Power, PersonalHIITNCT06103786
Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Physical Fitness, Skills, and Tactical Performance, 12 Weeks High-Intensity Interval Training
A study testing Assigned Interventions and Random Interventions in people with Power, Personal, run by Universiti Putra Malaysia at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
This clinical trial aims to compare the difference between high-intensity interval training and common traditional training on physical fitness, skills, and tactical performance among college ice hockey players in China. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 24 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Power, Personal
- What is being tested?
- Assigned Interventions and Random Interventions
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 4 Jul 2023to 2 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 24 years
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- College male ice hockey players aged from 18 to 24.
- Athletes from HPU and AXU universities: the experimental group in the training base of Henan Polytechnic University, and the control group in the training base of Anhui Xinhua.
Who cannot join
- Recent (less than 1 year) history of knee, elbow, waist, or shoulder injury: History of rheumatic disease or nerve injury and still receiving treatment.
- Participate in high-intensity interval training before the study.
- According to the requirements of the coach, participants with light motivation, negative training attitude and no willingness to participate in repeated training and testing were selected during the completion of the experimental task.
- Athletes directly interrupt training due to some factors.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Yuan Yandong
Jiaozuo, Henan, 454003
YANDONG YUAN, 8613613912672, squpm2020@126.com
Kim Geok Soh, 03-97698153 ext. Soh, kims@upm.edu.my
About this study
Official title: Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Physical Fitness, Skills, and Tactical Performance Among College Male Ice Hockey Players In China
This clinical trial aims to compare the difference between high-intensity interval training and common traditional training on physical fitness, skills, and tactical performance among college ice hockey players in China.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- 1. How does high-intensity interval training affect the physical fitness of college ice hockey players?
- 2. How does high-intensity interval training affect the skills of college ice hockey players?
- 3. How does high-intensity interval training affect the tactical performance of college ice hockey players? Participants will be asked to do 12 weeks of high-intensity interval training and common traditional training to see if there are differences between the two and the positive effects of high-intensity interval training.
Read the detailed description
Through experimental design and quantitative research methods. This experiment will test the effectiveness of the training method by intervening in the selective fitness, skills, and tactical performance of college students using a high-intensity interval training method on the ice. The experiment will use 12 weeks of high-intensity interval training to improve the fitness, skills, and tactical performance of the intervention for ice hockey players. The experiment consists of two groups, with 20 students in the experimental group and 20 students in the control group, to compare the differences between the two groups. The experiment was divided into a discussion group and a general teaching group. The purpose of this experiment is to provide a theoretical basis for the improvement of ice hockey training methods so that college ice hockey players can obtain better competitive performance, especially in physical fitness and technique.
The experimental group (1-12 weeks) performed repeated sprint training, sprint interval training (on-ice 45-s shift length conditioning drill), a long-pass tracking drill, and a chase-the-rabbit tracking drill. There are three phases: 1-4 weeks, 5-8 weeks, and 9-12 weeks, gradually increasing the intensity of training. Similarly, the control group performed varied-pace skating (1 minute accelerated skating, 2 minutes even pace), dribbling and shooting drill (30 m), passing-catching drill (20 m), and 2 on 1 offensive drill (full rink). As in the experimental group, the same three phases were used to gradually increase the intensity.
- Conditions
- Power, Personal
- Being tested
- Assigned Interventions, Random Interventions
- Keywords
- High-intensity interval training, Physical fitness, Skills, Tactical performance
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Assigned InterventionsBehavioural
Ice hockey players did 12 weeks of on-ice high-intensity interval training. Their training included:
Repetitive sprint training Sprint interval training Long-pass tracking drills Chase-the-rabbit tracking drills High-intensity interval training in four types improved college ice hockey players' sports performance in 12 weeks.
Random InterventionsBehavioural
Ice hockey players did 12 weeks of traditional on-ice training. Their training included:
Varied pacing skating Dribbling and shooting Passing and catching drills 2-on-1 offensive tactics Traditional training in four types improved college ice hockey players' sports performance in 12 weeks.
A 12-week on-ice training program was conducted on college players to observe its effects on their physical fitness, skills, and tactical performance compared to an experimental and control group.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Repeated Sprint 2. Interval Sprint 3.Long-Pass Tracking Drill 4. Chase-The-Rabbit Tracking Drill | Experimental | 1. Make repeated sprints on the ice for a certain distance to measure its speed.
