AzTrials
AzTrials

Anti-NMDA Receptor EncephalitisAMENDSNCT06183788

Antibody-mediated NMDA Receptor Encephalitis: Symptoms, Biomarkers, and Mechanisms of the Prolonged Recovery Stage

A study testing Remote cognitive rehabilitation program in people with Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis, run by Fundacion Clinic per a la Recerca Biomédica at 1 site in Spain.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The encephalitis mediated by antibodies against the NMDA receptor (NMDARe) predominantly affects young adults and children resulting in severe neurologic and psychiatric deficits. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis
What is being tested?
Remote cognitive rehabilitation program
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
16 Jan 2023to 30 Nov 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients ≥12 years old with NMDARe in the post-acute stage of the disease;
  • ≤6 months from hospital discharge (acute phase)

Who cannot join

  • Inability to obtain informed consent;
  • inability to travel to the center.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Josep Dalmau, MD,PhD contact

34 93 227 1738

jdalmau@clinic.cat

Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona

    Barcelona, Catalonia, 08036

    Josep Dalmau, MD, PhD, +34 93 227 1738, jdalmau@clinic.cat

    Victor Patricio, MS, +34 93 227 1738, vpatricio@recerca.clinic.cat

    Recruiting

Other trials in Spain

About this study

The encephalitis mediated by antibodies against the NMDA receptor (NMDARe) predominantly affects young adults and children resulting in severe neurologic and psychiatric deficits. After overcoming the acute stage, patients are left with long-lasting behavioral, cognitive, and psychiatric alterations with important socio-family-economical implications. Here investigators postulate that a better knowledge of this stage will improve treatment decisions and outcome.

In Aim 1, the post-acute stage will be clinically characterized, tools to remotely follow cognitive, behavioral and psychiatric deficits will be provided, and the impact of cognitive rehabilitation will be assessed.

Read more

In Aim 2, biomarkers (autoimmune, inflammatory, neuronal injury) will be identified as signatures of the acute and post-acute stages.

In Aim 3, a mouse model of NMDARe will be used to determine the underlying mechanisms and treatment of the postacute stage.

Being tested
Remote cognitive rehabilitation program
Keywords
Cognitive Impairment, Encephalitis, Autoimmune, Cognitive rehabilitation
Medical subject headings
Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis, Cognitive Dysfunction, Encephalitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Remote cognitive rehabilitation programBehavioural

    Remote cognitive rehabilitation program will be performed through an online validated platform (Guttmann NeuroPersonalTrainer: https://gnpt.es/) run by the psychologists team. This is a Sanitary Product with CE certification (Sanitary Product RPS/430/2014; International Patent [PCT/ES2008/00677]) and here will be used within its approved indications. The rehabilitation program will increase in difficulty and decrease in frequency during the first year of follow-up (V1-V3).

Study groups in NCT06183788
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Anti-NMDARe patients with remote cognitive rehabilitationExperimentalParticipants of a prospective cohort in post-acute phase of the Antibody-mediated NMDA Receptor Encephalitis that will received a behavioral treatment.
Receives: Behavioral: Remote cognitive rehabilitation program

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Age

    Age measured in years

    Measured: 18 months

  2. Gender

    Male or female

    Measured: 18 months

  3. Vision condition

    Studied by optometer

    Measured: 18 months

  4. Handedness

    Right- or Left-handed

    Measured: 18 months

  5. General medical history

    Description of the most important issues compiled in the general medical history of the participant

    Measured: 18 months

  6. Allergies

    List of allergies of each participant

    Measured: 18 months

  7. Symptoms related to NMDARe

    Detailed description of symptoms experienced before, during and after the post-acute phase of NMDARe.

    Measured: 18 months

  8. Treatments

    All treatments in which the participant is being involved.

    Measured: 18 months

  9. Functional status

    Functional status according to Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)

    Modified Rankin Scale:

    • Range: from 0 points (no symptoms) to 6 points (dead).

    Measured: 18 months

  10. Intelligence Quotient

    Estimated through General Ability Index (GAI; from Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale - IV (WAIS-IV).

    This index is obtained through Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI) and Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI).

    • Range of GAI: from 40 to 160. Higher is better.
    • Range of VCI: from 50 to 150. Higher is better.
    • Range of PRI: from 50 to 150. Higher is better.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  11. Verbal working memory

    Verbal Working Memory: Working Memory Index (WMI) from WAIS-IV.

    • Range of WMI: from 50 to 150. Higher is better.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  12. Phonological loop

    Assessed by Forward order span of Digit span subtest from WAIS-IV.

    • Range: from 0 to 9

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  13. Visual working memory

    Visual Working Memory: Spatial location subtest from Weschler Memory Scale - IV (WMS-IV).

