Plaque PsoriasisPhase 3NCT06220604
A Study of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis (ICONIC-ADVANCE 2)
A Phase 3 study testing JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib in people with Plaque Psoriasis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 128 sites in 11 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate how effective JNJ-77242113 is in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis compared to placebo and deucravacitinib. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Plaque Psoriasis
- What is being tested?
- JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 731 participants
- Where
- 128 sitesin 11 countries
- Study dates
- 9 Mar 2024to 20 Sep 2027
- Phase
- Phase 3
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of plaque psoriasis, with or without psoriatic arthritis (PsA), for at least 26 weeks prior to the first administration of study intervention
- Total body surface area (BSA) greater than or equal to (>=)10 percent (%) at screening and baseline
- Total psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) >=12 at screening and baseline
- Total investigator global assessment (IGA) >=3 at screening and baseline
- Candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment for plaque psoriasis
Who cannot join
- Nonplaque form of psoriasis (for example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular)
- Current drug-induced psoriasis (for example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium)
- A current diagnosis or signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, liver, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
- Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to JNJ-77242113, deucravacitinib or to any of the excipients or components of the study intervention
- Major surgical procedure, (for example, requiring general anesthesia) within 8 weeks before screening, or will not have fully recovered from surgical procedure, or has a surgical procedure planned during the time the participant is expected to participate in the study
Trial locations and contacts
128 sites in 11 countries.
128 sites in 11 countries
United States37 sites
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Arlington Research Center, Inc.
Arlington, Texas, 76011
Great Lakes Research Group
Bay City, Michigan, 48706
Bexley dermatology research
Bexley, Ohio, 43209
Cope Family Medicine - Ogden Clinic
Bountiful, Utah, 84010
Metro Boston Clinical Partners
Brighton, Massachusetts, 02135
The Derm Institute of West Michigan
Caledonia, Michigan, 49316
Hamzavi Dermatology
Canton, Michigan, 48187
Clinical Research Center of the Carolinas LLC
Charleston, South Carolina, 29407
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Southeast Dermatology Specialists
Douglasville, Georgia, 30135
California Dermatology & Clinical Research Institute
Encinitas, California, 92024
T Joseph Raoof Md Inc
Encino, California, 91436
UCSF Fresno
Fresno, California, 93701
Palmetto Clinical Trial Services, LLC
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615
Cleaver Dermatology
Kirksville, Missouri, 63501
University of California Los Angeles - Division of Dermatology
Los Angeles, California, 90024
Wallace Medical Group, Inc
Los Angeles, California, 90056
Skin Sciences, PLLC
Louisville, Kentucky, 40217
ActivMed Practices and Research
Methuen, Massachusetts, 01844
Miami Dermatology And Laser Institute
Miami, Florida, 33133
Bioclinical Research Alliance Inc.
Miami, Florida, 33155
Virginia Dermatology Skin Cancer Center Pllc
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502
Dermatologist Medical Group of North County, Inc.
Oceanside, California, 92056
Qualmedica Research
Owensboro, Kentucky, 42301
Paddington Testing Co, Inc.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19103
Alliance Dermatology and MOHS Center P C
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032
Oregon Dermatology & Research Center
Portland, Oregon, 97210-2996
DermAssociates, PC
Rockville, Maryland, 20850
Arlington Dermatology
Rolling Meadows, Illinois, 60008
Dermatology Clinical Research Center of San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Springville Dermatology CCT Research
Springville, Utah, 84663
Forcare Clinical Research Inc
Tampa, Florida, 33613
Somerset Skin Centre
Troy, Michigan, 48084
Essential Medical Research
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74137
Center for Clinical Studies
Webster, Texas, 77598
Kalo Clinical Research
West Valley City, Utah, 84120
Germany18 sites
Hautarztpraxis Dr. Mihaescu
Augsburg, 86150
Fachklinik Bad Bentheim
Bad Bentheim, 48455
CRS Clinical Research Services Berlin GmbH
Berlin, 13627
Niesmann & Othlinghaus GbR
Bochum, 44793
Klinikum Darmstadt GmbH - Hautklinik
Darmstadt, 64283
Medizinische Fakultaet Carl Gustav Carus Technische Universitaet Dresden
Dresden, 01307
Hautzentrum Dulmen
Dülmen, 48249
Privatpraxis Dr. Hilton & Partner
Düsseldorf, 40212
Derma-Study-Center Friedrichshafen GmbH
Friedrichshafen, 88045
Eurofins bioskin GmbH
Hamburg, 20095
Universitaetsklinikum Heidelberg
Heidelberg, 69120
Hautarztpraxis
Mahlow, 15831
Universitatsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg Universitat Mainz
Mainz, 55131
Hautmedizin Saar Science Hms GmbH
Merzig, 66663
Universitaetsklinikum Muenster
Münster, 48149
Klinikum Oldenburg
Oldenburg, 26133
Hautarztpraxis 1
Witten, 58453
CentroDerm GmbH
Wuppertal, 42287
Poland13 sites
Renew Clinic
Bialystok, 15 797
Care Clinic
Katowice, 40 568
Centrum Medyczne Angelius Provita
Katowice, 40 611
Prywatny Gabinet Dermatologiczny Elzbieta Klujszo
Kielce, 25-316
SGD s.c.