2. On the ice, perform 15 seconds of intermittent acceleration on the ice, with 30 seconds between each slide.
3. On the ice, make a long pass before taking a shot, then turn to track back.
4. On the ice, skate down the ice, 2 on 1, with a puck to pass and shoot. Receives: Behavioral: Assigned Interventions |
| 1. Varied Pace Skating 2.Driblling and Shooting Drill 3. Passing and Catching training 4. 2-on-1 | Experimental | 1. On the ice, a 1-minute accelerated skate and skating at an even pace for 2 minutes
2. On the ice, dribbling the ball and shooting at the goal
3. On the ice, they stood facing each other at a distance of 20 meters and practiced passing and catching.
4. On the ice, practice 2-on-1 offensive tactics and complete shots on goal. Receives: Behavioral: Random Interventions |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Maximal oxygen uptake performance among collegiate ice hockey players
- Maximum oxygen uptake measured during intensity training at 90-95% of maximum heart rate (per minute, per kilogram of body weight, the maximum amount of oxygen obtained (milliliters) will be combined to report VO2 max in ml/kg-min), #ml/kg-min#
Measured: before the experiment
The endurance performance of college ice hockey players
- The endurance level of the athletes was assessed using the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1 scale. The evaluation range is 5-23 points; the higher the score, the higher the endurance level.
Measured: before the experiment
The power performance of college ice hockey players
- A countermovement jump and a squat jump evaluate the power. The higher the jump, the stronger the power, #cm#
Measured: before the experiment
The agility and skill performance of college ice hockey players
- Using the Illinois Agility Test method of assessing athlete agility, the shorter the time, the higher the agility, #s#
- The time to skate to 20- and 30-meter, #s#
- The time to skate 20 meters with the ball, #s#
Measured: before the experiment
The passing and shooting performance of college ice hockey players
- Number of passes at distance 20m each other in a minute, #pcs#
- Number of successful shots on goal in one minute, #pcs#
Measured: before the experiment
Tactical performance among college ice hockey
- Evaluate the effect of attacking tactics by the number of shots and goals scored. The more shots and goals scored, the better the tactical effect.
- The offensive tactics were assessed based on the level of cooperation among players, their proficiency, and their success rate in passing and receiving. The coordination fluency was evaluated using a scale ranging from 1 to 10, where higher scores indicated greater fluency. The success rate was determined by calculating the percentage of successful passes out of the total passes made, multiplied by 100. Higher values reflected a higher success rate.
Measured: before the experiment
Secondary outcomes (6)
Maximum oxygen uptake performance of college ice hockey players
- Maximum oxygen uptake measured during intensity training at 90-95% of maximum heart rate (per minute, per kilogram of body weight, the maximum amount of oxygen obtained (milliliters) will be combined to report VO2 max in ml/kg-min), #ml/kg-min#
Measured: 6 weeks end
The endurance performance of college ice hockey players
- The endurance level of the athletes was assessed using the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1 scale. The evaluation range is 5-23 points; the higher the score, the higher the endurance level.
Measured: 6 weeks end
The power performance of college ice hockey players
- A countermovement jump and a squat jump evaluate the power. The higher the jump, the stronger the power, #cm#
Measured: 6 weeks end
The agility and skill performance of college ice hockey players
- Using the Illinois Agility Test method of assessing athlete agility, the shorter the time, the higher the agility, #s#
- The time to skate to 20- and 30-meter, #s#
- The time to skate 20 meters with the ball, #s#
Measured: 6 weeks end
The passing and shooting performance of college ice hockey players
- Number of passes at distance 20m each other in a minute, #pcs#
- Number of successful shots on goal in one minute, #pcs#
Measured: 6 weeks end
Tactical performance among college ice hockey
- Evaluate the effect of attacking tactics by the number of shots and goals scored. The more shots and goals scored, the better the tactical effect.
- The offensive tactics were assessed based on the level of cooperation among players, their proficiency, and their success rate in passing and receiving. The coordination fluency was evaluated using a scale ranging from 1 to 10, where higher scores indicated greater fluency. The success rate was determined by calculating the percentage of successful passes out of the total passes made, multiplied by 100. Higher values reflected a higher success rate.
Measured: 6 weeks end
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Oct 2023
- Study start4 Jul 2023
- Primary completion20 Nov 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion2 Dec 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Power, PersonalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This experiment utilized a high-intensity interval training methodology to intervene in the physical fitness, skills, and tactical performance of college athletes and compared it to traditional technical skill training methods.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universiti Putra Malaysia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Yuan Yandong, Universiti Putra Malaysia
- Investigators
- YANDONG YUAN, Principal investigator, Universiti Putra Malaysia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06103786
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Yuan Yandong
- Acronym
- HIIT
- Status last verified
- Oct 2023
- First submitted
- 7 Aug 2023
- Last updated
- 30 Oct 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Since this is my doctoral thesis experiment, I won't share it until I graduate.
