Parkinson's Disease and ParkinsonismNCT06174948
The Use of the CUE1/CUE1+ in People With Parkinson's Disease and Related Disorders
A study testing CUE1 non-invasive device in people with Parkinson's Disease and Parkinsonism and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, run by Queen Mary University of London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
People with Parkinson's disease (PD) commonly experience a range of both motor (e.g., bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor, and postural instability) and non-motor (e.g., fatigue, psychiatric and behavioural disturbances, autonomic dysfunction, cognitive impairment, sleep dysfunction and olfactory loss) features. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Parkinson's Disease and Parkinsonism, Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, Different Types of Tremor Including Essential Tremor
- What is being tested?
- CUE1 non-invasive device
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 25 Mar 2024to 31 Mar 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults over 18 years old
- Clinical diagnosis of idiopathic PD and related disorders including progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), multiple system atrophy (MSA), corticobasal degeneration (CBD), and vascular Parkinsonism (VaP) as well as atypical dystonias and tremor disorders and Orthostatic Tremor (OT)
- willing to participate and written consent provided after read the participant information sheet.
Who cannot join
- Individuals with:
- other neurological disorders excluding idiopathic PD, related disorders such PSP, MSA, CBD, and VaP as well as atypical dystonias and tremor disorders, affecting movement, balance and gait
- metabolic or autoimmune disorders affecting movement, balance and gait
- acute orthopaedic disorders influencing balance control and gait
- audiovestibular disorders including severe hearing loss
- visual disturbances, poor eyesight
Show all 13Show fewer
- not able to provide written consent form to participate
- clinical diagnosis of cognitive impairment including dementia or Alzheimer's.
- Mental impairments (illusions, hallucinations, impulse control disorders) (self-reported)
- Technical contraindications related to CUE1 device:
- implanted metallic or electronic devices usage
- hypersensitivity to vibrotactile stimulation
- skin conditions and/or open wound in the area of where the device will be positioned (e.g., sternum) if taking medicines for PD or related disorder, then on stable dose of treatment for the last three months.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Queen Mary University of London
London, EC1M 6BQ
Viktoria Azoidou, PhD, v.azoidou@qmul.ac.uk
Alastair Noyce, PhD, a.noyce@qmul.ac.uk
About this study
Official title: The Use of the CUE1/CUE1+ Device in People With Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease and Related Disorders: A Feasibility Study
People with Parkinson's disease (PD) commonly experience a range of both motor (e.g., bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor, and postural instability) and non-motor (e.g., fatigue, psychiatric and behavioural disturbances, autonomic dysfunction, cognitive impairment, sleep dysfunction and olfactory loss) features. Currently, it is challenging to alleviate these symptoms with first-line treatment, the medications such as levodopa. The CUE1 is a non-invasive device, which is approved for sale in the UK market as a Class I low risk device. It is worn on the sternum or other part of the body such as the forearm and attaches to the skin via an adhesive patch which has been dermatologically tested and approved.
The CUE1 delivers pulsing cueing and vibrotactile stimulation to help improve symptoms in people with PD and it has shown to be effective in doing so in previous small case studies. This 9-week feasibility study aims to investigate the feasibility, safety, tolerability and effect of using the CUE1 as an intervention to improve motor and non-motor symptoms in people with PD and related movement disorders. People with clinical diagnosis of idiopathic PD and related disorders including those with progressive supranuclear palsy, multiple system atrophy, corticobasal degeneration, orthostatic tremor and vascular Parkinsonism as well as atypical dystonias and tremor disorders aged over 18 years old who have the capacity to provide a written consent form to take part in the study, will receive as intervention to wear the CUE1 device at home, on daily basis while carrying out their activities of daily living. Participants will also have to attend face-to-face appointments of approximately half a day, to discuss how they are getting on with using the CUE1 and complete questionnaires on their symptoms, walking, balance, and movement tests as well as a participant's clinical diary.
Read the detailed description
Parkinson's disease (PD) may be the fastest growing neurodegenerative disease in the world (Bloem et al., 2021). Pathologically, it is characterised by the loss of the dopaminergic neurons within the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) and other pigmented nuclei of the brainstem. At present, the cost of healthcare for the estimated 145,000 people living with PD in the United Kingdom is over £728 million per year rising to a total economic impact of £3.6 billion (Weir et al. 2018). If current projections are correct of people with PD, this will double by 2040 (Dorsey et al. 2018), consequently the figure may exceed £7.2 billion. Most people affected are 60 years or above. However, there are many people who are diagnosed at a younger age. Common clinical manifestations of PD include a range of both motor (e.g., bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor, and postural instability) and non-motor (e.g., fatigue, psychiatric and behavioural disturbances, autonomic dysfunction, cognitive impairment, sleep dysfunction and olfactory loss) features.
The motor features can be present anywhere in the body. Some of the common features are lack of facial expression, low volume speech, stiffness and slowness of movements. Further, gait and balance are often affected. People with PD tend to have a festinating gait, and/or experience postural instability with or without freezing of gait (FOG) which may occur when initiating walking, standing from sitting, turning, and passing through narrow passages or certain circumstances such as approaching a destination (Nutt et al., 2011) or dual tasking (DT) (Bloem et al., 2000; Jacobs et al., 2014; Isaacson et al., 2018). Postural instability, gait problems and FOG may significantly affect a person's ability to perform ADL, increase their falls risk (Muslimovic et al., 2008; Lamont et al., 2017) and reduce their quality of life (QoL). Approximately 70% of people with PD will fall in a year period which can often result in serious consequences including injuries (e.g., fractures and traumatic brain injury) which further increase morbidity, mortality, and healthcare and personal costs (Farombi et al., 2016).
