Immunodepressed Patients (Hemato-oncology)ADNEMIANCT06075888
Metagenomic Sequencing for the Identification of Pathogens in Febrile Neutropenic Patients
A study testing Metagenomic diagnosis (mNGS, DISQVER) in people with Immunodepressed Patients (Hemato-oncology), run by Poitiers University Hospital at 5 sites in France.
Trial summary
The development of targeted therapies and intensive protocols in oncohaematology has improved the survival of patients with haematological malignancies. The increase in the number of patients treated and their life expectancy has been accompanied by an increase in the incidence of infectious complications secondary to… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Immunodepressed Patients (Hemato-oncology)
- What is being tested?
- Metagenomic diagnosis (mNGS, DISQVER)
- How many people
- 184 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 12 Jan 2024to 15 Jun 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient
- Age ≥18 years
- Being treated for solid tumour or haematological malignancy
- Presenting with high-risk febrile neutropenia (high-risk is defined by a Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) score ≥ 21) with an expected duration of neutropenia ≥ 7 days. Neutropenia is defined as an absolute neutrophil count ≤ 500/mm3. Fever is defined as temperature ≥ 38.3°C or ≥ 38°C twice within 1 hour.
- Free, without guardianship, tutelage or subordination;
- covered by a social security scheme or by a third party;
- have given informed consent to participate in the study.
Who cannot join
- Antibiotic therapy in the 24 hours prior to enrolment, with the exception of prophylactic use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (Cotrimoxazole) and penicillin G (Oracillin®).
- Previous study participation
- Patients with enhanced protection, i.e. minors, persons deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, persons in a health or social care institution, adults under legal protection;
- Pregnant or lactating women of childbearing age (menopause must be documented) who refuse or do not have an effective method of contraception (hormonal/mechanical: per os, injectable, transcutaneous, implantable, intrauterine device or surgical: tubal ligation, hysterectomy, total oophorectomy) for the duration of the study.
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
France5 sites
C.H.U. d'Angers
Angers, 49933
CHU de Brest
Brest, 29606
C.H.U. de Limoges
Limoges
C.H.U. de Poitiers
Poitiers, 86000
C.H.U. de Tours
Tours, 37044
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of the DISQVER® Metagenomic Sequencing Tool for the Identification of Pathogens in Febrile Neutropenic Haemato-oncology Patients
The development of targeted therapies and intensive protocols in oncohaematology has improved the survival of patients with haematological malignancies. The increase in the number of patients treated and their life expectancy has been accompanied by an increase in the incidence of infectious complications secondary to the immunosuppression induced by these therapies.
Febrile neutropenia (NF) is a complication that occurs in approximately 10% to 15% of patients treated for solid tumours and up to 100% of patients treated for haematological malignancies, particularly after bone marrow and/or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Read more
In 25% to 30% of cases, NF leads to serious complications. The vast majority of NF cases are caused by microbial infections (bacteria, viruses, fungi, parasites, etc.), which can progress to severe sepsis or septic shock if appropriate treatment is not initiated rapidly (introduction of anti-infective molecules and implementation of associated procedures). If no pathogen is identified during the management of the most severe patients, the prognosis is poor, with a mortality rate of 10%.
The performance of diagnostic strategies is therefore an important factor in improving the prognosis of these patients. To date, the reference diagnosis of microorganisms is based on blood cultures, blood Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), β-D-glucan and aspergillosis serology. Identifying the pathogens responsible for NF from a blood sample without an a priori hypothesis and in an optimised timeframe could allow earlier treatment of high-risk NF with implications for management (possible modification of antimicrobial and/or immunosuppressive treatment).
The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of the mNGS-DISQVER® tool in diagnosing pathogenic microorganisms from blood samples collected from patients being managed for high-risk NF.
