Resistance Sprint Training With and Without PowerNCT06147193
Effects of Resistance Sprint Training With and Without Power Training on Sprint and Agility Performance
A study testing with baseline intervention and power training interventions and baseline interventions and without power training interventions in people with Resistance Sprint Training With and Without Power, run by Sehat Medical Complex at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
This study will be randomized clinical trial will be used to get expected outcomes. Hence under ethical consideration athletes of Pakistan football federation will go under the selection criteria and chosen voluntarily to participate in the study. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Resistance Sprint Training With and Without Power
- What is being tested?
- with baseline intervention and power training interventions and baseline interventions and without power training interventions
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 38 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 23 Aug 2023to 15 Apr 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Male football players
- Age 18- 40 years
- BMI 18.5-25
- Being volunteered to participate in study
- Being engaged in practice from past 6th month
Who cannot join
- Athlete with current substance abuse
- Individual diagnose with severe anxiety disorder and psychosis
- History of previous fracture from last 6 months
- Musculoskeletal disorders (sprains, strains, tendinopathies, stress fracture)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Pakistan1 site
Riphah International University
Lahore, Punjab Province, 44000
About this study
Official title: Effects of Resistance Sprint Training With and Without Power Training on Sprint and Agility Performance in Football Players
This study will be randomized clinical trial will be used to get expected outcomes. Hence under ethical consideration athletes of Pakistan football federation will go under the selection criteria and chosen voluntarily to participate in the study. Data will be collected with non-probability convenient sampling technique and 40 football players will be participated in this study. Participates will be divided into two groups with randomization process. 20 athletes will be in each group. Group A will be treated with squats jumps, change of direction speed, countermovement jump, bench press, Romanian deadlift and barbell squats, resistance band sprints, stair sprints and weighted sled pulls and Group B will be treated with squats jumps, change of direction speed, countermovement jump, resistance band sprints, stairs sprints and weighted sled pulls. These exercises will be given in 3 sets with 10 repetitions in each set. Pre and post interventions measures will be taken on 1st day and at 6th week there will be 3 sessions in a week. SPSS version 25 will be used to analyze the data.
Read the detailed description
Football is a sport which is of high-intensity intermittent game that requires players to be physically capable of coping with high-intensity movements, having repeated changes of direction, sprints, and accelerations/decelerations, with complex and physically demanding technical different actions Developing and loading strength techniques in football come from knowledge of game performance and its specific components and limitation components. Most of the important factors in football are explosiveness activities such as changing direction, jumping, sprinting, and kicking. Working on these explosive performances have been found after strength training that improved the available force of muscular contraction in appropriate muscle groups. Vertical jump and sprint performances are interlinked with maximal muscular strength in football players and the heavy resistance training can also increase running economy and which ultimately increases the aerobic performance of the athlete
- Being tested
- with baseline intervention and power training interventions, baseline interventions and without power training interventions
- Keywords
- Agility Training, Football, Power Training, Resistance Sprint Training
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
with baseline intervention and power training interventionsOther
Group A (with power training ) was treated with
- squats jump,
- change of direction speed,
- countermovement jump,
- bench press,
- Romanian deadlift
- barbell squats,
- resistance band sprints,
- stair sprints
- weighted sled pulls
baseline interventions and without power training interventionsOther
Group B (without power training) was treated with
- squats jump
- change of direction speed
- countermovement jump
- barbell squats
- resistance band sprints
- stair sprints
- Weighted sled pulls.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Power training Group | Active comparator | with baseline intervention and power training interventions Receives: Other: with baseline intervention and power training interventions |
| Baseline Group | Other | baseline interventions and without power training interventions Receives: Other: baseline interventions and without power training interventions |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Resisted sprinting speeds at 10-30 m
The athlete sprints a distance of 10-30m while pushing or pulling against resistance. This resistance can be provided by various means, such as sled, resistance band, or a partner holding onto a harness worn by athlete. A study suggested that the magnitude of the correlation coefficient between speed-test results and match parameters was considered as small (0.1 ≤ r < 0.3), moderate (0.3 ≤ r < 0.5), large (0.5 ≤ r < 0.7), very large (0.7 ≤ r < 0.9), and nearly perfect (r ≥ 0.9)
Measured: Change from Baseline at 6 weeks
Change of direction speed (COD) testing
This test consists of four 5-m sections marked with cones set at 100° angles. Three maximal attempts were performed with a 5-min rest interval between attempts. Starting from a standing position with the front foot placed 0.3 m behind the first pair of photocells i.e., starting line athletes ran and changed direction as quickly as possible until crossing the second pair of photocells placed 20 m from the starting line .A study suggests a near perfect correlation between the COD (r=0.92)
Measured: Change from Baseline at 6 weeks
Squat jumps (SJ)
In the SJ, a static position with a 90° knee flexion angle was maintained for 2 seconds before every jump attempt. No preparatory movement was allowed and an experienced researcher visually inspected for proper technique. A study suggested that jumping tests had high correlation coefficients with the principal component (r = 0.76-0.87.
