AzTrials
AzTrials

GoutReMonit GoutNCT06211322

The Remote Monitoring of Gout Feasibility Study

A study testing "Urika", a self-management application for patients with gout in people with Gout, run by Diakonhjemmet Hospital at 1 site in Norway.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this feasibility trial, a digital follow-up treatment strategy with patient self-management app (Urika) and remote monitoring in specialist healthcare for patients with gout will be tested. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Gout
What is being tested?
"Urika", a self-management application for patients with gout
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
21 participants
Where
1 siteNorway
Study dates
27 Feb 2024to 11 Oct 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or non-pregnant, non-nursing female >18 years of age at screening
  • Patients with a clinical diagnosis of gout
  • Patients who fulfil the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR classification criteria
  • Serum urate level >360 μmol/L at inclusion
  • Having a smartphone/tablet

Who cannot join

  • Contraindication for urate lowering therapy
  • Unstable medical conditions (e.g,, uncontrollable hypertension, impaired liver function); known stage 3b or higher chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) rate/creatinine clearance <45 mL/min); severe infection or gastrointestinal bleed
  • Major co-morbidities (e.g., malignancies, severe cardiovascular disease, severe diabetes mellitus, severe respiratory diseases)
  • Psychiatric or mental disorders, alcohol abuse or other substance abuse, language barriers or other factors which makes adherence to the study protocol difficult

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Norway1 site
  • Diakonhjemmet Hospital

    Oslo, 0319

Other trials in Norway

About this study

Official title: The ReMonit Gout Feasibility Study

In this feasibility trial, a digital follow-up treatment strategy with patient self-management app (Urika) and remote monitoring in specialist healthcare for patients with gout will be tested.

Read the detailed description

In this feasibility study various outcome measures will be assessed to determine whether the app (Urika) is viable, practical, and useful. The study will include assessments of technical, operational, clinical, and trial aspects of feasibility.

Conditions
Gout
Being tested
"Urika", a self-management application for patients with gout
Medical subject headings
Gout

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • "Urika", a self-management application for patients with goutDevice

    The self-management software application (Urika) will include information videos on gout and treatment, reminders of daily medication and blood tests, a built-in algorithm for medical dosage escalation, visualization and log of serum urate levels, motivational gamification, asynchronous chat function patient-health professionals, and a platform for remote monitoring by health professionals.

Study groups in NCT06211322
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
To determine the feasibility of a patient self-management application (Urika) in patients with gout.ExperimentalThe intended purpose of the app is to support self-management for patients with gout that initiate urate lowering therapy.
Receives: Device: "Urika", a self-management application for patients with gout

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Desirable feasibility level

    Acceptable overall feasibility of the app with ≥70% of the secondary endpoints indicating feasibility.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 3 months

Secondary outcomes (31)
  1. App performance and functionality

    Acceptable number of errors (≤5 errors per participant) in the performance and functionality experienced by the patients and project group members

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 3 months

  2. Patient-reported software usability

    Considered feasible if the System Usability Scale median score is ≥68 on a 0-100 scale, 100= best score

    Measured: At 3 months

  3. Patient-reported experiences and perceived benefits with the app

    Open responses will be collected in semi-structured interview. No scales or instruments will be used

    Measured: At 3 months

  4. Patient and health professionals' training requirements

    Measured by registering amount of time spent (minutes) on training

    Measured: Pre-baseline for health professionals and at baseline for patients

  5. Patient-reported satisfaction with the app

    Measured by a numeric rating scale (NRS) 0-10, higher scores mean better outcome. Acceptable feasibility if >=70% of the participants report score >=5, otherwise considered not acceptable feasibility.

    Measured: At 3 months

  6. Integration of workflow for health professionals

    Measured by registering time spent on screening and enrollment

    Measured: At screening and enrollment

  7. Serum urate level

    Considered feasible if there is available data on serum urate levels for ≥90% of patients for calculation of mean levels and proportion with low serum urate level

    Measured: At 3 months

  8. Patient-reported software functionality

    Total number of reported errors related to the software functionality (e.g., downloading, login, registration of medication, reminders, access to videos, medication adherence, registration of blood test results, urate level graph, blood test history, chat, request new prescription). Considered acceptable feasibility if the number of errors are ≤5 per patient in the performance and functionality experienced by the patients and project group members.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 3 months

  9. Urate lowering therapy dose escalation

    Considered feasible if patient-reported data and the medication history in the app monitored in the platform for health personnel is available for ≥90% of patients.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 3 months

  10. Patient-reported adherence to serum urate lowering therapy

    Patient-reported Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5), score range 5-25, higher scores mean better adherence. Considered acceptable feasibility if >=90% of the patients complete the instrument.

