Renal StoneNCT06131151
Comparison Between External Oblique Intercostal Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block in PCNL
A study testing External Oblique Intercostal Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block in people with Renal Stone, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
The aim of the study is to compare the post-operative analgesic effect of USG unilateral External oblique intercostal (EOI) block with Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for after percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with a hypothesis that both External oblique intercostal fascial plane block and Erector spinae plane block are… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Renal Stone
- What is being tested?
- External Oblique Intercostal Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 54 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 12 Jan 2024to 3 Jan 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age between 18 and 65 years Body mass index of 18-35 kg/m2 Patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I/II Patients scheduled for elective Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Both sexes, males and females
Who cannot join
- Patients refusal Allergy to local anaesthetics Infection at the site of injection Coagulopathy Chronic pain syndrome Prolonged opioid medication Patients who received any analgesic 24 h befor surgery
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparison Between Analgesic Effect of Ultrasound Guided External Oblique Intercostal Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.
The aim of the study is to compare the post-operative analgesic effect of USG unilateral External oblique intercostal (EOI) block with Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for after percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with a hypothesis that both External oblique intercostal fascial plane block and Erector spinae plane block are effective in providing postoperative analgesia.
Read the detailed description
Introduction:
Percautaneous nephrolithotomy is the tretment of choice for patients with multiple or complex kidney or upper urinary tract stones. visceral pain from the kidney and ureter and somatic pain from the incision site are the primary cause of immediate postoperative pain following PCNL. poor pain control is associated with unwanted consequences such as patient discomfort, delayed recovery, and prolonged hospital stay.
This necessitates meticulous multi-modality analgesia due to mild to moderate pain originating from renal capsule dilatation or nephrostomy tube-related stress during the first 24 h after operation. Multimodal analgesia techniques are utilized broadly to manage postoperative pain. The concept of multimodal analgesia implies not only providing analgesic drugs, but also performing nerve blocks with local anaesthetics.
first described the Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB), the indications and clinical use of the block for different surgical interventions have been growing. Although ESPB is interfacial plane block, anatomical studies support the idea that some of its clinical benefit may derive from spread to the paravertebral and epidural space. External oblique intercostal (EOI) block is relatively new block technique modified aiming at obtaining upper midline and lateral abdominal wall analgesia. EOI block is achived by injecting the local anesthetic solution into the fascial plane on the deep aspect of the external oblique muscle. Previous studies have hypothesized that the block succesfully anesthetized the lateral cutaneous branch and the anterior cutaneous branch of the thoracoabdominal nerves, with low pain scores and minimal narcotic use postoperatively.
Recently, there have been several publications describing external oblique nerve blocks to control post-operativte pain after abdominal surgery.
Aim of the work:
The aim of this study is to compare the post-operative analgesic effect of USG unilateral External oblique intercostal (EOI) block with Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with a hypothesis that both External oblique intercostal fascial plane block and Erector spinae plane block are effective in providing postoperative analgesia.
Sample size calculation:
Based on the results of a previous study, a sample size of 21 patients in each group will be calculated to detect a 20% difference in the time to first analgesic request, with alfa=0.05 and a power of 85%. Twenty-seven patients in each group will be recruited to compensate for the dropouts.
Group A: will include 27 patients, will receive External Oblique Intercostal Block.
Group B: will include 27 patients, will receive Erector Spinae Plane Block. Randomization will be performed using an online random number generator. concealment was achieved using sealed opaque envelopes.
- Anesthesia induction:
Standard monitoring procedures will include pulse oximetry, electrocardiography, and noninvasive arterial pressure prior to anesthetic induction. All patients will be premedicated with intravenous (i.v.) midazolam 1-2 mg and antibiotic prophylaxis, according to the hospitals protocol. Anesthesia will be induced with intravenously (IV) adminestrated propofol. 2mg/kg, fentanyl 1mic/kg, and recuronium bromide 0.6 mg/kg following which endotracheal intubation will be performed. Anesthesia will be maintained with oxygen, air, and isoflurane using controlled ventilation with closed circuit in order to ensure normocarbia. At the end of the surgery, patients will receive their intervention according to gorup allocation under sterile conditions.
- Intervention:
- External Oblique Intercistal Block: A high frequency linear ultrasound probe will be placed in a longitudinal parasagital orientation in the anterior midaxillary line. A 21G 10 cm needle will be inserted using an in-plane approach. The tip of the needle will be placed into the fascial plane on the deep aspect of the external oblique muscle. A volume of 20 ml of LA (20 ml of bupivacaine 0.375% plus 5 ug/ml adrenaline. ) will be injected.
- Erector Spinae Plane block:
A high frequency linear ultrasound probe will be placed in a longitudinal parasagital orientation 2.5-3 cm lateral to the T9 spinous process. A 21G 10 cm needle will be inserted using an in-place approach. The tip of the needle will be placed into the fascial plane on the top of the aspect of the erector spinae muscle. A volume of 20 ml of LA (20 ml of bupivacaine 0.375% plus 5 ug/ml adrenaline. ) will be injected.
