AzTrials
AzTrials

Moderate Acute MalnutritionCHOP-MAMNCT06214897

Choline to Prevent SAM in Children With MAM

A study testing C-RUSF (Ready-to-use Supplemental Food with added Choline) and S-RUSF (Ready-to-use Supplemental Food without added Choline) in people with Moderate Acute Malnutrition, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 10 sites in Malawi.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to test choline supplementation in children with moderate acute malnutrition in Malawi. The main question it aims to answer is: Will provision of RUSF with added choline (500mg/day) throughout treatment of moderate acute malnutrition (up to 12 weeks) reduce deterioration to severe… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 59 months
Conditions the study is for
Moderate Acute Malnutrition
What is being tested?
C-RUSF (Ready-to-use Supplemental Food with added Choline) and S-RUSF (Ready-to-use Supplemental Food without added Choline)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,515 participants
Where
10 sitesMalawi
Study dates
18 Mar 2024to 16 Oct 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 59 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • 6-59 months of age
  • uncomplicated MAM (mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) ≥ 11.5 cm and < 12.5 cm and/or weight-for-length z-score (WLZ) ≥ -3 and < -2)
  • availability for the duration of the study with no plan to move from the catchment area of a participating clinic

Who cannot join

  • presence of nutritional edema
  • features of complicated MAM, such as mental status changes or breathing issues
  • participation in another feeding program
  • known allergy to study food ingredient
  • intention to move away from catchment area within 9 months
  • developmental delay
  • presence of a chronic severe medical condition (other than TB or HIV) such as congenital heart disease

Trial locations and contacts

10 sites in 1 country.

10 sites in 1 country

Malawi10 sites
  • Chikonde Health Center

    Chikonde

  • Chipolonga Health Center

    Chipolonga

  • Makhwira Health Center

    Makhwira

  • Mbiza Health Clinic

    Mbiza

  • Milonde Health Center

    Milonde

  • Mitondo Health Center

    Mitondo

  • Muloza Health Clinic

    Muloza

  • Namasalima Health Center

    Namasalima

  • Naphimba Health Center

    Naphimba

  • Nkhate Health Clinic

    Nkhate

Other trials in Malawi

About this study

Official title: An Individually Randomized, Partially Blinded, Controlled Trial of Choline-containing Ready-to-use Supplementary Food (C-RUSF) for Children With Moderate Acute Malnutrition to Reduce Deterioration to Severe Acute Malnutrition Compared to Standard RUSF.

The goal of this clinical trial is to test choline supplementation in children with moderate acute malnutrition in Malawi. The main question it aims to answer is:

Will provision of RUSF with added choline (500mg/day) throughout treatment of moderate acute malnutrition (up to 12 weeks) reduce deterioration to severe acute malnutrition among 6-59 month old Malawian children compared with standard RUSF?

Read the detailed description

Moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) is common among children worldwide, with a prevalence of 50M and an annual incidence likely 3-5x this number. It is defined by mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) ≥ 11.5 cm and < 12.5 cm or weight-for-length (WLZ) z-score ≥ -3 and < -2. MAM increases a child's risk of deterioration to severe acute malnutrition (SAM), stunting, death, infectious illnesses, and impaired cognitive development. In Malawi, in the year following MAM treatment, nearly one-third of children will face a repeat episode of MAM, 7-10% will develop SAM, and 4% will die. There is much progress yet to be made toward improving rates of recovery and preventing the worst outcomes for the millions of children suffering from MAM each year.

One potential avenue for improving outcomes in MAM is modification of supplementary foods used for its treatment. Choline is an essential nutrient for human health and development, evidence for which is largely drawn from animal models of choline deficiency in which various somatic and cognitive developmental abnormalities are found. Of the trials that have evaluated choline supplementation in humans, many have focused on the role of choline in brain development and, specifically, how it may help foster improved cognitive development in the setting of various insults, such as fetal alcohol syndrome.

There is also a growing body of evidence describing the many roles choline plays outside of the brain, including in the etiology of malnutrition. Recently, choline deficiency has been implicated in the development of kwashiorkor, an enigmatic form of severe acute malnutrition characterized by pitting edema, dermatitis, hair color changes, and fatty liver disease with inflammation. Animal models of choline deficiency display a remarkably similar phenotype to kwashiorkor. When choline has been given to mice, rats, and dogs with kwashiorkor-like malnutrition, the hallmark features of the disease have resolved. This line of evidence suggests a causal role for choline deficiency in kwashiorkor, proposed mechanisms for which include choline's functions in 1-carbon metabolism, sulfur amino acid recycling, and sparing of the essential amino acid methionine. Methionine is the key deficient amino acid in maize-predominant diets, such as are consumed in Malawi. Choline is most abundant in animal-source foods, precisely those which are lacking in the diets of many rural Malawian children. Kwashiorkor accounts for more than one-third of SAM in Malawi in children under 5 years of age and 80% of MAM deterioration to SAM. If the addition of choline to supplementary foods were demonstrated to reduce deterioration to SAM among children with MAM and thereby promote recovery, this would represent an important advance in MAM treatment.

