Crohn's DiseasePhase 4VEDIANNCT06180382
Comparison of Vedolizumab Treatment to Adalimumab Dose Intensification in Crohn's Disease Patients With Loss of Response or Biomarker Activity to Adalimumab on First Line With Therapeutic Drug Concentration.
A Phase 4 study testing Adalimumab and Vedolizumab in people with Crohn's Disease, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne at 12 sites in France.
Trial summary
A substantial fraction of IBD patients with an initial response to infliximab or adalimumab later experience re-emerging active disease despite ongoing anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor (TNF) agents maintenance therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Crohn's Disease
- What is being tested?
- Adalimumab and Vedolizumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 220 participants
- Where
- 12 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 31 Oct 2024to 31 Oct 2028
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Major patient and having given consent to participate in the study
- Patients with Crohn's disease who have responded primary to Adalimumab princeps or similar bio with loss of response to Adalimumab (40 mg every two weeks).
- Patient affiliated to or entitled under a social security scheme
Who cannot join
- Pregnant woman
- Patient unable to perform MRI or VCE or ileocolonoscopy or ultrasound less than one month before inclusion
- Previous or current use of vedolizumab or ustekinumab for Crohn's disease or participation in a biological study
- Concomitant use of immunomodulators
- Patients on corticosteroid therapy
- History of cancer
Show all 20Show fewer
- History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), immunodeficiency syndrome, central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating disease (including myelitis), neurological symptoms suggestive of demyelinating disease, chronic recurrent infection, active tuberculosis (received or untreated), severe infections such as sepsis and opportunistic infections
- Patient with ileoanal pouchitis or ileorectal anastomosis
- Patient with short small bowel syndrome as determined by investigator
- Patients receiving total parenteral nutrition (TPN)
- Patients receiving enteral nutrition
- Patient under legal protection or unable to give consent
- Hemorrhagic rectocolitis or indeterminate colitis
- Patients treated with concomitant immunosuppressive agents
- Patient treated with an optimized dose of adalimumab
- Primary non-responder to Adalimumab
- Patient previously treated with infliximab or ustekinumab before adalimumab
- Severe relapse defined by CDAI > 330
- Patient with anoperineal Crohn's disease
- Crohn's disease patient with transient or permanent stoma.
Trial locations and contacts
12 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
12 sites in 1 country
France12 sites, 12 recruiting
- Recruiting
CHU Amiens
Amiens, 80000
Mathurin FUMERY, PhD
Mathurin FUMERY, PhD
- Recruiting
APHP - Hôpital Bicêtre
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, PARIS, 94270
Aurélien AMIOT, PhD
Aurélien AMIOT, PhD
- Recruiting
CHRU Lille
Lille, 59037
Maria Nachury, MD
Maria Nachury, MD
- Recruiting
Chu Limoges
Limoges, 87000
Sophie GEYL, MD
Sophie GEYL, MD
- Recruiting
APHM
Marseille, 13000
Mélanie SERRERO, MD
Mélanie SERRERO, MD
- Recruiting
CHU Montpellier
Montpellier, 34295
Romain Altwegg, PhD
Romain Altwegg, PhD
- Recruiting
Hôpital de l'Archet II
Nice, 06202
Xavier Hebuterne, PhD
Xavier Hebuterne, PhD
- Recruiting
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Paris, 75004
Mathieu UZZAN, MD
Mathieu UZZAN, MD
- Recruiting
CHU Bordeaux
Pessac, 33604
David LAHARIE, PhD
David LAHARIE, PhD
- Recruiting
Ch Lyon Sud
Pierre-Bénite, 69230
Stéphane NANCEY, PhD
Stéphane NANCEY, PhD
- Recruiting
CHU Rennes
Rennes, 35033
Guillaume BOUGUEN, PhD
Guillaume BOUGUEN, PhD
- Recruiting
CHU de Saint-Etienne
Saint-Etienne, 42055
Mathilde BARRAU, MD, (0)477829626 ext. +33, mathilde.barrau@chu-st-etienne.fr
Xavier ROBLIN, PhD
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Vedolizumab Treatment to Adalimumab Dose Intensification in Crohn's Disease Patients With Loss of Response or Biomarker Activity to Adalimumab on First Line With Therapeutic Drug Concentration: A Randomized, Multicentre, Controlled Trial
A substantial fraction of IBD patients with an initial response to infliximab or adalimumab later experience re-emerging active disease despite ongoing anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor (TNF) agents maintenance therapy. The optimal intervention in patients with secondary loss-of-response (LOR) is still poorly defined, as there are still scant data on how best to choose the next intervention from among dose-intensification, switch to another anti-TNF or switch out of the anti-TNF class. Moreover, according to STRIDE 2 recommendations and CALM study, optimize patients based solely on lack of biological remission (CRP, calprotectin) can be discuss. If CALM study has showed that the intervention arm based on regular monitoring fecal calprotectin, CRP and/or CDAI to optimize patients under adalimumab was significantly associated to an increase rate of mucosal healing that the standard of care strategy based on only clinical activity, TDM was not available to guide drug optimization strategy.
