Bone Conduction DeafnessNCT06039332
Subjective and Audiological Benefit of BONEBRIDGE (BCI602) With Two Different Fitting Strategies
A study testing Fitting of the audioprocessor with the auditory implant BCI602 in people with Bone Conduction Deafness and Quality of Life, run by Hospital Universitario La Paz at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
The Bonebridge (BB) is a partially implantable active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing system manufactured by MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte Gesellschaft m.b.H. (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria). The BB augments hearing by providing acoustic input to the inner ear via bone conduction. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Bone Conduction Deafness, Quality of Life, Hearing Loss, Mixed
- What is being tested?
- Fitting of the audioprocessor with the auditory implant BCI602
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 27 Jun 2023to 27 Jun 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years of age or older
- Unilateral and/or bilateral conductive or mixed hearing loss (CHL/MHL) in indication range.
- Implanted with a BCI602 device.
- Willingness and ability to use the hearing system and to perform all tests required for the study
- Signed, and dated informed consent before the start of any study specific procedure
- Native speaker
Who cannot join
- Profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss, often termed Single sided deafness (SSD)
- Retrocochlear, or central auditory disorders
- Any physical, psychological, or emotional disorder that would interfere with the ability to perform on test and rehabilitation procedures
- Subjects who do not meet one or more of the above mentioned inclusion criteria are excluded from the study.
- Fluctuating hearing loss.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, 28046
Javier Gavilán, +34917270000, javier.gavilan@salud.madrid.org
About this study
The Bonebridge (BB) is a partially implantable active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing system manufactured by MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte Gesellschaft m.b.H. (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria).
The BB augments hearing by providing acoustic input to the inner ear via bone conduction.
Read more
In 2017 Hodgetts \& Scollie introduced a new fitting algorithm called DSL-BCD. The DSL-BCD algorithm was developed especially for the characteristics of bone conduction devices (BCD). If there is a benefit on the patient level in hearing outcomes when comparing the application of DSL-BCD in comparison to DSL v5 when using the BB, was not yet investigated.
The aim of this clinical study is to show the improvement in audiological performance and subjective satisfaction with the BCI602 and SAMBA 2 audio processor in patients with conductive hearing loss compared to the unaided condition and to evaluate performance differences through application of 2 different fitting algorithms, namely DSL v5 and DSL-BCD.
Read the detailed description
- The objective of this study was to verify the influence of different fitting procedures
- Duration of investigation: Unexperienced users group: Each subject will be actively involved in the study for a period of 4-6 weeks after the first fitting of the audio-processor, 4 visits in total. Experienced users group: Each subject implanted for at least 3 months will be asked to be involved in the study the day of their following scheduled fitting, 1 visit in total. We expect the study to conclude within 3 years for study start.
- Study design: The study is designed as a prospective two-period crossover, single-subject repeated-measures. It is intended to compare the performance with and without BB system in two fitting-configurations (A: DSL v5, B: DSL-BCD) using audiometric and subjective measures. For evaluation each subject serves as his/her own control. For experienced users only acute tests in condition A and B (order randomised, sequence AB or BA) will take place. For unexperienced users the period with each condition will be 2 to 3 weeks. From the clinical perspective no specific washout period between fitting A and B is needed to avoid a carryover effect. Heterogeneity and variability inherent to the population and their outcome measures will be recognized. By using a single-subject design, the effect of variability is minimized. The use of standardized evaluation methods assures the reliability of the data across investigational center.
- Randomisation: To eliminate the sequence effect, we performed a block randomisation to ensure that the number of patients in each sequence (fitting with configuration A or B) is similar throughout the study.
- Inclusion criteria:
- 18 years of age or older
- Unilateral and/or bilateral CHL/MHL in the device indication range
- Implanted with a BCI602 device
- Willingness and ability to use the hearing system and to perform all tests required for the study
- Signed, and dated informed consent before the start of any study specific procedure
- Native speaker 5.1. Exclusion criteria: A patient with/is
- Profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss, often termed Single Sided deafness (SSD)
- retrocochlear, or central auditory disorders
- any physical, psychological, or emotional disorder that would interfere with the ability to perform on test and rehabilitation procedures
- fluctuating hearing loss
- subjects who do not meet one or more of the above mentioned inclusion criteria are excluded from the study
- Fitting:
Fitting condition A: Fitted on study audioprocessor: DSL v5, Acclimatization Level - 100%, First Fit Fitting condition B: Fitted on study audioprocessor: simulated DSL-BCD, simulated on the basis of DSLv5 with adjustments to reach the DSL-BCD Only used in the experienced user group: Fitting condition C: Patients own fitting, with adjustments for best fit, fitted on patients own audioprocessor
- Study procedure:
Test intervals Prospective design: Subjects will be evaluated in four intervals.
