AzTrials
AzTrials

Abdominal ObesityOBENCT06208163

The Effects of Chiropractic in a Population With High Central Adiposity

A study testing Chiropractic in people with Abdominal Obesity, run by Life University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Since 1980, the global prevalence of obesity, commonly defined as a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or higher, has doubled. Importantly, high levels of central adiposity (i.e., abdominal fat) is associated with numerous PNI-related sequelae, including increased levels of psychological distress, cognitive deficits, ANS… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Abdominal Obesity
What is being tested?
Chiropractic
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
18 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
11 Nov 2024to 4 Sep 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18-65 years of age
  • Body mass index (BMI) at least 30
  • Waist circumference at least 35 inches if female or 40 inches if male

Who cannot join

  • Had chiropractic care within the past 30 days
  • Prescribed short-acting benzodiazepines which include midazolam \& triazolam
  • If taking prescription medications, other than short-acting benzodiazepines, not on a stable dose for a minimum of 6 weeks with plans to change medications or doses during the study
  • Not able to walk unassisted on a treadmill
  • Known disorder resulting in syncope/fainting during postural changes (e.g., POTS, orthostatic hypotension)
  • Pacemaker or known heart condition that influences the electrical or mechanical function of the heart (e.g., severe heart valve disease)
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Diagnosed with externalizing (e.g., substance use, antisocial disorder) or thought (e.g., schizophrenia, paranoid personality, bipolar) disorder that is uncontrolled or untreated
  • Diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, or cervical spine instability
  • Hearing impairment (cognitive task uses auditory stimuli)
  • Currently pregnant
  • Current litigation related to a physical, health-related injury
  • Whiplash injury in the past 3 months
  • Oral injury, inflammation, or disease that causes the mouth or gums to bleed easily

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Life University

    Marietta, Georgia, 30067

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Psychoneuroimmunology as a Framework for Studying the Effects of Chiropractic Care in a Population With High Central Adiposity: a Pilot Trial

Since 1980, the global prevalence of obesity, commonly defined as a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or higher, has doubled. Importantly, high levels of central adiposity (i.e., abdominal fat) is associated with numerous PNI-related sequelae, including increased levels of psychological distress, cognitive deficits, ANS dysfunction, and immune marker abnormalities. To our knowledge, rigorous investigation of chiropractic's impact on psychoneuroimmunological (PNI)-related outcomes in people with high central adiposity is lacking. Based on limited evidence to date, it is plausible that clinically important PNI-related dysfunctions (e.g., heightened stress levels, executive function impairments, dysautonomia, immune dysregulation) common in this population could be ameliorated via chiropractic care.

Read the detailed description

Up to twenty (20) obese individuals (18-65 yrs of age) will be recruited. For our trial, obesity will be indexed as a BMI ≥30 and an elevated waist circumference (i.e., >35 inches for women, >40 inches for men).

Subjects will be asked to do the following…

  • Restrict certain behaviors prior to their lab visits which include 1) 3 hours prior abstain from caffeine, brushing your teeth, alcohol-based mouthwash, nicotine, food, \& drinking large amounts of liquid very quickly (e.g., chugging a 16 oz bottle of water; sipping water is ok) and 2) 24 hours prior abstain from strenuous exercise, alcohol, \& over the counter drugs (e.g., antihistamines, Tylenol, etc.)
  • Have their height, weight, and waist circumference measured.
  • Drool into a tube for subsequent testing of immune markers (i.e., salivary IgA)
  • Have electrodes placed on/around their chest \& back to measure respiration, ECG, and impedance cardiography (ICG)
  • Perform a postural challenge whereby they lay supine (8 min), stand quickly (3 min), and return quickly to the supine position (3 min).
  • Have their cognitive function assessed while walking on a treadmill (dual task).
  • Answer questions about their mental, physical, and emotional health.
  • Receive 6-weeks of chiropractic adjustments from community-based clinicians.

Assessments will take place at baseline, after 2 weeks of chiropractic, and after 6 weeks of chiropractic.

Being tested
Chiropractic
Keywords
abdominal obesity, adults, psychoneuroimmunology, chiropractic
Medical subject headings
Obesity, Abdominal

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ChiropracticProcedure or surgery

    Chiropractic spinal adjustments

Study groups in NCT06208163
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Chiropractic careExperimental6 weeks of chiropractic care
Receives: Procedure: Chiropractic

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of Potential Participants Who Are Eligible.

    The number of adults attending the on-site screening who are eligible to participate, divided to the total number of adults attending the on-site screening. This assesses 'Eligibility'

    Measured: From lab arrival to completion of on-site screening (up to 15 minutes)

  2. Proportion of Participants Complying With Pre-baseline Lifestyle Restrictions

    The number of participants complying with 24hr and 3hr pre-baseline lifestyle restrictions, divided by the total number of participants. This assesses 'Compliance'.

    Measured: From start of lifestyle restriction window to lab arrival (up to 24 hours)

  3. Proportion of Participants Able to Tolerate the Assessments

    The number of participants able to complete baseline assessments as directed, divided by the total number of participants. This assesses 'Tolerability'.

