EndometriomaOMAlaserNCT06219044
Evaluation of Ovarian Reserve and Recurrence Rate After DWLS Diode Laser OMA Vaporization
A study testing laparoscopic endometrioma laser vaporization in people with Endometrioma and Ovarian Endometriosis, run by University of Cagliari at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Dual Wavelength Laser System (DWLS) diode laser on the treatment of endometrioma (OMA), with ablation and vaporization of the cystic capsule without performing the stripping technique, in terms of ovarian reserve and recurrence rate. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Endometrioma, Ovarian Endometriosis, Ovarian Endometrioma
- What is being tested?
- laparoscopic endometrioma laser vaporization
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2021to 1 Sep 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age between 18 and 40 years old
- OMA mono or bilateral ≥ 3 and ≤ 8 cm in diameter
- presence of symptoms such as pelvic pain and sterility
Who cannot join
- Patients who are unable to provide written informed consent or to follow the procedures provided for by the protocol
- Age <18 years and> 40 years
- OMA mono or bilateral <3 and> 8 cm in diameter
- Asymptomatic patients
- Absence of histological confirmation of endometriosis cysts
- previous interventions on one or both annexes
- Failure to follow-up
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site
University of Cagliari,Obstetrics and Gynecological Department
Monserrato, Cagliari, 09042
About this study
Official title: Ovarian Reserve, Recurrence Rate and Histopathologic Evaluation After DWLS Diode Laser Vaporization of Ovarian Endometriomas: Results From a Prospective, Multicentre, Clinical Trial.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Dual Wavelength Laser System (DWLS) diode laser on the treatment of endometrioma (OMA), with ablation and vaporization of the cystic capsule without performing the stripping technique, in terms of ovarian reserve and recurrence rate.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND Endometriosis cyst, or endometrioma (OMA), is one of the most frequent gynaecological pathologies and is commonly associated with symptoms such as infertility and chronic pelvic pain. Randomized and meta-analysis studies demonstrate how the most effective surgery, in terms of percentages of pregnancy after surgery and minor rates of recurrence of cysts or pelvic pain, is the complete removal of the cyst wall through laparoscopic "stripping". However, data has recently emerged on the possible damage determined by "stripping" surgery on the healthy ovarian tissue adjacent to the OMA.
Studies on the anatomopathological characteristics of the wall of the OMA surgically removed have shown that, with the complete removal surgery, part of ovarian tissue is inadvertently removed together with the OMA wall in almost all cases since there is no real cleavage plan between cysts and healthy ovarian tissue. The post-surgery ovarian reserve has been reported, measured as lower levels of antimullerian hormone (AMH), minor values of antral follicular count (AFC), and reduced postoperative ovarian volumes. Worst performances have also been reported for the induction of ovulation for in vitro fertilization techniques. In the event of the removal of bilateral OMA, 2-4% of early premature ovarian failure has been reported, confirming possible surgical damage to healthy ovarian tissue. Following these data, the international scientific community has begun to question the effective superiority of the complete removal approach of the cystic wall, or "stripping", given these new acquisitions on post-surgical ovarian damage. Therefore, the theme of the best therapeutic approach to OMA has become one of the most debated in the gynaecological field. Despite the data on the possible surgical damage, surgical intervention remains one of the cornerstones of OMA therapy.
The recurrence rate evaluation is one of the primary endpoints of all OMA surgery studies. Guo S.w. has estimated a recurrence rate of 21.5% to 2 years and 40-50% to 5 years. In a recent systematic review of Ceccaroni M. et al., 12-30% recurrence rates are shown 2-5 years after surgical treatment.
An alternative technique to "stripping" is the fenestration of the cyst followed by ablation or vaporization with the laser of the internal wall of the cyst left "in situ" without the complete removal of the cystic wall with healthy ovarian tissue. Candiani et al. demonstrated, in their randomized study, that the "One Step" vaporization of the OMA capsule with the CO2 laser is more effective than stripping in reducing the residual follicular damage (in terms of AMH and AFC).
For better results regarding controlled ablation of the cystic wall of the OMA, the DWLS diode laser could be helpful. The combination of two wavelengths, 980 Nm and 1470 Nm, gives a contemporary absorption in H2O and haemoglobin with an excellent ability of hemostasis, cut and vaporization, as previously demonstrated in laparoscopic and hysteroscopic surgery.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the DWLS diode laser on the treatment of OMA, with ablation and vaporization of the cystic capsule without performing the stripping technique, in terms of ovarian reserve, recurrence rate and patient's symptoms.