Krakow, 30-002
Krakowskie Centrum Badan Klinicznych
Krakow, 30-303
Jagiellonskie Centrum Innowacji
Krakow, 30-348
Diamond Clinic
Krakow, 31 559
Etyka Osrodek Badan Klinicznych
Olsztyn, 10-117
Carpe Diem Centrum Medycyny Estetycznej
Warsaw, 02 661
Synexus Polska Sp z o o Oddzial w Warszawie
Warsaw, 02 672
Royalderm Agnieszka Nawrocka
Warsaw, 02-962
WroMedica I Bielicka A Strzalkowska s c
Wroclaw, 51 685
Canada11 sites
Lovegrove Dermatology
London, Ontario, N6A 5R9
Lynderm Research Inc.
Markham, Ontario, L3P 1X2
DermEdge Research
Mississauga, Ontario, L4Y 4C5
Innovaderm Research Inc.
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 2V1
Skin Centre for Dermatology
Peterborough, Ontario, K9J 5K2
Centre De Recherche Dermatologique Du Quebec Metropolitain
Québec, Quebec, G1V 4X7
Dr. Chih ho Hong Medical
Surrey, British Columbia, V3R 6A7
North York Research Inc
Toronto, Ontario, M2N 3A6
Avenue Research Group
Toronto, Ontario, M3N 1A8
XLR8 Medical Research
Windsor, Ontario, N8T 1E6
Wiseman Dermatology Research Inc.
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3M 3Z4
Spain11 sites
Hosp. Univ. Fundacion Alcorcon
Alcorcón, 28922
Hosp. Univ. Germans Trias I Pujol
Badalona, 08916
Hosp Clinic de Barcelona
Barcelona, 08036
Hosp. de Manises
Manises, 46940
Hosp Clinico Univ de Salamanca
Salamanca, 37007
Clinica Gaias
Santiago de Compostela, 15702
Hosp. Clinico Univ. de Santiago
Santiago de Compostela, 15706
Hosp. Virgen Macarena
Seville, 41009
Hosp. Ntra. Sra. de Valme
Seville, 41014
Hosp. de La Marina Baixa
Villajoyosa, 03570
Hosp. Clinico Univ. Lozano Blesa
Zaragoza, 50009
Romania7 sites
Cabinet Medical Dermato-Venerologie
Cluj-Napoca, 400105
Centrul Medical Vitaplus
Craiova, 200541
Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta
Craiova, 200642
Sc Iasiprest Srl
Iași, 700381
Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta Bihor
Oradea, 410167
Spitalul Clinic Judetean Mures
Târgu Mureş, 540342
New Derm Clinic
Timișoara, 300757
South Korea7 sites
Korea University Ansan Hospital
Ansan-si, 15355
Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital
Anyang-si, 14068
The Catholic University of Korea Bucheon St Mary s Hospital
Bucheon-si, 14647
Chosun university hospital
Gwangju, 61453
CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University
Seongnam, 13496
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, 05505
Korea University Guro Hospital
Seoul, 8308
Taiwan7 sites
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung Ho Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City, 80756
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital
Kaohsiung City, 81362
Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
Taichung, 40201
Taichung Veterans General Hospital
Taichung, 40705
National Cheng Kung University Hospital
Tainan, 710
Taipei Medical University
Taipei, 110
Taipei Municipal Wanfang Hospital
Taipei, 116
Australia6 sites
The Skin Centre
Benowa, 4217
Monash Medical Centre
Clayton, 3168
Premier Specialists
Kogarah, 2217
The Alfred Hospital
Melbourne, 3004
ISHI dermatology
Mitcham, 3132
Royal Melbourne Hospital
Parkville, 3050
Brazil6 sites
UNESP - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Estadual Paulista - Campus Botucatu
Botucatu, 18618-686
Chronos Clinica Medica Ltda
Brasília, 72145-450
Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto
Ribeirão Preto, 14051140
Funfarme Sjrp
São José do Rio Preto, 15090-000
Hospital Das Clinicas Da Faculdade De Medicina Da USP
São Paulo, 05403 900
Cepes - Fmabc
São Paulo, 09060-870
Hungary5 sites
Uno Medical Trials Ltd.