Currently, there is no cure for PD or treatment options available that can slow down the progression of this condition. However, all people with PD are provided options to treat the signs and symptoms of the condition to support their ability to participate in ADL that are meaningful to them (Huber et al., 2011). First line therapy, the dopaminergic medications, have some impact on motor symptoms in PD but rarely get people back to a "normal" state (Killane et al., 2015). People often remain significantly limited in their ADL during 'OFF' state but even during 'ON' state, many features of PD do not respond adequately despite optimal pharmacotherapy (Shukla et al., 2012). Moreover, the usage of medication often has serious side effects, particularly in older adults. The average person living with PD may be taking nine doses of medication a day (Grosset et al., 2007). Thus, drug resistance is another concern and dose limiting side effects is a barrier to successful deployment of pharmacotherapy (Killane et al., 2015). This issue increases with disease progression because neurodegeneration progressively involves non-dopaminergic brain areas. As a result, various non-pharmacological, non-invasive interventions have been developed to manage sensory dysfunction, a major problem in people with PD, associated with PD symptoms (Conte et al., 2013). Cueing and vibrotactile sensory stimulation are two such examples that have been used to modulate sensory dysfunction in people with PD, especially the sensorimotor integration problems.
Cueing is a mechanism of applying an external temporal or spatial stimulus to facilitate movement initiation and continuation and it can be somatosensory, auditory, attentional or visual (Nieuwboer et al., 2007; Muthukrishnan et al., 2019). It is reported to work by shifting habitual motor control to goal directed motor control (Redgrave et al., 2010). Many studies have demonstrated that cueing helps to improve postural control, balance, FOG (van Wegen et al., 2006; Nieuwboer et al., 2007; Munoz-Hellin et al., 2013; Spaulding et al., 2013; Muthukrishnan et al., 2019), as well as DT performance in activities involving the upper (Heremans et al., 2016; Park \& Kim, 2021) and lower (Rochester et al., 2007; 2009; 2010 (a); 2010(b); Fok et al., 2010; Mak et al., 2013; Beck et al., 2015; Chomiak et al., 2017; Mancini et al., 2018; Stuart \& Mancini, 2020) limbs in people with PD. However, many cueing modalities used for the research purposes in the laboratory environments cannot be easily replicated in people's homes. Thus, a recent narrative review recommends the development of cueing wearable systems that can be used at home or in the community to improve gait and posture in PD (Muthukrishnan et al., 2019).
Interventions utilising vibrotactile sensory stimulation in PD can be split into two main groups: a) whole body vibrotactile stimulation and b) focused (e.g., targeted) vibrotactile stimulation. The results on the effectiveness of whole body vibrotactile stimulation on sensory dysfunction and motor symptoms are mixed with a large variation being reported from none to small improvement on motor symptoms, balance, gait and mobility (Dincher et al., 2019). On the other side, focused vibrotactile stimulation which is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique used by somatosensory cues (e.g., tactile/somatosensory cueing) to apply gentle vibrations to focal joints in the body may have a more positive and consistent effect (Basta et al., 2011; Pfeifer et al., 2021). Trials which include cylindrical vibration devices on the triceps (Pereira et al., 2016), a vibrotactile waistband around the abdomen in FOG (Goncalves et al., 2018), vibrotactile insoles to reduce falls (Otis et al., 2016) and a proprioceptive stabiliser on postural instability (Volpe et al., 2014) show promising results. The CUE1 is a non-invasive medical device which utilises a metronome-like pulsed vibration which represents both auditory and somatosensory low frequency cueing and high frequency focused vibrotactile stimulation to help improve motor task performance in people with PD (Tan et al., 2021; Ong et al., 2022; Wilhelm et al., 2022). It is a CE marked and an MHRA registered non-invasive medical device.
Like other cueing and vibrotactile stimulation devices, the CUE1 stands out as a non-invasive medical instrument. It employs a metronome-like pulsed vibration, incorporating both auditory and somatosensory low-frequency cueing, along with high-frequency targeted vibrotactile stimulation. This design aims to enhance motor task performance in individuals with PD (Tan et al., 2021; Ong et al., 2022; Wilhelm et al., 2022). Preliminary assessments of employing the CUE1 indicated an overall enhancement of 16.75% in motor symptoms, as evidenced in the White Paper on Proof of Concept from 2019. This improvement was observed not only in the MDS-UPDRS Part III Motor test score-considered the benchmark for evaluating motor symptoms in individuals with PD-but also in various assessments such as the TUG test, TTT, and diverse gait features, as detailed in the White Papers on Proof of Concept from 2020. Moreover, users reported that donning the CUE1 device contributed to enhanced fatigue levels and increased subjective balance confidence.
Subsequent investigations from smaller-scale studies revealed notable advancements linked to CUE1 usage. Specifically, the device was shown to significantly boost gait speed in the TUG test (Tan et al., 2021) and improve MDS-UPDRS performance scores while reducing falls by an impressive 85% (Ong et al., 2022). Furthermore, a study design acceptance paper authored by Wilhelm et al. in 2022 showcased a reduction in Freezing of Gait (FOG) and an augmentation in walking speed, accompanied by positive feedback from individuals with PD regarding their experience with the CUE1.
This feasibility study will test primarily the feasibility, safety and tolerability and secondary the effect of the CUE1 and the CUE1+ (e.g., updated version of the CUE1 which has better motor and longer battery life but same treatment settings) device in people with PD and related disorders. This clinical study aims to identify whether the results seen in the prototype testing and previous small studies (Tan et al., 2021; Ong et al., 2022; Wilhelm et al., 2022) can be reproduced in a controlled clinical setting. Overall the risk assessment related to the use of the CUE1 and CUE1+ device has been previously tested on people with PD and has shown to have a minimal chance for error or adverse effect to the patient. Based on real world data, the CUE1 has shown to be effective in significantly improving motor symptoms such as rigidity, stiffness, tremor and slowness of movement in people with PD (White Paper-Proof of Concept, 2019; 2020). The CUE1 has also shown to improve fatigue (White Paper-Proof of Concept, 2020), walking speed, balance and FOG and decrease falls in people with PD (Tan et al., 2021; Ong et al., 2022; Wilhelm et al., 2022). The potential harm for the people with PD was very low, the acceptance of using the CUE1 and its renamed/rebranded model with longer battery life and better motor function, the CUE1+ device was very good, and positive user feedback was received (Wilhelm et al., 2022). The device also utilised medical grade established silicone-based skin adhesives. The product is water resistant and designed to CE standards hence product and electrical malfunction risk will be low.
