Dental ImplantNCT06086873
Investigating Implant Surface Effect on Osseointegration: NGA vs. ModSLA
A study testing Implant Type in people with Dental Implant, run by Barts & The London NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
This study aims to characterise the stability of crestal bone levels one year after loading, the associated aesthetic outcomes, immunological response, prosthodontic outcomes as well as overall patient reported outcome measures for modSLA (SLActive, Institut Straumann AG, Switzerland) and NGA (TiUltraNP, Nobel Biocare… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Dental Implant
- What is being tested?
- Implant Type
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 39 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 5 Sep 2023to 31 Mar 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age: over 18 years old,
- Gender: male and female.
- Patient must be able and willing to follow study procedures and instructions and have capacity to provide informed consent.
- Patient must require tooth extraction of a maxillary first premolar or single-rooted anterior tooth as the result of caries, endodontic failure or trauma
- The extraction site must have adjacent teeth present.
- Adjacent teeth with no evidence of interdental bone loss
Who cannot join
- Systemic disease that can interfere with dental implant therapy (e.g. uncontrolled diabetes)
- 2 adjacent teeth requiring extraction
- Greater than one wall of the socket missing - assessed at time of extraction
- Any contraindications for oral surgical procedures
- Any known systemic disease affecting bone metabolism (e.g. Cushing's syndrome, Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, diabetes type I and uncontrolled diabetes type II), systemic infections or recent surgical procedures within 30 days of study initiation;
- Chronic treatment (i.e., 2 weeks or more) with any medication known to affect oral status (e.g., phenytoin, dihydropyridine, calcium antagonists and cyclosporine) or bone metabolism (e.g. bisphosphonates, hormone replacement therapy, immunosuppressants) within 1 month before baseline visit;
Show all 20Show fewer
- HIV or viral hepatitis;
- Physical handicaps that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene;
- History of local irradiation therapy in the head-neck region
- Mucosal diseases (e.g. erosive lichen planus)
- Current untreated periodontitis or gingivitis. In particular probing depths of >4mm on one of the teeth immediately adjacent to the extraction site
- Untreated acute endodontic lesions
- Current smokers (have smoked within 3 months of study onset)
- Any known systemic disease affecting bone metabolism (e.g. Cushing's syndrome, Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, diabetes type I and uncontrolled diabetes type II), systemic infections or recent surgical procedures within 30 days of study initiation;
- Self-reported alcoholism or chronic drug abuse;
- Patients suffering from a known psychological disorder or with limited mental capacity or language skills such that study information could not be understood,
- Non-compliant patients, vulnerable individuals or those unable to understand written or verbal communication and give consent.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
- Involvement in current research or recent involvement in any research prior to recruitment
- Full-mouth bleeding (BOP) and plaque (PI) scores >30% or sites with periodontal pocket depth >5 mm at the completion of the pre-treatment phase.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Royal London Dental Institute
London, E1 1BB
Shahdad Shakeel, 02073777000, shakeel.shahdad@nhs.net
Thomas Gill, 02073777000, thomas.gill@qmul.ac.uk
About this study
Official title: A Randomised Clinical Trial Investigating Effect of Implant Surface Characteristic on Crestal Marginal Bone Loss, Inflammatory Response and Aesthetic Outcomes: Novel Gradient Anodized and Sandblasted Large-grit Acid-etched Implant Surfaces
This study aims to characterise the stability of crestal bone levels one year after loading, the associated aesthetic outcomes, immunological response, prosthodontic outcomes as well as overall patient reported outcome measures for modSLA (SLActive, Institut Straumann AG, Switzerland) and NGA (TiUltraNP, Nobel Biocare AG, Switzerland) dental implants.
Read the detailed description
Ultra-hydrophilic SLActive (modSLA) implants have been extensively studied in pre-clinical and clinical studies, demonstrating their pro-osteogenic nature and long-term maintenance of facial bone and aesthetics.
A novel multi-zone novel gradient anodized (NGA) hydrophilic surface (TiUltra) has recently been introduced to clinical practice. Pre-clinical studies have demonstrated that the smoother coronal aspect achieved stable soft tissue adhesion.
In clinical practice, prosthetically driven implant placement, particularly in the anterior maxilla, may result in a buccal dehiscence that is commonly treated with guided bone regeneration (GBR). Currently no studies have been published investigating differences between these commercially available implant surfaces (modSLA, NGA).
This prospective, single centre randomised clinical trial will recruit 39 patients who require a single tooth extraction in the anterior maxilla for a Type IIc implant placement.