Primary objective Evaluation of the ovarian reserve regarding AFC, AMH and the patient's symptoms.
Secondary objective Evaluation of OMA recurrence rates on the treated ovary and pregnancy rate of the patients operated on.
EXPECTED BENEFITS Compared to the stripping technique with complete removal of the cystic wall, this approach could make the treatment easier and faster but, above all, less harmful for the healthy ovarian parenchyma below the cyst.
Compared to the one-step technique with CO2 laser, the combination of the two wavelengths of diode lasers would allow a more controlled ablation of the endometriosis tissue for its well-known characteristics of hemostasis and vaporization even in the most bloody tissues e irrigated by physiological solution.
INTERVENTION STRATEGY AND INSTRUMENTS The investigators plan to recruit 70 patients of reproductive age with mono of bilateral OMA with a diameter ≥ 3 and ≤ 8 cm associated with infertility or pelvic pain who have never carried out previous interventions on one or both annexes. The cyst diameter cut-offs were chosen according to the previous data present in the literature and guidelines for the management of OMA. The patients will be evaluated at the endometriosis/chronic pelvic pain centre of the gynaecology unit of the University Hospital of Monserrato (Cagliari) and in the other centres involved in the study. All patients will perform a visit, a transvaginal ultrasound and where magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis is necessary to provide accurate information on the location of the endometriosis pathology and to exclude other coexisting uterine or annexial diseases.
All surgical procedures will be performed in operating laparoscopy under general anaesthesia.
In all patients, the diagnosis of OMA will be confirmed by surgical exploration and histopathological examination.
During the surgery, the DWLS diose laser will be used to vaporise the endometrioma capsule after opening, aspiration of the liquid and subversion of the internal wall of the cyst. Before using the laser, an accurate exploration of the cyst capsule and a biopsy on it will be performed. The removed samples will be sent for histological examination by requiring the measurement of the thickness of the endometriosis capsule. After surgery, all patients will be followed over time at quarterly intervals in the first year. At each follow-up visit, the presence of pain symptoms will be checked (dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain, dyschezia, dysuria) in patients operated for pelvic pain and the presence of pregnancy in patients operated by infertility to evaluate the cure or recurrence rates of the symptoms.
Transvaginal ultrasounds will be performed on each control for the evaluation of the presence or absence of a recurrence of OMA. The cyst must have a diameter of at least 2 cm to satisfy the ultrasound criteria for the recurrence of OMA, and it must persist over time (for at least two consecutive menstrual cycles) to be distinguished as a functional cyst.
The AFC will also be assessed During the ultrasound examination between the second and seventh day of the cycle. The AMH will systematically be evaluated for the measurement of the ovarian reserve.
During the first visit, it will be detected:
- Clinical and surgical history
- Full target examination
- Gynecological examination
- Concomitant drugs and their indication
- Pelvic and trans-vaginal ultrasounds were performed between the second and seventh day of the cycle with an evaluation of the parameters of ovarian functionality, OMA volumes, and the ovary and AFC on both ovaries.
- Dosage of the AMH hormone
Follow up evaluation
With quarterly frequency in the first year:
- Clinical evaluation
- Pelvic and trans-vaginal ultrasounds were performed between the second and seventh day of the cycle to evaluate the parameters of ovarian functionality and AFC on both ovaries and possible recurrence of the OMA.
- Dosage of the AMH hormone.
POPULATION Seventy patients aged between 18 and 40 with clinical and ultrasound diagnoses of mono or bilateral OMA cysts. To be suitable for inclusion, patients with an ultrasound diagnosis of mono or bilateral OMA should present symptoms such as pelvic pain or sterility.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The data will be tabulated on a specific database and analyzed using specific software. A descriptive output will be created, and the comparison between variables will be made through parametric and non-parametric tests with a level of significance of 95%. The IBM SPSS Statistics software will be used for statistical analysis.
- Conditions
- Endometrioma, Ovarian Endometriosis, Ovarian Endometrioma
- Being tested
- laparoscopic endometrioma laser vaporization
- Keywords
- endometrioma, laparoscopy, diode laser
- Medical subject headings
- Endometriosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
laparoscopic endometrioma laser vaporizationProcedure or surgery
laser vaporization of ovarian endometrioma using a DWLS diode laser during a laparoscopy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| symptomatic ovarian endometrioma | Experimental | patients aged between 18 and 40 years with clinical and/or ultrasound diagnosis of symptomatic ovarian endometrioma Receives: Procedure: laparoscopic endometrioma laser vaporization |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluation of the ovarian reserve using AntiMullerian Hormone (AMH) assessment.