Budapest, 1152
Bugat Pal Korhaz
Gyöngyös, 3200
Synexus Magyarorszag Kft
Gyula, 5700
Bacs Kiskun Varmegyei Oktatokorhaz
Kecskemét, 6000
Synexus Magyarorszag Kft 1
Zalaegerszeg, H-8900
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled and Deucravacitinib Active Comparator-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
The purpose of the study is to evaluate how effective JNJ-77242113 is in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis compared to placebo and deucravacitinib.
- Conditions
- Plaque Psoriasis
- Being tested
- JNJ-77242113, JNJ-77242113 Matching Placebo, Deucravacitinib, Deucravacitinib Matching Placebo
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
JNJ-77242113Drug
JNJ-77242113 will be administered orally.
JNJ-77242113 Matching PlaceboDrug
JNJ-77242113 matching placebo will be administered orally.
DeucravacitinibDrug
Deucravacitinib will be administered orally.
Deucravacitinib Matching PlaceboDrug
Deucravacitinib matching placebo will be administered orally.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| JNJ-77242113 | Experimental | Participants will receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 156 and deucravacitinib matching placebo from Week 0 through Week 24. Receives: Drug: JNJ-77242113; Drug: Deucravacitinib Matching Placebo |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants will receive matching placebo for JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 16, matching placebo for deucravacitinib from Week 0 through Week 24 and JNJ-77242113 from Week 16 through Week 156. Receives: Drug: JNJ-77242113; Drug: JNJ-77242113 Matching Placebo; Drug: Deucravacitinib Matching Placebo |
| Deucravacitinib | Active comparator | Participants will receive deucravacitinib from Week 0 through Week 24 and matching placebo for JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 24 and JNJ-77242113 from Week 24 through Week 156. Receives: Drug: JNJ-77242113; Drug: JNJ-77242113 Matching Placebo; Drug: Deucravacitinib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16
IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using 5 point scale. Induration: 0 =no evidence of plaque elevation, 1=minimal plaque elevation,= 0.25 millimeters (mm); 2=mild plaque elevation,= 0.5 mm; 3=moderate plaque elevation,= 0.75 mm; 4=severe plaque elevation, greater than (>) 1 mm; Erythema: 0=no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1=faint erythema, 2=light red coloration, 3=moderate red coloration, 4=bright red coloration; Scaling: 0=no evidence of scaling, 1=minimal; 2=mild; fine scale dominates, 3=moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4=severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Higher score=more severe disease. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 16
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 score (>=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Secondary outcomes (34)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score of 0 at Week 16
The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 Response at Weeks 4 and 16
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-75 score (>=75% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Weeks 4 and 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Weeks 4 and 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 Response at Week 8
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 score (>=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 8 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 8
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 Response at Week 16
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-100 score (100% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scalp Specific (ss)-IGA Score of 0 or 1 and >=2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Ss-IGA Score >=2
The ss-IGA instrument was used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions were assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness which was scored as: absence of disease = 0, very mild disease = 1, mild disease = 2, moderate disease = 3, and severe disease = 4. A higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Symptom and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptom Score of 0 at Weeks 8 and 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >0
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Weeks 8 and 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in PSSD Itch Score at Weeks 4 and 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Itch Score >=4
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. PSSD itch item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly itch score, ranging from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating severe disease. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
Measured: Weeks 4 and 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of 0 or 1 and >=2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 16 and 24
IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using 5 point scale. Induration: 0=no evidence of plaque elevation, 1=minimal plaque elevation,=0.25mm; 2=mild plaque elevation,=0.5 mm; 3=moderate plaque elevation,=0.75 mm; 4=severe plaque elevation,>1 mm; Erythema: 0=no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1=faint erythema, 2=light red coloration, 3=moderate red coloration, 4=bright red coloration; Scaling: 0=no evidence of scaling, 1=minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of lesion, 2=mild; fine scale dominates, 3=moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4=severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Higher score=more severe disease.Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
Measured: Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of 0 at Weeks 16 and 24
The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.