Read the detailed description
To address these issues, for IFX or ADA therapy, several studies have proposed some algorithms according to which interventions are based on a combined assessment of IFX or ADA drug level and antibodies-to-IFX or ADA (ATI or AAA) levels at the time of therapeutic failure. Thus, IFX or ADA levels, classified as therapeutic or sub-therapeutic, and detectable or undetectable antibodies, are used to assess if LOR is likely due to immunogenicity, to non-immune-mediated pharmacokinetic problems or due to pharmacodynamic issues, and to guide interventions accordingly.
In the last AGA recommendations, the authors suggested that in case of secondary LOR under anti TNF drug with therapeutic levels to switch to another class (such as vedolizumab). However, recent studies showed that optimization of dose regimen of the same anti-TNF in these patients may still be associated with clinical response in 25% of patients. Indeed, in a recent bicentric, retrospective and non-randomized study, the investigators showed that IBD patients under ADA maintenance therapy who experience a secondary loss of response and in whom trough levels are >4.9µg/mL, swapping to another class was significantly better than optimizing ADA, in term of time without discontinuation of treatment.
- Conditions
- Crohn's Disease
- Being tested
- Adalimumab, Vedolizumab
- Keywords
- Crohn's disease, Adalimumab, Vedolizumab, therapeutic strategy, Efficacy, biomarker
- Medical subject headings
- Crohn Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AdalimumabDrug
Administration of adalimumab with optimisation either 80 mg every 14 days by subcutaneous injection, or the same dose of 40 mg every 7 days.
VedolizumabDrug
Strategy B: administration of vedolizumab 300mg by infusion at baseline, 14 days, 42 days and 60 days, followed by a dose of 108mg every fortnight by subcutaneous injection.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab with optimisation | Experimental | Patients with Crohn's disease will be included. They will have Adalimumab with optimisation as treatment. Receives: Drug: Adalimumab |
| Vedolizumab | Experimental | Patients with Crohn's disease will be included. They will have Vedolizumab as treatment. Receives: Drug: Vedolizumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
ADA optimized versus Vedolizumab as second line
The primary objective will be to compare the proportion of clinical and biomarker remission (composite score) in the two groups of CD patients by 24 weeks after inclusion.
Measured: Week 24
Secondary outcomes (17)
Proportion of deep remission
To compare the proportion of deep remissions, the composite score is :
- Clinical and biomarker remission at week 24 ;
- AND Mucosal remission at week 24;
- AND no treatment failure between inclusion and week 24.
Measured: Weeks 0; 24
Proportion of clinical remission
A patient is considered to be in clinical remission if they present:
- A Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI score) < 150 at week 24 ;
- OR a CDAI score ≥ 150 at week 24 AND a CDAI score < 150 at inclusion AND an increase < 70 points between inclusion and week 24.
