Thyroid Eye DiseasePhase 3SatraGO-2NCT06106828
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Satralizumab in Participants With Thyroid Eye Disease
A Phase 3 study testing Satralizumab in people with Thyroid Eye Disease, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 41 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of subcutaneous (SC) satralizumab, a recombinant, humanized anti-interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor monoclonal antibody, in participants with thyroid eye disease (TED). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Thyroid Eye Disease
- What is being tested?
- Satralizumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 127 participants
- Where
- 41 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- 15 Nov 2023to 25 Jun 2026
- Phase
- Phase 3
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Clinical diagnosis of TED based on CAS
Who cannot join
- Decrease in CAS or proptosis of >≥ 2 points or ≥ 2 mm, respectively, in the study eye between Screening and Study Baseline (Day 1)
- Requiring immediate surgical ophthalmological intervention or planning corrective surgery or irradiation during the course of the study, in the judgment of the investigator
- Identified pre-existing ophthalmic disease that, in the judgment of the investigator, would preclude study participation or complicate interpretation of study results, including corneal decompensation unresponsive to medical management and including ophthalmic diseases that will likely require prohibited therapy during the study
- Any serious medical condition or abnormality in clinical laboratory tests that, in the investigator's judgment, precludes an individual's safe participation in and completion of the study
- Pregnant or breastfeeding, or intention of becoming pregnant during the study or within 3 months after the final dose of satralizumab
Trial locations and contacts
41 sites in 10 countries.
41 sites in 10 countries
Spain7 sites
Hospital Universitario Vall d Hebron
Barcelona, 08035
Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
Granada, 18012
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 8907
Hospital Ramon y Cajal
Madrid, 28031
Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos
Madrid, 28040
Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Macarena
Seville, 41007
Hospital Universitario la Fe: Servicio de Oftalmologia
Valencia, 46026
United Kingdom7 sites
Sussex Eye Hospital
Brighton, BN2 5BF
Bristol Eye Hospital
Bristol, BS1 2LX
Gartnavel General Hospital
Glasgow, G12 0YN
St James University Hospital
Leeds, LS9 7TF
Royal Liverpool University Hospital
Liverpool, L7 8XP
Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
London, EC1V 2PD
Maidstone Hospital
Maidstone, Kent, ME16 9QQ
United States6 sites
University of Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Connecticut Eye Consultants, P.C.
Danbury, Connecticut, 06810
Vanderbilt Eye Institute
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-8808
Scheie Eye Institute
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Retina Consultants of Texas
San Antonio, Texas, 78251
Plastics-Orbit-Neuro
San Diego, California, 92108
China5 sites
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Beijing, 100032
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, 100191
Beijing Hospital of Ministry of Health
Beijing, 100730
Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, 100730
Xi'an Fourth Hospital
Xi'an, 710004
South Korea4 sites
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Seongnam-si, 13620
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
Seoul, 003-722
Chung-Ang University Hospital
Seoul, 06973
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 135-710
Canada3 sites
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta
Universite de Montreal - Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4
Toronto Retina Institute
Toronto, Ontario, M3C 0G9
France3 sites
CHU Nantes - Hotel Dieu
Nantes, 44093
CHNO Hopital des Quinze Vingts
Paris, 75012
Fondation Rothschild
Paris, 75019
Israel3 sites
Hadassah MC
Jerusalem, 9112001
Rabin MC
Petah Tikva, 4941492
Sheba medical center
Ramat Gan
Poland2 sites
Specjalistyczny Osrodek Okulistyczny Oculomedica
Bydgoszcz, 85-316
Profesorskie Centrum Medyczne Spolka Z Ograniczona Odpowiedzialnoscia
Gdansk, 80-180
Portugal1 site
AIBILI - Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light
Coimbra, 3000-548
About this study
Official title: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Satralizumab in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Thyroid Eye Disease
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of subcutaneous (SC) satralizumab, a recombinant, humanized anti-interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor monoclonal antibody, in participants with thyroid eye disease (TED).
- Conditions
- Thyroid Eye Disease
- Being tested
- Satralizumab, Placebo
- Keywords
- TED
- Medical subject headings
- Graves Ophthalmopathy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SatralizumabDrug
Satralizumab will be administered by SC injection.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo will be administered by SC injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Satralizumab | Experimental | In the Part I period, participants will receive satralizumab every 4 weeks (q4w) followed by proptosis response-based individualized treatment in Part II of the study. Receives: Drug: Satralizumab |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | In the part I period, participants will receive placebo q4w followed by proptosis response-based individualized treatment in part II of the study. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants in the Active TED Population Who Achieved ≥ 2 Millimeters (mm) Reduction in Proptosis From Baseline at Week 24 in the Study Eye
Percentage of participants in the active TED population (i.e., participants who have active disease) who achieved a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 in the study eye, with no corresponding deterioration of proptosis (≥ 2 mm increase) in the fellow eye have been reported. Percentages have been rounded off.
