AntipsychoticsMAIANCT06049953
Maternal And Infant Antipsychotic Study
An observational study of Antipsychotics and Pregnancy, run by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this observational study is to learn about maternal psychiatric course and infant development in pregnant individuals with severe mental illness, comparing those treated with antipsychotics to those treated with other medications or without medication. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Antipsychotics, Pregnancy
- What is being tested?
- Antipsychotics, Non-antipsychotic medication and No Medication
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- How many people
- 74 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 29 Sep 2023to 1 Jan 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Pregnant women with severe mental illness as defined in Eligibility Criteria
Who may be able to join
- Pregnant
- Severe mental illness, including:
- Psychotic disorder (affective and nonaffective)
- Bipolar disorder
- History of psychiatric hospitalization, regardless of diagnosis
- Able to complete study interviews and measures in English, Dutch, or Spanish
Who cannot join
- Active substance use disorder in pregnancy
- Insufficiently high-functioning to provide full informed consent and/or participate in study procedures
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, 10029
Thalia Robakis, 2126598893, thalia.robakis@mssm.edu
Luz Ospina, 212-659-1326, luz.ospina@mssm.edu
About this study
Official title: Developmental Effects of Antenatal Exposure to Antipsychotics
The goal of this observational study is to learn about maternal psychiatric course and infant development in pregnant individuals with severe mental illness, comparing those treated with antipsychotics to those treated with other medications or without medication. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is risk of psychiatric relapse different among individuals who take antipsychotic medication, other medication, or no medication?
- Are pregnancy and neonatal health outcomes different among individuals who take antipsychotic medication, other medication, or no medication?
- Do infant behavior and neurodevelopment differ among babies who were exposed to antipsychotic medication, other medication, or no medication in utero? Participants will
Read more
- complete a psychiatric interview and questionnaires while pregnant;
- donate blood from the mother and from the umbilical cord at delivery
- have their babies participate in infant behavior evaluations and an EEG procedure.
Researchers will compare these outcomes among individuals who were treated either with antipsychotic medication, with psychotropic medications of other classes, and with no medication, to see if psychiatric benefits for the mother and health outcomes for mother and child differ among these three types of treatment.
Read the detailed description
Antipsychotic (AP) medications are widely prescribed for a range of mental illnesses including bipolar disorder and nonaffective psychosis. These disorders usually onset in adolescence or early adulthood; thus, women of childbearing age are among those prescribed APs. The number of pregnancies exposed to APs has been increasing over time. Yet their efficacy has never been definitively demonstrated in this population.
APs cross the placenta and block dopamine (DA) D2 receptors, which are functional in the developing fetus, including influencing the proliferation and differentiation of neural progenitor cells. Increased DA signaling in early development results in increased numbers of inhibitory cortical interneurons and decreased numbers of pyramidal cells, while decreased DA signaling has the reverse effect. Thus, tonic DA blockade in utero could alter the excitatory/inhibitory balance in mature prefrontal cortex, which could affect fear processing, social functioning, and spatial or working memory in the long term. Additionally, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an established short-term risk of AP in pregnancy, which is associated with both increased body size and impaired cognitive and motor development in offspring.
At present very limited data exist on developmental outcomes associated with antenatal exposure to APs. Infant studies have found some evidence of initial difficulty adapting to life outside the womb as well as early neuromotor problems, but existing studies lack adequate comparison groups, and longitudinal data are lacking. Regarding long-term outcomes, the research group has found sex-specific increases in risk for psychiatric disorders for male, but not female, offspring, in both a register-based dataset and a clinical pilot study. This potential neurodevelopmental vulnerability requires further investigation in a rigorous longitudinal cohort study.
This study aims to investigate efficacy and adverse effects of AP exposure in pregnant women with severe mental illness (SMI). The research team hypothesizes that APs will be efficacious for psychiatric disorders, but will be associated with increased weight gain in mothers, poor neonatal adaptation in neonates, and sex-specific neurodevelopmental changes in infants. The overall goal is to precisely describe the risk/benefit ratio associated with AP treatment in pregnancy, in order to allow pregnant women with SMI to make informed decisions about their care.
