Pulmonary FibrosisIS-PPFNCT06162884
Single Time Point Prediction as Earlier Diagnosis of Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
An observational study of Pulmonary Fibrosis, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study is a prospective observational study for subjects with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) or non-IPF interstitial lung diseases (ILD). The purpose of this study is to compare whether imaging patterns from high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) at baseline can predict worsening. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pulmonary Fibrosis
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 6 Nov 2024to 19 Aug 2029
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Primary objective is to predict early for progression in both IPF and non-IPF ILD population using a new artificial intelligence machine learning (AI/ML) algorithm of Single Timepoint Prediction (STP) score from HRCT. The primary interest is to validate STP score in identifying cohort early for the candidate of anti-fibrotic treatment.
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- Planned to participate in an intervention trial within the next 6 months
- Currently listed for lung transplantation at the time of enrollment
- Malignancy, treated or untreated, other than malignancy unlikely to affect prognosis in the next 3 years such as skin cancer or non-metastatic prostate cancer within the past 5 years
- Any clinically significant co-morbidity, which in the view of investigator, is likely to contribute to mortality or ability to perform PFT's in the next 2 years
- Prebronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1)/Forced vital capacity (FVC) <0.7 at as screening
- Exclusion of co-morbidities: congestive heart failure (stroke, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction), current virus-associated community acquired pneumonia, smoking-related chronic obstructive lung disease with FEV1 <70%, history of lung cancer, history of other cancer treated within the past 4 years for IPF and 5 years for non-IPF ILD (excluding basal cell carcinoma of skin).
Show all 10Show fewer
- HRCT data from subjects with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) can be collected.
- Major Discontinuing Criteria in this study
- lung transplant after baseline or death
- withdraw of consent or transition to another care center
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90024
Samuel Weigt, MD
About this study
Official title: Imaging Signature of Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Non-IPF Interstitial Lung Diseases
This study is a prospective observational study for subjects with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) or non-IPF interstitial lung diseases (ILD).
The purpose of this study is to compare whether imaging patterns from high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) at baseline can predict worsening. Single Time point Prediction (STP) is a score derived from an artificial intelligenc/ machine learning (AI/ML) using the radiomic features from a HRCT scan that quantifies the imaging patterns of short-term predictive worsening.
Read the detailed description
Primary objective is to predict early for progression in both IPF and non-IPF ILD population using an artificial intelligence (AI)/Machine Learning (ML) algorithm of STP score. The primary interest is to validate STP score in identifying a cohort early for the candidate of anti-fibrotic treatment. The study plans to collect clinical information such as pulmonary function tests (PFT), symptom scores, 6-minute walk tests (6MWT), and radiologic information from HRCT. This study does not intervene with patient's standard medical care.
This proposal is a prospective study that will enroll patients from the UCLA ILD Center. STP scores of subjects' baseline HRCT images will be grouped to one of 2 arms based on the baseline HRCT.
- Arm A: STP>=30% in whole lung
- Arm B: STP < 30% in whole lung
A subject's allocation will be determined by the baseline HRCT scan. STP score will be derived from the baseline HRCT to compare the early prediction of progression in ILD, STP of 30% threshold is expected to be close to the mean of overall population. In addition, a multi-scale guided attention (MSGA) is an imaging marker from deep learning model with two attention models to classify an IPF-likeliness using HRCT.
Primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) is uniformly defined in IPF and non-IPD ILD subjects by the reduction of 10% or more by FVC in volume or 15% or more by DLCO or death from any cause, whichever came first.
Key secondary endpoint of this study are:
In IPF, progression-free survival (PFS) is defined by the reduction of 10% or more by FVC in volume or 15% or more by DLCO or death from any cause, whichever came first.
In non-IPF ILD, PFS is defined by two worsening outcomes out of three elements of PFT worsening, radiological worsening or symptom or disease-related death alone.
- Worsening in PFT is defined by 5% or more absolute decreases in the percent predicted FVC or 10% or more absolute decrease in the percent predicted DLCO.
- Radiological evidence of disease progression is defined by visual worsening (one or more of the following) from a radiological report or quantitative lung fibrosis (QLF) changes >=2% in whole lung
- Symptomatic worsening can be measure by King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease (K-BILD) or Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCD).