Measured: Change from Baseline at 6 weeks
Countermovement Jump (CMJ)
In the CMJ, athletes were instructed to perform a downward movement followed by a complete extension of the lower limbs and were allowed to freely determine the amplitude of the countermovement to avoid changes in their jumping coordination pattern. Participants were instructed to assume the same body position at takeoff and landing on both squat and counter movement jumps) the CMJ tests had a high correlation coefficient with the principal component (r=0.76-0.87)
Measured: Change from Baseline at 6 weeks
Horizontal Jump (HJ)
The athlete stands behind a line marked on the ground with feet slightly apart. A two-foot take-off and landing is used, with swinging of the arms and bending of the knees to provide forward drive. The subject attempts to jump as far as possible, landing on both feet without falling backwards. Three attempts are allowed a study suggested a Horizontal jump assessment(r=-0.7-0.86)
Measured: Change from Baseline at 6 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Nov 2023
- Study start23 Aug 2023
- Primary completion30 Mar 2024
- Study completion15 Apr 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Resistance Sprint Training With and Without PowerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sehat Medical Complex
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Imran Ghafoor, Principal investigator, Riphah International University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06147193
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REC/RCRS/1021 Tehreem
- Status last verified
- Apr 2024
- First submitted
- 19 Nov 2023
- Last updated
- 2 May 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Combs B, Fazeli PL, Brown DA, Gallagher S, Jones A, Romeo B, Heaton K. Description of the Nature of Musculoskeletal Shoulder Injuries in a Cohort of Commercial Truck Drivers: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study. Workplace Health Saf. 2021 Aug;69(8):375-382. doi: 10.1177/2165079921990364. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
PubMed 33845688O'Brien L, Collins K, Amirabdollhian F. Exploring Sports Nutrition Knowledge in Elite Gaelic Footballers. Nutrients. 2021 Mar 26;13(4):1081. doi: 10.3390/nu13041081.
PubMed 33810237Hasan S, Kandasamy G, Alyahya D, Alonazi A, Jamal A, Unnikrishnan R, Muthusamy H, Iqbal A. Effect of Resisted Sprint and Plyometric Training on Lower Limb Functional Performance in Collegiate Male Football Players: A Randomised Control Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 22;18(13):6702. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136702.
PubMed 34206346Gil S, Barroso R, Crivoi do Carmo E, Loturco I, Kobal R, Tricoli V, Ugrinowitsch C, Roschel H. Effects of resisted sprint training on sprinting ability and change of direction speed in professional soccer players. J Sports Sci. 2018 Sep;36(17):1923-1929. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1426346. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
PubMed 29334309Pacholek M, Zemkova E. Effect of Two Strength Training Models on Muscle Power and Strength in Elite Women's Football Players. Sports (Basel). 2020 Mar 30;8(4):42. doi: 10.3390/sports8040042.
PubMed 32235425Altmann S, Ringhof S, Neumann R, Woll A, Rumpf MC. Validity and reliability of speed tests used in soccer: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 14;14(8):e0220982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220982. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31412057Beato M, Bianchi M, Coratella G, Merlini M, Drust B. Effects of Plyometric and Directional Training on Speed and Jump Performance in Elite Youth Soccer Players. J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Feb;32(2):289-296. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002371.