- st Session The first session takes place before surgery.
- nd Session The 2nd session will take place at activation of the Bonebridge hearing system.
- rd Session The 3rd session will take place after 2-3 weeks using the Bonebridge in the first fitting condition.
- th Session The 4th session will take place after 2-3 weeks using the Bonebridge in the second fitting condition.
Retrospective design: Subjects will be evaluated in one interval.
- st Session The only session takes place the day of the next scheduled fitting (at least 3 months later their first fitting). Patient will be evaluated with their current fitting (DSL v5), and the new fitting condition (DSL-BCD). The 1st session comprises the following tests:
- unaided: Speech and Spatial Questionnaire (SSQ12) / Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB)
- Air conduction/Bone conduction under headphone, bilaterally
- Sound field tone audiometry with warble tone in unaided condition
- Sound field speech in quiet testin unaided condition
- Sound field speech in noise in unaided condition The 2nd session (acute measurements) comprises the following tests:
- BC threshold measurement, bilaterally
- Sound field tone audiometry with warble tone in aided condition, condition A \& B*
- Sound field speech in quiet test in aided condition, condition A \& B*
- Sound field speech in noise in aided condition, condition A \& B*
- Preference A or B questionnaire
- SAMBA 2 will be handed out with the fitting condition according to the randomization plan * If the randomization plan provides the patient with fitting condition B for the first 2-3 weeks, then condition B will be measured first in all acute sound field measurements at visit 2. The 3rd session (after 2-3 weeks of use) comprises the following tests:
- Optional: BC threshold measurement, bilaterally
- Aided: questionnaires SSQ12 / APHAB
- Wearing time will be noted
- Sound field tone audiometry with warble tone in aided condition , unaided \& condition A*
- Sound field speech in quiet test in aided condition, unaided \& condition A*
- Sound field speech in noise in aided condition, unaided \& condition A*
- SAMBA 2 will be handed out with the fitting condition according to the randomization plan The 4th session (after another 2-3 weeks of use) comprises the following tests:
- Aided: questionnaires SSQ12 / APHAB
- Wearing time will be noted
- Sound field tone audiometry with warble tone in aided condition, condition B* \& acute in condition A
- Sound field speech in quiet test in aided condition, condition B* \& acute in condition A
- Sound field speech in noise in aided condition, condition B* \& acute in condition A
- Preference A or B questionnaire
- Release of the patient from the study followed by personalized fitting of BB for the patient
- Data Management: The data manager will have the following duties and assure: Data anonymity, data management and reporting of data capture, follow conclusions set out in the study protocol and can be reliably drawn from the database. Concerns are identified and reported accurately. Creates a database, validates a database, documents data received. Performs database entry and processing, validation of entered data, data entry errors, and operates database security. Available data from patients who dropped out of the study at a certain time point or who are lost to follow-up will be used for analysis. Source data will be verified by the investigator. Data of participants will be pseudonymised for data handling and analysis and anonymised for publication.
- Statistical Analysis Descriptive statistics: To be used to report demographic (e.g. age and gender) and baseline characteristics (e.g. aetiologies). Quantitative data will be presented as mean, standard deviation and range (minimum and maximum); qualitative data as in questionnaires will be presented as absolute and relative frequencies and if appropriate as graphs. Parametric Student's t-tests or nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank tests will be performed, depending on the data distribution. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test will be used to check for data distribution.Two-period crossover data analysis: General Linear Models with "time" (visit 3 vs. visit 4) and "treatment" (fitting A vs. fitting B) as fixed factors will be used to analyze the time-by-treatment interaction for each tested hearing outcomes. Additionally, to verify the assumption that there is no sequence effect, the mean of the dependent variables (e.g. speech test outcomes, sound field thresholds) will be compared between the AB (difference between B and A) and BA (difference between A and B) sequences.