Positive results arising from this feasibility study will strengthen the evidence that the CUE1+ device is feasible to be used, tolerated, safe and help to improve movement and mobility in people living with PD and related disorders. It may also assist in selecting the most appropriate outcome measures to test the effectiveness of the CUE1+ and contribute to the growing academic interest in the application of peripheral stimulation in other neurological disorders with movement, gait and balance problems such as various types of dystonias and tremors, multiple sclerosis, stroke and vestibular disorders.
- Conditions
- Parkinson's Disease and Parkinsonism, Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, Different Types of Tremor Including Essential Tremor, Dystonia, Multiple System Atrophy, Corticobasal Degeneration
- Being tested
- CUE1 non-invasive device, CUE1+ device active vs sham CUE1+ device
- Keywords
- CUE1, Parkinson's disease, movement disorders
- Medical subject headings
- Parkinson Disease, Parkinsonian Disorders, Supranuclear Palsy, Progressive, Dystonia, Multiple System Atrophy, Corticobasal Degeneration, Movement Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CUE1 non-invasive deviceDevice
This is a 9-week feasibility study which will involve wearing the CUE1 device on a daily basis at participants' homes while they continue their usual activities of daily living (ADL). The CUE1 is a non-invasive medical device which delivers low frequency metronomes like tactile cueing and high frequency focused vibrotactile stimulation. All participants will be using the same pre-programmed settings for the CUE1 device which are: vibration strength delivered at 80%, pulse length 800 milliseconds (ms), and rest length 800ms as set at baseline and will not change. The CUE1 device is attached to the skin via an adhesive patch which has been dermatologically tested and approved. Participants will be provided with the adhesive patches and shown how to use them and the CUE1 device by the research team.
CUE1+ device active vs sham CUE1+ deviceDevice
Also called CUE1+ device sham
30-40 participants with idiopathic Parkinson's disease only will be randomly allocated to one of two interventions groups: one group will use the active CUE1+ device while the other group will use the CUE1+ at silent settings (e.g., sham device). All participants will use their device in the same way which is starting the usage from the morning, within an hour once they took their medications for Parkinson's (if any) and continue using the device for 8 hours, once a day, every day for 12 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| people with Parkinson's disease and related disorders | Experimental | Intervention
All participants with Parkinson's related disorders and the first 10 participants with Parkinson's will use the CUE1 device as follows:
* 1-2/9 weeks in the study: once a day for a continuous duration of 2 hours in the morning, 1 hour after taking the medication (if any) for PD or related disorder, every single day;
* 4-5/9 weeks in the study: once a day for a continuous duration of 8 hours, starting from morning, 1 hour after taking the medication (if any) for PD or related disorder, every single day;
* 7-8/9 weeks in the study: only at night, through all night, every single night and not during the day at all;
15-20 participants with Parkinson's disease will use the CUE1+ device at loud settings for 12 continuous weeks, as above the participants during weeks 4-5. Receives: Device: CUE1 non-invasive device; Device: CUE1+ device active vs sham CUE1+ device |
| People with Parkinson's disease | Sham comparator | 15-20 participants with Parkinson's disease will use the CUE1+ device sat silent settings for 12 continuous weeks, as above the participants during weeks 4-5 and compared to the active CUE1+ intervention with people with Parkinson's disease only as above Receives: Device: CUE1+ device active vs sham CUE1+ device |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Recruitment rate
This is a feasibility outcome, the recruitment rate which will be calculated as the percentage of eligible participants enrolled in the study. This will be reported at each follow up appointment at weeks -3, -6 and -9.
Measured: 1 minute
Compliance with interventions
This is a feasibility outcome, compliance with interventions, which will be reported as the percentage of days completed using the CUE1 device and duration of using the CUE1 device. These will be reported at each follow up appointment at weeks -3, -6 and -9.
Measured: 1 minute
Dropout rate
This is a feasibility outcome which will report the dropout rate at each follow up appointment at weeks -3, -6 and -9.
Measured: 1 minute
Physical observation
This is a safety and tolerability outcome which will be assessed by carrying out a physical observation by research team during the face to face appointments of any adverse event occurring as a result of using the adhesive patches. The adverse events in relation to the CUE1 device will be reported in the participants' clinical diary and discussed during the appointments with the research team.
Measured: 1 minute
Secondary outcomes (13)
Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) questionnaire
There are two parts in the PGI-C questionnaire. In part one, the patient scores on a scale 0-7 (0 = no change or condition has got worse, 7 = a great deal better, and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference) the change in their activity limitations, symptoms, emotions and overall QoL related to painful conditions. In part two, the patient scores on a scale 0-10 (0 = much better, 10 = much worse), the score that matches their degree of change since beginning the specific care (here the intervention with CUE1). The PGI-C will be completed at follow up appointments, at weeks-3, -6, and -9.
Measured: 5 minutes
Participant's clinical diary
This will be completed daily by the participant at home for 9 weeks, starting from week-1 of and finishing at the end of week-9 of the intervention. The diaries will be completed on the weeks of the intervention (e.g., 1-2, 4-5 and 7-8). The research team will provide the same instructions on how to complete the participant's diary to each person during the baseline appointment at week-0.
