MemoryPhase 2NCT06074172
The Effect of Cannabidiol in Learning and Memory of Adults
A Phase 2 study testing Cannabidiol (246mg press pill) in people with Memory, run by Colorado State University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The main objectives of this study were to test if a singular dose of Cannabidiol (1) enhances the learning and memory of healthy human subjects, (2) test if Cannabidiol has negative effects on Retroactive and Proactive Interference during learning, (3) and test if demographic factors will influence CBD's modulation of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Memory
- What is being tested?
- Cannabidiol (246mg press pill)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 57 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 14 Mar 2020to 6 Nov 2020
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Were 18 years of age or older
Who cannot join
- Were pregnant or breast-feeding
- Had been diagnosed with mental illness
- Didn't speak English fluently
- Had severe hearing problems
- Had recreational or opioid drug contaminants in their urine
- Were involved in criminal activity
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Colorado State University Pueblo
Pueblo, Colorado, 81001
About this study
The main objectives of this study were to test if a singular dose of Cannabidiol (1) enhances the learning and memory of healthy human subjects, (2) test if Cannabidiol has negative effects on Retroactive and Proactive Interference during learning, (3) and test if demographic factors will influence CBD's modulation of human learning and memory.
Read the detailed description
Using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled two-arm case-crossover trial, this study investigates the effect of 246 milligrams (mg) of Cannabidiol (CBD) on the learning and memory scores of human subjects, as well as the effect of Cannabidiol on Proactive and Retroactive Interference. This study also investigated the influence of demographic factors on CBD's modulation of human learning and memory.
This study was conducted at Colorado State University-Pueblo (CSU Pueblo) with volunteers recruited from CSU Pueblo and the local Pueblo community. Fifty-seven subjects were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive either CBD or placebo before completing two versions of learning and memory assessments. Each version of the learning and memory assessment included the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA), the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task-Revised (RAVLT-R), and the Logical Memory Subject of the Weschler Memory Scale. Several components of the RAVLT-R were evaluated including the Sum of Trials (Trials I-V) score, Proactive Interference Ratio (PI Ratio), and Retroactive Interference (RI Ratio).
- Conditions
- Memory
- Being tested
- Cannabidiol (246mg press pill), Placebo (246mg press pill)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cannabidiol (246mg press pill)Drug
Cannabidiol press pills provided by Steve Goods CBD (Longmont, Colorado). CBD pills were tested by the chemistry lab at CSU Pueblo and by Botanacor in Denver, CO. Both laboratories determined CBD pills to be 99.98% pure with no THC, heavy metals, bacteria, and pesticides detected.
Placebo (246mg press pill)Drug
Placebo press pills were provided by Steve Goods CBD (Longmont, Colorado). Placebo pills were tested by the chemistry lab at CSU Pueblo and by Botanacar in Denver, CO. Both laboratories determined placebo pills to be pure with no heavy metals, bacteria, and pesticides detected.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo, Then Cannabidiol | Placebo comparator | Participants first received a Placebo 246 mg press pill during visit 1. After a washout period of 1 week, subjects received a Cannabidiol press pill during visit 2. Receives: Drug: Placebo (246mg press pill) |
| Cannabidiol, Then Placebo | Active comparator | Participants first received a Cannabidiol 246 mg press pill during visit 1. After a washout period of 1 week, subjects received a Placebo press pill during visit 2. Receives: Drug: Cannabidiol (246mg press pill) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sum of Trials (I-V)
Sum of Trials = Trial A1 + Trial A2 + Trial A3 + Trial A4 + Trial A5;
Trial A1/A2/A3/A4/A5 are in reference to each trial in which list A is recalled during memory encoding. The score range for Sum of Trials is 0 to 75. A higher score is indicative of greater performance on the memory test and a lower score is indicative of lower performance on the memory test.
Participants were instructed to listen to a list of 15 words (List A) read to them. Subjects were asked recall List A during five different trials (A1, A2, A3, A4, A5), with the words repeated to them after each trial. Participants were scored for the number of correctly repeated words for each trial.
Measured: Each trial is 45 seconds for encoding and recall
Proactive Interference Ratio (PI Ratio)
PI Ratio = Trial B1/A1. Proactive interference is the tendency for previously learned information to affect to hinder learning of new information. A higher proactive interference ratio indicates protective effects on memory i.e. protection from interference during learning. A lower proactive interference is indicative of negative effects on memory caused from interference. Trial A1 is in reference to list A recall during the first trial. Trial B1 is in reference to list B recall. Highest score for each trial is 15 with a point awarded for each correctly recalled word from List A (15 words) and List B (15 words).
