AzTrials
AzTrials

Health Care UtilizationNCT06224712

Arogya Sangama: 3 Way Partnership of People, Providers, and Panchayat for Health

A study testing Arogya Sangama in people with Health Care Utilization and Health Care Seeking Behavior, run by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health at 2 sites in India.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a two-year pilot project in the Raichur and Chamarajanagar districts of Karnataka, India aiming to enhance the overall performance of primary health systems, including service utilization, quality, and responsive care, specifically within the recently developed facilities called the Health and Wellness Centres… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Arogya Sangama
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
4,160 participants
Where
2 sitesIndia
Study dates
18 Jan 2024to 31 Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

None listed.

Who cannot join

  • Group 1: women not in the age group 18-49 years of age
  • Group 2: participants younger than 30 years
  • Not residing in the service area covered by intervention and control PHC-HWCs
  • Unable to speak in Kannada
  • Unable to provide consent

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

India2 sites
  • Devadurga Block PHC-HWC

    Devadurga

  • Kollegal PHC-HWC

    Kollegāl

Other trials in India

About this study

This is a two-year pilot project in the Raichur and Chamarajanagar districts of Karnataka, India aiming to enhance the overall performance of primary health systems, including service utilization, quality, and responsive care, specifically within the recently developed facilities called the Health and Wellness Centres (HWCs). It will leverage rural local government structures known as Gram Panchayat Task Forces (GPTFs) created during the Covid-19 pandemic to strengthen the services delivered by HWCs. The aim is to build capacities and empower these GPTFs to function as a collaborative platform involving people, panchayats, and healthcare providers. This approach seeks to promote-community ownership, grassroots synergy, and social accountability to strengthen HWC service delivery in rural Karnataka (India).

Read the detailed description

Specific research questions:

  1. What are attitudes, perceptions, and experiences of stakeholders about GPTFs involvement in the COVID 19 management and PHC service delivery?
  2. What strategies and actions can GPTF undertake to improve community engagement, service provider support, and promote equitable access to essential PHC services?
  3. What capacity building inputs, mechanisms, and resources will be required for GPTFs to strengthen community engagement and serve as collaborative platforms to increase social accountability for PHC services?
  4. What has been the experience of GPTFs, community and program administrators about the Arogya Sangama model in terms of its applicability, adoption, and feasibility in the project settings?
  5. How have GPTF interventions within Arogya Sangama project impacted community engagement, service provider support, and equitable access to essential PHC services.
  6. What has been the effect of the GPTF intervention on utilization, and coverage of essential primary care services?

Empowered people and communities are a key pillar of primary health care (PHC). Within India, several policies, especially decentralization efforts under the National Health Mission had envisioned engagement of Panchayats or local self governments as a key mechanism to achieve large-scale community participation and ensure equitable access for vulnerable people, particularly women, children, and the poor. Empowering village panchayats to implement and provide oversight for National Health Ministry programs through village health committees and panchayat assemblies was expected to facilitate the process. The National Health Policy 2017 recommended an enhanced role of panchayats in health governance, including the social determinants of health and mandating community led accountability mechanisms for health to be driven by these local bodies.

States were expected to develop strategic plans and accountability mechanisms with active involvement of local self-governments for effective monitoring of quality of health care services. Despite several policies and promising vision, there is limited capacity and lack of a clear strategy for panchayat engagement and community ownership for HWCs at the state and district levels. Progress on implementing preventive and promotive services involving community and panchayats has been slow especially in aspirational districts and tribal settings. A recent evaluation of HWCs across 18 states in India including Karnataka further confirms lack of community participation as a key barrier in strengthening comprehensive primary health care (CPHC) delivery. These findings suggest a need to enable the state government to develop a clear community engagement strategy and build capacities of the panchayats in leading these efforts in the HWC service areas.

Building on the legacy of GPTF involvement in COVID 19 mitigation efforts so far, the Department of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, (DoRDPR), within the Government of Karnataka, is proposing to strengthen and equip GPTFs with the necessary skills and tools to transform into effective forums for local health action and convergence to enhance PHC delivery. The DoRDPR has commissioned a two-year implementation research project in collaboration with the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Karnataka Health Promotion Trust (KHPT), a leading Non Governmental Organization for Public Health action in Karnataka. The pilot project aims to build capacities of GPTFs to function as a "3-way partnership platform" (comprising of people, panchayats, and service providers) to increase community ownership, grassroots convergence, and social accountability for rural HWCs in Karnataka in Devadurga and Kollegal Block of Raichur and Chamarajanagar district respectively.

The Johns Hopkins team will use its expertise in global health and design thinking to develop interventions for GPTF based on end users' perspectives. The team, with KHPT support, will gather insights on stakeholders' perspectives about GPTF, potential new ideas, and intervention strategies required to develop GPTF as an effective 3-way partnership platform. It will develop, implement, test a prototype model, and investigate its applicability, adoption, and feasibility. It will document changes in service provision and formulate an operational framework for GPTF-enabled responsive PHC.

Being tested
Arogya Sangama
Medical subject headings
Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Arogya SangamaBehavioural

    Using human-centered design, the investigators will work wit the community to develop a prototype Arogya Sangama model to identify methods to bring GPTF and HWC service providers to create ideas, systems, processes, services, and delivery strategies for the GPTFs. They will help identify and prioritize interventions and address barriers to usability. There will also be capacity building of GPTFs to implement the interventions identified.

Study groups in NCT06224712
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arogya Sangama InterventionExperimentalThe villages in the service area of both the intervention and control PHC-HWCs will be selected randomly, weighted by population size (PPS). There are two different population groups that are being examined to get a comprehensive picture of primary health services. Group 1: To assess the impact of the intervention in improving the coverage and utilisation of antenatal and post-natal services, a cross-sectional sample of 1680 women, 840 in each arm, in the age group of 18-49 years who delivered in the last 12 months will be interviewed in the baseline and similarly in the endline. Group 2: To estimate the effect of the intervention on improving the access to screening and management of NCDs among diabetic and hypertensives, a cross-sectional sample of 200 persons in the age group of 30 years and above from each arm will be interviewed in the baseline and similarly in the endline. Hence in each round the total sample will be 400.
Receives: Behavioral: Arogya Sangama
ControlNo interventionSame inclusion criteria as above, without Arogya Sangama intervention.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percent of antenatal care utilization rates

    The study team will analyze whether there is a difference in antenatal care utilization rates. The percent of early antenatal care registration (within first trimester of pregnancy) will be assessed.

    Measured: 21 months

  2. Percent of non-communicable disease screening rate

    For Group 2, the percent of non-communicable disease screenings will be assessed.

    Measured: 21 months

  3. Percent of coverage of essential primary health care (PHC) services

    The study team will analyze whether there is a difference in coverage of essential PHC services.

    Measured: 21 months

  4. Percent of patients satisfied with treatment

    The study team will analyze percent of patients satisfied with the treatment at the Health and Wellness Centres

    Measured: 21 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Jan 2024
  2. Study start18 Jan 2024
  3. Primary completion1 Aug 2024
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The study team will use a 2 arm(intervention and control), pre and post, mixed-methods quasi experimental design comparing the intervention to the standard interventions in the area. It will be implemented in two PHC-HWCs in the Devadurga and Kollegal blocks of Raichur and Chamrajanagar districts; Two additional PHC- HWCs from these blocks similar in characteristics as the intervention PHC-HWCs will be identified as control.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
4,160 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06224712
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB00023305
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
16 Jan 2024
Last updated
23 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in