CDAI is the Crohn's disease activity score most commonly used in clinical trials. A CDAI below 150 corresponds to inactive Crohn's disease; between 150 and 450 to active Crohn's disease; above 450 to severe Crohn's disease.
Measured: Weeks 0; 24
faecal calprotectin (microG / g)
Biomarkers are considered to be standardised if the following are observed
- normalisation of faecal calprotectin: faecal calprotectin < 250 µg/g at week 24.
Measured: Week 24
serum C-reactive protein (CRP) mg/l
Biomarkers are considered to be standardised if the following are observed
- Normalisation of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) : serum CRP < 5 mg/L at week 24 ;
Measured: Week 24
Proportion of endoscopic remissions according to Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index score (CDEIS)
A patient is considered to be in endoscopic remission if they have:
- a CDEIS score < 3 at week 24 using ileocolonoscopy ; The CDEIS is an index of the severity of intestinal lesions caused by Crohn's disease.
The CDEIS ranges from 0 to 44 0: no lesions 44: most severe lesions Endoscopic remission defined by a CDEIS ≤ 7
Measured: Week 24
Proportion of endoscopic remissions according to Lewis score
A patient is considered to be in endoscopic remission if they have:
- a Lewis score < 135 at week 24 in the small bowel using VCE (video endoscopy); The Lewis score analyses 5 mucosal parameters for each of the four segments of the small bowel (duodenum, jejunum, proximal and distal ileum): erythema, oedema, presence of nodular lesions, ulcerations and stenosis. A Lewis score < 135 indicates inactive disease.
Measured: Week 24
Proportion of endoscopic remissions according to the number of ulcerations
A patient is considered to be in endoscopic remission if they have:
- no ulceration using endoscopic video capsule (VCE) at week 24;
Measured: Week 24
Proportion of endoscopic remissions according to the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) activity
A patient is considered to be in endoscopic remission if they have:
- no activity on MRI at week 24 (defined as segmental MaRIA score < 7); The MaRIA (Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity) scoring system is used to assess ileocolic Crohn's disease activity on contrast-enhanced MRI enterography. The segmental index represents the severity of disease in a segment of the bowel, while assessing six defined anatomical regions that can be combined to form an overall MaRIA index.
The cut-off points for the MaRIA score are as follows:
moderate disease: ≥7 severe disease: ≥11
Measured: Week 24
Proportion of endoscopic remissions according to bowel thickness
A patient is considered to be in endoscopic remission if they have:
- no bowel thickness on ultrasound at week 24 (< 3mm with no other signs of activity).
Measured: Week 24
Treatment failure
Compare treatment failure at week 24 or week 52 in the 2 groups.
Treatment failure is defined as:
- The performance of a CD-related surgery between inclusion and week 24 ;
- OR use of steroids between baseline and week 24;
- OR treatment dose optimisation between inclusion and week 24;
- OR a change in treatment between inclusion and week 24.
Measured: Weeks : 24; 52
Adverse events
Compare the percentage of adverse events in both arms at week 52
Measured: Week 24
Symptomatic remission at week 24
Symptomatic remission at week 24 is a composite criterion measured by PRO2 defined as: Stool frequency (SF) < 3 with abdominal pain score (AP) < 2 at week 24; AND absence of therapeutic failure between inclusion and week 24.
Measured: Week 24
Changes in quality of life score (Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ)-32
Compare evolution of IBDQ-32 in the two groups of patients between inclusion and week 24.
The IBDQ-32 questionnaire consists of 32 questions. Each question is answered on a scale from 1 to 7, with 1 being the lowest score and 7 the highest. Adding up the different scores gives a total score, ranging from 32 (worst score) to 224 (best score). The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Measured: Weeks : 0; 24
Clinical and biomarker remission
Compare rates of clinical and biomarker remission at week 12 and week 52.