Measured: 15 minutes
Functional Gait Assessment (FGA)
The FGA is a 10-item test that assesses performance on complex gait tasks (i.e., walking with head turns, stepping over an obstacle, stopping and turning or climbing stairs). Scores for each item are between 0-3. The highest score is 30 and greater outcomes are indicative of better performance. The FGA has been validated in healthy people, older adults with a history of falls and balance impairments, and people with balance problems including those with PD. The minimal detectable change for the FGA is reported to be 4 points in people with PD. Scores ≤22/30 identify fall risk and are predictable of falls in community-living older persons within 6 months. In people with PD, the cutoff point for predicting falls is 18/30, with sensitivity of 80.6%, specificity of 80.0%, and positive likelihood ratio of 4.03.
Measured: 10 minutes
Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Motor Part III
The MDS-UPDRS Motor Part III assesses the motor symptoms in people with PD. There are 33 scores based on 18 questions with several right, left or other body distribution scores. All items have 5 response options with uniform anchors of 0 = normal, 1 = slight (symptoms/signs with sufficiently low frequency or intensity to cause no impact on function), 2 = mild (symptoms/signs of frequency or intensity sufficient to cause a modest impact on function), 3 = moderate (symptoms/signs sufficiently frequent or intense to impact considerably, but not prevent function), and 4 = severe (symptoms/signs that prevent function). Higher scores indicate greater impact of PD symptoms. Score range between 0 and 132, 32 and below is mild, 59 and above is severe.
Measured: 10 minutes
Timed Up and Go test (TUG)
The TUG assesses mobility, balance, walking ability, and fall risks. The mean time in people with PD has been reported between 10.3-14.8 seconds.
Measured: 5 minutes
Bradykinesia Akinesia Incoordination test (BRAIN test)
The BRAIN test is used to assess upper limb motor function. The BRAIN test has been redeveloped to run in all internet browser software and has been validated in patients with PD and controls. Participants use the index finger of a single hand to alternately strike the 'S' and ';' keys on a standard computer keyboard, as fast and accurately as possible. The test is repeated for the other hand. The BRAIN test can be accessed at http://www.predictpd.com/braintest and applications to use this can be directed to AJN via the same web link.
Measured: 5 minutes
Distal Finger Tapping (DFT)
The DFT test is a web-based keyboard tapping test which has been validated to remotely evaluate upper limb movements and quantify separate kinetic components such as speed, akinesia and rhythm as part of motor dysfunction in PD. It is available online via https://predictpd.com/en/braintest, and compatible with regular laptops and computers with a keyboard. The DFT test consists of a 20-second single key tapping test. Participants will be instructed to repeatedly tap the down arrow key with their left index finger, as fast as possible for 20 s, whilst simultaneously depressing the left arrow key with their left middle finger. The same task will then be repeated for the right hand. These instructions stabilise the wrist and forearm, isolating movement to the index finger metacarpal joint, thereby giving a true measurement of distal finger movement.
Measured: 5 minutes
Activity-specific Balance Confidence (ABC)
The ABC is a 16-item questionnaire which assesses self-perceived balance confidence in daily activities. Scores range from 0-100; scores ≤ 67/100 are associated with increased fall risk. Higher scores indicate greater balance confidence.
Measured: 5 minutes
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
The PSQI includes seven component scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbance, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. Scores range from 0-21 with a higher total score indicating worse sleep quality. In distinguishing good and poor sleepers, a global PSQI score > 5 yields sensitivity of 89.6% and specificity of 86.5%.
Measured: 5 minutes
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
The FSS is a 9-item scale which measures the severity of fatigue and its effect on a person's activities and lifestyle in patients with a variety of disorders, including those with PD diagnosis. The items are scored on a 7-point scale with 1 = strongly disagree and 7= strongly agree. The minimum score = 9 and maximum score possible = 63. Higher the score = greater fatigue severity.
Measured: 5 minutes
Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39)
The PDQ-39 is a 39-item self-report questionnaire, which assesses PD-specific health related quality over the last month. It assesses how often patients experience difficulties across the 8 quality of life dimensions and impact of PD on specific dimensions of functioning and well-being. The scoring is done on a 5-point ordinal system (e.g., 0 = never, 1 = occasionally, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often, 4 = always). Each dimension's total score ranges from 0 (never have difficulty) to 100 (always have difficulty). Lower scores reflect better quality of life.
Measured: 5 minutes
Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) (Parts I, II, IV).
The rest of the MDS-UPDRS scale consists of three parts (apart from Part III Motor which will be completed already above): Part I, II and IV which include questions to assess non-motor experiences of daily living, motor experiences of daily living, and motor complications, of people living with PD, respectively.
Measured: 15 minutes
Participant's satisfaction form
This form will be will be provided to participants to complete at the last follow up appointment (week -9) to feedback on their experience on using the intervention, and support and services received from the research team.
Measured: 5 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Dec 2023
- Study start25 Mar 2024
- Primary completion31 Mar 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Mar 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (71)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Parkinson's Disease and ParkinsonismStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Queen Mary University of LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Initially, 10 people with idiopathic Parkinson's disease and 10-20 people with related movement disorders are firstly assigned into a single group study to investigate the feasibility, safety and tolerability of the CUE1 device. Then a subgroup of participants (e.g., 30-40 new participants) with idiopathic Parkinson's disease only will be randomly allocated to one of the two intervention Groups; one group will receive the CUE1+ intervention at loud settings while the other at silent settings. The outcome assessor and statistician the group of the participants. Participants will know in which group they are but they do not know which is the active and which the passive intervention. This intervention is the main of this study and is double blind.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Queen Mary University of London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Barts & The London NHS Trust, Homerton University Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Alastair Noyce, PhD, Study director, Queen Mary University of London
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06174948
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 333484
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 30 Nov 2023
- Last updated
- 21 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Akram N, Li H, Ben-Joseph A, Budu C, Gallagher DA, Bestwick JP, Schrag A, Noyce AJ, Simonet C. Developing and assessing a new web-based tapping test for measuring distal movement in Parkinson's disease: a Distal Finger Tapping test. Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 10;12(1):386. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03563-7.