Handling of missing data: Missing data will not be replaced but treated as "missing" values. Statistical significance will be set to p<0.05. SPSS software will be used for all analyses. Graphs will be created in Microsoft Office Excel.
- Being tested
- Fitting of the audioprocessor with the auditory implant BCI602
- Medical subject headings
- Hearing Loss, Mixed Conductive-Sensorineural
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fitting of the audioprocessor with the auditory implant BCI602Procedure or surgery
to compare the performance with BB system in two fitting-configurations (active comparator: DSL v5, experimental: DSL-BCD) using audiometric and subjective measures
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Fittig with DSL-BCD | Experimental | The new way of fitting the audioprocessor Receives: Procedure: Fitting of the audioprocessor with the auditory implant BCI602 |
| Fitting with DSL v5 | Active comparator | The way of fitting the audioprocessor until now Receives: Procedure: Fitting of the audioprocessor with the auditory implant BCI602 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Audiological performance with both ways of fitting
Standard audiometry Sound field testing will be conducted in quiet with the subject sitting one meter from the loudspeakers. The volume control of the device shall be set at the most comfortable level for the sound field tests.
Measured: 12 weeks
Speech performance in quiet with both ways of fitting
Speech audiometry in quiet The word recognition score will be measured in quiet. The test in quiet shall be conducted with the speaker at 0° azimuth (S0) with 1 meter distance from the center of the subject's head and at ear level.
Spanish speech material (recorded): Cardenas and Marrero balanced word list. 100% will be considered as the maximum outcome
Measured: 12 weeks
Speech performance in noise with both ways of fitting
Speech audiometry in noise For measuring speech intelligibility in noise the International Matrix Test is used with fixed noise level at 65 dB SPL and speech level at 65 dB SPL from S0N0 (speech and noise coming from the front). One list comprises 20 sentences with 5 words in each sentence. A negative value means, better performance
Measured: 12 weeks
Subjective satisfaction measured with SSQ12
Questionnaires
A hearing specific questionnaire will be filled out per participant, in 3 conditions, unaided (preoperatively), aided with BB in fitting condition A and aided with Bonebridge in fitting condition B.
The Spanish version of Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Questionnaire with 12 items (SSQ12) will be used. It is designed to measure self-reported auditory disability across a wide variety of domains, reflecting the reality of hearing in the everyday world. It takes approximately 5 minutes to complete. It consists of 12 questions that the subjects score on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (perfectly). The total score is the sum of all items and can range between 0 and 120. The higher score, the better outcomes.
Measured: 12 weeks
Subjective satisfaction evaluated by means of APHAB
Questionnaires A hearing specific questionnaire will be filled out per participant, in 3 conditions, unaided (preoperatively), aided with BB in fitting condition A and aided with Bonebridge in fitting condition B.
The Spanish version the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) will be used.
It is a 24-item questionnaire derived from the original 66-item Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit. The self-assessment instrument evaluates hearing impairment in real-life situations with and without hearing aids. Participants have to rate how often a given statement is true in their daily life, based on the following seven response alternatives: always (99%), almost always (87%), generally (75%), half-the-time (50%), occasionally (25%), seldom (12%) and never (1%). In the first three subscales, higher scores suggest less hearing disability, while lower scores indicate less hearing disability in the aversiveness subscale. The APHAB typically requires 10 minutes or less to complete.
Measured: 12 weeks
Subjective satisfaction assessed by a custom made questionnaire
Questionnaires A hearing specific questionnaire will be filled out per participant, in 3 conditions, unaided (preoperatively), aided with BB in fitting condition A and aided with Bonebridge in fitting condition B.
A third, custom made questionnaire, will be filled out at two timepoints, after the acute test of condition A \& B in visit 2 and at the last visit. The questionnaire will ask the patient what condition A or B was preferred in visit 2. At the last visit (for the unexperienced users, and in the only visit for the experienced users) the patient will be asked what condition was preferred in several listening scenarios during the trial time.
Measured: 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Sep 2023
- Study start27 Jun 2023
- Primary completion31 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion27 Jun 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Bone Conduction DeafnessStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Universitario La Paz
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GmbH
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Miryam Calvino, Hospital Universitario La Paz
- Investigators
- Javier Gavilan, Study chair, Hospital La Paz
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06039332
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PI-6471
- Status last verified
- Sep 2023
- First submitted
- 25 Aug 2023
- Last updated
- 15 Sep 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Sep 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Subjective and Audiological Benefit of BONEBRIDGE (BCI602) With Two Different Fitting Strategies
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06039332
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PI-6471
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Universitario La PazUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GmbH
- Study start
- 27 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 27 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The Bonebridge (BB) is a partially implantable active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing system manufactured by MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte Gesellschaft m.b.H. (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria).