Secondary outcomes of this study are:
- To compare additional PFS criteria between two arms of STP
- To compare overall survival between the two arms of STP
- To compare the changes in 6-minute walk tests between the two arms of STP
- To compare PFS between two groups of MSGA marker positive and negative
- To compare overall survival between two groups of MSGA marker positive and negative
With a chronic ILD or IPF, lung function may be stable for a few years or continue to deteriorate slowly or rapidly develop more scar tissues over time. While it is known that age, biological sex, and lung function are factors that can impact risk of worsening lung function, there is a great need for better methods to predict which patients are at risk of worsening lung function. Having better methods to predict disease progression could allow more timely treatment with anti-fibrotic treatment to prevent the disease progression.
In both IPF and non-IPF ILD, HRCT scan is required for diagnosis. Imaging patterns derived from HRCT, called STP is designed to predict the areas in lung that may be likely to progress in the next 6 to 12 months. High STP scores are associated with poor prognosis and worsening the pulmonary function. The goal of this study is to test whether an AI-algorithm, the STP score from a single CT study, can predict disease progression in subjects with IPF and non IPF-ILD in a prospective study. This AI-algorithm was developed under NIH-sponsored study.
The purpose of prospective observational cohort study from UCLA is to test for the early sign of progressive fibrosis using baseline HRCT. This study, Imaging Signature of Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis (IS-PPF) Research is a prospective study that will collect information regarding HRCT images, pulmonary function test, 6-minute walk, symptomatic score, and patients' clinical information to set up AI-driven imaging signature for evaluating the STP in predicting progression in IPF and non-IPF ILD.
This is an observational study; only minimally invasive procedures will be performed with study subjects (blood draws and nasal swabs). These biological samples will support future research studies. The study subject's will participation in the study for up to 3 years, the length of participation may vary. All subjects will continue to receive their usual care and treatment.
In summary, this research will create an opportunity to test and validate the imaging score and early prediction for IPF and non-IPF ILD that can impact current and future care practices.
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Fibrosis
- Keywords
- imaging outcome, Single Timepoint Prediction, AI/machine learning, progressive ILD
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Fibrosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| STP >=30% | STP score is 30% or greater than 30% in whole lung at baseline inspirational HRCT scan. STP score is an AL/ML derived score using radiomic patterns of lung parenchyma to identify the spatial location of likely progressed in the short-term follow up. The higher score is the worse expected outcome. | |
| STP < 30% | STP score is less than 30% in whole lung at baseline inspirational HRCT scan. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression Free Survival (PFS) between the two arms by Single Time point Prediction (STP) score
PFS of IPF and non-IPF ILD will be compared in patients with STP >=30% or <30%. A higher STP score, ranging from 0% to 100%, indicates a worse outcome. Progression is uniformly defined in both IPF and non-IPF ILD population as the reduction of FVC >=10% or the reduction of DLCO >=15% or death due to the disease.
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 2 years
Secondary outcomes (5)
Progression Free Survival (PFS2-PFS6) between the two arms by Single Time point Prediction (STP) score
Four additional PFS definitions will be used to test STP >=30% or <30%.
- Key Secondary PFS definition (PFS2): same PFS in the primary endpoint for IPF or PPF definition for non-IPF (two events out of three elements in PFT (reduction of 5% or more in % predicted FVC or 10% or more in predicted DLCO if available; radiological worsening; symptomatic worsening);
- Secondary PFS definition (PFS3) I: Key Secondary PFS definition (PFS2) convention for non-IPF or annual QLF increase of 2% or higher or visual worsening for IPF;
- Secondary PFS definition (PFS4) II: Secondary PFS3 or 6 min walk (decrease of > 25m in the 6-minute walk distance) or QoL (KBILD of 4-point increase or LCQ SGRQ of 310-point reduction) for both IPF and non-IPF;
- Secondary PFS definition (PFS5) III: Secondary PFS 4 or new Oxygen usage or increase in Oxygen usage (>1L of O2 per min) for both IPF and non-IPF
- Secondary PFS definition (PFS6) IV: Secondary PFS2 without acute infection
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 2 years.
Overall Survival (OS) between the two arms by Single Time point Prediction (STP) score
Overall Survival will be compared with STP >=30% or <30%.
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 3 years.
Changes in Distance Walked (Meters, m) on the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) by two arms of STP score
The 6MWT measures the distance a patient is able to walk quickly on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes. The 6MW can ranges from 0 m to 1000m. In healthy subjects, the 6MWT ranges from 400m to 700m.