Study Aims:
Aim 1: To investigate efficacy and adverse effects of AP treatment for pregnant women.
Aim 1a: Efficacy of AP treatment for pregnant women with SMI. Hypothesis: Women taking either APs or non-AP mood stabilizers will be less likely to relapse with mood or psychotic episodes than those not medicated.
Aim 1b: Adverse pregnancy outcomes with AP treatment for pregnant women. Hypothesis: Women taking APs will have greater weight gain in pregnancy than women taking non-APs or women taking no medication.
Researchers will recruit women in pregnancy with SMI (bipolar or primary psychotic disorder, N=200) in three groups: taking AP, taking other psychotropic medication, and taking no psychotropic medication, via two specialized perinatal psychiatric centers in NYC and the Netherlands. Women will be followed naturalistically and assessed for psychiatric relapse in pregnancy and the postpartum period, as well as complications of pregnancy, including weight gain and gestational diabetes, This will be the first study of AP efficacy in pregnancy.
Aim 2: To describe neonatal adaptation and physical growth in neonates of the mothers either exposed or unexposed to APs during pregnancy. Aim 2a: Neonatal adaptation in neonates either exposed or unexposed to APs during pregnancy. Hypothesis: Neonates of mothers who took APs during pregnancy will evince poorer neonatal adaptation than neonates of mothers who took either non-AP psychotropics or no medication. Aim 2b: Physical growth in neonates either exposed or unexposed to APs during pregnancy. Hypothesis: Neonates of mothers who took APs during pregnancy will have larger body sizes than neonates of mothers who took either non-AP psychotropics or no medication. The research team will examine obstetric and neonatal outcomes of infants of women with SMI, including neonatal adaptation syndrome (NAS), with control for maternal diagnosis and level of functioning. This will be the first controlled study of NAS after antenatal AP exposure.
Aim 3: To describe neurobehavioral development through 6 months in children from Aim 2. Aim 3a: Auditory sensory gating in children exposed to AP antenatally. Hypothesis: All infants prenatally exposed to APs will have reduced inhibitory activity as measured by the P50 component in the EEG. Aim 3b (Exploratory): Neurobehavioral development through 6 months in children exposed to AP antenatally. Hypothesis: Researchers predict increased symptoms of anxiety and internalizing behaviors for males only. Reduced auditory sensory gating will mediate, and sex will moderate, socioemotional outcomes associated with AP exposure. Comprehensive interviews, behavioral observations, and electroencephalography (EEG) obtained in a home visit at 6 months will assess socioemotional, cognitive, and motor development. The research team will investigate whether infant sex moderates any observed effects of AP exposure. This will be the first study of neural activity after antenatal AP exposure.
- Conditions
- Antipsychotics, Pregnancy
- Being tested
- Antipsychotics, Non-antipsychotic medication, No Medication
- Keywords
- antipsychotic, pregnancy, severe mental illness, neonatal adaptation syndrome, neurodevelopment
- Medical subject headings
- Mental Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AntipsychoticsDrug
Antipsychotic medications are widely prescribed for severe mental illness such as affective and non-affective psychosis, mood stabilization, and augmentation of unipolar depression.
Non-antipsychotic medicationDrug
Also called Antidepressants, Benzodiazepines
Psychotropic medications are typically prescribed to manage symptoms of anxiety, depression, psychological distress, and/or insomnia.