Measured: At Week 24
Secondary outcomes (40)
Percentage of Participants in the Overall Population Who Achieved ≥ 2 mm Reduction in Proptosis From Baseline at Week 24 in the Study Eye
Percentage of participants in the overall population (i.e., participants with active and chronic inactive TED) who achieved a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 in the study eye, with no corresponding deterioration of proptosis (≥ 2 mm increase) in the fellow eye have been reported. Percentages have been rounded off.
Measured: At Week 24
Change From Baseline in Proptosis at Week 24 in Active TED Population for Study Eye
This analysis used a Mixed-effects Model for Repeated Measure (MMRM) model. Adjusted mean values have been reported here.
Measured: At Week 24
Change From Baseline in Proptosis at Week 24 in Overall Population for Study Eye
This analysis used a MMRM model. Adjusted mean values have been reported here.
Measured: At Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Active TED Population Achieving ≥ 1 Grade Reduction/Improvement in Diplopia at Week 24
Diplopia grade was assessed with the use of the Gorman subjective diplopia score (range: 0-3 points), which included: no diplopia (absent, scored as 0), diplopia in the primary position of gaze when the participant is tired or awakening (intermittent, scored as 1), diplopia at extremes of gaze (inconstant, scored as 2), and continuous diplopia in the primary or reading position (constant, scored as 3). Participants with active TED with diplopia present at baseline who had Grade ≥1 reduction or improvement at Week 24 have been reported. Percentages have been rounded off.
Measured: At Week 24
Percentage of Participants in the Overall Population Achieving ≥ 1 Grade Reduction/Improvement in Diplopia at Week 24
Diplopia grade was assessed with the use of the Gorman subjective diplopia score (range: 0-3 points), which included: no diplopia (absent, scored as 0), diplopia in the primary position of gaze when the participant is tired or awakening (intermittent, scored as 1), diplopia at extremes of gaze (inconstant, scored as 2), and continuous diplopia in the primary or reading position (constant, scored as 3). Participants with active and chronic inactive TED with diplopia present at baseline who had Grade ≥1 reduction or improvement at Week 24 have been reported. Percentages have been rounded off.
Measured: At Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Active TED Population Achieving Absence of Motility-induced Pain at Week 24
Percentages have been rounded off.
Measured: At Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Active TED Population Achieving Absence of Spontaneous Pain at Week 24
Percentages have been rounded off.
Measured: At Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Active TED Population With a ≥ 6-point Improvement in the Visual Functioning Subscale of the Graves' Ophthalmopathy Quality-of-life (GO-QoL) From Baseline at Week 24
The GO-QoL is a 16-item self-administered questionnaire divided into two sub-scales, and is used to assess the perceived effects of TED by the participants on their: 1) Visual Functioning (questions 1-8); and 2) Appearance (questions 9-16). Both subscales and overall score (sum of scores from all 16 questions) are transformed to a scale of 0 to 100. Higher total scores indicate better QoL. Percentages have been rounded off.
Measured: At Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Active TED Population With a ≥ 6-point Improvement in the Appearance Subscale of the GO-QoL From Baseline at Week 24
The GO-QoL is a 16-item self-administered questionnaire divided into two sub-scales and used to assess the perceived effects of TED by the participants on their: 1) Visual Functioning (questions 1-8); and 2) Appearance (questions 9-16). Both subscales and overall score (sum of scores from all 16 questions) are transformed to a scale of 0 to 100. Higher total scores indicate better QoL. Percentages have been rounded off.
Measured: At Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Active TED Population Who Achieved Overall Response in the Study Eye at Week 24
Overall Response was defined as a ≥ 2-point reduction in clinical activity score (CAS), and a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline in the study eye, provided there is no corresponding deterioration in CAS or proptosis (≥ 2-point/mm increase) in the fellow eye. The CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. Percentages have been rounded off.
Measured: At Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Active TED Population Who Achieved a ≥ 2-point Reduction in CAS in the Study Eye From Baseline to Week 24
CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. Percentages have been rounded off.
Measured: At Week 24
Percentage of Participants in Active TED Population Who Achieved a CAS Value of 0 or 1 in the Study Eye at Week 24
CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. Percentages have been rounded off.
Measured: At Week 24
Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 10-point Improvement in the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Overall Scores Across All Levels of Baseline Severity at Week 24 in Overall Population
The OSDI instrument is a validated dry eye questionnaire and consists of three main sections concerning ocular symptoms, visual function, and environmental factors. It comprises of 12 questions and for every question, participants select a number between 0 and 4, where 0 equals "none of the time" and 4 equals "all of the time" with totals of score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores represent a worse disease index. Percentages have been rounded off.