    • Range of Spatial Location subtest: from 0 to 32. Higher is better.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  14. Verbal learning

    Assessed by:

    Adults: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense; TAVEC); or Infants: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test for Children (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense Infantil; TAVECI)

    • Total learning: range: from 0 to 80. Higher is better.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  15. Proactive interference verbal memory

    Assessed by:

    Adults: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense; TAVEC); or Infants: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test for Children (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense Infantil; TAVECI)

    • Interference list: range: 0 to 15. Higher is better.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  16. Short-term verbal memory

    Assessed by:

    Adults: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense; TAVEC); or Infants: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test for Children (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense Infantil; TAVECI)

    • Short-term memory free recall: range: 0 to 15. Higher is better.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  17. Long-term verbal memory

    Assessed by:

    Adults: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense; TAVEC); or Infants: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test for Children (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense Infantil; TAVECI)

    • Long-term memory free recall: range: 0 to 15. Higher is better.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  18. Verbal recognition memory

    Assessed by:

    Adults: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense; TAVEC); or Infants: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test for Children (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense Infantil; TAVECI)

    • Word-list Recognition: range: 0 to 15. Higher is better.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  19. Verbal discrimination memory

    Assessed by:

    Adults: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense; TAVEC); or Infants: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test for Children (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense Infantil; TAVECI)

    • Discrimination index of word-list: False positives + omissions of recognition between 44 total words to recognize. Higher is better.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  20. Verbal retention memory

    Assessed by:

    Adults: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense; TAVEC); or Infants: España - Complutense Auditory-Verbal Learning Test for Children (Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España - Complutense Infantil; TAVECI)

    • Retention index: percentatge of Long-term memory free recall between Short-term memory free recall. Higher is better.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  21. Immediate visual memory

    Assessed by: Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R)

    • Immediate visual memory: range: from 0 to 36. Higher is better.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  22. Delayed visual memory

    Assessed by: Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R)

    • Delayed visual memory: range: from 0 to 12. Higher is better.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  23. Visual retention memory

    Assessed by: Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R)

    • Retention index: percentatge of Long-term memory free recall between the Higher punctuation at Trial 2 or 3. Higher is better.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  24. Visual recognition memory

    Assessed by: Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R)

    • Figure Recognition: range: from 0 to 6. Higher is better.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  25. Visual discrimination memory

    Assessed by: Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R)

    • Discrimination index: figure recognized minus false positives. Range: from -6 to 6. Higher is better.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  26. Processing speed

    Processing speed Index (PSI; from Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale - IV (WAIS-IV).

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  27. TMT-A

    Trail Making Test part A (TMT-A):

    • Time in seconds: from 0 to infinity.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  28. TMT-B

    Trail Making Test part B (TMT-B):

    • Time in seconds: from 0 to infinity.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  29. Naming

    Assessed by: Boston Naming Test (BNT)

    • Total correct: from 0 to 60

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  30. Naming with cues

    Assessed by: Boston Naming Test (BNT)

    • Total correct with phonemic cue: from 0 to 60

    Measured: 18 months

  31. Latency in naming

    Assessed by: Boston Naming Test (BNT)

    • Time to complete test in seconds

    Measured: 18 months

  32. Semantic fluency

    Number of name of animals recalled in 1 minute: range: from 0 to infinity. (Test Barcelona - Revised) (for ADULTS) Number of name of animals recalled in 1 minute + number of name of food and drinks recalled in 1 minute: from 0 to infinity (NEPSY - II) (for CHILDREN)

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  33. Phonemic fluency

    Number of words started by letter "M" recalled in 1 minute: Range: from 0 to infinity. (Test Barcelona-Revised) (for ADULTS) Number of words started by letter "P" recalled in 1 minute + number of words started by letter "M" in 1 minute: range: from 0 to infinity (NEPSY-II) (for CHILDREN).

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  34. Visuospatial skills

    Number location subtest of the Visual-Object Spatial and Perceptual battery.

    • Range: from 0 to 10

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  35. Visuospatial skills - children

    Assessed by Arrows subtest of NEPSY-2 battery

    • Range: from 0 to 20

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  36. Stroop test - word subtest

    • Words: words read in 45 seconds

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  37. Stroop test - color subtest

    • Colour: colours distinguished in 45 seconds.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  38. Stroop test - word-color subtest

    • Word-colour: colours distinguished in 45 seconds.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  39. Detectability - CPT3

    Assessed by Continuous Performance Test - 3rd Version.

    Measures the respondent's ability to differentiate non-targets (i.e. the letter X) from targets (i.e. all other letters).

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  40. Omissions - CPT3

    Assessed by Continuous Performance Test - 3rd Version.

    Result from a failure to respond to targets.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  41. Comissions - CPT3

    Assessed by Continuous Performance Test - 3rd Version.

    Comissions are made when responses are given to non-targets.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  42. HRT - CPT3

    Assessed by Continuous Performance Test - 3rd Version.

