Educational ProblemsNCT06118424
Digital Manipulation 'Deepfake' Technology and the Believability of What Doesn't Exist; Impact on Nursing Education
A study testing deepfake video in people with Educational Problems, run by Sakarya University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Aim of the research: In addition to traditional education methods, it is important to try different methods to increase interest, attitude and motivation in accordance with the requirements of the age. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Educational Problems
- What is being tested?
- deepfake video
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2023to 1 Oct 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 4th year students of Muş Alparslan University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing 18 years and older Volunteer
Who cannot join
- Not being a 4th year nursing student, Not volunteering
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Aim of the research: In addition to traditional education methods, it is important to try different methods to increase interest, attitude and motivation in accordance with the requirements of the age. Our study was carried out to examine the attitudes of nursing students towards the course in line with the principle of attractiveness in education. In addition, the attitudes of the students were determined through deep mock videos. Method of the study: The research is planned to be conducted between March 2023 and June 2023. The population of the research consists of 4th year students of the Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Muş Alparslan University. In the research, the experimental and control groups were determined by randomisation. The sample of the study consisted of all volunteer students. The experimental group consisted of n:40 participants and the control group consisted of n:40 participants. In order to ensure homogeneity in the study, it was paid attention that different branches were in the same class. In order to ensure consistency between the observers, it was carried out in a course conducted by the same instructor.
The study was conducted in accordance with the CONSORT diagram. Data collection was carried out online. Participants answered questions about sociodemographic characteristics and scale items. It took approximately 15 minutes for the participants to answer the questions. The posttest was administered to the control group without any intervention. The experimental group was trained and monitored with deep mock videos every week. The data were evaluated using IBM SPSS Statistics 23 programme.
Read the detailed description
Data collection tools used in the study:
Data Collection Tools
- Introductory information form: It consists of questions regarding the demographic characteristics of the students.
- Instructional Material Motivation Scale (TMMÖ) Developed by Keller (2010) and adapted into Turkish by Dinçer et al. (2016), the Instructional Material Motivation Scale (TMMÖ) was developed to measure the effect of teaching materials on students' motivation. The original language of the scale is English. In Keller's original PMS scale, some of the items were designed as positive and some as negative. Accordingly, items 3, 7, 12, 15, 19, 22, 26, 29, 31 and 34 of the scale (10 items in total) are negative; Other items are positive. ÖMMÖ scale is a Likert-type scale consisting of 36 items. Each item on the scale will be scored by students from 1 (Not True) to 5 (Very True). Accordingly, the lowest score on the scale is 36 and the highest score is 180. In the reliability analysis, the reliability coefficient (Cronbach Alpha value) was found to be 0.92.
- Course Interest Scale: Student interest; The Course Interest Scale, developed by , in order to evaluate its relationship with variables such as learning motivation, effective learning, and course participation level, is a 5-point Likert-type measurement tool consisting of 16 items and two sub-dimensions (affective and cognitive interest). The study was adapted by Akın et al. (2015). ("1" Strongly Disagree, "2" Disagree, "3" Neutral, "4" Agree, "5" Completely Agree). There are no reverse coded items in the scale. The highest and lowest scores that can be obtained from the scale are 45 and 9, respectively, for the affective interest sub-dimension; 35 and 7 for the cognitive interest sub-dimension. As a result of the analyses, a two-dimensional structure was obtained with factor loadings ranging between .73 and .90. The affective interest sub-dimension of the scale consists of 9 items and the cognitive interest sub-dimension consists of 7 items. Cronbach's alpha internal consistency reliability coefficients of the scale were found to be .95 for the affective interest sub-dimension and .88 for the cognitive interest sub-dimension.
- Attitude Scale towards Learning: The scale developed by Çetin et al. was developed to determine the attitudes of students. As a result of all validity and reliability analyses, ÖYTÖ contains a total of 34 items. Of these scale items, 25 are positive and 9 are negative. The scale, which is graded in a five-point Likert style, is "Totally Agree", "To a Great extent", "Partly Agree", "I Disagree", "Totally Disagree". The highest attitude score that can be obtained from the scale is 170 and the lowest attitude score is 34. The 9 negative items in the scale are reverse scored. The Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.94 for the overall scale.
Path Followed in the Study:
Week 1: Branches were allocated randomly Week 1: Experimental and Control Group Pretest was conducted Week 6: Post-Test was given after the last training
- Conditions
- Educational Problems
- Being tested
- deepfake video
- Keywords
- Digital Manipulation, deepfake, The Believability of What Doesn't Exist, Nursing Education
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
deepfake videoBehavioural
The combination of the words deep and fake is called deepfake in the literature as deep learning. Deepfakes, which have recently become more widely known as a result of the shocking images and sound recordings of many people, from politicians to famous movie stars, are generally hyperrealistic videos in which people's faces and voices are used by other faces and voices without permission and manipulated digitally. Deepfakes rely on neural networks that analyze large data samples to learn to mimic a person's facial expressions, mannerisms, voice and tone. The process involves feeding a deep learning algorithm to exchange images of two people or faces.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| deepfake group | Experimental | The experimental group was trained and monitored with deep fake videos every week for 6 weeks. Receives: Behavioral: deepfake video |
| Control group | No intervention | The control group was given a pre-test before the study and a post-test at the end of the study, without any intervention. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Teaching Material Motivation Scale
Teaching Material Motivation Scale Teaching Material Motivation Instructional Material Motivation Scale: It was developed to measure the effect of instructional materials on students' motivation. The scale is a 5-point Likert-type scale consisting of 36 items. Each item in the scale will be scored from 1 (Not True) to 5 (Very True) by the students. Accordingly, the lowest score on the scale is 36, and the highest score is 180. An increase in the score on the scale indicates an increase in motivation.
