured: 4 hours after a meal

  4. Difference in an area under the curve of a glucose concentration change 4 hours after a meal (30 g and 50 g of carbohydrates) with a missed premeal bolus between individual HCL systems using different types of insulin analogs

    insulin analogs - aspart and ultra-rapid lispro

    Measured: 4 hours after a meal

  5. Difference in a maximal glucose rise from baseline after a meal (30 g and 50 g of carbohydrates) with a missed premeal bolus between individual HCL systems using two different types of insulin analogs

    insulin analogs - aspart and ultra-rapid lispro

    Measured: 4 hours after a meal

  6. Difference in time to maximal glucose rise from baseline after a meal (30 g and 50 g of carbohydrates) with a missed premeal bolus between individual HCL systems using two different types of insulin analogs

    insulin analogs - aspart and ultra-rapid lispro

    Measured: 4 hours after a meal

  7. Difference in CGM parameters after a meal (30 g and 50 g of carbohydrates) with a missed premeal bolus between individual HCL systems using insulin ultra-rapid lispro

    time in range TIR (3.9-10.0 mmol/L; 70-180 mg/dL) time above range level 1 TAR1 (10.1-13.9 mmol/L; 181-250 mg/dL) time above range level 2 TAR2 (> 13.9 mmol/L; >250 mg/dL) time below range level 1 TBR1 (3.0-3.8 mmol/L; 54-69 mg/dL) time below range level 2 TBR2 (< 3.0 mmol/L; <54 mg/dL) time in tight range TITR (3.9-7.8 mmol/L; 70-140 mg/dL)

    Measured: 4 hours after a meal

  8. Difference in CGM parameters after a meal (30 g and 50 g of carbohydrates) with a missed premeal bolus between individual HCL systems using insulin aspart.

    time in range TIR (3.9-10.0 mmol/L; 70-180 mg/dL) time above range level 1 TAR1 (10.1-13.9 mmol/L; 181-250 mg/dL) time above range level 2 TAR2 (> 13.9 mmol/L; >250 mg/dL) time below range level 1 TBR1 (3.0-3.8 mmol/L; 54-69 mg/dL) time below range level 2 TBR2 (< 3.0 mmol/L; <54 mg/dL) time in tight range TITR (3.9-7.8 mmol/L; 70-140 mg/dL)

    Measured: 4 hours after a meal

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Jan 2024
  2. Study start1 Jan 2024
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
45 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06230276
Sponsor's protocol ID
1B_23N01
Acronym
NOELLE
Status last verified
Jan 2024
First submitted
17 Dec 2023
Last updated
30 Jan 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing enteral nutrition (Resource Fibre, 2 kcal/ml) for breakfast in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, run by Zdeněk Šumník at 1 site in Czechia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Alžbeta Šantová, MD (+420 773 707 270, alzbetkasantova@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Difference in an area under the curve of a glucose concentration change 4 hours after a meal (30 g and 50 g of carbohydrates) with a missed premeal bolus between individual HCL systems. (time frame: 4 hour after a meal). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in