Read the detailed description
- Clinical context The development of targeted therapies and intensive protocols in oncohaematology has improved the survival of patients with haematological malignancies. The increase in the number of patients treated and their life expectancy has been accompanied by an increased incidence of infectious complications secondary to the immunosuppression induced by these therapies. Chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (NF) is a common and serious complication occurring in approximately 10% to 15% of patients treated for solid tumours and up to 100% of patients treated for haematological malignancies, particularly after bone marrow transplantation. Febrile neutropenia is defined as a combination of :
- Neutropenia: neutrophil count <500 g/L or <1000 g/L (if <500 g/L is expected within 48 hours)
- Fever: >38.5°C on a single occasion or >38°C for more than one hour. NF is associated with high morbidity and mortality (25-30% of serious complications and 10% of mortality). Its occurrence includes the need for hospitalisation with broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, delayed chemotherapy and loss of opportunity for the patient. In the USA, an episode of NF requiring hospitalisation is associated with an estimated health economic impact of $19,110. A recent study in France estimated the clinical and economic impact of hospitalisation for NF, in terms of number of patients hospitalised, number of stays, in-hospital mortality and average cost per stay, to be €5,333 for haemopathies. A significant proportion of NF cases are caused by microbial infections that can progress to septicaemia if probabilistic broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy is not administered within an hour. Furthermore, microbiological documentation remains essential to optimise antibiotic therapy, with blood culture as the reference test. However, this test is limited for a number of reasons: difficulties or slowness in culture, antibiotic treatment prior to sampling, or insufficient sample quantity. Despite the recommended minimum of 3 or 4 pairs of blood cultures, 70% of cases of febrile neutropenia are not microbiologically documented, making it impossible to adapt probabilistic broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. Another limitation is the time required to obtain results: 6 to 24 hours are required to obtain a positive blood culture, plus another 18 to 24 hours for bacteria to grow on solid media, and another 18 to 24 hours for susceptibility testing (antibiotic susceptibility testing). The absence of an identified pathogen in the management of the most severe patients is associated with a poor prognosis, with a mortality rate of 10%. As a result, the performance and timeliness of diagnostic strategies are important factors in improving the prognosis of these patients. In this context, the development of high-throughput sequencing technologies has led to the development of new diagnostic approaches based on the detection of circulating DNA (lcDNA, e.g. used in antenatal screening for trisomy 21). Although more recently democratised, the concept of microbial cDNA is well established in the field of infectious diseases. This technology, based on a blood sample obtained by simple venipuncture, could offer patients with febrile neutropenia an improved diagnosis, particularly in the case of negative blood cultures, and an adjustment in their management.
- Identification and description of the IVDD
The DISQVERⓇ device is CE-IVD marked according to the In Vitro Diagnostic Directive (IVDD) classification approved until May 2026. The assessment file for its marking according to In-Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR) is in progress.
DISQVER® is a digital analytical solution developed by Noscendo for the rapid identification of microorganisms in a patient's blood sample from free circulating DNA, without any a priori hypothesis.
The test is based on metagenomic Next Generation Sequencing "mNGS" to identify, without a priori assumptions, the genomic sequences of micro-organisms (bacteria, DNA viruses, fungi and parasites) potentially present in the patient's plasma sample. The genomic sequences identified are then compared with Noscendo's proprietary database of over 16,000 microbial genome sequences, including 1,500 pathogens.
A report detailing all relevant pathogens detected in the sample is provided within a few hours (access to a pseudonymised pdf report according to the laboratory's guidelines, including the micro-organisms found in the highest concentration and the most likely pathogen present).
- Being tested
- Metagenomic diagnosis (mNGS, DISQVER)
- Keywords
- Neutropenia, Fever, Bacteremia, Viremia, Fungemia, Antibiotic
- Medical subject headings
- Neutropenia, Fever, Bacteremia, Viremia, Fungemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Metagenomic diagnosis (mNGS, DISQVER)Diagnostic test
Blood sample taken for metagenomic sequencing at inclusion visit.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Performances (intrinsic diagnostic capabilities) of Metagenomic testing
Based on the microorganisms identified by the conventional work-up and the mNGS-DISQVER® tool, an adjudication committee consisting of a microbiologist, an infectiologist and a haematologist, independent of the study, will assess the presence of at least one pathogen requiring appropriate management. The interpretation of the conventional work-up and that provided by the mNGS-DISQVER® tool will be blinded.
The intrinsic diagnostic capabilities will be assessed by the sensitivity/specificity of the new mNGS-DISQVER® test, with the classification resulting from the conventional work-up as the reference.
Measured: 1 day
Secondary outcomes (3)
Performances (extrinsic diagnostic capabilities) of Metagenomic testing
The Youden index, the positive and negative predictive values of the new mNGS-DISQVER® test (with conventional work-up as reference) and the proportions of concordant and discordant pairs between the new test and conventional work-up.
Measured: 1 day
Clinical impact of Metagenomic testing on therapeutic choices
The differences between the percentages of patient management modalities (escalation, maintenance, de-escalation or discontinuation of anti-infective treatment) using the mNGS-DISQVER® tool versus the conventional work-up.