Measured: From Baseline in every 3-6-month to end of the study (up to 2 years)
PFS between two arms by Multi-Scale Guided Attention (MSGA) marker
Progression Free Survival will be compared in subjects with MSGA positive or negative marker.
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 2 years
OS between two arms by Multi-Scale Guided Attention (MSGA) marker
Overall Survival of IPF and non-IPF ILD will be compared in patients with MSGA positive or negative marker.
Measured: From Baseline to end of the study (up to 3 years)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Dec 2023
- Study start6 Nov 2024
- Primary completion22 Nov 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion19 Aug 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pulmonary FibrosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, Los AngelesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Los Angeles
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Grace Hyun Kim, University of California, Los Angeles
- Investigators
- Samuel Weigt, MD, Principal investigator, UCLA Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and HospitalsJonathan Goldin, MD, Principal investigator, Radiological Sciences at the University of California, Los Angeles
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06162884
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB#23-001246
- Other IDs
- ECR2022-3630
- Acronym
- IS-PPF
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 30 Nov 2023
- Last updated
- 18 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Imaging Signature of Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Non-IPF Interstitial Lung Diseases
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06162884
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IS-PPF / IRB#23-001246
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Fibrosis
- Keywords
- imaging outcome, Single Timepoint Prediction, AI/machine learning, progressive ILD
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Los AngelesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Study start
- 6 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Nov 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 19 Aug 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a prospective observational study for subjects with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) or non-IPF interstitial lung diseases (ILD).
The purpose of this study is to compare whether imaging patterns from high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) at baseline can predict worsening. Single Time point Prediction (STP) is a score derived from an artificial intelligenc/ machine learning (AI/ML) using the radiomic features from a HRCT scan that quantifies the imaging patterns of short-term predictive worsening.
Detailed description
Primary objective is to predict early for progression in both IPF and non-IPF ILD population using an artificial intelligence (AI)/Machine Learning (ML) algorithm of STP score. The primary interest is to validate STP score in identifying a cohort early for the candidate of anti-fibrotic treatment. The study plans to collect clinical information such as pulmonary function tests (PFT), symptom scores, 6-minute walk tests (6MWT), and radiologic information from HRCT. This study does not intervene with patient's standard medical care.
This proposal is a prospective study that will enroll patients from the UCLA ILD Center. STP scores of subjects' baseline HRCT images will be grouped to one of 2 arms based on the baseline HRCT.
- Arm A: STP>=30% in whole lung
- Arm B: STP < 30% in whole lung
A subject's allocation will be determined by the baseline HRCT scan. STP score will be derived from the baseline HRCT to compare the early prediction of progression in ILD, STP of 30% threshold is expected to be close to the mean of overall population. In addition, a multi-scale guided attention (MSGA) is an imaging marker from deep learning model with two attention models to classify an IPF-likeliness using HRCT.
Primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) is uniformly defined in IPF and non-IPD ILD subjects by the reduction of 10% or more by FVC in volume or 15% or more by DLCO or death from any cause, whichever came first.
Key secondary endpoint of this study are:
In IPF, progression-free survival (PFS) is defined by the reduction of 10% or more by FVC in volume or 15% or more by DLCO or death from any cause, whichever came first.
In non-IPF ILD, PFS is defined by two worsening outcomes out of three elements of PFT worsening, radiological worsening or symptom or disease-related death alone.
- Worsening in PFT is defined by 5% or more absolute decreases in the percent predicted FVC or 10% or more absolute decrease in the percent predicted DLCO.
- Radiological evidence of disease progression is defined by visual worsening (one or more of the following) from a radiological report or quantitative lung fibrosis (QLF) changes >=2% in whole lung
- Symptomatic worsening can be measure by King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease (K-BILD) or Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCD).
Secondary outcomes of this study are:
- To compare additional PFS criteria between two arms of STP
- To compare overall survival between the two arms of STP
- To compare the changes in 6-minute walk tests between the two arms of STP
- To compare PFS between two groups of MSGA marker positive and negative
- To compare overall survival between two groups of MSGA marker positive and negative
With a chronic ILD or IPF, lung function may be stable for a few years or continue to deteriorate slowly or rapidly develop more scar tissues over time. While it is known that age, biological sex, and lung function are factors that can impact risk of worsening lung function, there is a great need for better methods to predict which patients are at risk of worsening lung function. Having better methods to predict disease progression could allow more timely treatment with anti-fibrotic treatment to prevent the disease progression.