Despite the data supporting choline's essential role in human health and emerging data on its potential therapeutic role in malnutrition, there are no specifications for choline content in food aid products. Common MAM treatment options, such as corn-soy-blend plus and RUSF contain 50-70mg choline, approximately one-third of the 150-200mg recommended for well children 6mo-3y of age. This does not account for the likely increased demand for choline in the setting of malnutrition.

This will be an individually randomized, investigator-blinded, controlled clinical trial. This trial will be conducted at 10 rural sites in southern Malawi where the co-Principal Investigator, Mark Manary, has run malnutrition treatment clinics for over 15 years. The study will include 1500 children (750 per group) 6-59 months of age with uncomplicated MAM, as defined by mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) ≥ 11.5 cm and < 12.5 cm and/or weight-for-length z-score (WLZ) ≥ -3 and < -2. Exclusion criteria will be presence of nutritional edema, features of complicated MAM, such as mental status changes or breathing issues, as well as participation in a separate feeding program, known allergy to study food ingredient, intention to move away from catchment area within 3 months, developmental delay, or presence of a chronic severe medical condition such as congenital heart disease. Those who wish to take part will undergo randomization, wherein they will remove a single small opaque envelope from a larger opaque envelope and open it, revealing a colored sticker that will correspond to their study group. Caregivers will receive nutrition counselling, complete questionnaires pertaining to demographic, health history/symptoms, and socioeconomic information, and be provided with a two-week supply of their allotted study food for their child. Participants will receive approximately 500 Kcal/day of either C-RUSF or RUSF until they reach a clinical outcome (i.e., graduate, deteriorate to SAM, fail/remain MAM, transfer to hospital, death, default) or for a maximum of 12 weeks. They will be asked to return to clinic fortnightly for re-assessment of anthropometry, illness symptoms, and re-provision of supplementary food until they reach a study outcome. Participants will undergo MDAT testing at time of MAM outcome as well as 5-7 months after MAM outcome to undergo repeat MDAT testing. A randomly chosen subset of participants will undergo blood spot collection at time of MAM outcome.

Being tested
C-RUSF (Ready-to-use Supplemental Food with added Choline), S-RUSF (Ready-to-use Supplemental Food without added Choline)

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • C-RUSF (Ready-to-use Supplemental Food with added Choline)Dietary supplement

    Ready-to-use Supplemental Food with added Choline

  • S-RUSF (Ready-to-use Supplemental Food without added Choline)Dietary supplement

    Standard Ready-to-use Supplemental Food

Study groups in NCT06214897
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
C-RUSF (Ready-to-use Supplemental Food with added choline)ExperimentalA daily dose of 500 Kcal of RUSF containing 500mg choline will be provided
Receives: Dietary Supplement: C-RUSF (Ready-to-use Supplemental Food with added Choline)
S-RUSF (Standard Ready-to-use Supplemental Food without added choline)Active comparatorA daily dose of 500 Kcal of RUSF without choline
Receives: Dietary Supplement: S-RUSF (Ready-to-use Supplemental Food without added Choline)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of pairwise comparisons with wins of Clinical Benefit, which is a composite of time-to-SAM, graduation, and rate of weight change between enrollment and 4-week follow-up.

    Clinical benefit is defined as a composite of time-to-SAM, graduation, and rate of weight change. Each participant randomized to C-RUSF is compared to each participant randomized to S-RUSF. For any two participants, a participant will win, i.e. achieve a better clinical outcome, as determined by assessing the following criteria sequentially, stopping when an advantage for either participant is shown:

    Time-to-SAM: developing SAM faster is worse than slower; tied if not possible to determine.

    Graduation: graduating is better than not graduating; tied if not possible to determine.

    Rate of weight change: more positive rate of weight change is better. Rate of weight change is difference in weight (g) between the second follow-up visit and the enrollment visit, divided by enrollment weight (kg), divided by the (d) time elapsed between visits. If the participant lacks data beyond the first follow-up visit, this data will be used instead.