Measured: Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 Response at Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-75 score (>=75% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Weeks 16 and 24 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 Response at Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 score (>=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Weeks 16 and 24 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 Response at Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-100 score (100% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Weeks 16 and 24 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptom Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >0
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16
A BSA was commonly used measure of severity of skin disease. It was defined as the percentage of surface area of the body involved with the condition being assessed, (that is, plaque psoriasis). BSA was assessed using hand print method where the surface area of the participant's hand including the palm and all 5 digits was used as a guide to estimate 1% BSA. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16
Change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16
Percent change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Static Physician's Global Assessment of Genitalia (sPGA-G) Score of 0 or 1 and a >=2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=2
The sPGA-G was a 6-point scale to assess the severity of genital psoriasis at a given time point. The sPGA-G evaluates erythema, plaque elevation, and scale of genital psoriatic lesions. The severity of genital psoriasis was assessed as clear (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), severe (4), and very severe (5). Higher score indicates more severity. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Physician's Global Assessment of Hands and Feet (Hf-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a >=2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Hf-PGA Score >=2
The hf-PGA assesses the severity of hand and foot psoriasis using a 5-point scale to score the plaques on the hands and feet. hf-PFA was categorized from 0 to 4 where 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Higher score indicates more severity. Meeting the hf-PGA 0 or 1 criteria defined as having an hf-PGA score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) and a >=2-grade improvement from baseline. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline mNAPSI Score >0
Percent change from baseline in mNAPSI score at week 16 was reported. The mNAPSI was an index used for assessing and grading the severity of nail psoriasis. Each of the participant's ten fingernails were evaluated on 7 features. The first three features were each scored from 0 to 3 in severity and were 1=onycholysis and oil-drop dyschromia, 2=pitting, and 3=nail plate crumbling. Next four features was each scored 0 (absent) or 1 (present), and are (1) leukonychia, (2) splinter hemorrhages (3) nail bed hyperkeratosis, and (4) red spots in lunula. Each fingernail was rated for the presence and severity of seven features to give a total fingernail score of 0-13 (0= no involvement, 13 = greatest involvement). Total mNAPSI score is the sum of the 10 fingernail scores (range 0-130; 0= no involvement, 130= greatest involvement). Higher the score the more severe the nail bed psoriasis. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fingernail Physician's Global Assessment (f-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline f-PGA Score >=2
Percentage of participants who achieved f-PGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 was reported. f-PGA 0 or 1 criteria was defined as an f-PGA score of clear (0) or minimal (1). The f-PGA is a 5-point scale used to assess fingernails separately for nail bed signs and nail matrix signs of disease. A global score of between 0 indicating clear, and 4 indicating severe. The overall condition of the fingernails is rated on a 5-point scale: 0 = clear, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Baseline = closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Change From Baseline in PSSD Symptom Score at Week 16
Change from baseline in PSSD symptoms scores at Week 16 was reported. PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Change From Baseline in PSSD Sign Score at Week 16
Change from baseline in PSSD sign scores at Week 16 was reported. PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Sign score was derived by averaging the 6 weekly sign item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 6 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Sign Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Sign Score >0
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Sign score was derived by averaging the 6 weekly sign item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 6 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Genital Psoriasis Sexual Frequency Questionnaire (GenPs-SFQ) Item 2 Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline GenPS-SFQ Item 2 Score >=2 and With a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=3
