AzTrials
AzTrials

Plaque PsoriasisPhase 3NCT06220604

A Study of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis (ICONIC-ADVANCE 2)

A Phase 3 study testing JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib in people with Plaque Psoriasis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 128 sites in 11 countries.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate how effective JNJ-77242113 is in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis compared to placebo and deucravacitinib. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Plaque Psoriasis
What is being tested?
JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
731 participants
Where
128 sitesin 11 countries
Study dates
9 Mar 2024to 20 Sep 2027
Phase
Phase 3

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of plaque psoriasis, with or without psoriatic arthritis (PsA), for at least 26 weeks prior to the first administration of study intervention
  • Total body surface area (BSA) greater than or equal to (>=)10 percent (%) at screening and baseline
  • Total psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) >=12 at screening and baseline
  • Total investigator global assessment (IGA) >=3 at screening and baseline
  • Candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment for plaque psoriasis

Who cannot join

  • Nonplaque form of psoriasis (for example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular)
  • Current drug-induced psoriasis (for example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium)
  • A current diagnosis or signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, liver, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
  • Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to JNJ-77242113, deucravacitinib or to any of the excipients or components of the study intervention
  • Major surgical procedure, (for example, requiring general anesthesia) within 8 weeks before screening, or will not have fully recovered from surgical procedure, or has a surgical procedure planned during the time the participant is expected to participate in the study

Trial locations and contacts

128 sites in 11 countries.

128 sites in 11 countries

United States37 sites
  • University of Michigan

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

  • Arlington Research Center, Inc.

    Arlington, Texas, 76011

  • Great Lakes Research Group

    Bay City, Michigan, 48706

  • Bexley dermatology research

    Bexley, Ohio, 43209

  • Cope Family Medicine - Ogden Clinic

    Bountiful, Utah, 84010

  • Metro Boston Clinical Partners

    Brighton, Massachusetts, 02135

  • The Derm Institute of West Michigan

    Caledonia, Michigan, 49316

  • Hamzavi Dermatology

    Canton, Michigan, 48187

  • Clinical Research Center of the Carolinas LLC

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29407

  • UT Southwestern Medical Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75390

  • Southeast Dermatology Specialists

    Douglasville, Georgia, 30135

  • California Dermatology & Clinical Research Institute

    Encinitas, California, 92024

  • T Joseph Raoof Md Inc

    Encino, California, 91436

  • UCSF Fresno

    Fresno, California, 93701

  • Palmetto Clinical Trial Services, LLC

    Greenville, South Carolina, 29615

  • Cleaver Dermatology

    Kirksville, Missouri, 63501

  • University of California Los Angeles - Division of Dermatology

    Los Angeles, California, 90024

  • Wallace Medical Group, Inc

    Los Angeles, California, 90056

  • Skin Sciences, PLLC

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40217

  • ActivMed Practices and Research

    Methuen, Massachusetts, 01844

  • Miami Dermatology And Laser Institute

    Miami, Florida, 33133

  • Bioclinical Research Alliance Inc.

    Miami, Florida, 33155

  • Virginia Dermatology Skin Cancer Center Pllc

    Norfolk, Virginia, 23502

  • Dermatologist Medical Group of North County, Inc.

    Oceanside, California, 92056

  • Qualmedica Research

    Owensboro, Kentucky, 42301

  • Paddington Testing Co, Inc.

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19103

  • Alliance Dermatology and MOHS Center P C

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85032

  • Oregon Dermatology & Research Center

    Portland, Oregon, 97210-2996

  • DermAssociates, PC

    Rockville, Maryland, 20850

  • Arlington Dermatology

    Rolling Meadows, Illinois, 60008

  • Dermatology Clinical Research Center of San Antonio

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Springville Dermatology CCT Research

    Springville, Utah, 84663

  • Forcare Clinical Research Inc

    Tampa, Florida, 33613

  • Somerset Skin Centre

    Troy, Michigan, 48084

  • Essential Medical Research

    Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74137

  • Center for Clinical Studies

    Webster, Texas, 77598

  • Kalo Clinical Research

    West Valley City, Utah, 84120

Other trials in United States

Germany18 sites
  • Hautarztpraxis Dr. Mihaescu

    Augsburg, 86150

  • Fachklinik Bad Bentheim

    Bad Bentheim, 48455

  • CRS Clinical Research Services Berlin GmbH

    Berlin, 13627

  • Niesmann & Othlinghaus GbR

    Bochum, 44793

  • Klinikum Darmstadt GmbH - Hautklinik

    Darmstadt, 64283

  • Medizinische Fakultaet Carl Gustav Carus Technische Universitaet Dresden

    Dresden, 01307

  • Hautzentrum Dulmen

    Dülmen, 48249

  • Privatpraxis Dr. Hilton & Partner

    Düsseldorf, 40212

  • Derma-Study-Center Friedrichshafen GmbH

    Friedrichshafen, 88045

  • Eurofins bioskin GmbH

    Hamburg, 20095

  • Universitaetsklinikum Heidelberg

    Heidelberg, 69120

  • Hautarztpraxis

    Mahlow, 15831

  • Universitatsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg Universitat Mainz