Measured: 1 day
Use of Metagenomic testing during clinical patient's management
The mean time taken for conventional assessment, the prevalence of microorganisms diagnosed in routine care (independent of the adjudication committee) and the percentage distribution of anti-infective adjustments according to microorganisms diagnosed in routine care.
Measured: 1 day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Oct 2023
- Study start12 Jan 2024
- Primary completion15 Jun 2026
- Study completion15 Jun 2026
Why it stopped: Closure of NOSCENDO.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Immunodepressed Patients (Hemato-oncology)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Poitiers University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 184 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Poitiers University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Noscendo
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06075888
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ADNEMIA
- Acronym
- ADNEMIA
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 4 Oct 2023
- Last updated
- 25 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Pichon M, Burucoa C; ADNEMIA Study Group. Diagnostic performance of the DISQVER metagenomic sequencing tool for the identification of pathogens in febrile neutropenic patients: the ADNEMIA trial. BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 22;15(1):e087773. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087773.
PubMed 39843376
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of the DISQVER® Metagenomic Sequencing Tool for the Identification of Pathogens in Febrile Neutropenic Haemato-oncology Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06075888
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ADNEMIA / ADNEMIA
- Keywords
- Neutropenia, Fever, Bacteremia, Viremia, Fungemia, Antibiotic
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Closure of NOSCENDO.
- Enrolment
- 184 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Poitiers University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Noscendo
- Study start
- 12 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jun 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The development of targeted therapies and intensive protocols in oncohaematology has improved the survival of patients with haematological malignancies. The increase in the number of patients treated and their life expectancy has been accompanied by an increase in the incidence of infectious complications secondary to the immunosuppression induced by these therapies.
Febrile neutropenia (NF) is a complication that occurs in approximately 10% to 15% of patients treated for solid tumours and up to 100% of patients treated for haematological malignancies, particularly after bone marrow and/or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
In 25% to 30% of cases, NF leads to serious complications. The vast majority of NF cases are caused by microbial infections (bacteria, viruses, fungi, parasites, etc.), which can progress to severe sepsis or septic shock if appropriate treatment is not initiated rapidly (introduction of anti-infective molecules and implementation of associated procedures). If no pathogen is identified during the management of the most severe patients, the prognosis is poor, with a mortality rate of 10%.
The performance of diagnostic strategies is therefore an important factor in improving the prognosis of these patients. To date, the reference diagnosis of microorganisms is based on blood cultures, blood Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), β-D-glucan and aspergillosis serology. Identifying the pathogens responsible for NF from a blood sample without an a priori hypothesis and in an optimised timeframe could allow earlier treatment of high-risk NF with implications for management (possible modification of antimicrobial and/or immunosuppressive treatment).
The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of the mNGS-DISQVER® tool in diagnosing pathogenic microorganisms from blood samples collected from patients being managed for high-risk NF.
Detailed description
- Clinical context The development of targeted therapies and intensive protocols in oncohaematology has improved the survival of patients with haematological malignancies. The increase in the number of patients treated and their life expectancy has been accompanied by an increased incidence of infectious complications secondary to the immunosuppression induced by these therapies. Chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (NF) is a common and serious complication occurring in approximately 10% to 15% of patients treated for solid tumours and up to 100% of patients treated for haematological malignancies, particularly after bone marrow transplantation. Febrile neutropenia is defined as a combination of :
- Neutropenia: neutrophil count <500 g/L or <1000 g/L (if <500 g/L is expected within 48 hours)
- Fever: >38.5°C on a single occasion or >38°C for more than one hour. NF is associated with high morbidity and mortality (25-30% of serious complications and 10% of mortality). Its occurrence includes the need for hospitalisation with broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, delayed chemotherapy and loss of opportunity for the patient. In the USA, an episode of NF requiring hospitalisation is associated with an estimated health economic impact of $19,110. A recent study in France estimated the clinical and economic impact of hospitalisation for NF, in terms of number of patients hospitalised, number of stays, in-hospital mortality and average cost per stay, to be €5,333 for haemopathies. A significant proportion of NF cases are caused by microbial infections that can progress to septicaemia if probabilistic broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy is not administered within an hour. Furthermore, microbiological documentation remains essential to optimise antibiotic therapy, with blood culture as the reference test. However, this test is limited for a number of reasons: difficulties or slowness in culture, antibiotic treatment prior to sampling, or insufficient sample quantity. Despite the recommended minimum of 3 or 4 pairs of blood cultures, 70% of cases of febrile neutropenia are not microbiologically documented, making it impossible to adapt probabilistic broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. Another limitation is the time required to obtain results: 6 to 24 hours are required to obtain a positive blood culture, plus another 18 to 24 hours for bacteria to grow on solid media, and another 18 to 24 hours for susceptibility testing (antibiotic susceptibility testing). The absence of an identified pathogen in the management of the most severe patients is associated with a poor prognosis, with a mortality rate of 10%. As a result, the performance and timeliness of diagnostic strategies are important factors in improving the prognosis of these patients. In this context, the development of high-throughput sequencing technologies has led to the development of new diagnostic approaches based on the detection of circulating DNA (lcDNA, e.g. used in antenatal screening for trisomy 21). Although more recently democratised, the concept of microbial cDNA is well established in the field of infectious diseases. This technology, based on a blood sample obtained by simple venipuncture, could offer patients with febrile neutropenia an improved diagnosis, particularly in the case of negative blood cultures, and an adjustment in their management.