    Hit Reaction Time (HRT) is the mean response speed of correct responses from the whole administration.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  43. HRT-SD - CPT3

    Assessed by Continuous Performance Test - 3rd Version.

    Hit Reaction Time Standard Deviation (HRT-SD) is a measure of response speed consistency during the entire administration.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  44. Variability- CPT3

    Assessed by Continuous Performance Test - 3rd Version.

    The amount of variability that the patient showed in 18 separate segments of the administration in relation to their own overall Hit Reaction Time Standard Deviation (HRT-SD).

    It is a measure of response consistency and a "within respondent" measure".

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  45. HRT Block Change - CPT3

    Assessed by Continuous Performance Test - 3rd Version.

    Hit Reaction Time Block Change indicates the change in mean response speed across blocks.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  46. HRT ISI Change - CPT3

    Assessed by Continuous Performance Test - 3rd Version.

    Hit Reaction Time Inter-Stimulus Interval Change (HRT ISI Change) indicates the change in mean response speed at various ISIs.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  47. Prensence of psychiatric symptoms or disorders in presential assessments

    Number of participants with psychiatric symptoms/disorders following DSM-IV-TR guidelines (psychotic symptoms, symptoms of depression, symptoms of mania, global functioning).

    Measured: 18 months

  48. Sleep microstructure - Total study time

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported.

    Parameters:

    • Total sleep time: minutes

    Measured: 18 months

  49. Sleep microstructure - Total sleep time

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported.

    Parameters:

    • Total sleep time: minutes

    Measured: 18 months

  50. Sleep microstructure - Sleep efficiency

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported.

    Parameters:

    • Sleep efficiency: based on total study time and total sleep time

    Measured: 18 months

  51. Sleep microstructure - Time to sleep onset

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported.

    Parameters:

    • Time to sleep onset: minutes

    Measured: 18 months

  52. Sleep microstructure - Time in stage N1

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported.

    Parameters:

    • Time in stage N1: minutes

    Measured: 18 months

  53. Sleep microstructure - Time in stage N2

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported.

    Parameters:

    • Time in stage N2: minutes

    Measured: 18 months

  54. Sleep microstructure - Time in stage N3

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported.

    Parameters:

    • Time in stage N3: minutes

    Measured: 18 months

  55. Sleep microstructure - Time in stage R

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported.

    Parameters:

    • Time in stage R: minutes

    Measured: 18 months

  56. Sleep microstructure - First epoch of N1

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported.

    Parameters:

    • First epoch of N1: minutes

    Measured: 18 months

  57. Sleep microstructure - First epoch of N2

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported.

    Parameters:

    • First epoch of N2: minutes

    Measured: 18 months

  58. Sleep microstructure - First epoch of N3

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported.

    Parameters:

    • First epoch of N3: minutes

    Measured: 18 months

  59. Sleep microstructure - First epoch of REM

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported.

    Parameters:

    • First epoch of REM: minutes

    Measured: 18 months

  60. Sleep microstructure - REM/NREM time ratio

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported.

    Parameters:

    • REM/NREM time ratio

    Measured: 18 months

  61. Sleep microstructure - Number of arousals

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported.

    Parameters:

    • Number of arousals (total)

    Measured: 18 months

  62. Sleep microstructure - Arousal Index

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported.

    Parameters:

    • Arousal Index

    Measured: 18 months

  63. Sleep microstructure - Confusional arousals

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported.

    Parameters:

    • Confusional arousals: Yes or No

    Measured: 18 months

  64. Sleep microstructure - Direct transition from N3 to W

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported.

    Parameters:

    • Direct transition from N3 to W: yes or no

    Measured: 18 months

  65. Sleep microstructure - Delta arousals

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported.

    Parameters:

    • "Delta arousals"?: yes, no or unknown

    Measured: 18 months

  66. Sleep microstructure - Wake after sleep

    It will be adapted to patient's sleep habits (~23:00 to 07:30) using a digital polygraph (Deltamed). This includes EEG in 43 scalp channels + 11 channels for electrooculography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and audiovisual recording (sampling rate 256 Hz). Sleep stages will be scored manually (AASM criteria) using 30-s epochs, with modifications depending on sleep alterations, as reported.

    Parameters:

    • Wake after sleep: hour

    Measured: 18 months

  67. Adherence to cognitive treatment - 6 months

    Number of sessions performed in 6 months

    Measured: 6 months

  68. Adherence to cognitive treatment - 9 months

    Number of sessions performed in 9 months

    Measured: 9 months

  69. Adherence to cognitive treatment - 12 months

    Number of sessions performed in 12 months

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (83)
  1. Immune/inflammatory signaling-target gene expression pathways

    Whole blood/CSF will be collected using PAXgene® Blood RNA Tubes (Qiagen) shipped to the centers. Blood from healthy subjects and CSF from patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus will serve as controls.