    Measured: From enrollment to completion of baseline assessments (up to 2 hours)

  4. Proportion of Participants Adhering to Their Prescribed Care Plan

    The number of participants prescribed a chiropractic care plan that attended ≥80% of their chiropractic sessions, divided by the total number of participants prescribed a chiropractic care plan. This assesses 'Adherence'.

    Measured: From enrollment to end of treatment (up to 6 weeks)

  5. Proportion of Participants Retained in the Study

    Number of participants enrolled who attend the final assessment session, divided by the total number of participants enrolled. This assesses 'Retention'.

    Measured: From enrollment to end of treatment (up to 6 weeks)

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Changes in COMPASS-31 Raw Scores

    Changes in self-reported autonomic function per the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS-31) survey. The COMPASS-31 is a 31-item questionnaire that evaluates ANS functioning across 6 domains: 1) orthostatic intolerance (4-items), 2) vasomotor (3-items), 3) secretomotor (4-items), 4) gastrointestinal (12-items), 5) bladder (3-items), and 6) pupillomotor (5-items). The domains are weighted, and the sum of the weighted sub-scores yields a total raw score ranging from 0-100. Higher scores indicate greater autonomic dysfunction with total raw scores ≥20 suggested to reflect moderate-to-severe autonomic dysfunction.

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks

  2. Changes in PSS-10 T-scores

    Changes in perceived stress levels per the 10-item NIH Toolbox Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10). NIH Toolbox negative emotion measures utilize a 7-day recall period, 5-point Likert scales (e.g., 1=never, 2=almost never, 3=sometimes, 4=fairly often, 5=very often). Total raw scores can range from 10 to 50. Raw scores are converted to standardized uncorrected T-scores (mean=50, SD=10) using conversion tables available in the online scoring instructions (https://www.healthmeasures.net/). Higher scores indicate greater levels of perceived stress with T-scores ≥60 deemed 'potentially problematic'.

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks

  3. Changes in PROMIS-Cog 8 T-scores

    Changes in self-reported cognitive function per the 8-item PROMIS Cognitive Function (PROMIS-Cog 8) survey. It uses a 7-day recall period and relevant 5-point Likert scales (e.g., 1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, 5=always). Total raw scores can range from 8 to 40. Raw scores are converted to a standardized T-score (mean=50, SD=10) using conversion tables available in the scoring instructions at the PROMIS® website (https://www.healthmeasures.net/). Lower scores indicate greater functional impairment with standard benchmarks for mild (T-score = 40 to 45), moderate (T-score = 30 to 40), or severe (T-score <30) impairment.

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks

  4. Changes in PROMIS-29 Subscale T-scores

    Changes in self-reported health per the T-scored PROMIS-29 subscales (physical function, social participation, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance). It uses a 7-day recall period and relevant 5-point Likert scales (e.g., 1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, 5=always).Total raw scores can range from 4 to 20. Raw subscale scores are converted to a standardized T-score (mean=50, SD=10) using conversion tables available in the scoring instructions at the PROMIS® website (https://www.healthmeasures.net/). Lower scores on physical function, and social participation subscales indicate greater functional impairment with standard benchmarks for mild (T-score = 40 to 45), moderate (T-score = 30 to 40), or severe (T-score <30) impairment. Higher scores on the anxiety, depression, fatigue, and sleep disturbance subscales indicate greater severity of symptoms with standard benchmarks for mild (T-score = 55 to 60), moderate (T-score = 60 to 70), and severe (T-score >70) symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks

  5. Changes in PROMIS-29 Subscale Raw Scores

    Change in self-reported pain levels per the raw scored PROMIS-29 subscales (pain intensity). This subscale uses a 7-day recall period and is a single item scored on a 1 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) scale.

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks

  6. Changes in RMSSD

    Changes in ECG-derived root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) during rest, stress, and recovery. RMSSD is a time-domain heart rate variability (HRV) metric used to assess cardiac-related parasympathetic activity.

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks

  7. Changes in PEP

    Changes in impedance cardiography (ICG)-derived pre-ejection period (PEP) during rest, stress, and recovery. PEP is a time-domain metric used to assess cardiac-related sympathetic activity.

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks

  8. Changes in sIgA

    Changes in salivary-derived secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) levels at rest. Salivary-derived sIgA is a measure of mucosal immune function.

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jan 2024
  2. Study start11 Nov 2024
  3. Primary completion4 Sep 2025
  4. Study completion4 Sep 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
18 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06208163
Sponsor's protocol ID
Perez_OBE_042224
Acronym
OBE
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
5 Jan 2024
Last updated
8 May 2026
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Deidentified IPD necessary to reproduce results

Publications

  • Perez TM, Sliwka M, Smith-Ireland D, Jackson A, Sullivan S. Psychoneuroimmunological changes in adults with obesity receiving chiropractic care: a single-arm pilot trial. Front Psychiatry. 2026 Jul 17;17:1846987. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1846987. eCollection 2026.

    PubMed 42540508

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Chiropractic in people with Abdominal Obesity, run by Life University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 May 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of Potential Participants Who Are Eligible. (time frame: From lab arrival to completion of on-site screening (up to 15 minutes)). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06208163, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in