AzTrials
AzTrials

Behavioral EconomicsRCF: PCCENCT06155292

Report Cards and Feedback for PCCE

A study testing Standard Communication Email, Personalized Report Card Email and Bottom-Up Framing in people with Behavioral Economics and Primary Health Care, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

As part of UCLA Health's commitment to developing an integrated health system built on a foundation of physician-led, team-based primary care, the Department of Medicine (DOM) implemented a performance-based incentive plan called the Primary Care Clinical Excellence (PCCE) Incentive Plan. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Standard Communication Email, Personalized Report Card Email and Bottom-Up Framing
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
233 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
3 Oct 2023to 31 Oct 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Primary care physicians within the UCLA Health Department of Medicine Primary Care Network that are eligible for the PCCE Incentive program as of October 1, 2023.
  • Physicians with the clinical full-time employee level (FTE) of ≥ 40% as of October 1, 2023
  • Physicians with panel size >50 patients as of October 1, 2023

Who cannot join

  • Physicians classified as Pediatrics will be excluded from data analysis given the structural differences in health maintenance guidelines for children.
  • Physicians classified as Urgent Care will be excluded from data analysis given the structural differences in their performance evaluation. They are all in Arm 1.
  • Physicians who participate in the design of this experiment will be excluded from analysis.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • UCLA Health Department of Medicine, Quality Office

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Personalized Report Cards and Bottom-up Framing on PCCE Performance and Attitudes

As part of UCLA Health's commitment to developing an integrated health system built on a foundation of physician-led, team-based primary care, the Department of Medicine (DOM) implemented a performance-based incentive plan called the Primary Care Clinical Excellence (PCCE) Incentive Plan.

The UCLA Health DOM Quality team is leading the implementation and evaluation of this incentive plan across the UCLA Health primary care network, with the primary goal to immediately produce improvements in the quality of primary care. In order to rigorously measure the most efficacious ways to frame and communicate information about the quality improvement (QI) program, the DOM Quality team has partnered with the UCLA Anderson School of Management.

Understanding the factors that motivate physicians to deliver high quality primary care will provide pivotal insights into the successful implementation of performance based programs nationwide.

Read the detailed description

The investigators will use a communication strategy that leverages behavioral principles to motivate providers to improve in all four of the evaluated domains of the PCCE program: clinical quality, professional participation, patient experience, and risk coding.

The investigators will implement a three-arm experimental communication campaign that includes quarterly emails and quarterly survey messages. The communication strategies will utilize motivation and behavior change theories to improve physician performance in the program and attitudes towards the program. In particular, the investigators will test the independent and joint effects of communicating with physicians (a) personalized performance feedback and (b) the "co-creation" of the program (i.e., sharing how physician feedback informed the program design).

The investigators will randomly assign eligible physicians to one of the three experimental arms, stratified by overall baseline performance (the total percent allocated in the PCCE program for the April, May, June 2023 quarter), specialty (based on classification as Adult or Adult/Peds), and contract (based on classification as DOM or PCN (CPN/EIMG)).

The investigators will evaluate whether arm 3 differs from arm 1 in terms of the measures listed in the Outcome Measures section. If this comparison is statistically significant, the investigators will next compare arms 3 vs. 2 and arms 2 vs. 1.

