AzTrials
AzTrials

ObesitySTRIVENCT06116149

Strategies for Implementing a Postpartum Lifestyle Intervention in WIC Clinics

A study testing In-person health coach delivery of the GLB and Technology-assisted health coach delivery of the GLB in people with Obesity and Gestational Diabetes, run by Tulane University at 1 site in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of the STRIVE study is to compare two implementation strategies for Diabetes Prevention Program delivery: an in-person health coach strategy (standard 24 in-person sessions at WIC clinics) vs. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Obesity, Gestational Diabetes, Lifestyle, Healthy
What is being tested?
In-person health coach delivery of the GLB and Technology-assisted health coach delivery of the GLB
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
722 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
12 Dec 2023to Jul 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Serve a large number of WIC postpartum participants
  • Willing and able to provide space for the study
  • Age 18 or older
  • Gave birth in the past 6 weeks to 12 months
  • Obesity or history of gestational diabetes mellitus (Current BMI ≥30 kg/m², OR Medical-record documented history of gestational diabetes mellitus and BMI ≥25 kg/m²)
  • No self-reported diabetes (other than gestational diabetes)
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Hemoglobin A1c <6.5%
  • Not currently pregnant or planning to become pregnant in the next 6 months
  • No plans to move outside of the study region in the next 12 months
  • Access to a smartphone
  • Willing and able to participate in the intervention and provide consent
  • Not an immediate family member of the staff at the WIC clinic
  • Other concerns regarding ability to meet trial requirements, at the discretion of the principal investigator or study coordinator

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Strategies for Implementing a Postpartum Lifestyle Intervention in WIC Clinics: A Cluster Randomized Trial

The primary objective of the STRIVE study is to compare two implementation strategies for Diabetes Prevention Program delivery: an in-person health coach strategy (standard 24 in-person sessions at WIC clinics) vs. a multifaceted technology-assisted health coach implementation strategy (12 in-person sessions at WIC clinics supplemented by technology support) on implementation and health-related outcomes in postpartum women.

Read the detailed description

The overall objective of this project is to study the implementation, effectiveness, and sustainability of implementing the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) in postpartum women who receive services from WIC. In this effectiveness-implementation type III cluster-randomized trial, we will compare two implementation strategies for DPP delivery: an in-person health coach-led implementation strategy (standard 24 in-person sessions) vs. a multifaceted technology-assisted health coach implementation strategy (12 in-person sessions supplemented by technology tools).

Nineteen clinics will be randomized to the multifaceted technology-assisted health coach strategy and 19 to the in-person health coach-led strategy. A total of 722 postpartum participants (19 per clinic) will be recruited into the study and followed for 12 months for implementation and effectiveness outcomes. A post-intervention study visit will take place 6 months after the end of the 12-month intervention to evaluate the sustainability of the implementation strategies.

Being tested
In-person health coach delivery of the GLB, Technology-assisted health coach delivery of the GLB
Keywords
Diabetes Prevention Program
Medical subject headings
Obesity, Diabetes, Gestational, Prediabetic State, Hyperglycemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • In-person health coach delivery of the GLBBehavioural

    Delivery of 24 health coaching sessions in-person by health coaches over 1 year.

    Standard delivery of 24-sessions of the Group Lifestyle Balance (GLB) behavioral intervention in WIC clinics. The GLB was adapted from the original Lifestyle Balance behavioral intervention used in the original Diabetes Prevention Program trial for use in community translation and group settings. It focuses on improving diet and physical activity and promoting moderate weight loss through health coaching on behavioral change, including self-monitoring of food intake, physical activity, and weight.

  • Technology-assisted health coach delivery of the GLBBehavioural

    Delivery of 12 health coaching GLB sessions in-person by health coaches over one year; supplemental technology support, including tools for self-monitoring, health coach monitoring, asynchronous delivery of intervention materials, and asynchronous coach and group connection.

    The GLB was adapted from the original Lifestyle Balance behavioral intervention used in the original Diabetes Prevention Program trial for use in community translation and group settings. It focuses on improving diet and physical activity and promoting moderate weight loss through health coaching on behavioral change, including self-monitoring of food intake, physical activity, and weight.

Study groups in NCT06116149
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
In-person health coach strategyActive comparatorDelivery of 24 health coaching sessions in-person by health coaches over 1 year. Standard delivery of 24-sessions of the Group Lifestyle Balance (GLB) behavioral intervention in WIC clinics. The GLB was adapted from the original Lifestyle Balance behavioral intervention used in the original Diabetes Prevention Program trial for use in community translation and group settings. It focuses on improving diet and physical activity and promoting moderate weight loss through health coaching on behavioral change, including self-monitoring of food intake, physical activity, and weight.
Receives: Behavioral: In-person health coach delivery of the GLB
Multifaceted technology-assisted health coach implementation strategyActive comparatorDelivery of 12 health coaching GLB sessions in-person by health coaches over one year; supplemental technology support, including tools for self-monitoring, health coach monitoring, asynchronous delivery of intervention materials, and asynchronous coach and group connection. The GLB was adapted from the original Lifestyle Balance behavioral intervention used in the original Diabetes Prevention Program trial for use in community translation and group settings. It focuses on improving diet and physical activity and promoting moderate weight loss through health coaching on behavioral change, including self-monitoring of food intake, physical activity, and weight.
Receives: Behavioral: Technology-assisted health coach delivery of the GLB

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Difference in uptake (primary implementation outcome)

    The primary implementation outcome will be the difference between study arms in a composite uptake score, as defined by a composite score consisting of the percent of sessions attended and the percentage of times in which participants record weight, activity, and diet compared to what is recommended by the intervention.