The BB augments hearing by providing acoustic input to the inner ear via bone conduction.
In 2017 Hodgetts \& Scollie introduced a new fitting algorithm called DSL-BCD. The DSL-BCD algorithm was developed especially for the characteristics of bone conduction devices (BCD). If there is a benefit on the patient level in hearing outcomes when comparing the application of DSL-BCD in comparison to DSL v5 when using the BB, was not yet investigated.
The aim of this clinical study is to show the improvement in audiological performance and subjective satisfaction with the BCI602 and SAMBA 2 audio processor in patients with conductive hearing loss compared to the unaided condition and to evaluate performance differences through application of 2 different fitting algorithms, namely DSL v5 and DSL-BCD.
Detailed description
- The objective of this study was to verify the influence of different fitting procedures
- Duration of investigation: Unexperienced users group: Each subject will be actively involved in the study for a period of 4-6 weeks after the first fitting of the audio-processor, 4 visits in total. Experienced users group: Each subject implanted for at least 3 months will be asked to be involved in the study the day of their following scheduled fitting, 1 visit in total. We expect the study to conclude within 3 years for study start.
- Study design: The study is designed as a prospective two-period crossover, single-subject repeated-measures. It is intended to compare the performance with and without BB system in two fitting-configurations (A: DSL v5, B: DSL-BCD) using audiometric and subjective measures. For evaluation each subject serves as his/her own control. For experienced users only acute tests in condition A and B (order randomised, sequence AB or BA) will take place. For unexperienced users the period with each condition will be 2 to 3 weeks. From the clinical perspective no specific washout period between fitting A and B is needed to avoid a carryover effect. Heterogeneity and variability inherent to the population and their outcome measures will be recognized. By using a single-subject design, the effect of variability is minimized. The use of standardized evaluation methods assures the reliability of the data across investigational center.
- Randomisation: To eliminate the sequence effect, we performed a block randomisation to ensure that the number of patients in each sequence (fitting with configuration A or B) is similar throughout the study.
- Inclusion criteria:
- 18 years of age or older
- Unilateral and/or bilateral CHL/MHL in the device indication range
- Implanted with a BCI602 device
- Willingness and ability to use the hearing system and to perform all tests required for the study
- Signed, and dated informed consent before the start of any study specific procedure
- Native speaker 5.1. Exclusion criteria: A patient with/is
- Profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss, often termed Single Sided deafness (SSD)
- retrocochlear, or central auditory disorders
- any physical, psychological, or emotional disorder that would interfere with the ability to perform on test and rehabilitation procedures
- fluctuating hearing loss
- subjects who do not meet one or more of the above mentioned inclusion criteria are excluded from the study
- Fitting:
Fitting condition A: Fitted on study audioprocessor: DSL v5, Acclimatization Level - 100%, First Fit Fitting condition B: Fitted on study audioprocessor: simulated DSL-BCD, simulated on the basis of DSLv5 with adjustments to reach the DSL-BCD Only used in the experienced user group: Fitting condition C: Patients own fitting, with adjustments for best fit, fitted on patients own audioprocessor
- Study procedure:
Test intervals Prospective design: Subjects will be evaluated in four intervals.
- st Session The first session takes place before surgery.
- nd Session The 2nd session will take place at activation of the Bonebridge hearing system.
- rd Session The 3rd session will take place after 2-3 weeks using the Bonebridge in the first fitting condition.
- th Session The 4th session will take place after 2-3 weeks using the Bonebridge in the second fitting condition.
Retrospective design: Subjects will be evaluated in one interval.
