KeloidPhase 2NCT06138964
Comparing the Effect of siSPARC Microneedle Patch Versus siSPARC+siLR4A Microneedle Patch on Post-surgical Scars
A Phase 2 study testing siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patches and siSPARC microneedle patch in people with Keloid and Wound Heal, run by National Skin Centre at 1 site in Singapore.
Trial summary
This randomized, double-blind controlled study aims to compare the effect on appearance of post- surgical scars between daily application of siSPARC microneedle patch versus siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patches. These are patches comprising short microneedles embedded with hydrolysed RNA (siRNAs). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Keloid, Wound Heal, Wound
- What is being tested?
- siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patches and siSPARC microneedle patch
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSingapore
- Study dates
- 14 Nov 2023to 14 Nov 2024
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 75 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult
- Age 21-75
- 2 weeks (+/- 7 days) after surgical operation with incision into the dermis
- Post-stitch removal when stitches were applied
- Wound closure/union achieved
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or lactating participant
- Participants with wound infection
- Participants assessed to be uncooperative or unable to self-administer the interventions
- Participants with known contact allergy to ingredients in the patch formulation (comprising hyaluronic acid, siRNA and glue) and/or isopropyl alcohol
- Participants who are unable to personally consent (for e.g., cognitively impaired)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Singapore1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
National Skin Centre
Singapore, 308205
General National Skin Centre Contact, (65) 6253 4455
About this study
Official title: Randomized Intra-individually Controlled Double-blinded Trial Comparing Effect of Small Interfering RNA Against SPARC (siSPARC) Microneedle Patch Versus Small Interfering RNA Against SPARC and IL4-RA (siSPARC + siLR4A) Microneedle Patch on Appearance of Post-surgical Scars
This randomized, double-blind controlled study aims to compare the effect on appearance of post- surgical scars between daily application of siSPARC microneedle patch versus siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patches. These are patches comprising short microneedles embedded with hydrolysed RNA (siRNAs).
Read the detailed description
This is an 8-week, single centre double-blinded intra-individually controlled trial to compare the effect of daily application of siSPARC microneedle patch versus siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch on post-surgical scars. At least 50 subjects will be recruited for the study. After the patients have been screened for study eligibility by the study investigators or coordinators, the subjects who have understood and signed the informed consent will be enrolled in the study. Provided a subject satisfies all inclusion criteria and does not fall within exclusion criteria during the screening visit, that subject will be started on the trial during that same visit. Computer-generated randomisation will be performed to determine the randomization of patient population to the siSPARC microneedle patch or siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch. Subsequent follow-up visits would be on Day 30 and Day 60. A deviation of +/- 7 days will be accepted during the follow-up. Each study visit will last between 30-60 minutes.
Study investigators and coordinators will be performing the following assessments:
- High resolution 3D imaging: Scar elevation will be measured using the Space Spider 3D scanner, with a resolution of 0.1 mm and a blue light-emitting diode (LED) light source;
- Vancouver scar scale (VSS) score;
- Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale score from the photographs;
- Change in patient-reported levels of pain and itch using a 11-point numerical rating scale; and
- Assessment of side effects (if any). Photographic documentation: Photographic documentation will be performed at baseline and during the specified follow-up examinations. Images will be taken with standardized camera settings and standardized positioning of the subject. These images will be assessed by investigators to assess the change in scar appearance.
The siRNA microneedle patches are not commercially available. These patches have undergone testing with guinea pigs and white rabbits and were ascertained as a 'non-sensitiser' and 'non- irritant', respectively. The patches have also underwent testing to L-929 cells which are adherent cells of mouse fibroblast cell line and found to be 'non-cytotoxic'. This study involves a trial comparing treatment outcomes; there is no investigative work conducted and hence no incidental findings are not anticipated.
- Conditions
- Keloid, Wound Heal, Wound
- Being tested
- siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patches, siSPARC microneedle patch
- Medical subject headings
- Keloid, Wounds and Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patchesDrug
Also called siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch
siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch
siSPARC microneedle patchDrug
Also called siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch
siSPARC microneedle patch
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| siSPARC microneedle patch | Experimental | siSPARC microneedle patch Receives: Drug: siSPARC microneedle patch |
| siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch | Experimental | siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch Receives: Drug: siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patches |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Assessment of post-surgical scar elevation
To compare the efficacy in reducing post-surgical scar elevation between daily application of siSPARC microneedle patch versus siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch. This will be measured using high resolution 3D imaging: scar elevation will be measured using the Space Spider 3D scanner, with a resolution of 0.1 mm and a blue LED light source. The lower the elevation, the better the outcome.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (4)
Assessment of Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score
To evaluate the differences in VSS scores between daily application of siSPARC microneedle patch or siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch. The total VSS score is based on 4 points: (1) vascularity (on a scale of 0 being normal to 3 being purple); (2) pigmentation (on a scale of 0 being normal, to 2 being hyperpigmentation); (3) pliability (on a scale of 0 being normal to 5 being contractures); and (4) height (on a scale of normal being flat to 3 being >5mm). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
Measured: 1 year
Assessment of Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale
Assessment of SCAR Scale performed on photographs. The SCAR Scale is based on 8 points: (1) scar spread (on a scale of 0 being none to near-invisible to 4 being severe); (2) erythema (on a scale of 0 being none to 3 being deep red or purple); (3) dyspigmentation (being either 0 absent or 1 present); (4) track or suture marks (being either 0 absent or 1 present); (5) hypertrophy or atrophy (on a scale of 0 being none to 3 being severe); (6) impression (being either 0 desirable or 1 undesirable); (7) patient reported itch in last 24 hours (being either 0 absent or 1 present); and (8) patient reported pain (being either 0 absent or 1 present). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
Measured: 1 year
Patient-reported levels of pain and itch using a 11-point numerical rating scale
Patient-reported levels of pain and itch using a 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 to 10 (0 being no pain, and 10 being the worst pain). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
Measured: 1 year
Side effects
Patient reported side effects (if any), such as contact dermatitis (if any).