    Total RNA will be extracted using PAXgene® Blood RNA Kit (Qiagen). RNA samples are quantified using Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies) and RNA integrity is determined with Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies).

    Expression levels of 44 genes related to immune/inflammatory (or cytokine) pathways will be measured with the nCounter® Digital Analyzer (NanoString).

    The raw copy number of mRNA transcripts of each gene will be standardized (stdGene) using the geometric mean of the 4 housekeeping genes for each subject.

    Measured: 18 months

  2. Neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels in acute stage

    Signature of molecular biomarkers in the acute stage

    Measured: 18 months

  3. Neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels in post-acute stage

    Signature of molecular biomarkers in the post-acute stages

    Measured: 18 months

  4. Cell immunophenotyping - proportion of CD4

    Whole blood/CSF obtained in a EDTA tube will be analyzed in a FACS Canto II cytometer to assess the proportion of CD4.

    Measured: 18 months

  5. Cell immunophenotyping - proportion of CD8

    Whole blood/CSF obtained in a EDTA tube will be analyzed in a FACS Canto II cytometer to assess the proportion of CD8.

    Measured: 18 months

  6. Cell immunophenotyping - proportion of CD8+CD45RA+

    Whole blood/CSF obtained in a EDTA tube will be analyzed in a FACS Canto II cytometer to assess the proportion of CD8+CD45RA+.

    Measured: 18 months

  7. Cell immunophenotyping - proportion of CD8+CD45RO+

    Whole blood/CSF obtained in a EDTA tube will be analyzed in a FACS Canto II cytometer to assess the proportion of CD8+CD45RO+.

    Measured: 18 months

  8. Cell immunophenotyping - proportion of iNKT

    Whole blood/CSF obtained in a EDTA tube will be analyzed in a FACS Canto II cytometer to assess the proportion of iNKT.

    Measured: 18 months

  9. Cell immunophenotyping - proportion of CD19

    Whole blood/CSF obtained in a EDTA tube will be analyzed in a FACS Canto II cytometer to assess the proportion of CD19.

    Measured: 18 months

  10. Cell immunophenotyping - proportion of B naive (IgM+IgD+CD27-)

    Whole blood/CSF obtained in a EDTA tube will be analyzed in a FACS Canto II cytometer to assess the proportion of B naive (IgM+IgD+CD27-).

    Measured: 18 months

  11. Cell immunophenotyping - proportion of B memory (IgD-)

    Whole blood/CSF obtained in a EDTA tube will be analyzed in a FACS Canto II cytometer to assess the proportion of B memory (IgD-).

    Measured: 18 months

  12. Cell immunophenotyping - proportion of regulatory B cells

    Whole blood/CSF obtained in a EDTA tube will be analyzed in a FACS Canto II cytometer to assess the proportion of regulatory B cells.

    Measured: 18 months

  13. Cell immunophenotyping - proportion of plasmablasts

    Whole blood/CSF obtained in a EDTA tube will be analyzed in a FACS Canto II cytometer to assess the proportion of plasmablasts.

    Measured: 18 months

  14. Cell immunophenotyping - proportion of NK cells

    Whole blood/CSF obtained in a EDTA tube will be analyzed in a FACS Canto II cytometer to assess the proportion of NK cells.

    Measured: 18 months

  15. MRI

    It will be conducted on a 3 Tesla Prisma scanner using a 32-channel head coil. Scanning takes ~50 min including 3D T1-weighted in sagittal plane; T2*axial EPI; axial diffusion weighted EPI; 3D sagittal FLAIR; resting state functional MRI and glutamate and H2O univoxel spectroscopy in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and hippocampus. There is no contrast used for the MRI scans

    Outcome for MRI is normal or abnormal. Investigators will review all MRI sequences and determine if the MRI is abnormal and then describe the abnormality or abnormalities seen.

    Measured: 18 months

  16. EEG: normalcy

    It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases).

    Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases).

    • Normalcy: yes or no.

    Measured: 18 months

  17. EEG: time awake

    It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases).

    Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases).

    Parameters:

    • Time awake: percentage

    Measured: 18 months

  18. EEG: time in drowsiness

    It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases).

    Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases).

    Parameters:

    • Time in drowsiness: percentage

    Measured: 18 months

  19. EEG: time asleep

    It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases).

    Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases).

    Parameters:

    • Time asleep: percentage

    Measured: 18 months

  20. EEG: epileptiform activity

    It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases).

    Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases).

    Parameters:

    • Epileptiform activity: yes or no

    Measured: 18 months

  21. EEG: seizures

    It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases).

    Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases).

    Parameters:

    • Seizures: yes or no

    Measured: 18 months

  22. EEG: slowing

    It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases).

    Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases).

    Parameters:

    • EEG slowing: yes or no

    Measured: 18 months

  23. EEG: Changes with Intermittent Light Stimulation

    It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases).

    Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases).

    Parameters:

    • Changes with Intermittent Light Stimulation: yes or no

    Measured: 18 months

  24. EEG: Changes with hyperventilation

    It will include standard clinical EEG protocol (43 channels, 512 Hz18) (primary variables), and EEG reactivations of memories prior to new trials (secondary variables) while participants perform WM tasks, which will be synchronized with the task software in a laptop. The memory content from alpha power across electrodes will be related to the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases).

    Performances of the subjects produces a reactivation of memory prior to new trials while participants perform working memory tasks, and relate the decoding accuracy in different task periods to disease treatment and recovery and to behavioral parameters (WM precision, serial biases).

    Parameters:

    • Changes with hyperventilation: yes or no

    Measured: 18 months

  25. Verbal working memory - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Digit subtest from WAIS-IV: obtained by Forward order, indirect order, increasing order subtests.

    • Range: 0 - 48

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  26. Verbal learning - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Total learning List A subtest from Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)

    • Range: 0 - 75

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  27. Proactive interference verbal memory - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    List B subtest from Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)

    • Range: 0 - 15

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  28. Short-term verbal memory - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Short-term verbal memory subtest from Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)

    • Range: 0 - 15

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  29. Long-term verbal memory - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Long-term verbal memory subtest from Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)

    • Range: 0 - 15

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  30. Verbal recognition memory - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Verbal recognition memory list subtest from Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)

    • Range: 0 - 15

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  31. Verbal discrimination memory - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Verbal discrimination memory subtest from Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)

    • Range: 0 - 1

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  32. Complex figure copy - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Precision in the copy of the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure:

    • Range: 0-36

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  33. Time - Complex figure copy - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Time to perform the copy of the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure: seconds

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  34. Type - Complex figure copy - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Type of copy of the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure:

    • Range: 1 to 4

    Measured: 18 months

  35. Short-term visual memory - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Short term memory subtest of the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure:

    • Range: 0 - 36

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  36. Long-term visual memory - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Long-term memory subtest of the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure:

    • Range: 0 - 36

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  37. Orientation in time - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Orientation in time subtest from Test Barcelona - Revised.

    • Range: 0 - 5

    Higher is better.

    Measured: 18 months

  38. Orientation in space - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Orientation in space subtest from Test Barcelona - Revised.

    • Range: 0 -5

    Measured: 18 months

  39. 5DT Lecture - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Lecture subtest from 5 digit test: time

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  40. 5DT counting - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Counting subtest from 5 digit test: time

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  41. 5DT Choosing - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Choosing subtest from 5 digit test: time

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  42. 5DT Switching - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Switching subtest from 5 digit test: time

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  43. 5DT Inhibition - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Inhibition subtest from 5 digit test: time

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  44. 5DT Flexibility - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Flexibility subtest from 5 digit test: time

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  45. IEDEEDS - remote assessment

    IED EDS Errors: The number of times that the subject failed to select the stimulus compatible with the current rule on the stage where the extra-dimensional shift occurs. This is a measure of the subject's ability to shift attentional set.

    Assessed by:

    Intra-Extra Dimensional test from CANTAB battery.

    • Raw score range: 0 - 50. Lower is better.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  46. IEDYERTA - remote assessment

    IED Total Errors (Adjusted): The total number of times that the subject chose a wrong stimulus - i.e. one incompatible with the current rule, adjustment for every stage that was not reached. Lower is better. Total Errors Adjusted = Total Errors (problems reached) + [(number of unreached problems) * (25)] This is a measure of the subject's efficiency in attempting the test. Subjects failing at any stage of the test will have had less opportunity to make errors. The adjustment is carried out to compensate for this missing data, and provide a more comparable error score to subjects completing all stages of the test..

    Assessed by:

    Intra-Extra Dimensional test from CANTAB battery.

    • Raw score range: 0 - 402. Lower is better.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  47. IEDYCOST - remote assessment

    IED Stages Completed: This is the total number of stages the subject completed successfully. There are nine stages to be completed. Higher is better.

    Assessed by:

    Intra-Extra Dimensional test from CANTAB battery.

    • Range: 0 - 9. Higher is better.

    Measured: 18 months

  48. SWM Total Errors - remote assessment

    SWM Total Errors: The total number of times a box is selected that is certain not to contain a token and therefore should not have been visited by the subject, i.e. between errors + within errors - double errors. Calculated across all assessed four, six and eight token trials.

    Assessed by:

    Spatial Working Memory test from CANTAB battery.

    • Range: 0 - 157. Lower is better

    Measured: 18 months

  49. SWM Between Errors - remote assessment

    SWM Between Errors: The number of times the subject incorrectly revisits a box in which a token has previously been found. Calculated across all assessed four, six and eight token trials.