    Measured: Measured from baseline to 12 months

  2. Difference in mean 12-month weight reduction (primary health-related outcome)

    The primary health-related outcome will be difference in mean weight reduction from baseline to 12 months between study arms

    Measured: Measured at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Fidelity

    Percentage of sessions held

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Acceptability

    Acceptability scores for participants, DPP coordinators, DPP coaches, WIC clinic management. Measured by survey; higher score means better outcome.

    Measured: Measured at baseline, 6, and 12 months

  3. Appropriateness

    Appropriateness scores for participants, DPP coordinators, DPP coaches, WIC clinic management. Measured by survey; higher score means better outcome.

    Measured: baseline

  4. Feasibility (suitability)

    Feasibility scores for participants, DPP coordinators, DPP coaches, and WIC clinic management. Measured by survey; higher score means better outcome.

    Measured: Baseline

  5. Adoption (WIC clinics)

    Percentage of invited WIC clinics adopting the DPP program. Measured by study administrative data.

    Measured: Baseline

  6. Adoption (WIC nutritionists)

    Percentage of invited WIC nutritionists being trained. Measured by study administrative data.

    Measured: Baseline

  7. Adoption (WIC health educators)

    Percentage of invited WIC health educators being trained. Measured by study administrative data.

    Measured: Baseline

  8. Penetrance (participants)

    Percentage of enrolled participants receiving assigned intervention. Measured by study administrative data.

    Measured: 12 months

  9. Penetrance (WIC DPP coordinators)

    Percentage of percentage of trained WIC DPP coordinators supporting health coaches. Measured by study administrative data.

    Measured: 12 months

  10. Penetrance (WIC health coaches)

    Percentage of percentage of trained WIC DPP health coaches delivering the intervention. Measured by study administrative data.

    Measured: 12 months

  11. Percentage of participants who were either eligible, screened, or contacted who were enrolled.

    Reach

    Measured: Baseline

  12. Cost-effectiveness

    Incremental direct costs (intervention) per additional percentage of individuals reaching weight loss goal at 12 months

    Measured: 12 months

  13. Difference in mean 12-month change in percent weight reduction

    Difference in mean percent weight reduction from baseline to 12 months between study arms

    Measured: Measured from baseline to 12 months

  14. Difference in mean 12-month change in physical activity

    Difference in mean change in physical activity from baseline to 12 months between study arms, as assessed by metabolic equivalent (MET)-h/week (measured by validated questionnaire)

    Measured: Measured from baseline to 12 months

  15. Difference in mean 12-month change in healthy eating index

    Difference in mean change in healthy eating index from baseline to 12 months between study arms, as assessed by 24-hour dietary recalls (range 0 to 100; higher scores mean healthier eating pattern)

    Measured: Measured from baseline to 12 months

  16. Difference in mean 12-month change in waist circumference

    Difference in mean change in waist circumference from baseline to 12 months between study arms

    Measured: Measured from baseline to 12 months

  17. Difference in mean 12-month change in hemoglobin A1c

    Difference in mean change in hemoglobin A1c from baseline to 12 months between study arms

    Measured: Measured from baseline to 12 months

  18. Difference in mean 12-month change in systolic blood pressure

    Difference in mean change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to 12 months between study arms

    Measured: Measured from baseline to 12 months

  19. Difference in mean 12-month change in diastolic blood pressure

    Difference in mean change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to 12 months between study arms

    Measured: Measured from baseline to 12 months

  20. Difference in mean 12-month change in health-related quality of life (HRQoL)

    Difference in mean change in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) from baseline to 12 months between study arms (assessed by short form (SF)-12, validated survey)

    Measured: Measured from baseline to 12 months

  21. Difference in proportion of participants meeting intervention goals at 12 months

    Assessed by validated questionnaires, 24-hour dietary recalls, and weight measurements

    Measured: Measured from baseline to 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Nov 2023
  2. Study start12 Dec 2023
  3. Primary completionJul 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Cluster-randomization of 38 Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) clinics
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
722 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06116149
Sponsor's protocol ID
2022-1294
Other IDs
OT2HL158287
Acronym
STRIVE
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
29 Sep 2023
Last updated
15 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Our study data sharing plan will comply with all NIH policies for data sharing. Data sharing will be implemented in a timely manner. Study data, including data from baseline and follow-up visits, will be prepared sharing. Data will be prepared by the study data manager/biostatistician. These data will be free of identifiers that allow identification of individual research participants either directly or through "deductive disclosure." We are very open to sharing data enthusiastically with the general scientific community, since we also believe in the added value of other investigators working on these data.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing In-person health coach delivery of the GLB and Technology-assisted health coach delivery of the GLB in people with Obesity and Gestational Diabetes, run by Tulane University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Difference in uptake (primary implementation outcome) (time frame: Measured from baseline to 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in