PubMed 29176387Van Hooren B, Zolotarjova J. The Difference Between Countermovement and Squat Jump Performances: A Review of Underlying Mechanisms With Practical Applications. J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Jul;31(7):2011-2020. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001913.
PubMed 28640774Markovic G, Dizdar D, Jukic I, Cardinale M. Reliability and factorial validity of squat and countermovement jump tests. J Strength Cond Res. 2004 Aug;18(3):551-5. doi: 10.1519/1533-4287(2004)182.0.CO;2.
PubMed 15320660
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Resistance Sprint Training With and Without Power Training on Sprint and Agility Performance in Football Players
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06147193
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REC/RCRS/1021 Tehreem
- Keywords
- Agility Training, Football, Power Training, Resistance Sprint Training
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sehat Medical ComplexUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 23 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Apr 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will be randomized clinical trial will be used to get expected outcomes. Hence under ethical consideration athletes of Pakistan football federation will go under the selection criteria and chosen voluntarily to participate in the study. Data will be collected with non-probability convenient sampling technique and 40 football players will be participated in this study. Participates will be divided into two groups with randomization process. 20 athletes will be in each group. Group A will be treated with squats jumps, change of direction speed, countermovement jump, bench press, Romanian deadlift and barbell squats, resistance band sprints, stair sprints and weighted sled pulls and Group B will be treated with squats jumps, change of direction speed, countermovement jump, resistance band sprints, stairs sprints and weighted sled pulls. These exercises will be given in 3 sets with 10 repetitions in each set. Pre and post interventions measures will be taken on 1st day and at 6th week there will be 3 sessions in a week. SPSS version 25 will be used to analyze the data.
Detailed description
Football is a sport which is of high-intensity intermittent game that requires players to be physically capable of coping with high-intensity movements, having repeated changes of direction, sprints, and accelerations/decelerations, with complex and physically demanding technical different actions Developing and loading strength techniques in football come from knowledge of game performance and its specific components and limitation components. Most of the important factors in football are explosiveness activities such as changing direction, jumping, sprinting, and kicking. Working on these explosive performances have been found after strength training that improved the available force of muscular contraction in appropriate muscle groups. Vertical jump and sprint performances are interlinked with maximal muscular strength in football players and the heavy resistance training can also increase running economy and which ultimately increases the aerobic performance of the athlete
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Power training Group | Active comparator | Other: with baseline intervention and power training interventionswith baseline intervention and power training interventions |
| Baseline Group | Other | Other: baseline interventions and without power training interventionsbaseline interventions and without power training interventions |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Male football players
- Age 18- 40 years
- BMI 18.5-25
- Being volunteered to participate in study
- Being engaged in practice from past 6th month
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Athlete with current substance abuse
- Individual diagnose with severe anxiety disorder and psychosis
- History of previous fracture from last 6 months
- Musculoskeletal disorders (sprains, strains, tendinopathies, stress fracture)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| with baseline intervention and power training interventionsGroup A (with power training ) was treated with * squats jump, * change of direction speed, * countermovement jump, * bench press, * Romanian deadlift * barbell squats, * resistance band sprints, * stair sprints * weighted sled pulls | Other | Power training Group |
| baseline interventions and without power training interventionsGroup B (without power training) was treated with * squats jump * change of direction speed * countermovement jump * barbell squats * resistance band sprints * stair sprints * Weighted sled pulls. | Other | Baseline Group |
Primary outcome
Resisted sprinting speeds at 10-30 m
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 6 weeks
The athlete sprints a distance of 10-30m while pushing or pulling against resistance. This resistance can be provided by various means, such as sled, resistance band, or a partner holding onto a harness worn by athlete. A study suggested that the magnitude of the correlation coefficient between speed-test results and match parameters was considered as small (0.1 ≤ r < 0.3), moderate (0.3 ≤ r < 0.5), large (0.5 ≤ r < 0.7), very large (0.7 ≤ r < 0.9), and nearly perfect (r ≥ 0.9)
Change of direction speed (COD) testing
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 6 weeks
This test consists of four 5-m sections marked with cones set at 100° angles. Three maximal attempts were performed with a 5-min rest interval between attempts. Starting from a standing position with the front foot placed 0.3 m behind the first pair of photocells i.e., starting line athletes ran and changed direction as quickly as possible until crossing the second pair of photocells placed 20 m from the starting line .A study suggests a near perfect correlation between the COD (r=0.92)
Squat jumps (SJ)
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 6 weeks
In the SJ, a static position with a 90° knee flexion angle was maintained for 2 seconds before every jump attempt. No preparatory movement was allowed and an experienced researcher visually inspected for proper technique. A study suggested that jumping tests had high correlation coefficients with the principal component (r = 0.76-0.87.