Measured: At Week 24
Change From Baseline in the OSDI Ocular Symptoms, and Vision-related Function Subscale Scores at Week 24 in the Overall Population
The OSDI instrument is a validated dry eye questionnaire and consists of three main sections concerning ocular symptoms, visual function, and environmental factors. It comprises of 12 questions and for every question, participants select a number between 0 and 4, where 0 equals "none of the time" and 4 equals "all of the time" with totals of score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores represent a worse disease index. This analysis used a MMRM model. Adjusted mean values have been reported here.
Measured: At Week 24
Change From Baseline in Oxford Corneal Staining Scores at Week 24 in the Overall Population
Corneal staining was graded using Oxford Corneal Staining Chart which consists of a 6-point scale. Staining assessment will be based on the intensity of fluorescein staining, ranging from Grade 0 to V for each panel (0=absent; I=minimal; II=mild; III=moderate; IV= marked; and V=severe). Higher grade indicates worse disease index. The observer compares the overall appearance of the participant's corneal staining with the reference figure in the protocol. The observer selects the appropriate grade that best represents the state of corneal staining. The staining score were recorded for the exposed interpalpebral cornea and conjunctiva. This analysis used a MMRM model. Adjusted mean values have been reported here.
Measured: At Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Binocular Diplopia Response at Week 24 in Overall Population
The percentage of participants achieving a complete binocular diplopia response (diplopia score=0) at Week 24 have been reported. Diplopia grade was assessed with the use of the Gorman subjective diplopia score (range: 0-3 points), which included: no diplopia (absent, scored as 0), diplopia in the primary position of gaze when the participant is tired or awakening (intermittent, scored as 1), diplopia at extremes of gaze (inconstant, scored as 2), and continuous diplopia in the primary or reading position (constant, scored as 3). Percentages have been rounded off.
Measured: At Week 24
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Non-responders at Week 24) Achieving ≥ 2 mm Reduction in Proptosis at Week 48 in the Study Eye
Percentage of participants (proptosis non-responders) who will achieve a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline (Day 1) to Week 48 in the study eye, with no corresponding deterioration of proptosis (≥ 2 mm increase) in the fellow eye will be reported.
Measured: At Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Non-responders at Week 24) Achieving Overall Response at Week 48
Overall Response is defined as a ≥ 2-point reduction in CAS, and a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline in the study eye, provided there is no corresponding deterioration in CAS or proptosis ( ≥ 2-point/mm increase) in the fellow eye. The CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Measured: At Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Non-responders at Week 24) Achieving a ≥ 2-point Reduction in CAS in the Study Eye From Baseline to Week 48
The CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Measured: Baseline to Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Non-responders at Week 24) Achieving Grade ≥ 1 Reduction/Improvement in Diplopia at Week 48 in Participants With Baseline Diplopia > 0
Diplopia grade was assessed with the use of the Gorman subjective diplopia score (range: 0-3 points), which included: no diplopia (absent, scored as 0), diplopia in the primary position of gaze when the participant is tired or awakening (intermittent, scored as 1), diplopia at extremes of gaze (inconstant, scored as 2), and continuous diplopia in the primary or reading position (constant, scored as 3).
Measured: At Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Non-responders at Week 24) With a ≥ 6-point Improvement in the Visual Functioning and Appearance Subscale Scores of the GO-QoL From Week 24 to Week 48
The GO-QoL is a 16-item self-administered questionnaire divided into two sub-scales and used to assess the perceived effects of TED by the participants on their: 1) Visual Functioning (questions 1-8); and 2) Appearance (questions 9-16). Both subscales and overall score (sum of scores from all 16 questions) are transformed to a scale of 0 to 100. Higher total scores indicate better QoL.
Measured: From Week 24 to Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Non-responders at Week 24) With a ≥ 6-point Improvement in the Visual Functioning and Appearance Subscale Scores of the GO-QoL From Baseline to Week 48
The GO-QoL is a 16-item self-administered questionnaire divided into two sub-scales and used to assess the perceived effects of TED by the participants on their: 1) Visual Functioning (questions 1-8); and 2) Appearance (questions 9-16). Both subscales and overall score (sum of scores from all 16 questions) are transformed to a scale of 0 to 100. Higher total scores indicate better QoL.
Measured: From baseline up to Week 48
Change From Baseline in Proptosis at Week 48 (in Proptosis Non-responders at Week 24)
Proptosis response is defined as achieving a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 in the study eye, with no corresponding deterioration of proptosis (≥ 2 mm increase) in the fellow eye.