- st Session The only session takes place the day of the next scheduled fitting (at least 3 months later their first fitting). Patient will be evaluated with their current fitting (DSL v5), and the new fitting condition (DSL-BCD). The 1st session comprises the following tests:
- unaided: Speech and Spatial Questionnaire (SSQ12) / Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB)
- Air conduction/Bone conduction under headphone, bilaterally
- Sound field tone audiometry with warble tone in unaided condition
- Sound field speech in quiet testin unaided condition
- Sound field speech in noise in unaided condition The 2nd session (acute measurements) comprises the following tests:
- BC threshold measurement, bilaterally
- Sound field tone audiometry with warble tone in aided condition, condition A \& B*
- Sound field speech in quiet test in aided condition, condition A \& B*
- Sound field speech in noise in aided condition, condition A \& B*
- Preference A or B questionnaire
- SAMBA 2 will be handed out with the fitting condition according to the randomization plan * If the randomization plan provides the patient with fitting condition B for the first 2-3 weeks, then condition B will be measured first in all acute sound field measurements at visit 2. The 3rd session (after 2-3 weeks of use) comprises the following tests:
- Optional: BC threshold measurement, bilaterally
- Aided: questionnaires SSQ12 / APHAB
- Wearing time will be noted
- Sound field tone audiometry with warble tone in aided condition , unaided \& condition A*
- Sound field speech in quiet test in aided condition, unaided \& condition A*
- Sound field speech in noise in aided condition, unaided \& condition A*
- SAMBA 2 will be handed out with the fitting condition according to the randomization plan The 4th session (after another 2-3 weeks of use) comprises the following tests:
- Aided: questionnaires SSQ12 / APHAB
- Wearing time will be noted
- Sound field tone audiometry with warble tone in aided condition, condition B* \& acute in condition A
- Sound field speech in quiet test in aided condition, condition B* \& acute in condition A
- Sound field speech in noise in aided condition, condition B* \& acute in condition A
- Preference A or B questionnaire
- Release of the patient from the study followed by personalized fitting of BB for the patient
- Data Management: The data manager will have the following duties and assure: Data anonymity, data management and reporting of data capture, follow conclusions set out in the study protocol and can be reliably drawn from the database. Concerns are identified and reported accurately. Creates a database, validates a database, documents data received. Performs database entry and processing, validation of entered data, data entry errors, and operates database security. Available data from patients who dropped out of the study at a certain time point or who are lost to follow-up will be used for analysis. Source data will be verified by the investigator. Data of participants will be pseudonymised for data handling and analysis and anonymised for publication.
- Statistical Analysis Descriptive statistics: To be used to report demographic (e.g. age and gender) and baseline characteristics (e.g. aetiologies). Quantitative data will be presented as mean, standard deviation and range (minimum and maximum); qualitative data as in questionnaires will be presented as absolute and relative frequencies and if appropriate as graphs. Parametric Student's t-tests or nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank tests will be performed, depending on the data distribution. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test will be used to check for data distribution.Two-period crossover data analysis: General Linear Models with "time" (visit 3 vs. visit 4) and "treatment" (fitting A vs. fitting B) as fixed factors will be used to analyze the time-by-treatment interaction for each tested hearing outcomes. Additionally, to verify the assumption that there is no sequence effect, the mean of the dependent variables (e.g. speech test outcomes, sound field thresholds) will be compared between the AB (difference between B and A) and BA (difference between A and B) sequences.
Handling of missing data: Missing data will not be replaced but treated as "missing" values. Statistical significance will be set to p<0.05. SPSS software will be used for all analyses. Graphs will be created in Microsoft Office Excel.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Fittig with DSL-BCD | Experimental | Procedure: Fitting of the audioprocessor with the auditory implant BCI602The new way of fitting the audioprocessor |
| Fitting with DSL v5 | Active comparator | Procedure: Fitting of the audioprocessor with the auditory implant BCI602The way of fitting the audioprocessor until now |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- 18 years of age or older
- Unilateral and/or bilateral conductive or mixed hearing loss (CHL/MHL) in indication range.
- Implanted with a BCI602 device.
- Willingness and ability to use the hearing system and to perform all tests required for the study
- Signed, and dated informed consent before the start of any study specific procedure
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss, often termed Single sided deafness (SSD)
- Retrocochlear, or central auditory disorders
- Any physical, psychological, or emotional disorder that would interfere with the ability to perform on test and rehabilitation procedures
- Subjects who do not meet one or more of the above mentioned inclusion criteria are excluded from the study.