    Measured: At 3 months

  11. Acute gout flares

    Number of acute gout flares

    Measured: At 3 months

  12. Side-effects of urate lowering therapy

    Number of side-effects registered in the app or by study nurse or study coordinator

    Measured: At 3 months

  13. Adverse events

    Number of adverse events (incl. serious adverse events) registered by study medical doctor, study nurse or study coordinator

    Measured: At 3 months

  14. Patient satisfaction with the follow-up care

    Measured by a single item with 5 response categories, ranging from very dissatisfied to very satisfied, higher scores mean higher satisfaction. Considered acceptable feasibility if >=70% of the participants report to be satisfied or very satisfied.

    Measured: At 3 months

  15. Knowledge of gout and recommended treatment

    Measured by the Gout Knowledge Questionnaire, 0-10, higher scores mean better outcome. Considered acceptable feasibility if there is available total score data for >=90% of the patients.

    Measured: At baseline and 3 months

  16. Pain related to gout

    Measured by a numeric rating scale (NRS) 0-10, lower scores mean better outcome. Considered acceptable feasibility if there is available data for >=90% of the participants.

    Measured: At 3 months

  17. Health related quality of life

    Measured by the Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Levels, each item is scored 1-5, lower scores mean better outcome. Considered acceptable feasibility if there is available data for >=90% of the participants.

    Measured: At 3 months

  18. Activity limitations

    Measured by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) item no.6, 0-10, lower scores mean better outcome. Considered acceptable feasibility if there is available data for >=90% of the participants.

    Measured: At 3 months

  19. Number of consultations in specialist or primary healthcare

    Considered acceptable feasibility if there is available data for ≥90% of patients on patient-reported visits in specialist or primary healthcare

    Measured: At 3 months

  20. Costs and time for traveling

    Considered acceptable feasibility if there is available data for ≥90% of patients on patient-reported time for travelling to the hospital

    Measured: At 3 months

  21. Sick leave and time off work

    Considered acceptable feasibility if there is available data for ≥90% of participants using self-report

    Measured: At 3 months

  22. Eligible patients per month

    Number of eligible patients per month.

    Measured: At enrollment

  23. Recruitment rate

    Acceptable recruitment rate is ≥50% of eligible patients.

    Measured: After enrollment

  24. Patient dropout

    Number of patients that withdraw from the study. Acceptable withdrawal rate is ≤20% of included patients.

    Measured: At 3 months

  25. Trial logistics

    Acceptable overall trial logistics (Identification, screening, recruitment, patient training, data collections, monitoring blood test results, renewal of prescriptions) evaluated as Yes vs. No by the study group.

    Measured: At 3 months

  26. Patients' app use: videos watched

    Count the number of videos watched per participant. Considered acceptable feasibility if ≥70% of the participants have watched at least 1 video.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 3 months

  27. Patients' app use: registrations of daily medication adherence

    Count the number of registrations of daily medication adherence. Considered acceptable feasibility if ≥70% of the participants have registered at least 1 adherence.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 3 months

  28. Patients' app use: registration of serum urate levels

    Count the number of registered serum urate levels. Considered acceptable feasibility if ≥90% of the patients register their serum urate level monthly.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 3 months

  29. Patients' app use: chat messages

    Count the number of chat messages. Considered acceptable feasibility if ≥70% of the participants register at least 1 chat message.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 3 months

  30. Patients' app use: flare registering

    Count the number of flare registering. Considered acceptable feasibility if ≥10% of the participants register 1 flare.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 3 months

  31. Potential risk and challenges

    Incidence of hinders that could harm a successful clinical evaluation of the app in a large randomised, controlled trial.

    Measured: At 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jan 2024
  2. Study start27 Feb 2024
  3. Primary completion26 Sep 2024
  4. Study completion11 Oct 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
21 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06211322
Sponsor's protocol ID
23/02662
Other IDs
2023054
Acronym
ReMonit Gout
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
20 Dec 2023
Last updated
11 Dec 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Stjarne J, Aanesen F, Sohus S, Abhishek A, Dalbeth N, Hammer HB, Kristianslund EK, Tveter AT, Uhlig T, Berg IJ, Osteras N. A self-management app in a digital treat-to-target gout-care approach: the ReMonit Gout feasibility study. Scand J Rheumatol. 2026 Aug 13:1-13. doi: 10.1080/03009742.2026.2706265. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42592900

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing "Urika", a self-management application for patients with gout in people with Gout, run by Diakonhjemmet Hospital at 1 site in Norway.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Desirable feasibility level (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06211322, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Dec 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in