No MedicationOther
Non-psychotropic medications
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Antipsychotic medication | Pregnant women with severe mental illness (diagnosis of bipolar disorder, primary psychotic disorder, or any history of psychiatric hospitalization) who are treated with any of the following medications during pregnancy: Quetiapine, olanzapine, risperidone, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, lurasidone, haloperidol, or any other medication in the first- or second-generation antipsychotic class. All orally administered, with dosages titrated to clinical effect by the participant's primary psychiatrist. Receives: Drug: Antipsychotics | |
| Non-antipsychotic medication | Pregnant women with severe mental illness (diagnosis of bipolar disorder, primary psychotic disorder, or any history of psychiatric hospitalization) who are treated with any psychotropic medications during pregnancy other than those listed. Receives: Drug: Non-antipsychotic medication | |
| No medication | Pregnant women with severe mental illness (diagnosis of bipolar disorder, primary psychotic disorder, or any history of psychiatric hospitalization) who are not treated with any psychotropic medications during pregnancy. Receives: Other: No Medication |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview
In the DSM-5 Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.) researchers will conduct modules for major depressive episode, (hypo)manic episode, and psychotic disorders. A clinical structured interview with very precise questions about psychological problems will require a 'yes' or 'no' answer. The M.I.N.I. is divided into modules identified by letters, each corresponding to a diagnostic category. At the beginning of each diagnostic module (except for psychotic disorders module), screening questions(s) corresponding to the main criteria of the disorder are presented in a gray box. At the end of each module, diagnostic box(es) permit the clinician to indicate whether diagnostic criteria are met.
Measured: through study completion, an average of 6 months postpartum
Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System
Symptoms of poor neonatal adaptation, as assessed by Finnegan scale at 24 hours of life. Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System (NAS) is an observer-rated scale documenting signs of neonatal adaptation. The individual NAS symptoms are weighted (numerically scoring 1-5) depending on the symptom, and the severity of the symptom expressed. The total score ranges from 0 to 43. Infants scoring an 8 or greater are recommended to receive pharmacologic therapy.
Measured: 24 hours postnatal
Ratio of auditory evoked potentials as measured by EEG
Electrical activity of brain cells in response to a sound stimulus, measured noninvasively on the outside of the scalp by electroencephalography
Measured: 6 months postnatal
Secondary outcomes (17)
Maternal weight gain
Total pregnancy weight gain
Measured: through delivery, approximately 40 weeks post conception
Oral glucose tolerance test score
A glucose screening test is a routine test during pregnancy that checks a pregnant woman's blood glucose (sugar) level. Score on oral glucose tolerance test will be recorded.
Measured: at 24 weeks
Fetal body size
Fetal ultrasound-based and infant anthropometric measurements
Measured: at 20 weeks
Fetal weight
Measured: at 20 weeks
Fetal head circumference
Measured: at 20 weeks
Fetal biparietal diameter
Measured: at 20 weeks
Fetal cerebellar diameter
Measured: at 20 weeks
Neonatal birth weight adjusted for gestational age at delivery, as a percentile score
Measured: at 20 weeks
Fetal femur length
Measured: at 20 weeks
Neonatal body size
Measured: at delivery
Neonatal length
Measured: at delivery
Neonatal weight
Measured: at delivery
Neonatal head circumference
Measured: at delivery
Changes in Infant length percentile
Measured: at delivery and 6 months postnatal
Changes in weight percentile
Measured: at delivery and 6 months postnatal
Bayley-III Score
Neurodevelopmental assessment scores are age dependent and based motor and behavioral abilities, often reported for normal or abnormal for age. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, third edition, (Bayley III) is an instrument designed to measure the developmental functioning of infants and toddlers between the ages of 1 month and 42 months (age adjustments for prematurity are accommodated with the tool). It provides age specific composite scores for cognitive (91 items, score min 55 max 145), language (98 items, score min 47 max 153), and motor (138 items, score min 46 max 154) skills. For all scales, higher scores indicate favorable outcomes and lower scores indicate possible delay/deficit.
Measured: at 6 months postnatal
Vineland Interview
Socioemotional, cognitive, and motor development as measured by Vineland interviews. . The Vineland measures five domains: Communication, Daily Living Skills, Socialisation, Motor Skills, and Maladaptive Behaviour. Each domain is summed, and the domain scores are converted to standardized scores. The normative score is 100, with standard deviation of 15. A higher score (above 100) means better adaptive behavior.