Analysis plan

  • Physician-quarter-level linear regression models with heteroskedastic-consistent robust standard errors, clustered at the physician level.
  • The primary model term will be indicator variables for arms that patients are assigned to.
  • Control variables:
  • Baseline values of the outcome measure: the investigators will control for the baseline measures of the outcomes, based on performance from July through September 2023 and survey responses in April and July 2023, if available.
  • Physician baseline subjective understanding of the PCCE program from the July 2023 survey, with four items which asked the extent to which physicians understood how their score in each domain of the program was calculated.
  • Physician characteristics: self-reported gender, race, and age, plus years at UCLA Health and clinic from administrative data
  • Missing covariate values will be handled by including 'unknown' indicator variables, along with mean imputation for continuous covariates.
  • Exploratory analyses will investigate heterogeneous treatment effects by the following characteristics:
  • Physician baseline performance in the PCCE program (evaluated based on performance in July, August, and September 2023)
  • Physician baseline perceived leadership support reported in the July 2023 survey
  • Physician baseline program-related attitudes (agency, value in PCCE program) reported in the April 2023 survey
  • Physician baseline subjective understanding of the PCCE program from the July 2023 survey
  • Objective valence of the feedback delivered in the first email report card, measured by 1) the number of metrics within each domain for which the physician improved relative to the prior quarter, 2) the number of metrics within each domain for which the physician met or exceeded the benchmark, and 3) average distance from the benchmark across the metrics within each domain
  • Random assignment to providing feedback on the report card design in a survey conducted before the intervention launch, in July 2023
  • Physician gender
  • Physician years in practice
  • The investigators will investigate physicians' program-related attitudes and perceptions as proposed mechanisms of the interventions. These will be measured with 11 items that form three subscales about perceived justice, antecedents to one's intentions to succeed, and perceived value of the feedback.
  • Perceived justice in the PCCE program structure and implementation: Physicians will be surveyed regarding the structural justice (2 items), distributive justice (1 item), and informational justice of the program (2 items).
  • Antecedents of intentions to succeed in the program: Physicians will be surveyed regarding their perceived agency (behavioral control) over their performance in the PCCE program (1 item), their perceived value of the PCCE program (2 items), and their subjective norms about the endorsement and success of their colleagues in the program (2 items).
  • Perceived value of the performance feedback: Physicians will be surveyed about the utility of the quarterly performance feedback in contextualizing their goal pursuit efforts (1 item).
  • The investigators will investigate physicians' overall workplace attitudes as additional outcomes. These will be measured as a 4-item questionnaire about trust in UCLA Health leadership (1 item), perceived leadership support (1 item), job satisfaction (1 item), and burnout (1 item).
  • Robustness checks will be performed without covariates, and using logistic regression models in place of linear regression models for dependent variables that are measured as binary indicators.
Being tested
Standard Communication Email, Personalized Report Card Email, Bottom-Up Framing
Keywords
behavioral economics, personalized feedback

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Standard Communication EmailBehavioural

    This is a standard quarterly email communication without personalized performance metrics.

  • Personalized Report Card EmailBehavioural

    This personalized information about physician performance replaces the standard communication email to provide personalized feedback to physicians.

  • Bottom-Up FramingBehavioural

    The bottom-up framing is added onto the personalized communication email to provide insight on how the PCCE program was informed by physician feedback.

    The bottom-up framing is added onto the survey communication to provide insight on how the PCCE program was informed by physician feedback.

Study groups in NCT06155292
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1: Standard Communication ArmPlacebo comparatorQuarterly email communication: Quarterly standard communication via email providing a link to physicians to check their PCCE program performance over the prior quarter, and a link to access the PCCE dashboard. The email will also include a link to resources. Starting with the email communication in February 2024, there will be a reminder email sent two weeks after the first email with the same content. Quarterly survey: Quarterly standard communication via survey with questions about physician attitudes and beliefs.
Receives: Behavioral: Standard Communication Email
Arm 2: Personalized Report CardExperimentalQuarterly email communication: Quarterly personalized communication via email providing individualized performance metrics to physicians for the PCCE program from the prior quarter. All the links in the Arm 1 emails will be included in Arm 2 emails. Starting with the email communication in February 2024, there will be a reminder email sent two weeks after the first email with the same content. Quarterly survey: Quarterly standard communication via survey with the same questions about physician attitudes and beliefs as in Arm 1.
Receives: Behavioral: Personalized Report Card Email
Arm 3: Personalized Report Card + Bottom-Up FramingExperimentalQuarterly email communication as in Arm 2. Bottom-up intervention: The quarterly email communication will also describe the ways in which the PCCE program and its features were informed by physician feedback and recommendations. Quarterly survey: The quarterly survey will include information about the ways in which the PCCE program and its features were informed by physician feedback and recommendations. Physicians will respond to the same questions about physician attitudes and beliefs as in Arms 1 and 2.
Receives: Behavioral: Personalized Report Card Email; Behavioral: Bottom-Up Framing