- Fluctuating hearing loss.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fitting of the audioprocessor with the auditory implant BCI602to compare the performance with BB system in two fitting-configurations (active comparator: DSL v5, experimental: DSL-BCD) using audiometric and subjective measures | Procedure or surgery | Fittig with DSL-BCD, Fitting with DSL v5 |
Primary outcome
Audiological performance with both ways of fitting
Time frame: 12 weeks
Standard audiometry Sound field testing will be conducted in quiet with the subject sitting one meter from the loudspeakers. The volume control of the device shall be set at the most comfortable level for the sound field tests.
Speech performance in quiet with both ways of fitting
Time frame: 12 weeks
Speech audiometry in quiet The word recognition score will be measured in quiet. The test in quiet shall be conducted with the speaker at 0° azimuth (S0) with 1 meter distance from the center of the subject's head and at ear level. Spanish speech material (recorded): Cardenas and Marrero balanced word list. 100% will be considered as the maximum outcome
Speech performance in noise with both ways of fitting
Time frame: 12 weeks
Speech audiometry in noise For measuring speech intelligibility in noise the International Matrix Test is used with fixed noise level at 65 dB SPL and speech level at 65 dB SPL from S0N0 (speech and noise coming from the front). One list comprises 20 sentences with 5 words in each sentence. A negative value means, better performance
Subjective satisfaction measured with SSQ12
Time frame: 12 weeks
Questionnaires A hearing specific questionnaire will be filled out per participant, in 3 conditions, unaided (preoperatively), aided with BB in fitting condition A and aided with Bonebridge in fitting condition B. The Spanish version of Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Questionnaire with 12 items (SSQ12) will be used. It is designed to measure self-reported auditory disability across a wide variety of domains, reflecting the reality of hearing in the everyday world. It takes approximately 5 minutes to complete. It consists of 12 questions that the subjects score on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (perfectly). The total score is the sum of all items and can range between 0 and 120. The higher score, the better outcomes.
Subjective satisfaction evaluated by means of APHAB
Time frame: 12 weeks
Questionnaires A hearing specific questionnaire will be filled out per participant, in 3 conditions, unaided (preoperatively), aided with BB in fitting condition A and aided with Bonebridge in fitting condition B. The Spanish version the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) will be used. It is a 24-item questionnaire derived from the original 66-item Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit. The self-assessment instrument evaluates hearing impairment in real-life situations with and without hearing aids. Participants have to rate how often a given statement is true in their daily life, based on the following seven response alternatives: always (99%), almost always (87%), generally (75%), half-the-time (50%), occasionally (25%), seldom (12%) and never (1%). In the first three subscales, higher scores suggest less hearing disability, while lower scores indicate less hearing disability in the aversiveness subscale. The APHAB typically requires 10 minutes or less to complete.
Subjective satisfaction assessed by a custom made questionnaire
Time frame: 12 weeks
Questionnaires A hearing specific questionnaire will be filled out per participant, in 3 conditions, unaided (preoperatively), aided with BB in fitting condition A and aided with Bonebridge in fitting condition B. A third, custom made questionnaire, will be filled out at two timepoints, after the acute test of condition A \& B in visit 2 and at the last visit. The questionnaire will ask the patient what condition A or B was preferred in visit 2. At the last visit (for the unexperienced users, and in the only visit for the experienced users) the patient will be asked what condition was preferred in several listening scenarios during the trial time.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Sep 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Bone Conduction Deafness
Not yet recruiting
Outcomes of Cartilage Tympanoplasty in Children
Tympanic Membrane Perforation, Conductive Hearing Loss
Recruiting
Post-market Evaluation of the Transition From the Baha Connect System to the Osia System in Adult Bone Conduction Implant Recipients
Bone Conduction, Hearing Loss, Conductive
Active, not recruiting
Pediatric Expansion Study of the Sentio System
Hearing Loss, Conductive, Hearing Loss, Mixed
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Early Check: Expanded Screening in Newborns
Spinal Muscular Atrophy, Fragile X Syndrome
Not yet recruiting
Comparative Study of Non-surgical Hearing Devices Based on Bone Conduction
Mixed Hearing Loss, Conductive Hearing Loss
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Javier Gavilan study chair
Hospital La Paz
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Fitting of the audioprocessor with the auditory implant BCI602 in people with Bone Conduction Deafness and Quality of Life, run by Hospital Universitario La Paz at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Javier Gavilan (+34917270000, javier.gavilan@salud.madrid.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Audiological performance with both ways of fitting (time frame: 12 weeks). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Sep 2023.