Measured: Each trial is 45 seconds for encoding and recall
Retroactive Interference Ratio (RI Ratio)
RI Ratio = Trial A6/A5. Retroactive interference is the tendency for newly learned information to hinder the memory of previously learned information. A higher retroactive interference ratio indicates protection from interference during learning. A lower retroactive interference ratio is indicative of negative effects on memory caused from interference. Trial A6 is referring to delayed recall of list A; Trial A5 is referring to the fifth trial of list A recall. Highest score for each trial is 15 with a point awarded for each word correctly recalled from List A (15 words).
Measured: Each trial is 45 seconds for encoding and recall
Total Prose Recall
Total Prose Recall = Immediate Recall + Delayed Recall; Recall of a prose story was done immediately then after a delay; Highest score for prose recall test is 25 with a point awarded for each item correctly recalled in the story (25 total items). A higher recall score is indicative of better memory.
Measured: Each recall takes about 5 min for encoding and recall
Montreal Cognitive Assessment Score
Assessment of basal cognitive function; The range for Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) scores is 0 to 30. A higher recall score is indicative of better performance on the memory test. A lower recall score is indicative of worse performance on the memory test.
Measured: 10 minutes total for encoding and recall
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Oct 2023
- Study start14 Mar 2020
- Primary completion6 Nov 2020
- Study completion6 Nov 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MemoryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Two-arm Case-Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 57 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Colorado State University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institute of Cannabis Research
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Moussa M Diawara, PhD, Principal investigator, Colorado State University-Pueblo
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06074172
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MD012420BM
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 26 Sep 2023
- Last updated
- 24 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Individual (de-identified) participant data is to be made available to other researchers.
Publications
Gebregzi HH, Zeiger JS, Smith JP, Stuyt L, Cullen L, Carsella J, Rogers DC, Lafebre J, Knalfec J, Vargas A, Diawara MM. Oral cannabidiol did not impair learning and memory in healthy adults. J Cannabis Res. 2025 Jan 23;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s42238-025-00262-2.
PubMed 39849639
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Cannabidiol in Learning and Memory of Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06074172
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MD012420BM
- Conditions
- Memory
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 57 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Colorado State UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institute of Cannabis Research
- Study start
- 14 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 6 Nov 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 24 Mar 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main objectives of this study were to test if a singular dose of Cannabidiol (1) enhances the learning and memory of healthy human subjects, (2) test if Cannabidiol has negative effects on Retroactive and Proactive Interference during learning, (3) and test if demographic factors will influence CBD's modulation of human learning and memory.
Detailed description
Using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled two-arm case-crossover trial, this study investigates the effect of 246 milligrams (mg) of Cannabidiol (CBD) on the learning and memory scores of human subjects, as well as the effect of Cannabidiol on Proactive and Retroactive Interference. This study also investigated the influence of demographic factors on CBD's modulation of human learning and memory.
This study was conducted at Colorado State University-Pueblo (CSU Pueblo) with volunteers recruited from CSU Pueblo and the local Pueblo community. Fifty-seven subjects were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive either CBD or placebo before completing two versions of learning and memory assessments. Each version of the learning and memory assessment included the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA), the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task-Revised (RAVLT-R), and the Logical Memory Subject of the Weschler Memory Scale. Several components of the RAVLT-R were evaluated including the Sum of Trials (Trials I-V) score, Proactive Interference Ratio (PI Ratio), and Retroactive Interference (RI Ratio).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Two-arm Case-Crossover
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo, Then Cannabidiol | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo (246mg press pill)Participants first received a Placebo 246 mg press pill during visit 1. After a washout period of 1 week, subjects received a Cannabidiol press pill during visit 2. |
| Cannabidiol, Then Placebo | Active comparator | Drug: Cannabidiol (246mg press pill)Participants first received a Cannabidiol 246 mg press pill during visit 1. After a washout period of 1 week, subjects received a Placebo press pill during visit 2. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Were 18 years of age or older
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Were pregnant or breast-feeding
- Had been diagnosed with mental illness