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Physician Behavior: Rate of Engagement with Resources in First Email

    Whether physicians click through to access the "PCCE Resources and Improvement Strategies", for which a link is provided via quarterly report card emails. The time frame is one week after the first email was sent, as a binary indicator.

    Measured: 1 week

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Rate of Overall Resource Engagement

    Click-through behavior to access the "PCCE Resources and Improvement Strategies" as a binary indicator will be examined at the physician-quarter level. In November 2023 when there was just one email communication, click-through behavior will be assessed for one week after this email was sent. Starting in February 2024, a reminder email was sent two weeks after the first email, so click-through behavior will be assessed during the time between the send date of the first quarterly email through one week after the send date of the reminder email, per quarter.

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Domain-Specific and Aggregate PCCE Performance

    Standardized z-scores of the metrics for each domain in the PCCE program will be averaged following the incentive program weights to measure domain-specific performance at the physician-quarter level. The investigators will analyze performance in each domain separately. Also, to analyze the effect of an intervention on aggregate performance, physician-quarter-domain level data will be analyzed in regressions weighted by the program domain weights for physicians' affiliation. This will be examined from January through September, 2024. If there is a significant effect, the investigators will explore whether the effect persists through June 2025. If there is no positive significant effect of an intervention, the investigators will examine the effect of the intervention on the "points" that physicians receive, since physicians may focus on meeting thresholds to earn points (rather than improving absolute performance).

    Measured: 9 months

  3. Rate of Citizenship Behavior

    Physician willingness in a survey to opt in to perform an organizational citizenship behavior, as a binary indicator for whether physicians opted in.

    Measured: 2 weeks

  4. Physician Workplace Attitudes

    Measured with 4 items about: 1) trust in UCLA Health leadership (scale measured from 1-7, with higher values indicating higher trust), 2) perceived leadership support (scale measured from 1-5, with higher values indicating higher support), job satisfaction (scale measured from 1-7, with higher values indicating more satisfaction), and burnout (scale measured from 1-5, with higher values indicating more burnout).

    Measured: 12 months

  5. Physician Program-Related Attitudes and Perceptions

    Measured with 11 items that form three subscales about perceived justice, antecedents to one's intentions to succeed, and perceived value of the feedback. All items will be measured on a scale from 1-7, where higher scores indicate a better outcome.

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Dec 2023
  2. Study start3 Oct 2023
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2024
  4. Study completion31 Oct 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Parallel randomized trial at the physician level.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
233 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06155292
Sponsor's protocol ID
PCCE202324
Acronym
RCF: PCCE
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
3 Oct 2023
Last updated
30 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: There is no IPD sharing plan for this study.

Publications

  • Colquitt JA. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. J Appl Psychol. 2001 Jun;86(3):386-400. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386.

    PubMed 11419799
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.

  • Konovsky, M. A. (2000). Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 489-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(00)00042-8

  • Leventhal, H. (1980). Toward a comprehensive theory of emotion. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 139-207). Elsevier.

  • Shapiro, D. L., Buttner, E. H., & Barry, B. (1994). Explanations: What factors enhance their perceived adequacy? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58(3), 346-368.

  • Thibault, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A social psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Elbaum Associates.

  • Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. 1986. Interactional justice; Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & B. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations, Vol. 1: 43-55. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Standard Communication Email, Personalized Report Card Email and Bottom-Up Framing in people with Behavioral Economics and Primary Health Care, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Physician Behavior: Rate of Engagement with Resources in First Email (time frame: 1 week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06155292, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in