    Measured: 2-12 weeks of supplementary feeding

Secondary outcomes (22)
  1. Deterioration to SAM

    Children who meet any criteria for SAM during MAM treatment will be considered to have deteriorated to SAM. These are:

    • mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) < 11.5 cm
    • weight-for-length z-score (WLZ) < -3
    • Presence of bilateral pitting edema

    Measured: 2-12 weeks of supplementary feeding

  2. Graduation

    Based on the criteria by which the participant was diagnosed with MAM:

    • If a child qualifies for the study based on MUAC < 12.5 cm, the child must obtain MUAC ≥ 12.5 cm.
    • If a child qualifies for the study based on WLZ < -2, the child must obtain WLZ ≥ -2.
    • If a child has MUAC < 12.5 cm and WLZ < -2, either MUAC ≥ 12.5 cm or WLZ ≥ -2 is required for graduation

    Measured: 2-12 weeks of supplementary feeding

  3. Rate of weight change

    g/kg/day. Rate of weight gain is calculated as difference in weight in grams between the second follow-up visit (usually 4 weeks after enrollment) and the enrollment visit, divided by enrollment weight (kg), divided by the time between the second follow-up visit and enrollment visit. If the participant lacks data beyond the first follow-up visit, this data will be used instead of the second follow-up visit data. Participants without a follow-up visit will not have data available for rate of weight gain.

    Measured: Across first 4 weeks of supplementary feeding

  4. Death

    Defined by caregiver report

    Measured: From enrollment to end of participant's engagement (at latest, time of 6-month post-outcome MDAT testing)

  5. Deterioration to kwashiorkor

    Development of nutritional edema (bilateral pedal pitting edema)

    Measured: 2-12 weeks of supplementary feeding

  6. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) status

    DHA as % of serum fatty acids

    Measured: 2-12 weeks of supplementary feeding (at time of MAM outcome)

  7. Malawi Developmental Assessment Tool global z-score

    Age-standardized score, -6 to +6, higher scores are better

    Measured: 6 months after MAM outcome

  8. Malawi Developmental Assessment Tool global z-score

    Age-standardized score, -6 to +6, higher scores are better

    Measured: Within 4 weeks of MAM outcome

  9. Rate of mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) change

    mm/week

    Measured: Across first 4 weeks of supplementary feeding

  10. Rate of length change

    mm/week

    Measured: 2-12 weeks of supplementary feeding (until MAM outcome)

  11. Deterioration to marasmus

    Development of MUAC < 11.5 cm and/or WLZ < -3

    Measured: 2-12 weeks of supplementary feeding

  12. Change in MDAT global z-score

    Difference in MDAT global z-score between 6-month post-MAM outcome visit and MDAT global z-score measured within 4 weeks of MAM outcome, more positive scores are better

    Measured: From MDAT near time of MAM outcome to 6-month post-MAM-outcome MDAT visit

  13. Malawi Developmental Assessment Tool gross motor sub-domain z-score

    Age-standardized score, -6 to +6, higher scores are better

    Measured: 6 months after MAM outcome

  14. Malawi Developmental Assessment Tool fine motor sub-domain z-score

    Age-standardized score, -6 to +6, higher scores are better

    Measured: 6 months after MAM outcome

  15. Malawi Developmental Assessment Tool language sub-domain z-score

    Age-standardized score, -6 to +6, higher scores are better

    Measured: 6 months after MAM outcome

  16. Malawi Developmental Assessment Tool social sub-domain z-score

    Age-standardized score, -6 to +6, higher scores are better

    Measured: 6 months after MAM outcome

  17. Malawi Developmental Assessment Tool gross motor sub-domain z-score

    Age-standardized score, -6 to +6, higher scores are better

    Measured: Within 4 weeks of MAM outcome

  18. Malawi Developmental Assessment Tool fine motor sub-domain z-score

    Age-standardized score, -6 to +6, higher scores are better

    Measured: Within 4 weeks of MAM outcome

  19. Malawi Developmental Assessment Tool language sub-domain z-score

    Age-standardized score, -6 to +6, higher scores are better

    Measured: Within 4 weeks of MAM outcome

  20. Malawi Developmental Assessment Tool social sub-domain z-score

    Age-standardized score, -6 to +6, higher scores are better

    Measured: Within 4 weeks of MAM outcome

  21. Diarrhea

    Days, reported by caregiver, safety outcome

    Measured: 2-12 weeks of supplementary feeding (until MAM outcome)

  22. Proportion of participations requiring hospitalization

    Safety outcome

    Measured: 2-12 weeks of supplementary feeding (until MAM outcome)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jan 2024
  2. Study start18 Mar 2024
  3. Primary completion22 Jun 2026
  4. Study completion16 Oct 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
1,515 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06214897
Sponsor's protocol ID
202308159
Acronym
CHOP-MAM
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
31 Dec 2023
Last updated
23 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All collected, de-identified individual patient data

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing C-RUSF (Ready-to-use Supplemental Food with added Choline) and S-RUSF (Ready-to-use Supplemental Food without added Choline) in people with Moderate Acute Malnutrition, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 10 sites in Malawi.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 10 sites in Malawi. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of pairwise comparisons with wins of Clinical Benefit, which is a composite of time-to-SAM, graduation, and rate of weight change between enrollment and 4-week follow-up. (time frame: 2-12 weeks of supplementary feeding). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Choline to Prevent SAM in Children With MAM | AzTrials