PubMed 35013372Basta D, Rossi-Izquierdo M, Soto-Varela A, Greters ME, Bittar RS, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Eckardt R, Harada T, Goto F, Ogawa K, Ernst A. Efficacy of a vibrotactile neurofeedback training in stance and gait conditions for the treatment of balance deficits: a double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study. Otol Neurotol. 2011 Dec;32(9):1492-9. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31823827ec.
PubMed 22089958Beck EN, Ehgoetz Martens KA, Almeida QJ. Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease: An Overload Problem? PLoS One. 2015 Dec 17;10(12):e0144986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144986. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 26678262Bloem BR, Grimbergen YA, Cramer M, Valkenburg VV. "Stops walking when talking" does not predict falls in Parkinson's disease. Ann Neurol. 2000 Aug;48(2):268. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(200008)48:23.0.co;2-4. No abstract available.
PubMed 10939582Bloem BR, Okun MS, Klein C. Parkinson's disease. Lancet. 2021 Jun 12;397(10291):2284-2303. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00218-X. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
PubMed 33848468Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.
PubMed 2748771Chaudhuri KR, Schrag A, Weintraub D, Rizos A, Rodriguez-Blazquez C, Mamikonyan E, Martinez-Martin P. The movement disorder society nonmotor rating scale: Initial validation study. Mov Disord. 2020 Jan;35(1):116-133. doi: 10.1002/mds.27862. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
PubMed 31571279Chomiak T, Watts A, Meyer N, Pereira FV, Hu B. A training approach to improve stepping automaticity while dual-tasking in Parkinson's disease: A prospective pilot study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Feb;96(5):e5934. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005934.
PubMed 28151878Conte A, Khan N, Defazio G, Rothwell JC, Berardelli A. Pathophysiology of somatosensory abnormalities in Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013 Dec;9(12):687-97. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.224. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
PubMed 24217516Dal Bello-Haas V, Klassen L, Sheppard MS, Metcalfe A. Psychometric Properties of Activity, Self-Efficacy, and Quality-of-Life Measures in Individuals with Parkinson Disease. Physiother Can. 2011 Winter;63(1):47-57. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2009-08. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
PubMed 22210979Dincher A, Schwarz M, Wydra G. Analysis of the Effects of Whole-Body Vibration in Parkinson Disease - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PM R. 2019 Jun;11(6):640-653. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12094. Epub 2019 May 6.
PubMed 30689308Dorsey ER, Sherer T, Okun MS, Bloem BR. The Emerging Evidence of the Parkinson Pandemic. J Parkinsons Dis. 2018;8(s1):S3-S8. doi: 10.3233/JPD-181474.
PubMed 30584159Farombi TH, Owolabi MO, Ogunniyi A. Falls and Their Associated Risks in Parkinson's Disease Patients in Nigeria. J Mov Disord. 2016 Sep;9(3):160-5. doi: 10.14802/jmd.16011. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
PubMed 27667188Fok P, Farrell M, McMeeken J. Prioritizing gait in dual-task conditions in people with Parkinson's. Hum Mov Sci. 2010 Oct;29(5):831-42. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.06.005. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
PubMed 20727609Giladi N, Shabtai H, Simon ES, Biran S, Tal J, Korczyn AD. Construction of freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinsonism. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2000 Jul 1;6(3):165-170. doi: 10.1016/s1353-8020(99)00062-0.
PubMed 10817956
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Use of the CUE1/CUE1+ Device in People With Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease and Related Disorders: A Feasibility Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06174948
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 333484
- Conditions
- Parkinson's Disease and Parkinsonism, Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, Different Types of Tremor Including Essential Tremor, Dystonia, Multiple System Atrophy, Corticobasal Degeneration
- Keywords
- CUE1, Parkinson's disease, movement disorders
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Queen Mary University of LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Barts & The London NHS Trust, Homerton University Hospital
- Study start
- 25 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
People with Parkinson's disease (PD) commonly experience a range of both motor (e.g., bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor, and postural instability) and non-motor (e.g., fatigue, psychiatric and behavioural disturbances, autonomic dysfunction, cognitive impairment, sleep dysfunction and olfactory loss) features. Currently, it is challenging to alleviate these symptoms with first-line treatment, the medications such as levodopa. The CUE1 is a non-invasive device, which is approved for sale in the UK market as a Class I low risk device. It is worn on the sternum or other part of the body such as the forearm and attaches to the skin via an adhesive patch which has been dermatologically tested and approved.
The CUE1 delivers pulsing cueing and vibrotactile stimulation to help improve symptoms in people with PD and it has shown to be effective in doing so in previous small case studies. This 9-week feasibility study aims to investigate the feasibility, safety, tolerability and effect of using the CUE1 as an intervention to improve motor and non-motor symptoms in people with PD and related movement disorders. People with clinical diagnosis of idiopathic PD and related disorders including those with progressive supranuclear palsy, multiple system atrophy, corticobasal degeneration, orthostatic tremor and vascular Parkinsonism as well as atypical dystonias and tremor disorders aged over 18 years old who have the capacity to provide a written consent form to take part in the study, will receive as intervention to wear the CUE1 device at home, on daily basis while carrying out their activities of daily living. Participants will also have to attend face-to-face appointments of approximately half a day, to discuss how they are getting on with using the CUE1 and complete questionnaires on their symptoms, walking, balance, and movement tests as well as a participant's clinical diary.
Detailed description
Parkinson's disease (PD) may be the fastest growing neurodegenerative disease in the world (Bloem et al., 2021). Pathologically, it is characterised by the loss of the dopaminergic neurons within the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) and other pigmented nuclei of the brainstem. At present, the cost of healthcare for the estimated 145,000 people living with PD in the United Kingdom is over £728 million per year rising to a total economic impact of £3.6 billion (Weir et al. 2018). If current projections are correct of people with PD, this will double by 2040 (Dorsey et al. 2018), consequently the figure may exceed £7.2 billion. Most people affected are 60 years or above. However, there are many people who are diagnosed at a younger age. Common clinical manifestations of PD include a range of both motor (e.g., bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor, and postural instability) and non-motor (e.g., fatigue, psychiatric and behavioural disturbances, autonomic dysfunction, cognitive impairment, sleep dysfunction and olfactory loss) features.