Blood dosage of AntiMullerian Hormone expressed in nanograms/milliliter (ng/mL)
Measured: every 3 months for one year
Evaluation of the ovarian reserve using Antral follicular Count (AFC)
counts of the number of antral follicles present in the ovary during ultrasound scan. The count is presented in Numbers from 0 to any numbers (n°)
Measured: every 3 months for one year
Evaluation of the patients' symptoms
assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) , from 0 as the minimum to 10 as maximum value. Higher scores mean a worse outcome
Measured: every 3 months for one year
Secondary outcomes (2)
Evaluation of endometrioma recurrence rate
Ultrasound scan Evaluation of OMA recurrence. Assessed using a percentage (%) of patients who present the endometrioma in the ovaries after surgery
Measured: every 3 months for one year
Evaluation of pregnancy rate
Assessed as percentage (%) of patients who achieved pregnancy after surgery
Measured: every 3 months for one year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jan 2024
- Study start1 Mar 2021
- Primary completion1 Mar 2022
- Study completion1 Sep 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for EndometriomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Cagliari
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Foggia, Azienda Ospedaliera per l'Emergenza Canizzaro
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Stefano Angioni, University of Cagliari
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06219044
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OMA Diode Laser Vaporization
- Acronym
- OMAlaser
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 23 Dec 2023
- Last updated
- 23 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kennedy S, Bergqvist A, Chapron C, D'Hooghe T, Dunselman G, Greb R, Hummelshoj L, Prentice A, Saridogan E; ESHRE Special Interest Group for Endometriosis and Endometrium Guideline Development Group. ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2005 Oct;20(10):2698-704. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei135. Epub 2005 Jun 24.
PubMed 15980014Dunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Becker C, Calhaz-Jorge C, D'Hooghe T, De Bie B, Heikinheimo O, Horne AW, Kiesel L, Nap A, Prentice A, Saridogan E, Soriano D, Nelen W; European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2014 Mar;29(3):400-12. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det457. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
PubMed 24435778Benschop L, Farquhar C, van der Poel N, Heineman MJ. Interventions for women with endometrioma prior to assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Nov 10;2010(11):CD008571. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008571.pub2.
PubMed 21069706Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Endometriosis and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012 Sep;98(3):591-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.031. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
PubMed 22704630Donnez J, Lousse JC, Jadoul P, Donnez O, Squifflet J. Laparoscopic management of endometriomas using a combined technique of excisional (cystectomy) and ablative surgery. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jun;94(1):28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.065. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
PubMed 19361793Tsolakidis D, Pados G, Vavilis D, Athanatos D, Tsalikis T, Giannakou A, Tarlatzis BC. The impact on ovarian reserve after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy versus three-stage management in patients with endometriomas: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jun;94(1):71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.138. Epub 2009 Apr 25.
PubMed 19393996Muzii L, Bellati F, Bianchi A, Palaia I, Manci N, Zullo MA, Angioli R, Panici PB. Laparoscopic stripping of endometriomas: a randomized trial on different surgical techniques. Part II: pathological results. Hum Reprod. 2005 Jul;20(7):1987-92. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh851. Epub 2005 Apr 28.
PubMed 15860498Guo SW. Recurrence of endometriosis and its control. Hum Reprod Update. 2009 Jul-Aug;15(4):441-61. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmp007. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
PubMed 19279046Ceccaroni M, Bounous VE, Clarizia R, Mautone D, Mabrouk M. Recurrent endometriosis: a battle against an unknown enemy. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019 Dec;24(6):464-474. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2019.1662391. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
PubMed 31550940Seo JW, Lee DY, Yoon BK, Choi D. The age-related recurrence of endometrioma after conservative surgery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Jan;208:81-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.11.015. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
PubMed 27894033Candiani M, Ottolina J, Posadzka E, Ferrari S, Castellano LM, Tandoi I, Pagliardini L, Nocun A, Jach R. Assessment of ovarian reserve after cystectomy versus 'one-step' laser vaporization in the treatment of ovarian endometrioma: a small randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2018 Dec 1;33(12):2205-2211. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey305.