    Mainz, 55131

  • Hautmedizin Saar Science Hms GmbH

    Merzig, 66663

  • Universitaetsklinikum Muenster

    Münster, 48149

  • Klinikum Oldenburg

    Oldenburg, 26133

  • Hautarztpraxis 1

    Witten, 58453

  • CentroDerm GmbH

    Wuppertal, 42287

Other trials in Germany

Poland13 sites
  • Renew Clinic

    Bialystok, 15 797

  • Care Clinic

    Katowice, 40 568

  • Centrum Medyczne Angelius Provita

    Katowice, 40 611

  • Prywatny Gabinet Dermatologiczny Elzbieta Klujszo

    Kielce, 25-316

  • SGD s.c.

    Krakow, 30-002

  • Krakowskie Centrum Badan Klinicznych

    Krakow, 30-303

  • Jagiellonskie Centrum Innowacji

    Krakow, 30-348

  • Diamond Clinic

    Krakow, 31 559

  • Etyka Osrodek Badan Klinicznych

    Olsztyn, 10-117

  • Carpe Diem Centrum Medycyny Estetycznej

    Warsaw, 02 661

  • Synexus Polska Sp z o o Oddzial w Warszawie

    Warsaw, 02 672

  • Royalderm Agnieszka Nawrocka

    Warsaw, 02-962

  • WroMedica I Bielicka A Strzalkowska s c

    Wroclaw, 51 685

Other trials in Poland

Canada11 sites
  • Lovegrove Dermatology

    London, Ontario, N6A 5R9

  • Lynderm Research Inc.

    Markham, Ontario, L3P 1X2

  • DermEdge Research

    Mississauga, Ontario, L4Y 4C5

  • Innovaderm Research Inc.

    Montreal, Quebec, H2X 2V1

  • Skin Centre for Dermatology

    Peterborough, Ontario, K9J 5K2

  • Centre De Recherche Dermatologique Du Quebec Metropolitain

    Québec, Quebec, G1V 4X7

  • Dr. Chih ho Hong Medical

    Surrey, British Columbia, V3R 6A7

  • North York Research Inc

    Toronto, Ontario, M2N 3A6

  • Avenue Research Group

    Toronto, Ontario, M3N 1A8

  • XLR8 Medical Research

    Windsor, Ontario, N8T 1E6

  • Wiseman Dermatology Research Inc.

    Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3M 3Z4

Other trials in Canada

Spain11 sites
  • Hosp. Univ. Fundacion Alcorcon

    Alcorcón, 28922

  • Hosp. Univ. Germans Trias I Pujol

    Badalona, 08916

  • Hosp Clinic de Barcelona

    Barcelona, 08036

  • Hosp. de Manises

    Manises, 46940

  • Hosp Clinico Univ de Salamanca

    Salamanca, 37007

  • Clinica Gaias

    Santiago de Compostela, 15702

  • Hosp. Clinico Univ. de Santiago

    Santiago de Compostela, 15706

  • Hosp. Virgen Macarena

    Seville, 41009

  • Hosp. Ntra. Sra. de Valme

    Seville, 41014

  • Hosp. de La Marina Baixa

    Villajoyosa, 03570

  • Hosp. Clinico Univ. Lozano Blesa

    Zaragoza, 50009

Other trials in Spain

Romania7 sites
  • Cabinet Medical Dermato-Venerologie

    Cluj-Napoca, 400105

  • Centrul Medical Vitaplus

    Craiova, 200541

  • Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta

    Craiova, 200642

  • Sc Iasiprest Srl

    Iași, 700381

  • Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta Bihor

    Oradea, 410167

  • Spitalul Clinic Judetean Mures

    Târgu Mureş, 540342

  • New Derm Clinic

    Timișoara, 300757

Other trials in Romania

South Korea7 sites
  • Korea University Ansan Hospital

    Ansan-si, 15355

  • Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital

    Anyang-si, 14068

  • The Catholic University of Korea Bucheon St Mary s Hospital

    Bucheon-si, 14647

  • Chosun university hospital

    Gwangju, 61453

  • CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University

    Seongnam, 13496

  • Asan Medical Center

    Seoul, 05505

  • Korea University Guro Hospital

    Seoul, 8308

Other trials in South Korea

Taiwan7 sites
  • Kaohsiung Medical University Chung Ho Memorial Hospital

    Kaohsiung City, 80756

  • Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital

    Kaohsiung City, 81362

  • Chung Shan Medical University Hospital

    Taichung, 40201

  • Taichung Veterans General Hospital

    Taichung, 40705

  • National Cheng Kung University Hospital

    Tainan, 710

  • Taipei Medical University

    Taipei, 110

  • Taipei Municipal Wanfang Hospital

    Taipei, 116

Other trials in Taiwan

Australia6 sites
  • The Skin Centre

    Benowa, 4217

  • Monash Medical Centre

    Clayton, 3168

  • Premier Specialists

    Kogarah, 2217

  • The Alfred Hospital

    Melbourne, 3004

  • ISHI dermatology

    Mitcham, 3132

  • Royal Melbourne Hospital

    Parkville, 3050

Other trials in Australia

Brazil6 sites
  • UNESP - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Estadual Paulista - Campus Botucatu

    Botucatu, 18618-686

  • Chronos Clinica Medica Ltda

    Brasília, 72145-450

  • Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto

    Ribeirão Preto, 14051140

  • Funfarme Sjrp

    São José do Rio Preto, 15090-000

  • Hospital Das Clinicas Da Faculdade De Medicina Da USP

    São Paulo, 05403 900

  • Cepes - Fmabc

    São Paulo, 09060-870

Other trials in Brazil

Hungary5 sites
  • Uno Medical Trials Ltd.

    Budapest, 1152

  • Bugat Pal Korhaz

    Gyöngyös, 3200

  • Synexus Magyarorszag Kft

    Gyula, 5700

  • Bacs Kiskun Varmegyei Oktatokorhaz

    Kecskemét, 6000

  • Synexus Magyarorszag Kft 1

    Zalaegerszeg, H-8900

Other trials in Hungary

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled and Deucravacitinib Active Comparator-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

The purpose of the study is to evaluate how effective JNJ-77242113 is in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis compared to placebo and deucravacitinib.

Being tested
JNJ-77242113, JNJ-77242113 Matching Placebo, Deucravacitinib, Deucravacitinib Matching Placebo

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • JNJ-77242113Drug

    JNJ-77242113 will be administered orally.

  • JNJ-77242113 Matching PlaceboDrug

    JNJ-77242113 matching placebo will be administered orally.

  • DeucravacitinibDrug

    Deucravacitinib will be administered orally.

  • Deucravacitinib Matching PlaceboDrug

    Deucravacitinib matching placebo will be administered orally.

Study groups in NCT06220604
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
JNJ-77242113ExperimentalParticipants will receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 156 and deucravacitinib matching placebo from Week 0 through Week 24.
Receives: Drug: JNJ-77242113; Drug: Deucravacitinib Matching Placebo
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants will receive matching placebo for JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 16, matching placebo for deucravacitinib from Week 0 through Week 24 and JNJ-77242113 from Week 16 through Week 156.
Receives: Drug: JNJ-77242113; Drug: JNJ-77242113 Matching Placebo; Drug: Deucravacitinib Matching Placebo
DeucravacitinibActive comparatorParticipants will receive deucravacitinib from Week 0 through Week 24 and matching placebo for JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 24 and JNJ-77242113 from Week 24 through Week 156.
Receives: Drug: JNJ-77242113; Drug: JNJ-77242113 Matching Placebo; Drug: Deucravacitinib

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16

    IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using 5 point scale. Induration: 0 =no evidence of plaque elevation, 1=minimal plaque elevation,= 0.25 millimeters (mm); 2=mild plaque elevation,= 0.5 mm; 3=moderate plaque elevation,= 0.75 mm; 4=severe plaque elevation, greater than (>) 1 mm; Erythema: 0=no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1=faint erythema, 2=light red coloration, 3=moderate red coloration, 4=bright red coloration; Scaling: 0=no evidence of scaling, 1=minimal; 2=mild; fine scale dominates, 3=moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4=severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Higher score=more severe disease. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 score (>=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

Secondary outcomes (34)
  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score of 0 at Week 16

    The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 Response at Weeks 4 and 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-75 score (>=75% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Weeks 4 and 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Weeks 4 and 16

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 Response at Week 8

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 score (>=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 8 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 8