    Assessed by:

    Spatial Working Memory test from CANTAB battery:

    • Raw score range: 0 - 153. Lower is better.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  50. SWM Within Errors - remote assessment

    SWM Within Errors: The number of times a subject revisits a box already shown to be empty during the same search. Calculated across all assessed four, six and eight token trials.

    Assessed by:

    Spatial Working Memory test from CANTAB battery:

    • Range: 0 - 153. Lower is better.

    Measured: 18 months

  51. SWM Double Errors - remote assessment

    SWM Double Errors: The number of times a subject commits an error that is both a within error and a between error. Calculated across all assessed four, six and eight token trials.

    Assessed by:

    Spatial Working Memory test from CANTAB battery:

    • Range: 0 - 147. Lower is better.

    Measured: 18 months

  52. SWMS - remote assessment

    SWM Strategy (6-8 boxes): The number of times a subject begins a new search pattern from the same box they started with previously. If they always begin a search from the same starting point we infer that the subject is employing a planned strategy for finding the tokens. Therefore a low score indicates high strategy use (1 = they always begin the search from the same box), a high score indicates that they are beginning their searches from many different boxes. Calculated across assessed trials with 6 tokens or 8 tokens.

    Assessed by:

    Spatial Working Memory test from CANTAB battery:

    • Range: 2 - 14. Lower is better.

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased

    Measured: 18 months

  53. SWMSX - remote assessment

    SWM Strategy (6-12 boxes): The number of times a subject begins a new search pattern from the same box they started with previously. If they always begin a search from the same starting point we infer that the subject is employing a planned strategy for finding the tokens. Therefore a low score indicates high strategy use (1 = they always begin the search from the same box), a high score indicates that they are beginning their searches from many different boxes. Calculated across assessed trials with 6 tokens or more.

    Assessed by:

    Spatial Working Memory test from CANTAB battery:

    • Range: 3 - 26. Lower is better.

    Measured: 18 months

  54. SWMPR - remote assessment

    SWM Problem Reached: This measure reports the problem number that the subject reached, but did not necessarily complete.

    Assessed by:

    Spatial Working Memory test from CANTAB battery:

    • Range: 2 - 6. Higher is better.

    Measured: 18 months

  55. ERTTH - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Emotion Recognition Task from CANTAB battery.

    ERT Total Hits: The total number of times the subject selected the correct emotion. Calculated across all assessed trials.

    • Range: 0 - 90. Higher is Better

    Measured: 18 months

  56. ERTTHH - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Emotion Recognition Task from CANTAB battery.

    ERT Total Hits Happiness: The total number of times the subject correctly selected the emotion 'Happiness'. Calculated across all assessed trials.

    • Range: 0 - 15 . Higher is Better

    Measured: 18 months

  57. ERTTHS - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Emotion Recognition Task from CANTAB battery.

    ERT Total Hits Sadness: The total number of times the subject correctly selected the emotion 'Sadness'. Calculated across all assessed trials.

    • Range: 0 - 15 . Higher is Better

    Measured: 18 months

  58. ERTTHF - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Emotion Recognition Task from CANTAB battery.

    ERT Total Hits Fear: The total number of times the subject correctly selected the emotion 'Fear'. Calculated across all assessed trials.

    • Range: 0 - 15 . Higher is Better

    Measured: 18 months

  59. ERTTHA - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Emotion Recognition Task from CANTAB battery.

    ERT Total Hits Anger: The total number of times the subject correctly selected the emotion 'Anger'. Calculated across all assessed trials.

    • Range: 0 - 15 . Higher is Better

    Measured: 18 months

  60. ERTTHSU - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Emotion Recognition Task from CANTAB battery

    ERT Total Hits Surprise: The total number of times the subject correctly selected the emotion 'Surprise'. Calculated across all assessed trials.

    • Range: 0 - 15 . Higher is Better.

    Measured: 18 months

  61. ERTTHD - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Emotion Recognition Task from CANTAB battery.

    ERT Total Hits Disgust: The total number of times the subject correctly selected the emotion 'Disgust'. Calculated across all assessed trials.

    • Range: 0 - 15 . Higher is Better.

    Measured: 18 months

  62. ERTTFAH - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Emotion Recognition Task from CANTAB battery.

    ERT Total False Alarms Happiness: The total number of times the subject incorrectly selected the emotion 'Happiness'. Calculated across all assessed trials.

    • Range: 0 - 75 . Lower is Better.

    Measured: 18 months

  63. ERTTFAS - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Emotion Recognition Task from CANTAB battery.

    ERT Total False Alarms Sadness: The total number of times the subject incorrectly selected the emotion 'Sadness'. Calculated across all assessed trials.

    • Range: 0 - 75 . Lower is Better.

    Measured: 18 months

  64. ERTTFAF - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Emotion Recognition Task from CANTAB battery.

    ERT Total False Alarms Fear: The total number of times the subject incorrectly selected the emotion 'Fear'. Calculated across all assessed trials.