Patients enrolled in the study will be allocated to one of three implant groups:
- Group 1: NGA Implant (NobelActive TiUltraNP, Nobel Biocare AG, Switzerland)
- Group 2: BLX implant (BLX) modSLA Surface (BLX, SLActive, Roxolid, Institut Straumann AG, Switzerland)
- Group 3: TLX implant (TLX) modSLA Surface (TLX, SLActive, Roxolid, Institut Straumann AG, Switzerland).
This study aims to characterise the stability of crestal bone levels one year after loading, the associated aesthetic outcomes, immunological response, prosthodontic outcomes as well as overall patient reported outcome measures.
- Conditions
- Dental Implant
- Being tested
- Implant Type
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Implant TypeDevice
Patients enrolled in the study will be allocated to one of three implant groups:
- Group 1: NGA Implant (NobelActive TiUltraNP, Nobel Biocare AG, Switzerland)
- Group 2: BLX implant (BLX) modSLA Surface (BLX, SLActive, Roxolid, Institut Straumann AG, Switzerland)
- Group 3: TLX implant (TLX) modSLA Surface (TLX, SLActive, Roxolid, Institut Straumann AG, Switzerland).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| NGA Implant | Experimental | NGA Implant (NobelActive TiUltraNP, Nobel Biocare AG, Switzerland) Receives: Device: Implant Type |
| BLX implant (BLX) modSLA Surface | Experimental | BLX implant (BLX) modSLA Surface (BLX, SLActive, Roxolid, Institut Straumann AG, Switzerland) Receives: Device: Implant Type |
| TLX implant (TLX) modSLA Surface | Experimental | TLX implant (TLX) modSLA Surface (TLX, SLActive, Roxolid, Institut Straumann AG, Switzerland). Receives: Device: Implant Type |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Coronal Facial Bone Maintenance
A numerical comparison of coronal facial bone thickness between the groups. CBCT scans will be compared to quantify the linear changes in crestal bone thickness at the coronal aspect of the implant (shoulder of NGA and BLX implants and rough-smooth transition of TLX implant).
Measured: 1 Year post loading
Secondary outcomes (5)
Aesthetic Outcome
- A numerical comparison of the three groups from an objective aesthetic scale derived from a panel of 2 dentists.
Measured: 1 Year post loading
Patient Satisfaction
- A numerical comparison of the patient satisfaction between the three groups derived from an analysis of patient questionnaires (Likert Scales).
Measured: 1 Year post loading
Patient Satisfaction- Aesthetics
- A numerical comparison of the aesthetic merit between the three groups derived from an analysis of patient questionnaires (Likert scales)
Measured: 1 Year post loading
Primary Stability
A numerical comparison of primary stability measurement of the three groups (IT, RFA).
Measured: 1 Year post loading
Immunological Response
- A numerical and qualitative comparison of inflammatory profiles derived from peripheral blood of the three groups
Measured: Pre-surgery to 12 Weeks post surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Oct 2023
- Study start5 Sep 2023
- Primary completion31 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Mar 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Dental ImplantStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 39 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Barts & The London NHS Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Virginia Commonwealth University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06086873
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 160995
- Other IDs
- IRAS:329055
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 11 Oct 2023
- Last updated
- 22 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised Clinical Trial Investigating Effect of Implant Surface Characteristic on Crestal Marginal Bone Loss, Inflammatory Response and Aesthetic Outcomes: Novel Gradient Anodized and Sandblasted Large-grit Acid-etched Implant Surfaces
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06086873
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 160995
- Conditions
- Dental Implant
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 39 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Barts & The London NHS TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Virginia Commonwealth University
- Study start
- 5 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to characterise the stability of crestal bone levels one year after loading, the associated aesthetic outcomes, immunological response, prosthodontic outcomes as well as overall patient reported outcome measures for modSLA (SLActive, Institut Straumann AG, Switzerland) and NGA (TiUltraNP, Nobel Biocare AG, Switzerland) dental implants.
Detailed description
Ultra-hydrophilic SLActive (modSLA) implants have been extensively studied in pre-clinical and clinical studies, demonstrating their pro-osteogenic nature and long-term maintenance of facial bone and aesthetics.
A novel multi-zone novel gradient anodized (NGA) hydrophilic surface (TiUltra) has recently been introduced to clinical practice. Pre-clinical studies have demonstrated that the smoother coronal aspect achieved stable soft tissue adhesion.
In clinical practice, prosthetically driven implant placement, particularly in the anterior maxilla, may result in a buccal dehiscence that is commonly treated with guided bone regeneration (GBR). Currently no studies have been published investigating differences between these commercially available implant surfaces (modSLA, NGA).