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 Response at Week 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-100 score (100% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scalp Specific (ss)-IGA Score of 0 or 1 and >=2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Ss-IGA Score >=2

    The ss-IGA instrument was used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions were assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness which was scored as: absence of disease = 0, very mild disease = 1, mild disease = 2, moderate disease = 3, and severe disease = 4. A higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  6. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Symptom and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptom Score of 0 at Weeks 8 and 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >0

    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Weeks 8 and 16

  7. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in PSSD Itch Score at Weeks 4 and 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Itch Score >=4

    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. PSSD itch item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly itch score, ranging from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating severe disease. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Weeks 4 and 16

  8. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of 0 or 1 and >=2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 16 and 24

    IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using 5 point scale. Induration: 0=no evidence of plaque elevation, 1=minimal plaque elevation,=0.25mm; 2=mild plaque elevation,=0.5 mm; 3=moderate plaque elevation,=0.75 mm; 4=severe plaque elevation,>1 mm; Erythema: 0=no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1=faint erythema, 2=light red coloration, 3=moderate red coloration, 4=bright red coloration; Scaling: 0=no evidence of scaling, 1=minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of lesion, 2=mild; fine scale dominates, 3=moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4=severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Higher score=more severe disease.Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Weeks 16 and 24

  9. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of 0 at Weeks 16 and 24

    The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: Weeks 16 and 24

  10. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 Response at Weeks 16 and 24

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-75 score (>=75% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Weeks 16 and 24 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Weeks 16 and 24

  11. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 Response at Weeks 16 and 24

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 score (>=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Weeks 16 and 24 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Weeks 16 and 24

  12. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 Response at Weeks 16 and 24

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-100 score (100% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Weeks 16 and 24 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Weeks 16 and 24

  13. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptom Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >0

    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  14. Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16

    A BSA was commonly used measure of severity of skin disease. It was defined as the percentage of surface area of the body involved with the condition being assessed, (that is, plaque psoriasis). BSA was assessed using hand print method where the surface area of the participant's hand including the palm and all 5 digits was used as a guide to estimate 1% BSA. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  15. Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16

    Change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  16. Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16

    Percent change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  17. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Static Physician's Global Assessment of Genitalia (sPGA-G) Score of 0 or 1 and a >=2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=2

    The sPGA-G was a 6-point scale to assess the severity of genital psoriasis at a given time point. The sPGA-G evaluates erythema, plaque elevation, and scale of genital psoriatic lesions. The severity of genital psoriasis was assessed as clear (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), severe (4), and very severe (5). Higher score indicates more severity. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  18. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Physician's Global Assessment of Hands and Feet (Hf-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a >=2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Hf-PGA Score >=2

    The hf-PGA assesses the severity of hand and foot psoriasis using a 5-point scale to score the plaques on the hands and feet. hf-PFA was categorized from 0 to 4 where 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Higher score indicates more severity. Meeting the hf-PGA 0 or 1 criteria defined as having an hf-PGA score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) and a >=2-grade improvement from baseline. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  19. Percent Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline mNAPSI Score >0

    Percent change from baseline in mNAPSI score at week 16 was reported. The mNAPSI was an index used for assessing and grading the severity of nail psoriasis. Each of the participant's ten fingernails were evaluated on 7 features. The first three features were each scored from 0 to 3 in severity and were 1=onycholysis and oil-drop dyschromia, 2=pitting, and 3=nail plate crumbling. Next four features was each scored 0 (absent) or 1 (present), and are (1) leukonychia, (2) splinter hemorrhages (3) nail bed hyperkeratosis, and (4) red spots in lunula. Each fingernail was rated for the presence and severity of seven features to give a total fingernail score of 0-13 (0= no involvement, 13 = greatest involvement). Total mNAPSI score is the sum of the 10 fingernail scores (range 0-130; 0= no involvement, 130= greatest involvement). Higher the score the more severe the nail bed psoriasis. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  20. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fingernail Physician's Global Assessment (f-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline f-PGA Score >=2

    Percentage of participants who achieved f-PGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 was reported. f-PGA 0 or 1 criteria was defined as an f-PGA score of clear (0) or minimal (1). The f-PGA is a 5-point scale used to assess fingernails separately for nail bed signs and nail matrix signs of disease. A global score of between 0 indicating clear, and 4 indicating severe. The overall condition of the fingernails is rated on a 5-point scale: 0 = clear, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Baseline = closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  21. Change From Baseline in PSSD Symptom Score at Week 16

    Change from baseline in PSSD symptoms scores at Week 16 was reported. PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  22. Change From Baseline in PSSD Sign Score at Week 16