- Didn't speak English fluently
- Had severe hearing problems
- Had recreational or opioid drug contaminants in their urine
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cannabidiol (246mg press pill)Cannabidiol press pills provided by Steve Goods CBD (Longmont, Colorado). CBD pills were tested by the chemistry lab at CSU Pueblo and by Botanacor in Denver, CO. Both laboratories determined CBD pills to be 99.98% pure with no THC, heavy metals, bacteria, and pesticides detected. | Drug | Cannabidiol, Then Placebo |
| Placebo (246mg press pill)Placebo press pills were provided by Steve Goods CBD (Longmont, Colorado). Placebo pills were tested by the chemistry lab at CSU Pueblo and by Botanacar in Denver, CO. Both laboratories determined placebo pills to be pure with no heavy metals, bacteria, and pesticides detected. | Drug | Placebo, Then Cannabidiol |
Primary outcome
Sum of Trials (I-V)
Time frame: Each trial is 45 seconds for encoding and recall
Sum of Trials = Trial A1 + Trial A2 + Trial A3 + Trial A4 + Trial A5; Trial A1/A2/A3/A4/A5 are in reference to each trial in which list A is recalled during memory encoding. The score range for Sum of Trials is 0 to 75. A higher score is indicative of greater performance on the memory test and a lower score is indicative of lower performance on the memory test. Participants were instructed to listen to a list of 15 words (List A) read to them. Subjects were asked recall List A during five different trials (A1, A2, A3, A4, A5), with the words repeated to them after each trial. Participants were scored for the number of correctly repeated words for each trial.
Proactive Interference Ratio (PI Ratio)
Time frame: Each trial is 45 seconds for encoding and recall
PI Ratio = Trial B1/A1. Proactive interference is the tendency for previously learned information to affect to hinder learning of new information. A higher proactive interference ratio indicates protective effects on memory i.e. protection from interference during learning. A lower proactive interference is indicative of negative effects on memory caused from interference. Trial A1 is in reference to list A recall during the first trial. Trial B1 is in reference to list B recall. Highest score for each trial is 15 with a point awarded for each correctly recalled word from List A (15 words) and List B (15 words).
Retroactive Interference Ratio (RI Ratio)
Time frame: Each trial is 45 seconds for encoding and recall
RI Ratio = Trial A6/A5. Retroactive interference is the tendency for newly learned information to hinder the memory of previously learned information. A higher retroactive interference ratio indicates protection from interference during learning. A lower retroactive interference ratio is indicative of negative effects on memory caused from interference. Trial A6 is referring to delayed recall of list A; Trial A5 is referring to the fifth trial of list A recall. Highest score for each trial is 15 with a point awarded for each word correctly recalled from List A (15 words).
Total Prose Recall
Time frame: Each recall takes about 5 min for encoding and recall
Total Prose Recall = Immediate Recall + Delayed Recall; Recall of a prose story was done immediately then after a delay; Highest score for prose recall test is 25 with a point awarded for each item correctly recalled in the story (25 total items). A higher recall score is indicative of better memory.
Montreal Cognitive Assessment Score
Time frame: 10 minutes total for encoding and recall
Assessment of basal cognitive function; The range for Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) scores is 0 to 30. A higher recall score is indicative of better performance on the memory test. A lower recall score is indicative of worse performance on the memory test.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Mar 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39849639Gebregzi HH, Zeiger JS, Smith JP, Stuyt L, Cullen L, Carsella J, Rogers DC, Lafebre J, Knalfec J, Vargas A, Diawara MM. Oral cannabidiol did not impair learning and memory in healthy adults. J Cannabis Res. 2025 Jan 23;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s42238-025-00262-2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Individual (de-identified) participant data is to be made available to other researchers.
Related trials for Memory
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Women Who Are Victims of Violence: Treatment of PTSD Through Reactivation of Traumatic Memories Using Propranolol
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, PTSD
RecruitingPhase 1
Lm-LLO-TT and Gemcitabine in Unresectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Pancreas Cancer, Duct Cell Adenocarcinoma, Pancreatic Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Studies of Blood Flow to the Brain During Thought
Healthy Volunteer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prospective Research on Identification of Dementia in Early Stages (P.R.I.D.E)
Mild Cognitive Impairment, Memory Disorders
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Study of Attention and Memory Processes in Breast Cancer Survivors
Breast Cancer Survivors
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Moussa M Diawara, PhD principal investigator
Colorado State University-Pueblo
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Cannabidiol (246mg press pill) in people with Memory, run by Colorado State University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Mar 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sum of Trials (I-V) (time frame: Each trial is 45 seconds for encoding and recall). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06074172, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2025.