AzTrials
AzTrials

Single Embryo TransferTRABLANNCT06177613

Advantages of Early Intrauterine Transfer of "Blank" Culture Medium Prior to 1st or 2nd Transfer of Thawed Embryo(s).

A study testing Blank culture transfer in people with Single Embryo Transfer and Fertilization in Vitro, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 7 sites in 2 countries.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Despite technical advances in Medically Assisted Reproduction (AMP), the success of fertility treatments is sometimes limited by embryo implantation failure. The coordinated development of the embryo and the uterine endometrium requires close communication between the maternal tissue and the embryo. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age, women only
What is being tested?
Blank culture transfer
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
1,154 participants
Where
7 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
9 Feb 2024to Feb 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Having had a first "fresh" or frozen embryo transfer, whatever the embryo's stage of development, transfer followed by pregnancy failure ;
  • Frozen embryos must be at least D3 stage;
  • The patient must have given their free and informed consent and signed the consent form
  • The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance plan

Who cannot join

  • The subject is participating in an interventional study, or is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study
  • The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship

Trial locations and contacts

7 sites in 2 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

7 sites in 2 countries

France6 sites, 6 recruiting
  • Hôpital Antoine Béclère

    Clamart

    Michaël Grynberg, michael.grynberg@aphp.fr

    Michaël Grynberg

    Not yet recruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier Alpes Léman

    Contamine-sur-Arve

    Béatrice Dorphin, beatrice.dorphin@biogroup.fr

    Béatrice Dorphin

    Not yet recruiting
  • CHU Arnaud de Villeneuve

    Montpellier

    Noémie Ranisavljevic, n-ranisavljevic@chu-montpellier.fr

    Noémie Ranisavljevic

    Not yet recruiting
  • Clinique Saint Roch

    Montpellier

    Olivier Pouget, pouget@abcgyneco.fr

    Not yet recruiting
  • CHU de Nîmes

    Nîmes, 30029

    Anissa Megzari, 04.66.68.42.36, drc@chu-nimes.fr

    Nathalie Rougier

    Recruiting
  • Clinique Saint-Pierre

    Perpignan

    Emmanuelle Petit, emmapetit@gmail.com

    Emmanuelle Petit

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in France

Reunion1 site, 1 recruiting
  • CHU de la Réunion

    Saint-Pierre

    Helene Flye Sainte Marie, helene.flye@chu-reunion.fr

    Helene Flye Sainte Marie

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in Reunion

About this study

Official title: Advantages of Early Intrauterine Transfer of "Blank" Culture Medium Prior to 1st or 2nd Transfer of Thawed Embryo(s). Randomized, Single-blind, Multicenter Controlled Trial.

Despite technical advances in Medically Assisted Reproduction (AMP), the success of fertility treatments is sometimes limited by embryo implantation failure. The coordinated development of the embryo and the uterine endometrium requires close communication between the maternal tissue and the embryo. In in vitro fertilization (IVF), embryo transfer generally takes place between the 2nd (D2) and the 6th (D6) day following oocyte fertilization. Recent studies have shown the advantages of sequential transfer (transfer of an embryo on D2/D3 followed by the transfer of another embryo on D5/D6), with higher implantation and clinical pregnancy rate, fewer miscarriages, more live births, and yet no increase in multiple pregnancies. However, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendations continue to prioritize the transfer of a single embryo for all patients aged under 38. To improve pregnancy rates for patients having a single embryo transferred, the study investigators wish to carry out on "blank" transfer, based on the principle of sequential transfer. The study investigators hypothesize that a culture medium, placed in the uterus before the time of embryo transfer, will modify immune tolerance. The study will test whether transferring the same culture medium in an equivalent quantity as during the real transfer into the uterus 2/3 days before the embryo transfer will improve tolerance to this foreign medium and, therefore, embryo implantation. The aim of this study is thus to evaluate the impact of a "blank" transfer with culture medium alone, on the results of frozen embryo transfers (FET) from IVF.

Being tested
Blank culture transfer, Sham transfer

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Blank culture transferProcedure or surgery

    A maximum of 0.1 ml of gassed embryo culture medium preheated to 37°C is injected into the uterine cavity transcervically using an embryo transfer catheter placed just beyond the internal os, two to 3 days before transfer of the thawed embryo

  • Sham transferProcedure or surgery

    An intermediate transfer step is added two or three days before the planned transfer of the frozen embryo but with an empty catheter.

Study groups in NCT06177613
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
With blank cultureExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: Blank culture transfer
Without blank cultureSham comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Sham transfer

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Clinically progressive pregnancy rate between groups

    Measured on first-trimester ultrasound

    Measured: 12 weeks of amenorrhea

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Occurrence of pregnancy between groups

    Defined by a positive beta HCG test ≥ 100 IU/ml

    Measured: Day 14

  2. Occurrence of a biochemical pregnancy between groups

    Defined by a positive beta HCG test ≥ 10 IU/ml and < 100 IU/ml

    Measured: Day 14

  3. Occurrence of a clinical pregnancy between groups

    Defined by a positive beta HCG test ≥ 100 IU/ml and presence of at least one gestational sac on dating ultrasound

    Measured: 6 weeks of amenorrhea

  4. Occurrence of an early miscarriage between groups

    Defined by the presence of a pregnancy defined by a positive beta HCG test ≥ 100 IU at D14 and the absence of an evolving clinical pregnancy at first-trimester ultrasound

    Measured: 12 weeks of amenorrhea

  5. Occurrence of live birth

    Yes/no

    Measured: Upon giving birth (maximum month 9)

  6. Differential cost-result ratio

    Ratio of the cost differential and the number of additional live births (additional progressive clinical pregnancies) between the two strategies, to evaluate the cost per additional live birth.

    Measured: End of study (Year 3)

  7. Total estimated expenditure for the two care strategies compared (budget impact analysis) over a one-year time horizon.

    Calculated at national level (implementation of the system and consumption of care)

    Measured: End of study (Year 3)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Dec 2023
  2. Study start9 Feb 2024
  3. Primary completionMay 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionFeb 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
1,154 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06177613
Sponsor's protocol ID
PHRC-I/2022/NR-01
Acronym
TRABLAN
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
11 Dec 2023
Last updated
20 Feb 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Blank culture transfer in people with Single Embryo Transfer and Fertilization in Vitro, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 7 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 7 sites in France, Reunion. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Nathalie Rougier (04.66.68.32.24, nathalie.rougier@chu-nimes.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Clinically progressive pregnancy rate between groups (time frame: 12 weeks of amenorrhea). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Feb 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in