PubMed 30299482Angioni S, Pontis A, Sorrentino F, Nappi L. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and adhesiolysis with single port access laparoscopy and use of diode laser in a BRCA carrier. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2015;36(4):479-81.
PubMed 26390708
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ovarian Reserve, Recurrence Rate and Histopathologic Evaluation After DWLS Diode Laser Vaporization of Ovarian Endometriomas: Results From a Prospective, Multicentre, Clinical Trial.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06219044
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OMAlaser / OMA Diode Laser Vaporization
- Conditions
- Endometrioma, Ovarian Endometriosis, Ovarian Endometrioma
- Keywords
- endometrioma, laparoscopy, diode laser
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CagliariUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Foggia, Azienda Ospedaliera per l'Emergenza Canizzaro
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Dual Wavelength Laser System (DWLS) diode laser on the treatment of endometrioma (OMA), with ablation and vaporization of the cystic capsule without performing the stripping technique, in terms of ovarian reserve and recurrence rate.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND Endometriosis cyst, or endometrioma (OMA), is one of the most frequent gynaecological pathologies and is commonly associated with symptoms such as infertility and chronic pelvic pain. Randomized and meta-analysis studies demonstrate how the most effective surgery, in terms of percentages of pregnancy after surgery and minor rates of recurrence of cysts or pelvic pain, is the complete removal of the cyst wall through laparoscopic "stripping". However, data has recently emerged on the possible damage determined by "stripping" surgery on the healthy ovarian tissue adjacent to the OMA.
Studies on the anatomopathological characteristics of the wall of the OMA surgically removed have shown that, with the complete removal surgery, part of ovarian tissue is inadvertently removed together with the OMA wall in almost all cases since there is no real cleavage plan between cysts and healthy ovarian tissue. The post-surgery ovarian reserve has been reported, measured as lower levels of antimullerian hormone (AMH), minor values of antral follicular count (AFC), and reduced postoperative ovarian volumes. Worst performances have also been reported for the induction of ovulation for in vitro fertilization techniques. In the event of the removal of bilateral OMA, 2-4% of early premature ovarian failure has been reported, confirming possible surgical damage to healthy ovarian tissue. Following these data, the international scientific community has begun to question the effective superiority of the complete removal approach of the cystic wall, or "stripping", given these new acquisitions on post-surgical ovarian damage. Therefore, the theme of the best therapeutic approach to OMA has become one of the most debated in the gynaecological field. Despite the data on the possible surgical damage, surgical intervention remains one of the cornerstones of OMA therapy.
The recurrence rate evaluation is one of the primary endpoints of all OMA surgery studies. Guo S.w. has estimated a recurrence rate of 21.5% to 2 years and 40-50% to 5 years. In a recent systematic review of Ceccaroni M. et al., 12-30% recurrence rates are shown 2-5 years after surgical treatment.
An alternative technique to "stripping" is the fenestration of the cyst followed by ablation or vaporization with the laser of the internal wall of the cyst left "in situ" without the complete removal of the cystic wall with healthy ovarian tissue. Candiani et al. demonstrated, in their randomized study, that the "One Step" vaporization of the OMA capsule with the CO2 laser is more effective than stripping in reducing the residual follicular damage (in terms of AMH and AFC).
For better results regarding controlled ablation of the cystic wall of the OMA, the DWLS diode laser could be helpful. The combination of two wavelengths, 980 Nm and 1470 Nm, gives a contemporary absorption in H2O and haemoglobin with an excellent ability of hemostasis, cut and vaporization, as previously demonstrated in laparoscopic and hysteroscopic surgery.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the DWLS diode laser on the treatment of OMA, with ablation and vaporization of the cystic capsule without performing the stripping technique, in terms of ovarian reserve, recurrence rate and patient's symptoms.
Primary objective Evaluation of the ovarian reserve regarding AFC, AMH and the patient's symptoms.
Secondary objective Evaluation of OMA recurrence rates on the treated ovary and pregnancy rate of the patients operated on.
EXPECTED BENEFITS Compared to the stripping technique with complete removal of the cystic wall, this approach could make the treatment easier and faster but, above all, less harmful for the healthy ovarian parenchyma below the cyst.
Compared to the one-step technique with CO2 laser, the combination of the two wavelengths of diode lasers would allow a more controlled ablation of the endometriosis tissue for its well-known characteristics of hemostasis and vaporization even in the most bloody tissues e irrigated by physiological solution.