Peimary Outcome:
The first call for rescue analgesia.
Secondary Outcome:
- The total analgesic requirement in 24 hours.
- Any adverse effects related to anesthesia or the technique.
- Pain scores; Numerical Rating Scales (NRS) at rest and when coughing (at 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 hours postoperatively.)
- Block related complications during and after block procedure till 24 hours postoperatively (local anesthetic systemic toxicity, pneumothorax and vascular puncture during block procedure).
Statistical Analysis:
Continous data with normal distribution will be compared by paired or unpaired t-tests, whereas non-normally distributed data will be assessed using the Mann- Whitney U test and Wilcoxon ranksum test for unpaired and paired results, respectively. Chi-square test or fisher's exact test will measure the association between qualitative variables.
P-valve>0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
- Conditions
- Renal Stone
- Being tested
- External Oblique Intercostal Block, Erector Spinae Plane Block
- Medical subject headings
- Nephrolithiasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
External Oblique Intercostal BlockProcedure or surgery
A volume of 20 ml of LA (20 ml of bupivacaine 0.375% plus 5 ug/ml adrenaline ) will be injected.
Erector Spinae Plane BlockProcedure or surgery
A volume of 20 ml of LA (20 ml of bupivacaine 0.375% plus 5 ug/ml adrenaline ) will be injected.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| External Oblique Intercostal Block | Experimental | 27 patients will receive External Oblique Intercostal Block. A volume of 20 ml of LA (20 ml of bupivacaine 0.375% plus 5 ug/ml adrenaline ) will be injected. Receives: Procedure: External Oblique Intercostal Block |
| Erector Spinae Plane Block | Experimental | 27 patients will receive Erector Spinae Plane Block. A volume of 20 ml of LA (20 ml of bupivacaine 0.375% plus 5 ug/ml adrenaline ) will be injected. Receives: Procedure: Erector Spinae Plane Block |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The first call for rescue analgesia after the end of the surgery
Measured: 24 hours
Secondary outcomes (1)
pain scores; Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Numerical Rating Scale at rest and when coughing. Zero is equivalent to no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.
Measured: 24 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Nov 2023
- Study start12 Jan 2024
- Primary completion3 Jan 2026
- Study completion3 Jan 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Renal StoneStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assiut UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Rehab Gomaa Ismail, Assiut University
- Investigators
- Amr Thabet, Study director, Department of anesthesia, intensive care and pain management
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06131151
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EOI Block
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 30 Oct 2023
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison Between Analgesic Effect of Ultrasound Guided External Oblique Intercostal Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06131151
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EOI Block
- Conditions
- Renal Stone
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 12 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Jan 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study is to compare the post-operative analgesic effect of USG unilateral External oblique intercostal (EOI) block with Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for after percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with a hypothesis that both External oblique intercostal fascial plane block and Erector spinae plane block are effective in providing postoperative analgesia.
Detailed description
Introduction:
Percautaneous nephrolithotomy is the tretment of choice for patients with multiple or complex kidney or upper urinary tract stones. visceral pain from the kidney and ureter and somatic pain from the incision site are the primary cause of immediate postoperative pain following PCNL. poor pain control is associated with unwanted consequences such as patient discomfort, delayed recovery, and prolonged hospital stay.
This necessitates meticulous multi-modality analgesia due to mild to moderate pain originating from renal capsule dilatation or nephrostomy tube-related stress during the first 24 h after operation. Multimodal analgesia techniques are utilized broadly to manage postoperative pain. The concept of multimodal analgesia implies not only providing analgesic drugs, but also performing nerve blocks with local anaesthetics.
first described the Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB), the indications and clinical use of the block for different surgical interventions have been growing. Although ESPB is interfacial plane block, anatomical studies support the idea that some of its clinical benefit may derive from spread to the paravertebral and epidural space. External oblique intercostal (EOI) block is relatively new block technique modified aiming at obtaining upper midline and lateral abdominal wall analgesia. EOI block is achived by injecting the local anesthetic solution into the fascial plane on the deep aspect of the external oblique muscle. Previous studies have hypothesized that the block succesfully anesthetized the lateral cutaneous branch and the anterior cutaneous branch of the thoracoabdominal nerves, with low pain scores and minimal narcotic use postoperatively.
Recently, there have been several publications describing external oblique nerve blocks to control post-operativte pain after abdominal surgery.
Aim of the work:
The aim of this study is to compare the post-operative analgesic effect of USG unilateral External oblique intercostal (EOI) block with Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with a hypothesis that both External oblique intercostal fascial plane block and Erector spinae plane block are effective in providing postoperative analgesia.
Sample size calculation:
Based on the results of a previous study, a sample size of 21 patients in each group will be calculated to detect a 20% difference in the time to first analgesic request, with alfa=0.05 and a power of 85%. Twenty-seven patients in each group will be recruited to compensate for the dropouts.
Group A: will include 27 patients, will receive External Oblique Intercostal Block.