Measured: Baseline and Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Non-responders at Week 24) Requiring Surgical Intervention for TED up to Week 48
Measured: Up to Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) With Worsening of Proptosis by ≥ 2 mm From Week 24 to Week 48
Measured: From Week 24 to Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) With Worsening of Proptosis by ≥ 2 mm From Baseline to Week 48
Measured: Baseline to Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) With Maintenance of Proptosis Response From Week 24 at Week 48
Proptosis response is defined as achieving a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 in the study eye, with no corresponding deterioration of proptosis (≥ 2 mm increase) in the fellow eye.
Measured: Weeks 24 and 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) With Maintenance of CAS Response From Week 24 at Week 48
The CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Measured: Weeks 24 and 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) With Maintenance of Proptosis Response From Baseline at Week 48
Proptosis response is defined as achieving a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 in the study eye, with no corresponding deterioration of proptosis (≥ 2 mm increase) in the fellow eye.
Measured: At Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) With Maintenance of CAS Response From Baseline at Week 48
The CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Measured: At Week 48
Change in Proptosis From Week 24 to 48 (in Proptosis Responders at Week 24)
Proptosis response is defined as achieving a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 in the study eye, with no corresponding deterioration of proptosis (≥ 2 mm increase) in the fellow eye.
Measured: From Week 24 to Week 48
Change in CAS From Week 24 to 48 (in Proptosis Responders at Week 24)
The CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Measured: From Week 24 to Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) With a ≥ 6-point Improvement in the Visual Functioning and Appearance Subscale Scores of the GO-QoL From Week 24 to Week 48
The GO-QoL is a 16-item self-administered questionnaire divided into two sub-scales and used to assess the perceived effects of TED by the participants on their: 1) Visual Functioning (questions 1-8); and 2) Appearance (questions 9-16). Both subscales and overall score (sum of scores from all 16 questions) are transformed to a scale of 0 to 100. Higher total scores indicate better QoL.
Measured: From Week 24 to Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) With a ≥ 6-point Improvement in the Visual Functioning and Appearance Subscale Scores of the GO-QoL From Baseline to Week 48
The GO-QoL is a 16-item self-administered questionnaire divided into two sub-scales and used to assess the perceived effects of TED by the participants on their: 1) Visual Functioning (questions 1-8); and 2) Appearance (questions 9-16). Both subscales and overall score (sum of scores from all 16 questions) are transformed to a scale of 0 to 100. Higher total scores indicate better QoL.
Measured: From baseline up to Week 48
Change From Baseline in Proptosis to Week 48 (in Proptosis Responders at Week 24)
Proptosis response is defined as achieving a ≥ 2 mm reduction in proptosis from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 in the study eye, with no corresponding deterioration of proptosis (≥ 2 mm increase) in the fellow eye.
Measured: Baseline to Week 48
Change From Baseline in CAS to Week 48 (in Proptosis Responders at Week 24)
The CAS is a 7-item description of clinical activity, including: 1. Spontaneous orbital pain; 2. Gaze evoked orbital pain; 3. Eyelid swelling that is considered to be due to TED; 4. Eyelid erythema; 5. Conjunctival redness that is considered to be due to active TED (ignore "equivocal" redness); 6. Chemosis; 7. Swelling of caruncle or plica. Each item is scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) and scores for each item are summed for total score of 0 (no inflammatory symptoms) to 7 (most inflammatory symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Measured: Baseline to Week 48
Percentage of Participants (Proptosis Responders at Week 24) Requiring Surgical Intervention for TED up to Week 48
Measured: Up to Week 48
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study intervention.
Measured: Up to Week 72
Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Satralizumab at Specified Timepoints
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Satralizumab at Baseline and During the Study
Participants will be considered to be ADA positive if they were ADA negative at baseline but developed an ADA response following study drug exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples is at least 4-fold greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response).
Measured: Up to Week 48
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Oct 2023
- Study start15 Nov 2023
- Primary completion24 Jul 2025
- Study completion25 Jun 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Thyroid Eye DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 127 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06106828
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GP44729
- Other IDs
- 2023-503669-50-00, 2023
- Acronym
- SatraGO-2
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 25 Oct 2023
- Last updated
- 12 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: For eligible studies, qualified researchers may request access to individual patient level clinical data. See Roche's commitment to transparency of clinical study information here: https://go.roche.com/data\_sharing
Publications
Ezra D, Collins A, Haskova Z, Kuenzel T, Ida H, Triyatni M, Brittain C, Idowu O. Targeting IL-6 Receptor Signaling with Satralizumab in Thyroid Eye Disease: Design of the Phase 3 SatraGO-1 and SatraGO-2 Trials. Ophthalmol Ther. 2025 Dec;14(12):3119-3132. doi: 10.1007/s40123-025-01255-3. Epub 2025 Oct 9.
PubMed 41066062