Measured: Weeks : 12; 52
Mucosal remission
Rate of Mucosal remission at week 24. Mucosal remission is definied by ;
- a CDEIS score < 3 at week 24 using ileocolonoscopy ; The CDEIS is an index of the severity of intestinal lesions caused by Crohn's disease.
- Or a Lewis score < 135 at week 24 in the small bowel using VCE (video endoscopy)
- Or no ulceration using endoscopic video capsule (VCE) at week 24;
- Or no activity on MRI at week 24 (defined as segmental MaRIA score < 7);
- Or no bowel thickness on ultrasound at week 24 (< 3mm with no other signs of activity).
Measured: Week 24
Clinical Decision Support Tool (CDST) score
Analyze the CDST score for prediction of remission under vedolizumab and adalimumab optimization.
A CDST score :
- < 13 points is considered a low probability of remission;
- Between 13 and 19 points is considered an intermediate probability of remission;
- > 19 points is considered a high probability of remission.
Measured: Week 52
Pharmacodynamic failure
Compare the efficacy of each strategy based on baseline serum ADA levels, classified into three groups: Pharmacodynamic failure: Therapeutic level of ADA in blood (> 7.5 µg/mL) Pharmacokinetic failure: Subtherapeutic level of ADA in blood (< 7.5 µg/mL) Immunogenic failure (undetectable serum ADA level with the presence of anti-ADA antibodies >50 ng/mL).
Measured: Week 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Dec 2023
- Study start31 Oct 2024
- Primary completion31 Oct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Oct 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Crohn's DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomization comparing 2 therapeutic strategies
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 220 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Takeda France
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mathilde BARRAU, MD, Principal investigator, CHU de Saint-Etienne
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06180382
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 23CH134
- Other IDs
- 2023-508154-25-00, 2023
- Acronym
- VEDIAN
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 12 Dec 2023
- Last updated
- 5 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Vedolizumab Treatment to Adalimumab Dose Intensification in Crohn's Disease Patients With Loss of Response or Biomarker Activity to Adalimumab on First Line With Therapeutic Drug Concentration: A Randomized, Multicentre, Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06180382
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VEDIAN / 23CH134
- Conditions
- Crohn's Disease
- Keywords
- Crohn's disease, Adalimumab, Vedolizumab, therapeutic strategy, Efficacy, biomarker
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 220 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Takeda France
- Study start
- 31 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Oct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Oct 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A substantial fraction of IBD patients with an initial response to infliximab or adalimumab later experience re-emerging active disease despite ongoing anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor (TNF) agents maintenance therapy. The optimal intervention in patients with secondary loss-of-response (LOR) is still poorly defined, as there are still scant data on how best to choose the next intervention from among dose-intensification, switch to another anti-TNF or switch out of the anti-TNF class. Moreover, according to STRIDE 2 recommendations and CALM study, optimize patients based solely on lack of biological remission (CRP, calprotectin) can be discuss. If CALM study has showed that the intervention arm based on regular monitoring fecal calprotectin, CRP and/or CDAI to optimize patients under adalimumab was significantly associated to an increase rate of mucosal healing that the standard of care strategy based on only clinical activity, TDM was not available to guide drug optimization strategy.
Detailed description
To address these issues, for IFX or ADA therapy, several studies have proposed some algorithms according to which interventions are based on a combined assessment of IFX or ADA drug level and antibodies-to-IFX or ADA (ATI or AAA) levels at the time of therapeutic failure. Thus, IFX or ADA levels, classified as therapeutic or sub-therapeutic, and detectable or undetectable antibodies, are used to assess if LOR is likely due to immunogenicity, to non-immune-mediated pharmacokinetic problems or due to pharmacodynamic issues, and to guide interventions accordingly.