    • Range: 0 - 75 . Lower is Better.

    Measured: 18 months

  65. ERTTFAA - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Emotion Recognition Task from CANTAB battery.

    ERT Total False Alarms Anger: The total number of times the subject incorrectly selected the emotion 'Anger'. Calculated across all assessed trials.

    • Range: 0 - 75 . Lower is Better.

    Measured: 18 months

  66. ERTTFASU - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Emotion Recognition Task from CANTAB battery.

    ERT Total False Alarms Surprise: The total number of times the subject incorrectly selected the emotion 'Surprise'. Calculated across all assessed trials.

    • Range: 0 - 75 . Lower is Better.

    Measured: 18 months

  67. ERTTFAD - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Emotion Recognition Task from CANTAB battery.

    ERT Total False Alarms Disgust: The total number of times the subject incorrectly selected the emotion 'Disgust'. Calculated across all assessed trials.

    • Range: 0 - 75 . Lower is Better.

    Measured: 18 months

  68. ERTUHRH - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Emotion Recognition Task from CANTAB battery.

    ERT Unbiased Hit Rate Happiness: The unbiased hit rate ensures that recognition accuracy of the Happiness emotion is not influenced by response guessing or response bias effects. It takes into consideration the joint probability of an individual making a correct response, based on the presentation of the correct stimulus out of the available possibilities. Calculated for assessed Happiness trials only.

    • Range: 0 to 1. Higher is better.

    Measured: 18 months

  69. ERTUHRS - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Emotion Recognition Task from CANTAB battery.

    ERT Unbiased Hit Rate Sadness: The unbiased hit rate ensures that recognition accuracy of the Sadness emotion is not influenced by response guessing or response bias effects. It takes into consideration the joint probability of an individual making a correct response, based on the presentation of the correct stimulus out of the available possibilities. Calculated for assessed Sadness trials only

    • Range: 0 to 1. Higher is better.

    Measured: 18 months

  70. ERTUHRF - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Emotion Recognition Task from CANTAB battery.

    ERT Unbiased Hit Rate Fear: The unbiased hit rate ensures that recognition accuracy of the Fear emotion is not influenced by response guessing or response bias effects. It takes into consideration the joint probability of an individual making a correct response, based on the presentation of the correct stimulus out of the available possibilities. Calculated for assessed Fear trials only.

    • Range: 0 to 1. Higher is better.

    Measured: 18 months

  71. ERTUHRA - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Emotion Recognition Task from CANTAB battery.

    ERT Unbiased Hit Rate Anger: The unbiased hit rate ensures that recognition accuracy of the Anger emotion is not influenced by response guessing or response bias effects. It takes into consideration the joint probability of an individual making a correct response, based on the presentation of the correct stimulus out of the available possibilities. Calculated for assessed Anger trials only.

    • Range: 0 to 1. Higher is better.

    Measured: 18 months

  72. ERTUHRSU - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Emotion Recognition Task from CANTAB battery.

    ERT Unbiased Hit Rate Surprise: The unbiased hit rate ensures that recognition accuracy of the Surprise emotion is not influenced by response guessing or response bias effects. It takes into consideration the joint probability of an individual making a correct response, based on the presentation of the correct stimulus out of the available possibilities. Calculated for assessed Anger trials only.

    • Range: 0 to 1. Higher is better.

    Measured: 18 months

  73. ERTUHRSD - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Emotion Recognition Task from CANTAB battery.

    ERT Unbiased Hit Rate Disgust: The unbiased hit rate ensures that recognition accuracy of the Disgust emotion is not influenced by response guessing or response bias effects. It takes into consideration the joint probability of an individual making a correct response, based on the presentation of the correct stimulus out of the available possibilities. Calculated for assessed Disgust trials only.

    • Range: 0 to 1. Higher is better.

    Measured: 18 months

  74. Semantic fluency - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Semantic fluency test:

    • Produce names of fruits and vegetables in 1 minute (Test Barcelona - Revised) (for ADULTS)
    • Number of name of animals recalled in 1 minute + number of name of food and drinks recalled in 1 minute: from 0 to infinity (NEPSY - II) (for CHILDREN)

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  75. Phonemic fluency - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Phonemic fluenct test:

    • Produce words that start with letter M in 1 minute: range from 0 to infinity (Test Barcelona - Revised) (for ADULTS)
    • Number of words started by letter "P" recalled in 1 minute + number of words started by letter "M" in 1 minute: range: from 0 to infinity (NEPSY-II) (for CHILDREN).