Measured: Evaluated at the end of 6 weeks.
Course Interest Scale
Student Interest Scale; Developed by (Mazer, 2013) in order to evaluate its relationship with variables such as learning motivation, effective learning, and level of participation in the lesson, the Class Interest Scale is a 5-point Likert-type measurement tool consisting of 16 items and two sub-dimensions (affective and cognitive interest). et al (2015) ("1" Strongly disagree, "2" Disagree, "3" Undecided, "4" Agree, "5" Totally Agree). There is no reverse coded item in the scale. Affective interest sub-dimension of the scale consists of 9 items and cognitive interest sub-dimension consists of 7 items. As the scale score increases, the interest increases.
Measured: Evaluated at the end of 6 weeks
Attitude Scale Towards Learning
Attitude Scale Towards Learning:Attitude Scale Towards Learning: The scale developed by Çetin et al. was developed to determine students' attitudes. As a result of all validity and reliability analyzes, there are 34 items in total. Of these scale items, 25 are positive and 9 are negative. The five-point Likert scale is "Totally Agree", "Strongly Agree", "Partly Agree", "Disagree", "Strongly Disagree". The highest attitude score that can be obtained from the scale is 170 and the lowest attitude score is 34. As the attitude score increases, the positive attitude increases.
Measured: Evaluated at the end of 6 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Nov 2023
- Study start1 Mar 2023
- Primary completion1 Jun 2023
- Study completion1 Oct 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Educational ProblemsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sakarya UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sakarya University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Metin Yildiz, Sakarya University
- Investigators
- Sakarya University, Study director, Sakarya University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06118424
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SakaryaU-metinyildiz-005
- Status last verified
- Oct 2023
- First submitted
- 31 Oct 2023
- Last updated
- 7 Nov 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Nov 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Digital Manipulation 'Deepfake' Technology and the Believability of What Doesn't Exist; Impact on Nursing Education
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06118424
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SakaryaU-metinyildiz-005
- Conditions
- Educational Problems
- Keywords
- Digital Manipulation, deepfake, The Believability of What Doesn't Exist, Nursing Education
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sakarya UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Aim of the research: In addition to traditional education methods, it is important to try different methods to increase interest, attitude and motivation in accordance with the requirements of the age. Our study was carried out to examine the attitudes of nursing students towards the course in line with the principle of attractiveness in education. In addition, the attitudes of the students were determined through deep mock videos. Method of the study: The research is planned to be conducted between March 2023 and June 2023. The population of the research consists of 4th year students of the Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Muş Alparslan University. In the research, the experimental and control groups were determined by randomisation. The sample of the study consisted of all volunteer students. The experimental group consisted of n:40 participants and the control group consisted of n:40 participants. In order to ensure homogeneity in the study, it was paid attention that different branches were in the same class. In order to ensure consistency between the observers, it was carried out in a course conducted by the same instructor.
The study was conducted in accordance with the CONSORT diagram. Data collection was carried out online. Participants answered questions about sociodemographic characteristics and scale items. It took approximately 15 minutes for the participants to answer the questions. The posttest was administered to the control group without any intervention. The experimental group was trained and monitored with deep mock videos every week. The data were evaluated using IBM SPSS Statistics 23 programme.
Detailed description
Data collection tools used in the study:
Data Collection Tools
- Introductory information form: It consists of questions regarding the demographic characteristics of the students.
- Instructional Material Motivation Scale (TMMÖ) Developed by Keller (2010) and adapted into Turkish by Dinçer et al. (2016), the Instructional Material Motivation Scale (TMMÖ) was developed to measure the effect of teaching materials on students' motivation. The original language of the scale is English. In Keller's original PMS scale, some of the items were designed as positive and some as negative. Accordingly, items 3, 7, 12, 15, 19, 22, 26, 29, 31 and 34 of the scale (10 items in total) are negative; Other items are positive. ÖMMÖ scale is a Likert-type scale consisting of 36 items. Each item on the scale will be scored by students from 1 (Not True) to 5 (Very True). Accordingly, the lowest score on the scale is 36 and the highest score is 180. In the reliability analysis, the reliability coefficient (Cronbach Alpha value) was found to be 0.92.