Measured: at 6 months postnatal
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Sep 2023
- Study start29 Sep 2023
- Primary completion1 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jan 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for AntipsychoticsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 74 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Erasmus Medical Center, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Thalia Robakis, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
- Investigators
- Thalia Robakis, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06049953
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY 23-00239
- Other IDs
- R01HD111117-01
- Acronym
- MAIA
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 11 Sep 2023
- Last updated
- 22 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data will be stored and shared in accordance with HIPAA and GDPR law. Deidentified data will be shared between the two sites for the purpose of analysis of study outcomes. For this purpose: * dataset will be deidentified * datasets will be limited * data will be aggregated * no directly traceable data will be shared * data keys will never be shared between sites * data will be encrypted The process will be legally supported by Data transfer Agreements. Deidentified US data will be stored at the NICHD Data and Specimen Hub (DASH). Deidentified Dutch data will be stored at the electronic archives at the Erasmus MC. Repositories will be accessible for researchers of the MAIA study with the proper access rights, only
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Developmental Effects of Antenatal Exposure to Antipsychotics
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06049953
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MAIA / STUDY 23-00239
- Conditions
- Antipsychotics, Pregnancy
- Keywords
- antipsychotic, pregnancy, severe mental illness, neonatal adaptation syndrome, neurodevelopment
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 74 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Erasmus Medical Center, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Study start
- 29 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this observational study is to learn about maternal psychiatric course and infant development in pregnant individuals with severe mental illness, comparing those treated with antipsychotics to those treated with other medications or without medication. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is risk of psychiatric relapse different among individuals who take antipsychotic medication, other medication, or no medication?
- Are pregnancy and neonatal health outcomes different among individuals who take antipsychotic medication, other medication, or no medication?
- Do infant behavior and neurodevelopment differ among babies who were exposed to antipsychotic medication, other medication, or no medication in utero? Participants will
- complete a psychiatric interview and questionnaires while pregnant;
- donate blood from the mother and from the umbilical cord at delivery
- have their babies participate in infant behavior evaluations and an EEG procedure.
Researchers will compare these outcomes among individuals who were treated either with antipsychotic medication, with psychotropic medications of other classes, and with no medication, to see if psychiatric benefits for the mother and health outcomes for mother and child differ among these three types of treatment.
Detailed description
Antipsychotic (AP) medications are widely prescribed for a range of mental illnesses including bipolar disorder and nonaffective psychosis. These disorders usually onset in adolescence or early adulthood; thus, women of childbearing age are among those prescribed APs. The number of pregnancies exposed to APs has been increasing over time. Yet their efficacy has never been definitively demonstrated in this population.
APs cross the placenta and block dopamine (DA) D2 receptors, which are functional in the developing fetus, including influencing the proliferation and differentiation of neural progenitor cells. Increased DA signaling in early development results in increased numbers of inhibitory cortical interneurons and decreased numbers of pyramidal cells, while decreased DA signaling has the reverse effect. Thus, tonic DA blockade in utero could alter the excitatory/inhibitory balance in mature prefrontal cortex, which could affect fear processing, social functioning, and spatial or working memory in the long term. Additionally, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an established short-term risk of AP in pregnancy, which is associated with both increased body size and impaired cognitive and motor development in offspring.
At present very limited data exist on developmental outcomes associated with antenatal exposure to APs. Infant studies have found some evidence of initial difficulty adapting to life outside the womb as well as early neuromotor problems, but existing studies lack adequate comparison groups, and longitudinal data are lacking. Regarding long-term outcomes, the research group has found sex-specific increases in risk for psychiatric disorders for male, but not female, offspring, in both a register-based dataset and a clinical pilot study. This potential neurodevelopmental vulnerability requires further investigation in a rigorous longitudinal cohort study.
This study aims to investigate efficacy and adverse effects of AP exposure in pregnant women with severe mental illness (SMI). The research team hypothesizes that APs will be efficacious for psychiatric disorders, but will be associated with increased weight gain in mothers, poor neonatal adaptation in neonates, and sex-specific neurodevelopmental changes in infants. The overall goal is to precisely describe the risk/benefit ratio associated with AP treatment in pregnancy, in order to allow pregnant women with SMI to make informed decisions about their care.
Study Aims:
Aim 1: To investigate efficacy and adverse effects of AP treatment for pregnant women.