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  76. Naming - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Boston Naming Test (BNT):

    • Range: from 0 to 60

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  77. Naming with cues - remote assessment

    Assessed by: Boston Naming Test (BNT)

    • Total correct with phonemic cue: from 0 to 60

    Measured: 18 months

  78. Time in Naming - remote assessment

    Assessed by: Boston Naming Test (BNT): time to complete

    Measured: 18 months

  79. Visuospatial skills - remote assessment

    Assessed by:

    Benton Judgment of Line Orientation Test (JLO):

    • Range: 0 to 30

    Raw scores were transformed into standard T-scores (mean 50 ± standard deviation [SD] 10) and a score below 35 (≤ 1.5 SD below normative mean, or the equivalent ≤9th percentile) was considered significantly decreased.

    Measured: 18 months

  80. Psychiatric symptoms/disorders in remote assessments

    Number of participants with psychiatric symptoms/disorders following DSM-IV-TR guidelines (psychotic symptoms, symptoms of depression, symptoms of mania, global functioning).

    Measured: 18 months

  81. Serial bias in working memory

    This is quantified from the participant responses in the working memory task. Errors in the report of memorized locations are multiplied by the sign of the difference in locations in the previous and current trials and then averaged over the whole session to obtain the index of serial bias. We expect increases in this index as patients improve clinically.

    Measured: 18 months

  82. EEG reactivations in working memory

    This is quantified by training decoders of memorized locations on EEG signals acquired over several electrodes during the working memory task. Reactivations are the average strength of the decoders during the fixation period of the next trial. We expect that EEG reactivations increase as patients improve clinically and correlate with the serial bias index.

    Measured: 18 months

  83. Slow-wave rate of growth during slow-wave sleep period

    This is quantified from EEG recorded during sleep, by detecting individual slow-waves and estimating their strength, and then computing the rate of growth of this strength in the first slow-wave periods in the night. We expect the rate of growth of slow waves to increase as patients improve.

    Measured: 18 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Dec 2023
  2. Study start16 Jan 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06183788
Sponsor's protocol ID
HR22-00221
Acronym
AMENDS
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
19 May 2023
Last updated
6 May 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Guasp M, Rosa-Justicia M, Munoz-Lopetegi A, Martinez-Hernandez E, Armangue T, Sugranyes G, Stein H, Borras R, Prades L, Arino H, Planaguma J, De-La-Serna E, Escudero D, Llufriu S, Sanchez-Valle R, Santamaria J, Compte A, Castro-Fornieles J, Dalmau J; Spanish anti-NMDAR Encephalitis Study Group. Clinical characterisation of patients in the post-acute stage of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: a prospective cohort study and comparison with patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2022 Oct;21(10):899-910. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00299-X.

    PubMed 36115362
  • Titulaer MJ, McCracken L, Gabilondo I, Armangue T, Glaser C, Iizuka T, Honig LS, Benseler SM, Kawachi I, Martinez-Hernandez E, Aguilar E, Gresa-Arribas N, Ryan-Florance N, Torrents A, Saiz A, Rosenfeld MR, Balice-Gordon R, Graus F, Dalmau J. Treatment and prognostic factors for long-term outcome in patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: an observational cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2013 Feb;12(2):157-65. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70310-1. Epub 2013 Jan 3.

    PubMed 23290630
  • Arino H, Munoz-Lopetegi A, Martinez-Hernandez E, Armangue T, Rosa-Justicia M, Escudero D, Matos N, Graus F, Sugranyes G, Castro-Fornieles J, Compte A, Dalmau J, Santamaria J. Sleep disorders in anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Neurology. 2020 Aug 11;95(6):e671-e684. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009987. Epub 2020 Jun 23.

    PubMed 32576635
  • Finke C, Kopp UA, Scheel M, Pech LM, Soemmer C, Schlichting J, Leypoldt F, Brandt AU, Wuerfel J, Probst C, Ploner CJ, Pruss H, Paul F. Functional and structural brain changes in anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis. Ann Neurol. 2013 Aug;74(2):284-96. doi: 10.1002/ana.23932. Epub 2013 Jul 8.

    PubMed 23686722
  • Heine J, Kopp UA, Klag J, Ploner CJ, Pruss H, Finke C. Long-Term Cognitive Outcome in Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis. Ann Neurol. 2021 Dec;90(6):949-961. doi: 10.1002/ana.26241. Epub 2021 Oct 21.

    PubMed 34595771
  • Armangue T, Titulaer MJ, Malaga I, Bataller L, Gabilondo I, Graus F, Dalmau J; Spanish Anti-N-methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor (NMDAR) Encephalitis Work Group. Pediatric anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis-clinical analysis and novel findings in a series of 20 patients. J Pediatr. 2013 Apr;162(4):850-856.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.10.011. Epub 2012 Nov 16.

    PubMed 23164315

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Remote cognitive rehabilitation program in people with Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis, run by Fundacion Clinic per a la Recerca Biomédica at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Josep Dalmau, MD,PhD (34 93 227 1738, jdalmau@clinic.cat), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Age (time frame: 18 months). The study lists 69 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06183788, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in