INTERVENTION STRATEGY AND INSTRUMENTS The investigators plan to recruit 70 patients of reproductive age with mono of bilateral OMA with a diameter ≥ 3 and ≤ 8 cm associated with infertility or pelvic pain who have never carried out previous interventions on one or both annexes. The cyst diameter cut-offs were chosen according to the previous data present in the literature and guidelines for the management of OMA. The patients will be evaluated at the endometriosis/chronic pelvic pain centre of the gynaecology unit of the University Hospital of Monserrato (Cagliari) and in the other centres involved in the study. All patients will perform a visit, a transvaginal ultrasound and where magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis is necessary to provide accurate information on the location of the endometriosis pathology and to exclude other coexisting uterine or annexial diseases.
All surgical procedures will be performed in operating laparoscopy under general anaesthesia.
In all patients, the diagnosis of OMA will be confirmed by surgical exploration and histopathological examination.
During the surgery, the DWLS diose laser will be used to vaporise the endometrioma capsule after opening, aspiration of the liquid and subversion of the internal wall of the cyst. Before using the laser, an accurate exploration of the cyst capsule and a biopsy on it will be performed. The removed samples will be sent for histological examination by requiring the measurement of the thickness of the endometriosis capsule. After surgery, all patients will be followed over time at quarterly intervals in the first year. At each follow-up visit, the presence of pain symptoms will be checked (dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain, dyschezia, dysuria) in patients operated for pelvic pain and the presence of pregnancy in patients operated by infertility to evaluate the cure or recurrence rates of the symptoms.
Transvaginal ultrasounds will be performed on each control for the evaluation of the presence or absence of a recurrence of OMA. The cyst must have a diameter of at least 2 cm to satisfy the ultrasound criteria for the recurrence of OMA, and it must persist over time (for at least two consecutive menstrual cycles) to be distinguished as a functional cyst.
The AFC will also be assessed During the ultrasound examination between the second and seventh day of the cycle. The AMH will systematically be evaluated for the measurement of the ovarian reserve.
During the first visit, it will be detected:
- Clinical and surgical history
- Full target examination
- Gynecological examination
- Concomitant drugs and their indication
- Pelvic and trans-vaginal ultrasounds were performed between the second and seventh day of the cycle with an evaluation of the parameters of ovarian functionality, OMA volumes, and the ovary and AFC on both ovaries.
- Dosage of the AMH hormone
Follow up evaluation
With quarterly frequency in the first year:
- Clinical evaluation
- Pelvic and trans-vaginal ultrasounds were performed between the second and seventh day of the cycle to evaluate the parameters of ovarian functionality and AFC on both ovaries and possible recurrence of the OMA.
- Dosage of the AMH hormone.
POPULATION Seventy patients aged between 18 and 40 with clinical and ultrasound diagnoses of mono or bilateral OMA cysts. To be suitable for inclusion, patients with an ultrasound diagnosis of mono or bilateral OMA should present symptoms such as pelvic pain or sterility.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The data will be tabulated on a specific database and analyzed using specific software. A descriptive output will be created, and the comparison between variables will be made through parametric and non-parametric tests with a level of significance of 95%. The IBM SPSS Statistics software will be used for statistical analysis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| symptomatic ovarian endometrioma | Experimental | Procedure: laparoscopic endometrioma laser vaporizationpatients aged between 18 and 40 years with clinical and/or ultrasound diagnosis of symptomatic ovarian endometrioma |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age between 18 and 40 years old
- OMA mono or bilateral ≥ 3 and ≤ 8 cm in diameter
- presence of symptoms such as pelvic pain and sterility
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients who are unable to provide written informed consent or to follow the procedures provided for by the protocol
- Age <18 years and> 40 years
- OMA mono or bilateral <3 and> 8 cm in diameter
- Asymptomatic patients
- Absence of histological confirmation of endometriosis cysts
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| laparoscopic endometrioma laser vaporizationlaser vaporization of ovarian endometrioma using a DWLS diode laser during a laparoscopy | Procedure or surgery | symptomatic ovarian endometrioma |
Primary outcome
Evaluation of the ovarian reserve using AntiMullerian Hormone (AMH) assessment.
Time frame: every 3 months for one year
Blood dosage of AntiMullerian Hormone expressed in nanograms/milliliter (ng/mL)
Evaluation of the ovarian reserve using Antral follicular Count (AFC)
Time frame: every 3 months for one year
counts of the number of antral follicles present in the ovary during ultrasound scan. The count is presented in Numbers from 0 to any numbers (n°)
Evaluation of the patients' symptoms
Time frame: every 3 months for one year
assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) , from 0 as the minimum to 10 as maximum value. Higher scores mean a worse outcome
2 secondary outcomes
Evaluation of endometrioma recurrence rate
Time frame: every 3 months for one year
Evaluation of pregnancy rate
Time frame: every 3 months for one year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jan 2024.