Publications
Buchheit M, Laursen PB. High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle. Part II: anaerobic energy, neuromuscular load and practical applications. Sports Med. 2013 Oct;43(10):927-54. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0066-5.
PubMed 23832851
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Oct 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Physical Fitness, Skills, and Tactical Performance Among College Male Ice Hockey Players In China
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06103786
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HIIT / Yuan Yandong
- Conditions
- Power, Personal
- Keywords
- High-intensity interval training, Physical fitness, Skills, Tactical performance
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Universiti Putra MalaysiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Nov 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 2 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This clinical trial aims to compare the difference between high-intensity interval training and common traditional training on physical fitness, skills, and tactical performance among college ice hockey players in China.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- 1. How does high-intensity interval training affect the physical fitness of college ice hockey players?
- 2. How does high-intensity interval training affect the skills of college ice hockey players?
- 3. How does high-intensity interval training affect the tactical performance of college ice hockey players? Participants will be asked to do 12 weeks of high-intensity interval training and common traditional training to see if there are differences between the two and the positive effects of high-intensity interval training.
Detailed description
Through experimental design and quantitative research methods. This experiment will test the effectiveness of the training method by intervening in the selective fitness, skills, and tactical performance of college students using a high-intensity interval training method on the ice. The experiment will use 12 weeks of high-intensity interval training to improve the fitness, skills, and tactical performance of the intervention for ice hockey players. The experiment consists of two groups, with 20 students in the experimental group and 20 students in the control group, to compare the differences between the two groups. The experiment was divided into a discussion group and a general teaching group. The purpose of this experiment is to provide a theoretical basis for the improvement of ice hockey training methods so that college ice hockey players can obtain better competitive performance, especially in physical fitness and technique.
The experimental group (1-12 weeks) performed repeated sprint training, sprint interval training (on-ice 45-s shift length conditioning drill), a long-pass tracking drill, and a chase-the-rabbit tracking drill. There are three phases: 1-4 weeks, 5-8 weeks, and 9-12 weeks, gradually increasing the intensity of training. Similarly, the control group performed varied-pace skating (1 minute accelerated skating, 2 minutes even pace), dribbling and shooting drill (30 m), passing-catching drill (20 m), and 2 on 1 offensive drill (full rink). As in the experimental group, the same three phases were used to gradually increase the intensity.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This experiment utilized a high-intensity interval training methodology to intervene in the physical fitness, skills, and tactical performance of college athletes and compared it to traditional technical skill training methods.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Repeated Sprint 2. Interval Sprint 3.Long-Pass Tracking Drill 4. Chase-The-Rabbit Tracking Drill | Experimental | Behavioral: Assigned Interventions1. Make repeated sprints on the ice for a certain distance to measure its speed. 2. On the ice, perform 15 seconds of intermittent acceleration on the ice, with 30 seconds between each slide. 3. On the ice, make a long pass before taking a shot, then turn to track back. 4. On the ice, skate down the ice, 2 on 1, with a puck to pass and shoot. |
| 1. Varied Pace Skating 2.Driblling and Shooting Drill 3. Passing and Catching training 4. 2-on-1 | Experimental | Behavioral: Random Interventions1. On the ice, a 1-minute accelerated skate and skating at an even pace for 2 minutes 2. On the ice, dribbling the ball and shooting at the goal 3. On the ice, they stood facing each other at a distance of 20 meters and practiced passing and catching. 4. On the ice, practice 2-on-1 offensive tactics and complete shots on goal. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 24 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- College male ice hockey players aged from 18 to 24.
- Athletes from HPU and AXU universities: the experimental group in the training base of Henan Polytechnic University, and the control group in the training base of Anhui Xinhua.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Recent (less than 1 year) history of knee, elbow, waist, or shoulder injury: History of rheumatic disease or nerve injury and still receiving treatment.
- Participate in high-intensity interval training before the study.
- According to the requirements of the coach, participants with light motivation, negative training attitude and no willingness to participate in repeated training and testing were selected during the completion of the experimental task.