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Nov 2023
- Study start14 Nov 2023
- Primary completion14 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion14 Nov 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for KeloidStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Skin Centre
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Hong Liang Tey, Principal investigator, National Skin Centre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06138964
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2022/00942
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 9 Nov 2023
- Last updated
- 24 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Intra-individually Controlled Double-blinded Trial Comparing Effect of Small Interfering RNA Against SPARC (siSPARC) Microneedle Patch Versus Small Interfering RNA Against SPARC and IL4-RA (siSPARC + siLR4A) Microneedle Patch on Appearance of Post-surgical Scars
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06138964
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2022/00942
- Conditions
- Keloid, Wound Heal, Wound
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National Skin CentreResearch network
- Study start
- 14 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 14 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized, double-blind controlled study aims to compare the effect on appearance of post- surgical scars between daily application of siSPARC microneedle patch versus siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patches. These are patches comprising short microneedles embedded with hydrolysed RNA (siRNAs).
Detailed description
This is an 8-week, single centre double-blinded intra-individually controlled trial to compare the effect of daily application of siSPARC microneedle patch versus siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch on post-surgical scars. At least 50 subjects will be recruited for the study. After the patients have been screened for study eligibility by the study investigators or coordinators, the subjects who have understood and signed the informed consent will be enrolled in the study. Provided a subject satisfies all inclusion criteria and does not fall within exclusion criteria during the screening visit, that subject will be started on the trial during that same visit. Computer-generated randomisation will be performed to determine the randomization of patient population to the siSPARC microneedle patch or siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch. Subsequent follow-up visits would be on Day 30 and Day 60. A deviation of +/- 7 days will be accepted during the follow-up. Each study visit will last between 30-60 minutes.
Study investigators and coordinators will be performing the following assessments:
- High resolution 3D imaging: Scar elevation will be measured using the Space Spider 3D scanner, with a resolution of 0.1 mm and a blue light-emitting diode (LED) light source;
- Vancouver scar scale (VSS) score;
- Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale score from the photographs;
- Change in patient-reported levels of pain and itch using a 11-point numerical rating scale; and
- Assessment of side effects (if any). Photographic documentation: Photographic documentation will be performed at baseline and during the specified follow-up examinations. Images will be taken with standardized camera settings and standardized positioning of the subject. These images will be assessed by investigators to assess the change in scar appearance.
The siRNA microneedle patches are not commercially available. These patches have undergone testing with guinea pigs and white rabbits and were ascertained as a 'non-sensitiser' and 'non- irritant', respectively. The patches have also underwent testing to L-929 cells which are adherent cells of mouse fibroblast cell line and found to be 'non-cytotoxic'. This study involves a trial comparing treatment outcomes; there is no investigative work conducted and hence no incidental findings are not anticipated.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| siSPARC microneedle patch | Experimental | Drug: siSPARC microneedle patchsiSPARC microneedle patch |
| siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch | Experimental | Drug: siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patchessiSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Adult
- Age 21-75
- 2 weeks (+/- 7 days) after surgical operation with incision into the dermis
- Post-stitch removal when stitches were applied
- Wound closure/union achieved
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Pregnant or lactating participant
- Participants with wound infection
- Participants assessed to be uncooperative or unable to self-administer the interventions
- Participants with known contact allergy to ingredients in the patch formulation (comprising hyaluronic acid, siRNA and glue) and/or isopropyl alcohol
- Participants who are unable to personally consent (for e.g., cognitively impaired)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patchesAlso: siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patchsiSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch | Drug | siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch |
| siSPARC microneedle patchAlso: siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patchsiSPARC microneedle patch | Drug | siSPARC microneedle patch |
Primary outcome
Assessment of post-surgical scar elevation
Time frame: 1 year
To compare the efficacy in reducing post-surgical scar elevation between daily application of siSPARC microneedle patch versus siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch. This will be measured using high resolution 3D imaging: scar elevation will be measured using the Space Spider 3D scanner, with a resolution of 0.1 mm and a blue LED light source. The lower the elevation, the better the outcome.
4 secondary outcomes
Assessment of Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score
Time frame: 1 year
Assessment of Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale
Time frame: 1 year
Patient-reported levels of pain and itch using a 11-point numerical rating scale
Time frame: 1 year
Side effects
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jun 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Keloid
Not yet recruiting
Fractional Radiofrequency With Streroids Versus Fractional CO2 Laser With Steroids in the Treatment of Keloids
Keloids
Active, not recruiting
Transdermal Versus Intralesional Betamethasone for Keloids
Keloid
RecruitingPhase 2
Ritlecitinib in Patients With Keloids or Those Undergoing Keloidectomy
Keloid
Recruiting
Radiotherapy for Keloids
Keloid
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
siRNA Microneedle Patches for Ear Keloid Post-Surgical Scars
Keloid of Ear Lobe
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hong Liang Tey principal investigator
National Skin Centre
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patches and siSPARC microneedle patch in people with Keloid and Wound Heal, run by National Skin Centre at 1 site in Singapore.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Hong Liang Tey (6350 6666, teyhongliang@ntu.edu.sg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Assessment of post-surgical scar elevation (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jun 2024.