Countermovement Jump (CMJ)
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 6 weeks
In the CMJ, athletes were instructed to perform a downward movement followed by a complete extension of the lower limbs and were allowed to freely determine the amplitude of the countermovement to avoid changes in their jumping coordination pattern. Participants were instructed to assume the same body position at takeoff and landing on both squat and counter movement jumps) the CMJ tests had a high correlation coefficient with the principal component (r=0.76-0.87)
Horizontal Jump (HJ)
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 6 weeks
The athlete stands behind a line marked on the ground with feet slightly apart. A two-foot take-off and landing is used, with swinging of the arms and bending of the knees to provide forward drive. The subject attempts to jump as far as possible, landing on both feet without falling backwards. Three attempts are allowed a study suggested a Horizontal jump assessment(r=-0.7-0.86)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 May 2024.
- Background: PubMed 33845688Combs B, Fazeli PL, Brown DA, Gallagher S, Jones A, Romeo B, Heaton K. Description of the Nature of Musculoskeletal Shoulder Injuries in a Cohort of Commercial Truck Drivers: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study. Workplace Health Saf. 2021 Aug;69(8):375-382. doi: 10.1177/2165079921990364. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
- Background: PubMed 33810237O'Brien L, Collins K, Amirabdollhian F. Exploring Sports Nutrition Knowledge in Elite Gaelic Footballers. Nutrients. 2021 Mar 26;13(4):1081. doi: 10.3390/nu13041081.
- Background: PubMed 34206346Hasan S, Kandasamy G, Alyahya D, Alonazi A, Jamal A, Unnikrishnan R, Muthusamy H, Iqbal A. Effect of Resisted Sprint and Plyometric Training on Lower Limb Functional Performance in Collegiate Male Football Players: A Randomised Control Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 22;18(13):6702. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136702.
- Background: PubMed 29334309Gil S, Barroso R, Crivoi do Carmo E, Loturco I, Kobal R, Tricoli V, Ugrinowitsch C, Roschel H. Effects of resisted sprint training on sprinting ability and change of direction speed in professional soccer players. J Sports Sci. 2018 Sep;36(17):1923-1929. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1426346. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
- Background: PubMed 32235425Pacholek M, Zemkova E. Effect of Two Strength Training Models on Muscle Power and Strength in Elite Women's Football Players. Sports (Basel). 2020 Mar 30;8(4):42. doi: 10.3390/sports8040042.
- Background: PubMed 31412057Altmann S, Ringhof S, Neumann R, Woll A, Rumpf MC. Validity and reliability of speed tests used in soccer: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 14;14(8):e0220982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220982. eCollection 2019.
- Background: PubMed 29176387Beato M, Bianchi M, Coratella G, Merlini M, Drust B. Effects of Plyometric and Directional Training on Speed and Jump Performance in Elite Youth Soccer Players. J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Feb;32(2):289-296. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002371.
- Background: PubMed 28640774Van Hooren B, Zolotarjova J. The Difference Between Countermovement and Squat Jump Performances: A Review of Underlying Mechanisms With Practical Applications. J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Jul;31(7):2011-2020. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001913.
- Background: PubMed 15320660Markovic G, Dizdar D, Jukic I, Cardinale M. Reliability and factorial validity of squat and countermovement jump tests. J Strength Cond Res. 2004 Aug;18(3):551-5. doi: 10.1519/1533-4287(2004)182.0.CO;2.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Imran Ghafoor principal investigator
Riphah International University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing with baseline intervention and power training interventions and baseline interventions and without power training interventions in people with Resistance Sprint Training With and Without Power, run by Sehat Medical Complex at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Resisted sprinting speeds at 10-30 m (time frame: Change from Baseline at 6 weeks). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06147193, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 May 2024.