In both IPF and non-IPF ILD, HRCT scan is required for diagnosis. Imaging patterns derived from HRCT, called STP is designed to predict the areas in lung that may be likely to progress in the next 6 to 12 months. High STP scores are associated with poor prognosis and worsening the pulmonary function. The goal of this study is to test whether an AI-algorithm, the STP score from a single CT study, can predict disease progression in subjects with IPF and non IPF-ILD in a prospective study. This AI-algorithm was developed under NIH-sponsored study.
The purpose of prospective observational cohort study from UCLA is to test for the early sign of progressive fibrosis using baseline HRCT. This study, Imaging Signature of Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis (IS-PPF) Research is a prospective study that will collect information regarding HRCT images, pulmonary function test, 6-minute walk, symptomatic score, and patients' clinical information to set up AI-driven imaging signature for evaluating the STP in predicting progression in IPF and non-IPF ILD.
This is an observational study; only minimally invasive procedures will be performed with study subjects (blood draws and nasal swabs). These biological samples will support future research studies. The study subject's will participation in the study for up to 3 years, the length of participation may vary. All subjects will continue to receive their usual care and treatment.
In summary, this research will create an opportunity to test and validate the imaging score and early prediction for IPF and non-IPF ILD that can impact current and future care practices.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| STP >=30% | – | –STP score is 30% or greater than 30% in whole lung at baseline inspirational HRCT scan. STP score is an AL/ML derived score using radiomic patterns of lung parenchyma to identify the spatial location of likely progressed in the short-term follow up. The higher score is the worse expected outcome. |
| STP < 30% | – | –STP score is less than 30% in whole lung at baseline inspirational HRCT scan. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Primary objective is to predict early for progression in both IPF and non-IPF ILD population using a new artificial intelligence machine learning (AI/ML) algorithm of Single Timepoint Prediction (STP) score from HRCT. The primary interest is to validate STP score in identifying cohort early for the candidate of anti-fibrotic treatment.
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Planned to participate in an intervention trial within the next 6 months
- Currently listed for lung transplantation at the time of enrollment
- Malignancy, treated or untreated, other than malignancy unlikely to affect prognosis in the next 3 years such as skin cancer or non-metastatic prostate cancer within the past 5 years
- Any clinically significant co-morbidity, which in the view of investigator, is likely to contribute to mortality or ability to perform PFT's in the next 2 years
- Prebronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1)/Forced vital capacity (FVC) <0.7 at as screening
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Progression Free Survival (PFS) between the two arms by Single Time point Prediction (STP) score
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 2 years
PFS of IPF and non-IPF ILD will be compared in patients with STP >=30% or <30%. A higher STP score, ranging from 0% to 100%, indicates a worse outcome. Progression is uniformly defined in both IPF and non-IPF ILD population as the reduction of FVC >=10% or the reduction of DLCO >=15% or death due to the disease.
5 secondary outcomes
Progression Free Survival (PFS2-PFS6) between the two arms by Single Time point Prediction (STP) score
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 2 years.
Overall Survival (OS) between the two arms by Single Time point Prediction (STP) score
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 3 years.
Changes in Distance Walked (Meters, m) on the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) by two arms of STP score
Time frame: From Baseline in every 3-6-month to end of the study (up to 2 years)
PFS between two arms by Multi-Scale Guided Attention (MSGA) marker
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 2 years
OS between two arms by Multi-Scale Guided Attention (MSGA) marker
Time frame: From Baseline to end of the study (up to 3 years)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jun 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Pulmonary Fibrosis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
CFTR Modulator Effects on Bone and Muscle in Adults With Cystic Fibrosis
Cystic Fibrosis, Bone Loss
RecruitingPhase 2
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of PIPE 791 in Subjects With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Bronchiectasis
Bronchiectasis, Cystic Fibrosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
RecruitingObservational study
Role of Genetic Factors in the Development of Lung Disease
Cystic Fibrosis, Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Samuel Weigt, MD principal investigator
UCLA Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Hospitals
Jonathan Goldin, MD principal investigator
Radiological Sciences at the University of California, Los Angeles
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Pulmonary Fibrosis, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Grace Hyun Kim, PhD ((310) 481-7594, GraceKim@mednet.ucla.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression Free Survival (PFS) between the two arms by Single Time point Prediction (STP) score (time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jun 2026.