This prospective, single centre randomised clinical trial will recruit 39 patients who require a single tooth extraction in the anterior maxilla for a Type IIc implant placement.
Patients enrolled in the study will be allocated to one of three implant groups:
- Group 1: NGA Implant (NobelActive TiUltraNP, Nobel Biocare AG, Switzerland)
- Group 2: BLX implant (BLX) modSLA Surface (BLX, SLActive, Roxolid, Institut Straumann AG, Switzerland)
- Group 3: TLX implant (TLX) modSLA Surface (TLX, SLActive, Roxolid, Institut Straumann AG, Switzerland).
This study aims to characterise the stability of crestal bone levels one year after loading, the associated aesthetic outcomes, immunological response, prosthodontic outcomes as well as overall patient reported outcome measures.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| NGA Implant | Experimental | Device: Implant TypeNGA Implant (NobelActive TiUltraNP, Nobel Biocare AG, Switzerland) |
| BLX implant (BLX) modSLA Surface | Experimental | Device: Implant TypeBLX implant (BLX) modSLA Surface (BLX, SLActive, Roxolid, Institut Straumann AG, Switzerland) |
| TLX implant (TLX) modSLA Surface | Experimental | Device: Implant TypeTLX implant (TLX) modSLA Surface (TLX, SLActive, Roxolid, Institut Straumann AG, Switzerland). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age: over 18 years old,
- Gender: male and female.
- Patient must be able and willing to follow study procedures and instructions and have capacity to provide informed consent.
- Patient must require tooth extraction of a maxillary first premolar or single-rooted anterior tooth as the result of caries, endodontic failure or trauma
- The extraction site must have adjacent teeth present.
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Systemic disease that can interfere with dental implant therapy (e.g. uncontrolled diabetes)
- 2 adjacent teeth requiring extraction
- Greater than one wall of the socket missing - assessed at time of extraction
- Any contraindications for oral surgical procedures
- Any known systemic disease affecting bone metabolism (e.g. Cushing's syndrome, Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, diabetes type I and uncontrolled diabetes type II), systemic infections or recent surgical procedures within 30 days of study initiation;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Implant TypePatients enrolled in the study will be allocated to one of three implant groups: * Group 1: NGA Implant (NobelActive TiUltraNP, Nobel Biocare AG, Switzerland) * Group 2: BLX implant (BLX) modSLA Surface (BLX, SLActive, Roxolid, Institut Straumann AG, Switzerland) * Group 3: TLX implant (TLX) modSLA Surface (TLX, SLActive, Roxolid, Institut Straumann AG, Switzerland). | Device | BLX implant (BLX) modSLA Surface, NGA Implant, TLX implant (TLX) modSLA Surface |
Primary outcome
Coronal Facial Bone Maintenance
Time frame: 1 Year post loading
A numerical comparison of coronal facial bone thickness between the groups. CBCT scans will be compared to quantify the linear changes in crestal bone thickness at the coronal aspect of the implant (shoulder of NGA and BLX implants and rough-smooth transition of TLX implant).
5 secondary outcomes
Aesthetic Outcome
Time frame: 1 Year post loading
Patient Satisfaction
Time frame: 1 Year post loading
Patient Satisfaction- Aesthetics
Time frame: 1 Year post loading
Primary Stability
Time frame: 1 Year post loading
Immunological Response
Time frame: Pre-surgery to 12 Weeks post surgery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Apr 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Dental Implant
Not yet recruiting
Free Soft Tissue Grafts (FSTG) Using Autograft Palatal Donor Tissue vs. Xenograft Collagen Matrix (Zderm™)
Gingival Recession Localized Moderate, Dental Implant
Not yet recruiting
Safety Assessment of Placing a Single Dental Implant Without Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Simple Cases: A Pilot Study
Tooth Loss and Rehabillitation, Dental Implant Failure
Active, not recruiting
L-PRF Block vs Composite Graft for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation
Alveolar Ridge Resorption After Extraction, Alveolar Bone Loss
RecruitingObservational study
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Dentsply Sirona PrimeTaper Implants
Dental Implants
Active, not recruiting
The Aim of the Study Will be Clinically and Radio Graphically Comparison of Two Implant Designs Used to Treat Atrophied Mandible . Implant Design Comparison Will Done for Implant Stability,Peri-implant Soft Tissue Health Changes and Bone Changes .Patients Will be Divided Randomly Into Two Group
Dental Implant Bone Loss, Peri-Implant Health
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Implant Type in people with Dental Implant, run by Barts & The London NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Coronal Facial Bone Maintenance (time frame: 1 Year post loading). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Apr 2026.