- Background: PubMed 15980014Kennedy S, Bergqvist A, Chapron C, D'Hooghe T, Dunselman G, Greb R, Hummelshoj L, Prentice A, Saridogan E; ESHRE Special Interest Group for Endometriosis and Endometrium Guideline Development Group. ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2005 Oct;20(10):2698-704. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei135. Epub 2005 Jun 24.
- Background: PubMed 24435778Dunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Becker C, Calhaz-Jorge C, D'Hooghe T, De Bie B, Heikinheimo O, Horne AW, Kiesel L, Nap A, Prentice A, Saridogan E, Soriano D, Nelen W; European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2014 Mar;29(3):400-12. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det457. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
- Background: PubMed 21069706Benschop L, Farquhar C, van der Poel N, Heineman MJ. Interventions for women with endometrioma prior to assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Nov 10;2010(11):CD008571. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008571.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 22704630Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Endometriosis and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012 Sep;98(3):591-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.031. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
- Background: PubMed 19361793Donnez J, Lousse JC, Jadoul P, Donnez O, Squifflet J. Laparoscopic management of endometriomas using a combined technique of excisional (cystectomy) and ablative surgery. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jun;94(1):28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.065. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
- Background: PubMed 19393996Tsolakidis D, Pados G, Vavilis D, Athanatos D, Tsalikis T, Giannakou A, Tarlatzis BC. The impact on ovarian reserve after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy versus three-stage management in patients with endometriomas: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jun;94(1):71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.138. Epub 2009 Apr 25.
- Background: PubMed 15860498Muzii L, Bellati F, Bianchi A, Palaia I, Manci N, Zullo MA, Angioli R, Panici PB. Laparoscopic stripping of endometriomas: a randomized trial on different surgical techniques. Part II: pathological results. Hum Reprod. 2005 Jul;20(7):1987-92. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh851. Epub 2005 Apr 28.
- Background: PubMed 19279046Guo SW. Recurrence of endometriosis and its control. Hum Reprod Update. 2009 Jul-Aug;15(4):441-61. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmp007. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
- Background: PubMed 31550940Ceccaroni M, Bounous VE, Clarizia R, Mautone D, Mabrouk M. Recurrent endometriosis: a battle against an unknown enemy. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019 Dec;24(6):464-474. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2019.1662391. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
- Background: PubMed 27894033Seo JW, Lee DY, Yoon BK, Choi D. The age-related recurrence of endometrioma after conservative surgery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Jan;208:81-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.11.015. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
- Background: PubMed 30299482Candiani M, Ottolina J, Posadzka E, Ferrari S, Castellano LM, Tandoi I, Pagliardini L, Nocun A, Jach R. Assessment of ovarian reserve after cystectomy versus 'one-step' laser vaporization in the treatment of ovarian endometrioma: a small randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2018 Dec 1;33(12):2205-2211. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey305.
- Background: PubMed 26390708Angioni S, Pontis A, Sorrentino F, Nappi L. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and adhesiolysis with single port access laparoscopy and use of diode laser in a BRCA carrier. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2015;36(4):479-81.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Endometrioma
RecruitingPhase 4
Estetrol/Drospirenone to Reduce the Average Size of Endometriomas
Ovarian Endometrioma, Endometrioma
Recruiting
Effect of Alcohol Sclerotherapy on Pelvic Pain and Quality of Life in Women With Ovarian Endometriosis
Endometrioma, Ultrasound Therapy; Complications
Recruiting
Argon Plasma Treatment for Ovarian Endometrioma Compared to Standard Cystectomy
Endometriosis
RecruitingObservational study
Study on the Ultrasound and Biological Characteristics of Atypical Endometriosis.
Endometriosis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Laparoscopic Sclerotherapy for the Management of Ovarian Endometriomas
Endometriosis, Endometrioma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing laparoscopic endometrioma laser vaporization in people with Endometrioma and Ovarian Endometriosis, run by University of Cagliari at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluation of the ovarian reserve using AntiMullerian Hormone (AMH) assessment. (time frame: every 3 months for one year). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06219044, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jan 2024.