The GenPs-SFQ was a 2-item participant-reported instrument used to assess the impact of genital psoriasis on the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days. Item 1 assesses overall frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (none/zero, once, or 2 or more times), and item 2 assesses how frequently genital psoriasis symptoms have limited the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often, or 4 = always). Lower scores of item 2 indicated less limitation of sexual activity due to genital psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline DLQI Score >1
The DLQI was a dermatology specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL). The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Total DLQI Score at Week 16
The DLQI was a dermatology specific HRQoL instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL). The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) Score at Week 16
PROMIS-29, 29-item generic HRQoL survey, assesses each 7 PROMIS domains (depression; anxiety; physical function; pain interference; fatigue; sleep disturbance; ability to participate in social roles and activities) with 4 questions and pain intensity. Questions ranked on 5-point Likert Scale (1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often and 5=always). Pain intensity was rated on 11-point scale (0=no pain; 10=worst imaginable pain). Higher score= worst pain. Each domain included 4 items, plus a single pain intensity item totaling 29 items. Raw score of each PROMIS domain was converted into a standardized score with mean of 50; standard deviation (SD) of 10 (T-Score). Higher PROMIS T-score=more of concept being measured that is higher scores in anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, sleep disturbance= worse symptoms, higher scores in physical function, social roles= better functioning. Baseline: closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 16 and 24 Among Participants With a Baseline DLQI Score >1
The DLQI was a dermatology specific HRQoL instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL). The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptoms Score of 0 at Week 24 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >0
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 After Week 24, Among PASI 75 Nonresponders to Deucravacitinib at Week 24
Measured: From Week 24 up to Week 160
Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 90 After Week 24, Among PASI 90 Nonresponders to Deucravacitinib at Week 24
Measured: From Week 24 up to Week 160
Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Score of 0 or 1 After Week 24, Among Participants in the Deucravacitinib Group With IGA Score >=2 at Week 24
Measured: From Week 24 up to Week 160
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Measured: From Week 0 to Week 160
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
Measured: From Week 0 to Week 160
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jan 2024
- Study start9 Mar 2024
- Primary completion15 Nov 2024
- Study completion20 Sep 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Plaque PsoriasisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Janssen Research & Development, LLCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 731 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinicaltrial, Study director, Janssen Research & Development, LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06220604
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 77242113PSO3004
- Other IDs
- 77242113PSO3004, 2023-507039-39-00, 2023
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 15 Jan 2024
- Last updated
- 28 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson \& Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu
Publications
Stein Gold L, Armstrong AW, Soung J, Vender RB, Gonzalez Cantero A, Hoffmann M, Guenthner ST, Hong HC, Murrell DF, Song EJ, Kircik L, Augustin M, Sauder M, Gerdes S, Reyes-Servin O, Edem BE, Campbell J, Cresswell K, Kephart L, Li S, Yang YW, Bissonnette R. Durability of response to icotrokinra in adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 1-year results from the phase III, placebo- and active comparator-controlled ICONIC-ADVANCE 1 and ICONIC-ADVANCE 2 trials. Br J Dermatol. 2026 Sep 18;195(4):600. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljag264.
PubMed 42397072Gold LS, Armstrong AW, Bissonnette R, Magnolo N, Vender RB, Sebastian M, Galimberti ML, Tsianakas A, Arnone M, Wallace P, Simon M, Riera-Monroig J, Gerdes S, Waibel J, Gonzalez-Cantero A, Schwarz B, Tada Y, Cecchini M, Ehst B, Kircik L, Kephart L, Reyes-Servin O, Edem BE, Campbell JH, Shen YK, Cresswell K, Li S, DeKlotz CMC, Nunes F, Papp KA. Once-daily oral icotrokinra versus placebo and once-daily oral deucravacitinib in participants with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (ICONIC-ADVANCE 1 & 2): two phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled and active-comparator-controlled trials. Lancet. 2025 Sep 27;406(10510):1363-1374. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01576-4. Epub 2025 Sep 18.
PubMed 40976249