The motor features can be present anywhere in the body. Some of the common features are lack of facial expression, low volume speech, stiffness and slowness of movements. Further, gait and balance are often affected. People with PD tend to have a festinating gait, and/or experience postural instability with or without freezing of gait (FOG) which may occur when initiating walking, standing from sitting, turning, and passing through narrow passages or certain circumstances such as approaching a destination (Nutt et al., 2011) or dual tasking (DT) (Bloem et al., 2000; Jacobs et al., 2014; Isaacson et al., 2018). Postural instability, gait problems and FOG may significantly affect a person's ability to perform ADL, increase their falls risk (Muslimovic et al., 2008; Lamont et al., 2017) and reduce their quality of life (QoL). Approximately 70% of people with PD will fall in a year period which can often result in serious consequences including injuries (e.g., fractures and traumatic brain injury) which further increase morbidity, mortality, and healthcare and personal costs (Farombi et al., 2016).
Currently, there is no cure for PD or treatment options available that can slow down the progression of this condition. However, all people with PD are provided options to treat the signs and symptoms of the condition to support their ability to participate in ADL that are meaningful to them (Huber et al., 2011). First line therapy, the dopaminergic medications, have some impact on motor symptoms in PD but rarely get people back to a "normal" state (Killane et al., 2015). People often remain significantly limited in their ADL during 'OFF' state but even during 'ON' state, many features of PD do not respond adequately despite optimal pharmacotherapy (Shukla et al., 2012). Moreover, the usage of medication often has serious side effects, particularly in older adults. The average person living with PD may be taking nine doses of medication a day (Grosset et al., 2007). Thus, drug resistance is another concern and dose limiting side effects is a barrier to successful deployment of pharmacotherapy (Killane et al., 2015). This issue increases with disease progression because neurodegeneration progressively involves non-dopaminergic brain areas. As a result, various non-pharmacological, non-invasive interventions have been developed to manage sensory dysfunction, a major problem in people with PD, associated with PD symptoms (Conte et al., 2013). Cueing and vibrotactile sensory stimulation are two such examples that have been used to modulate sensory dysfunction in people with PD, especially the sensorimotor integration problems.
Cueing is a mechanism of applying an external temporal or spatial stimulus to facilitate movement initiation and continuation and it can be somatosensory, auditory, attentional or visual (Nieuwboer et al., 2007; Muthukrishnan et al., 2019). It is reported to work by shifting habitual motor control to goal directed motor control (Redgrave et al., 2010). Many studies have demonstrated that cueing helps to improve postural control, balance, FOG (van Wegen et al., 2006; Nieuwboer et al., 2007; Munoz-Hellin et al., 2013; Spaulding et al., 2013; Muthukrishnan et al., 2019), as well as DT performance in activities involving the upper (Heremans et al., 2016; Park \& Kim, 2021) and lower (Rochester et al., 2007; 2009; 2010 (a); 2010(b); Fok et al., 2010; Mak et al., 2013; Beck et al., 2015; Chomiak et al., 2017; Mancini et al., 2018; Stuart \& Mancini, 2020) limbs in people with PD. However, many cueing modalities used for the research purposes in the laboratory environments cannot be easily replicated in people's homes. Thus, a recent narrative review recommends the development of cueing wearable systems that can be used at home or in the community to improve gait and posture in PD (Muthukrishnan et al., 2019).
Interventions utilising vibrotactile sensory stimulation in PD can be split into two main groups: a) whole body vibrotactile stimulation and b) focused (e.g., targeted) vibrotactile stimulation. The results on the effectiveness of whole body vibrotactile stimulation on sensory dysfunction and motor symptoms are mixed with a large variation being reported from none to small improvement on motor symptoms, balance, gait and mobility (Dincher et al., 2019). On the other side, focused vibrotactile stimulation which is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique used by somatosensory cues (e.g., tactile/somatosensory cueing) to apply gentle vibrations to focal joints in the body may have a more positive and consistent effect (Basta et al., 2011; Pfeifer et al., 2021). Trials which include cylindrical vibration devices on the triceps (Pereira et al., 2016), a vibrotactile waistband around the abdomen in FOG (Goncalves et al., 2018), vibrotactile insoles to reduce falls (Otis et al., 2016) and a proprioceptive stabiliser on postural instability (Volpe et al., 2014) show promising results. The CUE1 is a non-invasive medical device which utilises a metronome-like pulsed vibration which represents both auditory and somatosensory low frequency cueing and high frequency focused vibrotactile stimulation to help improve motor task performance in people with PD (Tan et al., 2021; Ong et al., 2022; Wilhelm et al., 2022). It is a CE marked and an MHRA registered non-invasive medical device.
Like other cueing and vibrotactile stimulation devices, the CUE1 stands out as a non-invasive medical instrument. It employs a metronome-like pulsed vibration, incorporating both auditory and somatosensory low-frequency cueing, along with high-frequency targeted vibrotactile stimulation. This design aims to enhance motor task performance in individuals with PD (Tan et al., 2021; Ong et al., 2022; Wilhelm et al., 2022). Preliminary assessments of employing the CUE1 indicated an overall enhancement of 16.75% in motor symptoms, as evidenced in the White Paper on Proof of Concept from 2019. This improvement was observed not only in the MDS-UPDRS Part III Motor test score-considered the benchmark for evaluating motor symptoms in individuals with PD-but also in various assessments such as the TUG test, TTT, and diverse gait features, as detailed in the White Papers on Proof of Concept from 2020. Moreover, users reported that donning the CUE1 device contributed to enhanced fatigue levels and increased subjective balance confidence.
