AzTrials
AzTrials

Well-Being, PsychologicalMEDEISNCT06137898

The Benefits of Dietary and Micro-nutritional Management for Well-being at Work

An observational study of Well-Being, Psychological, run by Larena SAS at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this observational study is to describe the benefits of this treatment, particularly in terms of changes in the well-being of participating employees in relation to their nutritional/micro-nutritional status. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 62 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Well-Being, Psychological
What is being tested?
biological check-up
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
31 Jan 2024to 31 Dec 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 62 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Study population: Adult wishing to initiate dietetic and micro-nutritional management of their state of health

Who may be able to join

  • Wishing to initiate dietetic and micro-nutritional management of their state of health
  • Having freely declared to the investigator that he/she does not object to his/her participation in the study the study and to the collection of data strictly necessary for the study, after having received informed oral and written information from the investigator
  • Have a smartphone compatible with the secure data collection application

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women
  • Participating in another study or in the exclusion period
  • Person under court protection

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CEN

    Dijon, 21000

    Carole PERRIN, 03 80 68 05 05

Other trials in France

About this study

The aim of this observational study is to describe the benefits of this treatment, particularly in terms of changes in the well-being of participating employees in relation to their nutritional/micro-nutritional status.

Read the detailed description

Biological check-ups and medical appointments with the investigators will be carried out as part of the hygienic-dietary and micro-nutritional management that study participants have enrolled in. No additional investigations or blood sampling are required for the study. Participants will only be asked to complete the WHO5 and MSP9 self-questionnaires once a month, for 12 months. The inclusion visit will take place at the same time as the first medical visit for dietary and nutritional management. After obtaining the participant's non-opposition, the investigator will check the inclusion and non-inclusion criteria.

If eligible, the participant will download a data collection application onto his or her smartphone, and will be provided with an identifier and access code.

As part of the program, dietary hygiene and micro-nutritional recommendations will be proposed on the basis of the results of a biological (blood test) and nutritional (interview with the doctor) assessment. If necessary, the doctor may prescribe additional blood tests on a regular basis, and will carry out nutritional assessments to adapt the program's management.

The program will be organized into 5 visits:

  • a first visit V0 (micro-nutritional interview) with a biological check-up ;
  • a second V1 visit (within a fortnight of the initial visit) to review all the results of the initial assessment and, if necessary, to implement hygienic-dietary and/or nutritional recommendations (in the form of cards) and/or a micro-nutritional prescription;
  • quarterly follow-up visits (at 3 and 6 months) and a visit at 1 year to carry out check-ups.

These visits can take place face-to-face with an investigating physician, or by teleconsultation.

A statistical analysis plan will precisely indicate the populations studied, the analysis procedures, the treatment of missing data envisaged, the statistical tests for each variable and for the analysis of the primary and secondary judgment criteria to be used.

The threshold of statistical significance will be defined at the risk alpha = 0.05.

Trial data will be collected :

  • by investigators for biological and clinical data on the e-CRF
  • by participants on their smartphones using the data acquisition system for self-questionnaires.

Description of the population:

Descriptions of subjects included in the study will be made by mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables and by frequency and numbers for qualitative variables.

Analysis of endpoints:

Changes in WHO5, MSP9 scores and biological variables will be analyzed using a repeated-measures ANOVA. The same analyses will be carried out on secondary criteria. Correlations between changes in WHO5 and MSP-9 scores and changes in biological and clinical and clinical data.

Sample size:

The required sample size is based on the evolution of the WHO-5 global score between the initial visit and the 6-month follow-up visit using a two-tailed paired t-test with an estimated mean evolution of 5, an estimated standard deviation of 19 (12) and a confidence level of 90. 154 subjects are required, which is rounded up to 200 to account for unexploitable records (≈10%) or premature study withdrawals (≈10%).

Being tested
biological check-up
Medical subject headings
Psychological Well-Being

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • biological check-upBiological

    Blood sampling

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Evolution of WHO-5

    Evolution of World Health Organization Well-Being Index score (WHO 5) between M0 inclusion (V1) and 6 months after the start of management (V3).

    Measured: Baseline, 6 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Evolution of subjective well-being

    Evolution of the WHO-5 score between M0 inclusion (V1) and each month of management to M12

    Measured: Each month up to 12 months

  2. Evolution of psychological stress

    Evolution of psychological stress measured using the MSP9 scale between inclusion M0 (V1) and each month of treatment up to M12.

    Measured: Each month up to 12 months

  3. Evolution of biological parameters

    Evolution of biological parameters (nutritional/micro-nutritional status) measured at inclusion and at the visits usually organized as part of the management process. (M0, M3, M6, M12).

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12

  4. Prevention and evolution of symptomatologies mainly linked to nutritional nutritional/micro-nutritional status

    the micro-nutritional follow-up questionnaire completed at inclusion and at the usual follow-up visits (M0, M3, M6, M12).

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12

  5. Describe compliance with hygienodietary and micro-nutritional follow-up.

    Compliance will be described by an observance questionnaire completed at inclusion and at the usual follow-up visits (M0, M3, M6 and M12), and by attendance (presence/absence at the various follow-up follow-up visits).

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12

  6. Describe satisfaction with hygienodietary and micro-nutritional follow-up.

    Satisfaction with care will be described using 4-point Likert scales (0: not at all satisfied to 3: very satisfied) completed at follow-up visits (M3, M6 and M12).

    Measured: Month 3, Month 6, Month 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Nov 2023
  2. Study start31 Jan 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06137898
Sponsor's protocol ID
PIL-RIPH3-MEDEIS-023
Acronym
MEDEIS
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
9 Nov 2023
Last updated
18 Nov 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Well-Being, Psychological, run by Larena SAS at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Samira AIT ABDELLAH (+33(0)1 45 51 78 77, s.aitabdellah@pileje.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Evolution of WHO-5 (time frame: Baseline, 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Nov 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in