- Athletes directly interrupt training due to some factors.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Assigned InterventionsIce hockey players did 12 weeks of on-ice high-intensity interval training. Their training included: Repetitive sprint training Sprint interval training Long-pass tracking drills Chase-the-rabbit tracking drills High-intensity interval training in four types improved college ice hockey players' sports performance in 12 weeks. | Behavioural | 1. Repeated Sprint 2. Interval Sprint 3.Long-Pass Tracking Drill 4. Chase-The-Rabbit Tracking Drill |
| Random InterventionsIce hockey players did 12 weeks of traditional on-ice training. Their training included: Varied pacing skating Dribbling and shooting Passing and catching drills 2-on-1 offensive tactics Traditional training in four types improved college ice hockey players' sports performance in 12 weeks. A 12-week on-ice training program was conducted on college players to observe its effects on their physical fitness, skills, and tactical performance compared to an experimental and control group. | Behavioural | 1. Varied Pace Skating 2.Driblling and Shooting Drill 3. Passing and Catching training 4. 2-on-1 |
Primary outcome
Maximal oxygen uptake performance among collegiate ice hockey players
Time frame: before the experiment
1. Maximum oxygen uptake measured during intensity training at 90-95% of maximum heart rate (per minute, per kilogram of body weight, the maximum amount of oxygen obtained (milliliters) will be combined to report VO2 max in ml/kg-min), #ml/kg-min#
The endurance performance of college ice hockey players
Time frame: before the experiment
1. The endurance level of the athletes was assessed using the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1 scale. The evaluation range is 5-23 points; the higher the score, the higher the endurance level.
The power performance of college ice hockey players
Time frame: before the experiment
1. A countermovement jump and a squat jump evaluate the power. The higher the jump, the stronger the power, #cm#
The agility and skill performance of college ice hockey players
Time frame: before the experiment
1. Using the Illinois Agility Test method of assessing athlete agility, the shorter the time, the higher the agility, #s# 2. The time to skate to 20- and 30-meter, #s# 3. The time to skate 20 meters with the ball, #s#
The passing and shooting performance of college ice hockey players
Time frame: before the experiment
1. Number of passes at distance 20m each other in a minute, #pcs# 2. Number of successful shots on goal in one minute, #pcs#
Tactical performance among college ice hockey
Time frame: before the experiment
1. Evaluate the effect of attacking tactics by the number of shots and goals scored. The more shots and goals scored, the better the tactical effect. 2. The offensive tactics were assessed based on the level of cooperation among players, their proficiency, and their success rate in passing and receiving. The coordination fluency was evaluated using a scale ranging from 1 to 10, where higher scores indicated greater fluency. The success rate was determined by calculating the percentage of successful passes out of the total passes made, multiplied by 100. Higher values reflected a higher success rate.
6 secondary outcomes
Maximum oxygen uptake performance of college ice hockey players
Time frame: 6 weeks end
The endurance performance of college ice hockey players
Time frame: 6 weeks end
The power performance of college ice hockey players
Time frame: 6 weeks end
The agility and skill performance of college ice hockey players
Time frame: 6 weeks end
The passing and shooting performance of college ice hockey players
Time frame: 6 weeks end
Tactical performance among college ice hockey
Time frame: 6 weeks end
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Oct 2023.
- Background: PubMed 23832851Buchheit M, Laursen PB. High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle. Part II: anaerobic energy, neuromuscular load and practical applications. Sports Med. 2013 Oct;43(10):927-54. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0066-5.
- This article is from National Library of MediniceLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Since this is my doctoral thesis experiment, I won't share it until I graduate.
Related trials for Power, Personal
Active, not recruiting
Improving Student Mental Health Through a Universal Trauma-Informed Intervention
Anxiety Symptoms, Post-traumatic Stress Symptoms
Not yet recruiting
Personal Exoskeleton or Manual Wheelchair: a Comparison of Performance and Satisfaction in Activities of Daily Living Among People With Spinal Cord Injuries, Using the SCED Methodology.
Paraplegia, Spinal Cord Injury
Recruiting
Artificial Intelligence-Powered Support For Quality Of Life Improvement In Participants With Cancer
Cancer
Recruiting
Low to Moderate Load Power Training for Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer.
Prostatic Neoplasms
Not yet recruiting
ACT Dad's Power: Feasibility RCT for Fathers of Children With Special Needs
Developmental Disabilities
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
YANDONG YUAN principal investigator
Universiti Putra Malaysia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Assigned Interventions and Random Interventions in people with Power, Personal, run by Universiti Putra Malaysia at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact YANDONG YUAN (+8613613912672, squpm2020@126.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Maximal oxygen uptake performance among collegiate ice hockey players (time frame: before the experiment). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06103786, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Oct 2023.