Subsequent investigations from smaller-scale studies revealed notable advancements linked to CUE1 usage. Specifically, the device was shown to significantly boost gait speed in the TUG test (Tan et al., 2021) and improve MDS-UPDRS performance scores while reducing falls by an impressive 85% (Ong et al., 2022). Furthermore, a study design acceptance paper authored by Wilhelm et al. in 2022 showcased a reduction in Freezing of Gait (FOG) and an augmentation in walking speed, accompanied by positive feedback from individuals with PD regarding their experience with the CUE1.
This feasibility study will test primarily the feasibility, safety and tolerability and secondary the effect of the CUE1 and the CUE1+ (e.g., updated version of the CUE1 which has better motor and longer battery life but same treatment settings) device in people with PD and related disorders. This clinical study aims to identify whether the results seen in the prototype testing and previous small studies (Tan et al., 2021; Ong et al., 2022; Wilhelm et al., 2022) can be reproduced in a controlled clinical setting. Overall the risk assessment related to the use of the CUE1 and CUE1+ device has been previously tested on people with PD and has shown to have a minimal chance for error or adverse effect to the patient. Based on real world data, the CUE1 has shown to be effective in significantly improving motor symptoms such as rigidity, stiffness, tremor and slowness of movement in people with PD (White Paper-Proof of Concept, 2019; 2020). The CUE1 has also shown to improve fatigue (White Paper-Proof of Concept, 2020), walking speed, balance and FOG and decrease falls in people with PD (Tan et al., 2021; Ong et al., 2022; Wilhelm et al., 2022). The potential harm for the people with PD was very low, the acceptance of using the CUE1 and its renamed/rebranded model with longer battery life and better motor function, the CUE1+ device was very good, and positive user feedback was received (Wilhelm et al., 2022). The device also utilised medical grade established silicone-based skin adhesives. The product is water resistant and designed to CE standards hence product and electrical malfunction risk will be low.
Positive results arising from this feasibility study will strengthen the evidence that the CUE1+ device is feasible to be used, tolerated, safe and help to improve movement and mobility in people living with PD and related disorders. It may also assist in selecting the most appropriate outcome measures to test the effectiveness of the CUE1+ and contribute to the growing academic interest in the application of peripheral stimulation in other neurological disorders with movement, gait and balance problems such as various types of dystonias and tremors, multiple sclerosis, stroke and vestibular disorders.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Initially, 10 people with idiopathic Parkinson's disease and 10-20 people with related movement disorders are firstly assigned into a single group study to investigate the feasibility, safety and tolerability of the CUE1 device. Then a subgroup of participants (e.g., 30-40 new participants) with idiopathic Parkinson's disease only will be randomly allocated to one of the two intervention Groups; one group will receive the CUE1+ intervention at loud settings while the other at silent settings. The outcome assessor and statistician the group of the participants. Participants will know in which group they are but they do not know which is the active and which the passive intervention. This intervention is the main of this study and is double blind.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| people with Parkinson's disease and related disorders | Experimental | Device: CUE1 non-invasive device, Device: CUE1+ device active vs sham CUE1+ deviceIntervention All participants with Parkinson's related disorders and the first 10 participants with Parkinson's will use the CUE1 device as follows: * 1-2/9 weeks in the study: once a day for a continuous duration of 2 hours in the morning, 1 hour after taking the medication (if any) for PD or related disorder, every single day; * 4-5/9 weeks in the study: once a day for a continuous duration of 8 hours, starting from morning, 1 hour after taking the medication (if any) for PD or related disorder, every single day; * 7-8/9 weeks in the study: only at night, through all night, every single night and not during the day at all; 15-20 participants with Parkinson's disease will use the CUE1+ device at loud settings for 12 continuous weeks, as above the participants during weeks 4-5. |
| People with Parkinson's disease | Sham comparator | Device: CUE1+ device active vs sham CUE1+ device15-20 participants with Parkinson's disease will use the CUE1+ device sat silent settings for 12 continuous weeks, as above the participants during weeks 4-5 and compared to the active CUE1+ intervention with people with Parkinson's disease only as above |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adults over 18 years old
- Clinical diagnosis of idiopathic PD and related disorders including progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), multiple system atrophy (MSA), corticobasal degeneration (CBD), and vascular Parkinsonism (VaP) as well as atypical dystonias and tremor disorders and Orthostatic Tremor (OT)
- willing to participate and written consent provided after read the participant information sheet.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- other neurological disorders excluding idiopathic PD, related disorders such PSP, MSA, CBD, and VaP as well as atypical dystonias and tremor disorders, affecting movement, balance and gait
- metabolic or autoimmune disorders affecting movement, balance and gait
- acute orthopaedic disorders influencing balance control and gait
- audiovestibular disorders including severe hearing loss
- visual disturbances, poor eyesight
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CUE1 non-invasive deviceThis is a 9-week feasibility study which will involve wearing the CUE1 device on a daily basis at participants' homes while they continue their usual activities of daily living (ADL). The CUE1 is a non-invasive medical device which delivers low frequency metronomes like tactile cueing and high frequency focused vibrotactile stimulation. All participants will be using the same pre-programmed settings for the CUE1 device which are: vibration strength delivered at 80%, pulse length 800 milliseconds (ms), and rest length 800ms as set at baseline and will not change. The CUE1 device is attached to the skin via an adhesive patch which has been dermatologically tested and approved. Participants will be provided with the adhesive patches and shown how to use them and the CUE1 device by the research team. | Device | people with Parkinson's disease and related disorders |
| CUE1+ device active vs sham CUE1+ deviceAlso: CUE1+ device sham30-40 participants with idiopathic Parkinson's disease only will be randomly allocated to one of two interventions groups: one group will use the active CUE1+ device while the other group will use the CUE1+ at silent settings (e.g., sham device). All participants will use their device in the same way which is starting the usage from the morning, within an hour once they took their medications for Parkinson's (if any) and continue using the device for 8 hours, once a day, every day for 12 weeks | Device | People with Parkinson's disease, people with Parkinson's disease and related disorders |
Primary outcome
Recruitment rate
Time frame: 1 minute
This is a feasibility outcome, the recruitment rate which will be calculated as the percentage of eligible participants enrolled in the study. This will be reported at each follow up appointment at weeks -3, -6 and -9.