- Course Interest Scale: Student interest; The Course Interest Scale, developed by , in order to evaluate its relationship with variables such as learning motivation, effective learning, and course participation level, is a 5-point Likert-type measurement tool consisting of 16 items and two sub-dimensions (affective and cognitive interest). The study was adapted by Akın et al. (2015). ("1" Strongly Disagree, "2" Disagree, "3" Neutral, "4" Agree, "5" Completely Agree). There are no reverse coded items in the scale. The highest and lowest scores that can be obtained from the scale are 45 and 9, respectively, for the affective interest sub-dimension; 35 and 7 for the cognitive interest sub-dimension. As a result of the analyses, a two-dimensional structure was obtained with factor loadings ranging between .73 and .90. The affective interest sub-dimension of the scale consists of 9 items and the cognitive interest sub-dimension consists of 7 items. Cronbach's alpha internal consistency reliability coefficients of the scale were found to be .95 for the affective interest sub-dimension and .88 for the cognitive interest sub-dimension.
- Attitude Scale towards Learning: The scale developed by Çetin et al. was developed to determine the attitudes of students. As a result of all validity and reliability analyses, ÖYTÖ contains a total of 34 items. Of these scale items, 25 are positive and 9 are negative. The scale, which is graded in a five-point Likert style, is "Totally Agree", "To a Great extent", "Partly Agree", "I Disagree", "Totally Disagree". The highest attitude score that can be obtained from the scale is 170 and the lowest attitude score is 34. The 9 negative items in the scale are reverse scored. The Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.94 for the overall scale.
Path Followed in the Study:
Week 1: Branches were allocated randomly Week 1: Experimental and Control Group Pretest was conducted Week 6: Post-Test was given after the last training
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| deepfake group | Experimental | Behavioral: deepfake videoThe experimental group was trained and monitored with deep fake videos every week for 6 weeks. |
| Control group | No intervention | –The control group was given a pre-test before the study and a post-test at the end of the study, without any intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 4th year students of Muş Alparslan University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing 18 years and older Volunteer
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Not being a 4th year nursing student, Not volunteering
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| deepfake videoThe combination of the words deep and fake is called deepfake in the literature as deep learning. Deepfakes, which have recently become more widely known as a result of the shocking images and sound recordings of many people, from politicians to famous movie stars, are generally hyperrealistic videos in which people's faces and voices are used by other faces and voices without permission and manipulated digitally. Deepfakes rely on neural networks that analyze large data samples to learn to mimic a person's facial expressions, mannerisms, voice and tone. The process involves feeding a deep learning algorithm to exchange images of two people or faces. | Behavioural | deepfake group |
Primary outcome
Teaching Material Motivation Scale
Time frame: Evaluated at the end of 6 weeks.
Teaching Material Motivation Scale Teaching Material Motivation Instructional Material Motivation Scale: It was developed to measure the effect of instructional materials on students' motivation. The scale is a 5-point Likert-type scale consisting of 36 items. Each item in the scale will be scored from 1 (Not True) to 5 (Very True) by the students. Accordingly, the lowest score on the scale is 36, and the highest score is 180. An increase in the score on the scale indicates an increase in motivation.
Course Interest Scale
Time frame: Evaluated at the end of 6 weeks
Student Interest Scale; Developed by (Mazer, 2013) in order to evaluate its relationship with variables such as learning motivation, effective learning, and level of participation in the lesson, the Class Interest Scale is a 5-point Likert-type measurement tool consisting of 16 items and two sub-dimensions (affective and cognitive interest). et al (2015) ("1" Strongly disagree, "2" Disagree, "3" Undecided, "4" Agree, "5" Totally Agree). There is no reverse coded item in the scale. Affective interest sub-dimension of the scale consists of 9 items and cognitive interest sub-dimension consists of 7 items. As the scale score increases, the interest increases.
Attitude Scale Towards Learning
Time frame: Evaluated at the end of 6 weeks
Attitude Scale Towards Learning:Attitude Scale Towards Learning: The scale developed by Çetin et al. was developed to determine students' attitudes. As a result of all validity and reliability analyzes, there are 34 items in total. Of these scale items, 25 are positive and 9 are negative. The five-point Likert scale is "Totally Agree", "Strongly Agree", "Partly Agree", "Disagree", "Strongly Disagree". The highest attitude score that can be obtained from the scale is 170 and the lowest attitude score is 34. As the attitude score increases, the positive attitude increases.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Nov 2023.
Related trials for Educational Problems
Not yet recruiting
Standardized Educational Videos of Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgeries
Educational Problems, Surgery
Active, not recruiting
Impact of Surgical Coaching on Resident ObGyn Laparoscopic Skills
Educational Problems
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of a Couple-based Psycho-socio-educational Intervention Using WeChat/WhatsApp on Dyadic Psychological and Sleep Outcomes
Sleep Problems, Psychological
Active, not recruiting
Fostering Healthy Futures for Teens: An RCT
Child Abuse, Child Neglect
Recruiting
Health Equity and Rural Education (HERE!) Clinical Trial
Behavioral Symptoms, Community Health Workers
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sakarya University study director
Sakarya University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing deepfake video in people with Educational Problems, run by Sakarya University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Teaching Material Motivation Scale (time frame: Evaluated at the end of 6 weeks.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Nov 2023.