- Identification and description of the IVDD
The DISQVERⓇ device is CE-IVD marked according to the In Vitro Diagnostic Directive (IVDD) classification approved until May 2026. The assessment file for its marking according to In-Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR) is in progress.
DISQVER® is a digital analytical solution developed by Noscendo for the rapid identification of microorganisms in a patient's blood sample from free circulating DNA, without any a priori hypothesis.
The test is based on metagenomic Next Generation Sequencing "mNGS" to identify, without a priori assumptions, the genomic sequences of micro-organisms (bacteria, DNA viruses, fungi and parasites) potentially present in the patient's plasma sample. The genomic sequences identified are then compared with Noscendo's proprietary database of over 16,000 microbial genome sequences, including 1,500 pathogens.
A report detailing all relevant pathogens detected in the sample is provided within a few hours (access to a pseudonymised pdf report according to the laboratory's guidelines, including the micro-organisms found in the highest concentration and the most likely pathogen present).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patient
- Age ≥18 years
- Being treated for solid tumour or haematological malignancy
- Presenting with high-risk febrile neutropenia (high-risk is defined by a Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) score ≥ 21) with an expected duration of neutropenia ≥ 7 days. Neutropenia is defined as an absolute neutrophil count ≤ 500/mm3. Fever is defined as temperature ≥ 38.3°C or ≥ 38°C twice within 1 hour.
- Free, without guardianship, tutelage or subordination;
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Antibiotic therapy in the 24 hours prior to enrolment, with the exception of prophylactic use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (Cotrimoxazole) and penicillin G (Oracillin®).
- Previous study participation
- Patients with enhanced protection, i.e. minors, persons deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, persons in a health or social care institution, adults under legal protection;
- Pregnant or lactating women of childbearing age (menopause must be documented) who refuse or do not have an effective method of contraception (hormonal/mechanical: per os, injectable, transcutaneous, implantable, intrauterine device or surgical: tubal ligation, hysterectomy, total oophorectomy) for the duration of the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Metagenomic diagnosis (mNGS, DISQVER)Blood sample taken for metagenomic sequencing at inclusion visit. | Diagnostic test | – |
Primary outcome
Performances (intrinsic diagnostic capabilities) of Metagenomic testing
Time frame: 1 day
Based on the microorganisms identified by the conventional work-up and the mNGS-DISQVER® tool, an adjudication committee consisting of a microbiologist, an infectiologist and a haematologist, independent of the study, will assess the presence of at least one pathogen requiring appropriate management. The interpretation of the conventional work-up and that provided by the mNGS-DISQVER® tool will be blinded. The intrinsic diagnostic capabilities will be assessed by the sensitivity/specificity of the new mNGS-DISQVER® test, with the classification resulting from the conventional work-up as the reference.
3 secondary outcomes
Performances (extrinsic diagnostic capabilities) of Metagenomic testing
Time frame: 1 day
Clinical impact of Metagenomic testing on therapeutic choices
Time frame: 1 day
Use of Metagenomic testing during clinical patient's management
Time frame: 1 day
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Closure of NOSCENDO.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Aug 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39843376Pichon M, Burucoa C; ADNEMIA Study Group. Diagnostic performance of the DISQVER metagenomic sequencing tool for the identification of pathogens in febrile neutropenic patients: the ADNEMIA trial. BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 22;15(1):e087773. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087773.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Metagenomic diagnosis (mNGS, DISQVER) in people with Immunodepressed Patients (Hemato-oncology), run by Poitiers University Hospital at 5 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Closure of NOSCENDO.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Performances (intrinsic diagnostic capabilities) of Metagenomic testing (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06075888, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Aug 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.