Group B: will include 27 patients, will receive Erector Spinae Plane Block. Randomization will be performed using an online random number generator. concealment was achieved using sealed opaque envelopes.
- Anesthesia induction:
Standard monitoring procedures will include pulse oximetry, electrocardiography, and noninvasive arterial pressure prior to anesthetic induction. All patients will be premedicated with intravenous (i.v.) midazolam 1-2 mg and antibiotic prophylaxis, according to the hospitals protocol. Anesthesia will be induced with intravenously (IV) adminestrated propofol. 2mg/kg, fentanyl 1mic/kg, and recuronium bromide 0.6 mg/kg following which endotracheal intubation will be performed. Anesthesia will be maintained with oxygen, air, and isoflurane using controlled ventilation with closed circuit in order to ensure normocarbia. At the end of the surgery, patients will receive their intervention according to gorup allocation under sterile conditions.
- Intervention:
- External Oblique Intercistal Block: A high frequency linear ultrasound probe will be placed in a longitudinal parasagital orientation in the anterior midaxillary line. A 21G 10 cm needle will be inserted using an in-plane approach. The tip of the needle will be placed into the fascial plane on the deep aspect of the external oblique muscle. A volume of 20 ml of LA (20 ml of bupivacaine 0.375% plus 5 ug/ml adrenaline. ) will be injected.
- Erector Spinae Plane block:
A high frequency linear ultrasound probe will be placed in a longitudinal parasagital orientation 2.5-3 cm lateral to the T9 spinous process. A 21G 10 cm needle will be inserted using an in-place approach. The tip of the needle will be placed into the fascial plane on the top of the aspect of the erector spinae muscle. A volume of 20 ml of LA (20 ml of bupivacaine 0.375% plus 5 ug/ml adrenaline. ) will be injected.
Peimary Outcome:
The first call for rescue analgesia.
Secondary Outcome:
- The total analgesic requirement in 24 hours.
- Any adverse effects related to anesthesia or the technique.
- Pain scores; Numerical Rating Scales (NRS) at rest and when coughing (at 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 hours postoperatively.)
- Block related complications during and after block procedure till 24 hours postoperatively (local anesthetic systemic toxicity, pneumothorax and vascular puncture during block procedure).
Statistical Analysis:
Continous data with normal distribution will be compared by paired or unpaired t-tests, whereas non-normally distributed data will be assessed using the Mann- Whitney U test and Wilcoxon ranksum test for unpaired and paired results, respectively. Chi-square test or fisher's exact test will measure the association between qualitative variables.
P-valve>0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| External Oblique Intercostal Block | Experimental | Procedure: External Oblique Intercostal Block27 patients will receive External Oblique Intercostal Block. A volume of 20 ml of LA (20 ml of bupivacaine 0.375% plus 5 ug/ml adrenaline ) will be injected. |
| Erector Spinae Plane Block | Experimental | Procedure: Erector Spinae Plane Block27 patients will receive Erector Spinae Plane Block. A volume of 20 ml of LA (20 ml of bupivacaine 0.375% plus 5 ug/ml adrenaline ) will be injected. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Age between 18 and 65 years Body mass index of 18-35 kg/m2 Patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I/II Patients scheduled for elective Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Both sexes, males and females
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients refusal Allergy to local anaesthetics Infection at the site of injection Coagulopathy Chronic pain syndrome Prolonged opioid medication Patients who received any analgesic 24 h befor surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| External Oblique Intercostal BlockA volume of 20 ml of LA (20 ml of bupivacaine 0.375% plus 5 ug/ml adrenaline ) will be injected. | Procedure or surgery | External Oblique Intercostal Block |
| Erector Spinae Plane BlockA volume of 20 ml of LA (20 ml of bupivacaine 0.375% plus 5 ug/ml adrenaline ) will be injected. | Procedure or surgery | Erector Spinae Plane Block |
Primary outcome
The first call for rescue analgesia after the end of the surgery
Time frame: 24 hours
1 secondary outcome
pain scores; Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Time frame: 24 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Renal Stone
Not yet recruiting
Automated Versus Manual Irrigation During Flexible Ureteroscopy
Renal Stone Disease
Not yet recruiting
Optimal Intrarenal Pressure During Flexible Ureteroscopy
Renal Stone Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Stone Clearance With Aspiration vs Other Technologies: a Real-world Evidence Study
Urolithiasis, Stones, Kidney
Not yet recruiting
Intertransverse Process Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Kidney Stones, Urolithiasis, Hypocitraturia, Pain, Postoperative
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Smart Pressure-Controlled Flexible Ureteroscopy and Flexible Suction Ureteral Access Sheath-Assisted Flexible Ureteroscopy for 2-3 cm Renal Stones
Kidney Stones
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Amr Thabet study director
Department of anesthesia, intensive care and pain management
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing External Oblique Intercostal Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block in people with Renal Stone, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The first call for rescue analgesia after the end of the surgery (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2026.