AzTrials
AzTrials

Anatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8NCT06193070

An Escape Room Intervention to Help Improve Breast Cancer Patients' Ability to Navigate Online Access to Nutrition Information

A study testing Educational Intervention, Interview and Survey Administration in people with Anatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8 and Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, run by Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This clinical trial evaluates an educational escape room intervention for improving awareness of and concern about breast cancer misinformation and reducing vulnerability to believing cancer misinformation among patients with stage I-III breast cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Educational Intervention, Interview and Survey Administration
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
45 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
7 Mar 2024to 22 Jun 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 years of age or older
  • English speaking
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Have access to a computer (desktop or laptop)
  • Have been previously diagnosed with breast cancer (Stages I-III) and currently in active treatment for breast cancer

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium

    Seattle, Washington, 98109

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Escape Room: A Gamified Approach to Learning About Cancer Nutrition Information

This clinical trial evaluates an educational escape room intervention for improving awareness of and concern about breast cancer misinformation and reducing vulnerability to believing cancer misinformation among patients with stage I-III breast cancer. Misinformation, or communication about health information that is inaccurate or false, can have serious health consequences for those that believe it. The rise of the access to and use of various sources of information on the internet such as websites and social media has caused the spread of misinformation and disinformation to grow rapidly, resulting in negative consequences on health outcomes. Cancer misinformation, in particular, has become an increasingly prevalent issue that poses a real threat to the many cancer patients in the United States. The educational escape room intervention is a game designed to teach participants how to discern whether cancer nutrition information is accurate or may potentially be misinformation. Participants are immersed in the narrative while solving puzzles to learn key themes such as the need to talk to their doctors, looking for scientific studies, as well as avoiding fads and trends, miracle cures, anecdotal evidence, and targeted and clickbait ads.

Read the detailed description

OUTLINE:

Patients complete a baseline before playing the virtual cancer nutrition information escape room game. Patients then play the virtual misinformation escape room game consisting of 5 puzzles and a final task over 30-45 minutes on study. Following the escape room game, patients complete a post-game survey and debrief interview (15 minutes).

Being tested
Educational Intervention, Interview, Survey Administration, Telemedicine

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Educational InterventionOther

    Also called Escape room cancer nutrition game

    Play virtual misinformation escape room game

  • InterviewOther

    Ancillary studies

  • Survey AdministrationOther

    Ancillary studies

  • TelemedicineOther

    Also called Telehealth

    Play virtual misinformation escape room game

Study groups in NCT06193070
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Supportive Care (escape room game)ExperimentalPatients play the virtual misinformation escape room game consisting of 5 puzzles and a final task over 30-45 minutes on study.
Receives: Other: Educational Intervention; Other: Interview; Other: Survey Administration; Other: Telemedicine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Accrued to the Study (Feasibility)

    The percentage of patients who accrue to the study among those who are eligible and approached.

    Measured: At enrollment

  2. Percentage of Patients Who Complete Game Sessions (Feasibility)

    The percentage of patients who complete the game.

    Measured: Up to 1 week

  3. Satisfaction (Acceptability)

    Will be assessed using a Likert-type question to assess satisfaction with the game (1 = not at all satisfied, 10 = very satisfied)

    Measured: Up to 1 week

  4. Likelihood to Recommend the Game to Someone Else (Acceptability)

    Will be assessed using a Likert-type question to assess likelihood to recommend the game to someone else (1 = not at all likely, 5 = very likely).

    Measured: Up to 1 week

  5. Usability (System Usability Scale)

    Usability will be assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS). The SUS is a reliable, 10-item measure 10-item scale, scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree; 5=strongly agree), with previously reported excellent internal reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.91). Total scores on the SUS range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating greater usability.

    Measured: Up to 1 week

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Types of Online Information

    Will be assessed using a 6-item checklist that asks which resources participants or their family members have used to find nutrition information in the past 3 months (self-care/health and wellness book, telephone advice service, booklet/flyer shared by a health professional, internet forums, internet search, social media).

    Reported as count data of number of participants who endorsed one or more sources (self-care/health and wellness book, telephone advice service, booklet/flyer shared by a health professional, internet forums, internet search, social media).

    Measured: At baseline

  2. Concern About Misinformation and Confidence in Identifying Misinformation

    Will be assessed using our 4-item scale in which patients indicate degree to which they agree with statements using a 5-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree, 5=strongly agree). Items asked participants to rate the degree to which they agree with the following: (1) I am more worried about accidentally believing misinformation, (2) I am more worried about accidentally sharing misinformation online, (3) I am more concerned about misinformation in society, and (4) I feel more confident in my ability to identify misinformation).

    Measured: Up to 1 week

  3. Cancer Nutrition Information Beliefs

    Will be assessed using a 15-item checklist of common cancer nutrition misinformation and credible nutrition advice, using a 5-point Likert Scale (1=definitely false, 5 = definitely true). Data reported as an average score at both pre-intervention (pre-game score) and post-intervention (post-game score).

    Measured: At baseline and up to 1 week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Jan 2024
  2. Study start7 Mar 2024
  3. Primary completion22 Jun 2024
  4. Study completion22 Jun 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
45 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06193070
Sponsor's protocol ID
RG1123830
Other IDs
NCI-2023-08424, 20282, P30CA015704
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
12 Dec 2023
Last updated
27 Dec 2024
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Educational Intervention, Interview and Survey Administration in people with Anatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8 and Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, run by Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Dec 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Accrued to the Study (Feasibility) (time frame: At enrollment). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Dec 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in