Aim 1a: Efficacy of AP treatment for pregnant women with SMI. Hypothesis: Women taking either APs or non-AP mood stabilizers will be less likely to relapse with mood or psychotic episodes than those not medicated.
Aim 1b: Adverse pregnancy outcomes with AP treatment for pregnant women. Hypothesis: Women taking APs will have greater weight gain in pregnancy than women taking non-APs or women taking no medication.
Researchers will recruit women in pregnancy with SMI (bipolar or primary psychotic disorder, N=200) in three groups: taking AP, taking other psychotropic medication, and taking no psychotropic medication, via two specialized perinatal psychiatric centers in NYC and the Netherlands. Women will be followed naturalistically and assessed for psychiatric relapse in pregnancy and the postpartum period, as well as complications of pregnancy, including weight gain and gestational diabetes, This will be the first study of AP efficacy in pregnancy.
Aim 2: To describe neonatal adaptation and physical growth in neonates of the mothers either exposed or unexposed to APs during pregnancy. Aim 2a: Neonatal adaptation in neonates either exposed or unexposed to APs during pregnancy. Hypothesis: Neonates of mothers who took APs during pregnancy will evince poorer neonatal adaptation than neonates of mothers who took either non-AP psychotropics or no medication. Aim 2b: Physical growth in neonates either exposed or unexposed to APs during pregnancy. Hypothesis: Neonates of mothers who took APs during pregnancy will have larger body sizes than neonates of mothers who took either non-AP psychotropics or no medication. The research team will examine obstetric and neonatal outcomes of infants of women with SMI, including neonatal adaptation syndrome (NAS), with control for maternal diagnosis and level of functioning. This will be the first controlled study of NAS after antenatal AP exposure.
Aim 3: To describe neurobehavioral development through 6 months in children from Aim 2. Aim 3a: Auditory sensory gating in children exposed to AP antenatally. Hypothesis: All infants prenatally exposed to APs will have reduced inhibitory activity as measured by the P50 component in the EEG. Aim 3b (Exploratory): Neurobehavioral development through 6 months in children exposed to AP antenatally. Hypothesis: Researchers predict increased symptoms of anxiety and internalizing behaviors for males only. Reduced auditory sensory gating will mediate, and sex will moderate, socioemotional outcomes associated with AP exposure. Comprehensive interviews, behavioral observations, and electroencephalography (EEG) obtained in a home visit at 6 months will assess socioemotional, cognitive, and motor development. The research team will investigate whether infant sex moderates any observed effects of AP exposure. This will be the first study of neural activity after antenatal AP exposure.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Antipsychotic medication | – | Drug: AntipsychoticsPregnant women with severe mental illness (diagnosis of bipolar disorder, primary psychotic disorder, or any history of psychiatric hospitalization) who are treated with any of the following medications during pregnancy: Quetiapine, olanzapine, risperidone, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, lurasidone, haloperidol, or any other medication in the first- or second-generation antipsychotic class. All orally administered, with dosages titrated to clinical effect by the participant's primary psychiatrist. |
| Non-antipsychotic medication | – | Drug: Non-antipsychotic medicationPregnant women with severe mental illness (diagnosis of bipolar disorder, primary psychotic disorder, or any history of psychiatric hospitalization) who are treated with any psychotropic medications during pregnancy other than those listed. |
| No medication | – | Other: No MedicationPregnant women with severe mental illness (diagnosis of bipolar disorder, primary psychotic disorder, or any history of psychiatric hospitalization) who are not treated with any psychotropic medications during pregnancy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Pregnant women with severe mental illness as defined in Eligibility Criteria
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Pregnant
- Severe mental illness, including:
- Able to complete study interviews and measures in English, Dutch, or Spanish
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Active substance use disorder in pregnancy
- Insufficiently high-functioning to provide full informed consent and/or participate in study procedures
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AntipsychoticsAntipsychotic medications are widely prescribed for severe mental illness such as affective and non-affective psychosis, mood stabilization, and augmentation of unipolar depression. | Drug | Antipsychotic medication |
| Non-antipsychotic medicationAlso: Antidepressants, BenzodiazepinesPsychotropic medications are typically prescribed to manage symptoms of anxiety, depression, psychological distress, and/or insomnia. | Drug | Non-antipsychotic medication |
| No MedicationNon-psychotropic medications | Other | No medication |
Primary outcome
Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months postpartum
In the DSM-5 Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.) researchers will conduct modules for major depressive episode, (hypo)manic episode, and psychotic disorders. A clinical structured interview with very precise questions about psychological problems will require a 'yes' or 'no' answer. The M.I.N.I. is divided into modules identified by letters, each corresponding to a diagnostic category. At the beginning of each diagnostic module (except for psychotic disorders module), screening questions(s) corresponding to the main criteria of the disorder are presented in a gray box. At the end of each module, diagnostic box(es) permit the clinician to indicate whether diagnostic criteria are met.
Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System
Time frame: 24 hours postnatal
Symptoms of poor neonatal adaptation, as assessed by Finnegan scale at 24 hours of life. Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System (NAS) is an observer-rated scale documenting signs of neonatal adaptation. The individual NAS symptoms are weighted (numerically scoring 1-5) depending on the symptom, and the severity of the symptom expressed. The total score ranges from 0 to 43. Infants scoring an 8 or greater are recommended to receive pharmacologic therapy.
Ratio of auditory evoked potentials as measured by EEG
Time frame: 6 months postnatal
Electrical activity of brain cells in response to a sound stimulus, measured noninvasively on the outside of the scalp by electroencephalography
17 secondary outcomes
Maternal weight gain
Time frame: through delivery, approximately 40 weeks post conception
Oral glucose tolerance test score
Time frame: at 24 weeks
Fetal body size
Time frame: at 20 weeks
Fetal weight
Time frame: at 20 weeks
Fetal head circumference
Time frame: at 20 weeks
Fetal biparietal diameter
Time frame: at 20 weeks
Fetal cerebellar diameter
Time frame: at 20 weeks
Neonatal birth weight adjusted for gestational age at delivery, as a percentile score
Time frame: at 20 weeks
Fetal femur length
Time frame: at 20 weeks
Neonatal body size
Time frame: at delivery
Neonatal length
Time frame: at delivery
Neonatal weight
Time frame: at delivery
Neonatal head circumference
Time frame: at delivery
Changes in Infant length percentile
Time frame: at delivery and 6 months postnatal
Changes in weight percentile
Time frame: at delivery and 6 months postnatal
Bayley-III Score
Time frame: at 6 months postnatal
Vineland Interview
Time frame: at 6 months postnatal
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jun 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Data will be stored and shared in accordance with HIPAA and GDPR law. Deidentified data will be shared between the two sites for the purpose of analysis of study outcomes. For this purpose: * dataset will be deidentified * datasets will be limited * data will be aggregated * no directly traceable data will be shared * data keys will never be shared between sites * data will be encrypted The process will be legally supported by Data transfer Agreements. Deidentified US data will be stored at the NICHD Data and Specimen Hub (DASH). Deidentified Dutch data will be stored at the electronic archives at the Erasmus MC. Repositories will be accessible for researchers of the MAIA study with the proper access rights, only
Related trials for Antipsychotics
RecruitingObservational study
The ATP Project (Antipsychotic-TEP-Psychosis)
First Episose Psychosis, Metabolic Disease
Enrolling by invitation
Incentives and Long-Acting Injectable Adherence After Involuntary Hospitalization
Schizophrenia Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Psychoactive Drug Use and Acute Care Use After Trauma and Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Wounds and Injuries, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
RecruitingObservational study
Quality of Life, Safety and Compliance of Patients Using Monotherapy or Combinatorial Therapy With Quetiapine for Treatment of Schizophrenia or Bipolar Affective Disorder
Schizophrenia, Bipolar Affective Disorder
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Antipsychotics on Brain Insulin Action in Females
Insulin Resistance, Menstrual Cycle
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Thalia Robakis, MD, PhD principal investigator
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Antipsychotics and Pregnancy, run by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Floriana Milazzo, MPH ((212) 659-1326, floriana.milazzo@mssm.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months postpartum). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jun 2026.