    Change from baseline in PSSD sign scores at Week 16 was reported. PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Sign score was derived by averaging the 6 weekly sign item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 6 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  23. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Sign Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Sign Score >0

    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Sign score was derived by averaging the 6 weekly sign item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 6 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  24. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Genital Psoriasis Sexual Frequency Questionnaire (GenPs-SFQ) Item 2 Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline GenPS-SFQ Item 2 Score >=2 and With a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=3

    The GenPs-SFQ was a 2-item participant-reported instrument used to assess the impact of genital psoriasis on the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days. Item 1 assesses overall frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (none/zero, once, or 2 or more times), and item 2 assesses how frequently genital psoriasis symptoms have limited the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often, or 4 = always). Lower scores of item 2 indicated less limitation of sexual activity due to genital psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  25. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline DLQI Score >1

    The DLQI was a dermatology specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL). The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  26. Change From Baseline in Total DLQI Score at Week 16

    The DLQI was a dermatology specific HRQoL instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL). The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  27. Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) Score at Week 16

    PROMIS-29, 29-item generic HRQoL survey, assesses each 7 PROMIS domains (depression; anxiety; physical function; pain interference; fatigue; sleep disturbance; ability to participate in social roles and activities) with 4 questions and pain intensity. Questions ranked on 5-point Likert Scale (1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often and 5=always). Pain intensity was rated on 11-point scale (0=no pain; 10=worst imaginable pain). Higher score= worst pain. Each domain included 4 items, plus a single pain intensity item totaling 29 items. Raw score of each PROMIS domain was converted into a standardized score with mean of 50; standard deviation (SD) of 10 (T-Score). Higher PROMIS T-score=more of concept being measured that is higher scores in anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, sleep disturbance= worse symptoms, higher scores in physical function, social roles= better functioning. Baseline: closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  28. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 16 and 24 Among Participants With a Baseline DLQI Score >1

    The DLQI was a dermatology specific HRQoL instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL). The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Weeks 16 and 24

  29. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptoms Score of 0 at Week 24 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >0

    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 24

  30. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 After Week 24, Among PASI 75 Nonresponders to Deucravacitinib at Week 24

    Measured: From Week 24 up to Week 160

  31. Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 90 After Week 24, Among PASI 90 Nonresponders to Deucravacitinib at Week 24

    Measured: From Week 24 up to Week 160

  32. Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Score of 0 or 1 After Week 24, Among Participants in the Deucravacitinib Group With IGA Score >=2 at Week 24

    Measured: From Week 24 up to Week 160

  33. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Measured: From Week 0 to Week 160

  34. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

    Measured: From Week 0 to Week 160

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Jan 2024
  2. Study start9 Mar 2024
  3. Primary completion15 Nov 2024
  4. Study completion20 Sep 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
731 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06220604
Sponsor's protocol ID
77242113PSO3004
Other IDs
77242113PSO3004, 2023-507039-39-00, 2023
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
15 Jan 2024
Last updated
28 Sep 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson \& Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu

Publications

  • Stein Gold L, Armstrong AW, Soung J, Vender RB, Gonzalez Cantero A, Hoffmann M, Guenthner ST, Hong HC, Murrell DF, Song EJ, Kircik L, Augustin M, Sauder M, Gerdes S, Reyes-Servin O, Edem BE, Campbell J, Cresswell K, Kephart L, Li S, Yang YW, Bissonnette R. Durability of response to icotrokinra in adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 1-year results from the phase III, placebo- and active comparator-controlled ICONIC-ADVANCE 1 and ICONIC-ADVANCE 2 trials. Br J Dermatol. 2026 Sep 18;195(4):600. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljag264.

    PubMed 42397072
  • Gold LS, Armstrong AW, Bissonnette R, Magnolo N, Vender RB, Sebastian M, Galimberti ML, Tsianakas A, Arnone M, Wallace P, Simon M, Riera-Monroig J, Gerdes S, Waibel J, Gonzalez-Cantero A, Schwarz B, Tada Y, Cecchini M, Ehst B, Kircik L, Kephart L, Reyes-Servin O, Edem BE, Campbell JH, Shen YK, Cresswell K, Li S, DeKlotz CMC, Nunes F, Papp KA. Once-daily oral icotrokinra versus placebo and once-daily oral deucravacitinib in participants with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (ICONIC-ADVANCE 1 & 2): two phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled and active-comparator-controlled trials. Lancet. 2025 Sep 27;406(10510):1363-1374. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01576-4. Epub 2025 Sep 18.

    PubMed 40976249

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in