AzTrials
AzTrials

Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNCT06138184

Learning Theory Patient Education for Anticoagulants

A study testing Anticoagulation Educational Materials in people with Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, run by University of Utah.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this study is to test the feasibility of a randomized control trial evaluating the educational tool for anticoagulated patients. Participants will be randomized to use new educational materials or current existing educational materials and answer survey questions. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
What is being tested?
Anticoagulation Educational Materials
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
68 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Apr 2026to Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • initiating (naïve) or currently taking (experienced) oral anticoagulants with an anticipated treatment duration of at least three months
  • Experienced patients will be eligible if they score less than 75% on the Anticoagulation Knowledge Test

Who cannot join

  • Deficits in cognitive abilities, sensory input, or language significant enough to impede their use of the education tool and/or provision of written informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Aubrey E Jones, PharmD, MSCI contact

801-587-9715

aubrey.e.jones@pharm.utah.edu

About this study

Official title: Patient Education for Anticoagulants Using Learning Theories - a Pilot Study

The goal of this study is to test the feasibility of a randomized control trial evaluating the educational tool for anticoagulated patients.

Participants will be randomized to use new educational materials or current existing educational materials and answer survey questions.

Read the detailed description

Eligible patients will be randomized using stratified block randomization to control for the type of anticoagulant (warfarin vs. DOAC) and status (naïve vs. experienced) to either the education intervention from Aim 2 or standard of care Data will be collected via online surveys before the intervention, immediately after, and then 3 months after the intervention.

Patients at the University of Utah Thrombosis Clinic will be recruited.

Being tested
Anticoagulation Educational Materials, Control Group: Standard of Care
Keywords
anticoagulant, direct oral anticoagulant, vitamin k antagonist, warfarin, patient education, learning theory
Medical subject headings
Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Anticoagulation Educational MaterialsBehavioural

    This includes new web-based patient educational materials that have been developed prior to the start of the study

  • Control Group: Standard of CareBehavioural

    This will be the current practice for patient education

Study groups in NCT06138184
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard CareActive comparatorStandard Educational process
Receives: Behavioral: Control Group: Standard of Care
Education InterventionExperimentalNew educational intervention
Receives: Behavioral: Anticoagulation Educational Materials

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Feasibility of implementing a randomized control trial

    The study will be feasible if 1) the consent rate if 5 patients per month, 2) Proportion of patients completing the educational tool is 90%; 3) Loss to follow-up at three months is 20% or less

    Measured: 18 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Acceptability

    High acceptability based on self-reported questionnaires using Likert questions per the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability domains

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Acceptability - Educational Tool

    This will be measured using an adapted version of the Ottawa Decision Aid Acceptability Measures which is a 10-question tool shortened to 5 questions that assess: 1) The way information is presented, 2) Length of the Materials, 3) Amount of information, 4) What was liked, and 5) Suggestions for improvement

    Measured: At time of intervention

  3. Acceptability - Workflow Disruption

    2 questions to providers asking to rate how much a) the study disrupted their workflow and b) how much the educational tool disrupted their workflow on a scale from 1- Very disruptive to 5 - Not all disruptive. Higher scores are better outcomes

    Measured: 18 months

  4. Acceptability - Satisfaction

    Patients and providers will both complete a 5 point Likert scale asking how satisfied they are with the educational materials, with 1 being Very dissatisfied and 5 being Very Satisfied.

    Measured: 3 months

  5. Acceptability - Intervention/Survey Fatigue

    1 question measuring survey fatigue: 1) the length of surveys was a) too long, b) too short, c) just right and the number of surveys that were not filled out/not completed. If the majority of surveys are not completed or started, and the majority of patients answer that the length of surveys was too long, that will indicate high survey fatigue

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Nov 2023
  2. Study startApr 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionOct 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
68 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06138184
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB_00146488
Other IDs
K23HL157751
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
16 Dec 2022
Last updated
17 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Anticoagulation Educational Materials in people with Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, run by University of Utah.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Aubrey E Jones, PharmD, MSCI (801-587-9715, aubrey.e.jones@pharm.utah.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Feasibility of implementing a randomized control trial (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Dec 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in