Compliance with interventions
Time frame: 1 minute
This is a feasibility outcome, compliance with interventions, which will be reported as the percentage of days completed using the CUE1 device and duration of using the CUE1 device. These will be reported at each follow up appointment at weeks -3, -6 and -9.
Dropout rate
Time frame: 1 minute
This is a feasibility outcome which will report the dropout rate at each follow up appointment at weeks -3, -6 and -9.
Physical observation
Time frame: 1 minute
This is a safety and tolerability outcome which will be assessed by carrying out a physical observation by research team during the face to face appointments of any adverse event occurring as a result of using the adhesive patches. The adverse events in relation to the CUE1 device will be reported in the participants' clinical diary and discussed during the appointments with the research team.
13 secondary outcomes
Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) questionnaire
Time frame: 5 minutes
Participant's clinical diary
Time frame: 15 minutes
Functional Gait Assessment (FGA)
Time frame: 10 minutes
Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Motor Part III
Time frame: 10 minutes
Timed Up and Go test (TUG)
Time frame: 5 minutes
Bradykinesia Akinesia Incoordination test (BRAIN test)
Time frame: 5 minutes
Distal Finger Tapping (DFT)
Time frame: 5 minutes
Activity-specific Balance Confidence (ABC)
Time frame: 5 minutes
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time frame: 5 minutes
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
Time frame: 5 minutes
Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39)
Time frame: 5 minutes
Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) (Parts I, II, IV).
Time frame: 15 minutes
Participant's satisfaction form
Time frame: 5 minutes
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Nov 2024.
- Background: PubMed 35013372Akram N, Li H, Ben-Joseph A, Budu C, Gallagher DA, Bestwick JP, Schrag A, Noyce AJ, Simonet C. Developing and assessing a new web-based tapping test for measuring distal movement in Parkinson's disease: a Distal Finger Tapping test. Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 10;12(1):386. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03563-7.
- Background: PubMed 22089958Basta D, Rossi-Izquierdo M, Soto-Varela A, Greters ME, Bittar RS, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Eckardt R, Harada T, Goto F, Ogawa K, Ernst A. Efficacy of a vibrotactile neurofeedback training in stance and gait conditions for the treatment of balance deficits: a double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study. Otol Neurotol. 2011 Dec;32(9):1492-9. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31823827ec.
- Background: PubMed 26678262Beck EN, Ehgoetz Martens KA, Almeida QJ. Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease: An Overload Problem? PLoS One. 2015 Dec 17;10(12):e0144986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144986. eCollection 2015.
- Background: PubMed 10939582Bloem BR, Grimbergen YA, Cramer M, Valkenburg VV. "Stops walking when talking" does not predict falls in Parkinson's disease. Ann Neurol. 2000 Aug;48(2):268. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(200008)48:23.0.co;2-4. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 33848468Bloem BR, Okun MS, Klein C. Parkinson's disease. Lancet. 2021 Jun 12;397(10291):2284-2303. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00218-X. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
- Background: PubMed 2748771Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.
- Background: PubMed 31571279Chaudhuri KR, Schrag A, Weintraub D, Rizos A, Rodriguez-Blazquez C, Mamikonyan E, Martinez-Martin P. The movement disorder society nonmotor rating scale: Initial validation study. Mov Disord. 2020 Jan;35(1):116-133. doi: 10.1002/mds.27862. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
- Background: PubMed 28151878Chomiak T, Watts A, Meyer N, Pereira FV, Hu B. A training approach to improve stepping automaticity while dual-tasking in Parkinson's disease: A prospective pilot study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Feb;96(5):e5934. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005934.
- Background: PubMed 24217516Conte A, Khan N, Defazio G, Rothwell JC, Berardelli A. Pathophysiology of somatosensory abnormalities in Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013 Dec;9(12):687-97. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.224. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
- Background: PubMed 22210979Dal Bello-Haas V, Klassen L, Sheppard MS, Metcalfe A. Psychometric Properties of Activity, Self-Efficacy, and Quality-of-Life Measures in Individuals with Parkinson Disease. Physiother Can. 2011 Winter;63(1):47-57. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2009-08. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
- Background: PubMed 30689308Dincher A, Schwarz M, Wydra G. Analysis of the Effects of Whole-Body Vibration in Parkinson Disease - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PM R. 2019 Jun;11(6):640-653. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12094. Epub 2019 May 6.
- Background: PubMed 30584159Dorsey ER, Sherer T, Okun MS, Bloem BR. The Emerging Evidence of the Parkinson Pandemic. J Parkinsons Dis. 2018;8(s1):S3-S8. doi: 10.3233/JPD-181474.
Related trials for Parkinson's Disease and Parkinsonism
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Early Molecular Biomarkers for Differentiating Parkinsonian Syndromes
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Atypical Parkinsonism
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stromal Cells-derived Exosomes in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson Disease (PD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Adaptive DBS to Offset STN Dysregulation During Exercise in PD
Parkinson Disease
Not yet recruiting
Compulsive Eating and Brain's Reward System in Different Pathologies
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Bipolar 1 Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Alastair Noyce, PhD study director
Queen Mary University of London
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CUE1 non-invasive device in people with Parkinson's Disease and Parkinsonism and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, run by Queen Mary University of London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Cristina Simonet, PhD (020 7882 3543, c.simonet@qmul.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Recruitment rate (time frame: 1 minute). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06174948, which also lists 71 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Nov 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.