In the last AGA recommendations, the authors suggested that in case of secondary LOR under anti TNF drug with therapeutic levels to switch to another class (such as vedolizumab). However, recent studies showed that optimization of dose regimen of the same anti-TNF in these patients may still be associated with clinical response in 25% of patients. Indeed, in a recent bicentric, retrospective and non-randomized study, the investigators showed that IBD patients under ADA maintenance therapy who experience a secondary loss of response and in whom trough levels are >4.9µg/mL, swapping to another class was significantly better than optimizing ADA, in term of time without discontinuation of treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomization comparing 2 therapeutic strategies
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab with optimisation | Experimental | Drug: AdalimumabPatients with Crohn's disease will be included. They will have Adalimumab with optimisation as treatment. |
| Vedolizumab | Experimental | Drug: VedolizumabPatients with Crohn's disease will be included. They will have Vedolizumab as treatment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Major patient and having given consent to participate in the study
- Patients with Crohn's disease who have responded primary to Adalimumab princeps or similar bio with loss of response to Adalimumab (40 mg every two weeks).
- Patient affiliated to or entitled under a social security scheme
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Pregnant woman
- Patient unable to perform MRI or VCE or ileocolonoscopy or ultrasound less than one month before inclusion
- Previous or current use of vedolizumab or ustekinumab for Crohn's disease or participation in a biological study
- Concomitant use of immunomodulators
- Patients on corticosteroid therapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AdalimumabAdministration of adalimumab with optimisation either 80 mg every 14 days by subcutaneous injection, or the same dose of 40 mg every 7 days. | Drug | Adalimumab with optimisation |
| VedolizumabStrategy B: administration of vedolizumab 300mg by infusion at baseline, 14 days, 42 days and 60 days, followed by a dose of 108mg every fortnight by subcutaneous injection. | Drug | Vedolizumab |
Primary outcome
ADA optimized versus Vedolizumab as second line
Time frame: Week 24
The primary objective will be to compare the proportion of clinical and biomarker remission (composite score) in the two groups of CD patients by 24 weeks after inclusion.
17 secondary outcomes
Proportion of deep remission
Time frame: Weeks 0; 24
Proportion of clinical remission
Time frame: Weeks 0; 24
faecal calprotectin (microG / g)
Time frame: Week 24
serum C-reactive protein (CRP) mg/l
Time frame: Week 24
Proportion of endoscopic remissions according to Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index score (CDEIS)
Time frame: Week 24
Proportion of endoscopic remissions according to Lewis score
Time frame: Week 24
Proportion of endoscopic remissions according to the number of ulcerations
Time frame: Week 24
Proportion of endoscopic remissions according to the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) activity
Time frame: Week 24
Proportion of endoscopic remissions according to bowel thickness
Time frame: Week 24
Treatment failure
Time frame: Weeks : 24; 52
Adverse events
Time frame: Week 24
Symptomatic remission at week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Changes in quality of life score (Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ)-32
Time frame: Weeks : 0; 24
Clinical and biomarker remission
Time frame: Weeks : 12; 52
Mucosal remission
Time frame: Week 24
Clinical Decision Support Tool (CDST) score
Time frame: Week 52
Pharmacodynamic failure
Time frame: Week 52
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 May 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Crohn's Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Open-label, DDI Study to Investigate the Effects of Duvakitug on the PK of Selected Cytochrome P450 Substrates
Ulcerative Colitis, Crohn's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Longitudinal Immunophenotyping of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Crohn's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Ibd CAncer and seRious Infections in France (I-CARE 2)
IBD, Ulcerative Colitis
RecruitingObservational study
Characterization of Colorectal Dysplasic Lesions and Stratification of Their Evolving Risk in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: a Prospective, Observational and Multicenter Study
Crohn Disease (CD), Colitis Ulcerative
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
MOdel-Informed Precision Dosing of Ustekinumab and VEdolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Crohn Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Mathilde BARRAU, MD principal investigator
CHU de Saint-Etienne
12 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Adalimumab and Vedolizumab in people with Crohn's Disease, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne at 12 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 12 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Mathilde BARRAU, MD ((0)477829626 ext. +33, mathilde.barrau@chu-st-etienne.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
ADA optimized versus Vedolizumab as second line (time frame: Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 May 2026.