Moderate Plaque PsoriasisPhase 3SPECTREMNCT06039189
Study of Guselkumab Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Low Body Surface Area Moderate Plaque Psoriasis
A Phase 3 study testing Guselkumab in people with Moderate Plaque Psoriasis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 64 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab compared to an inactive drug in participants with low body surface area moderate plaque psoriasis and special site involvement. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Moderate Plaque Psoriasis
- What is being tested?
- Guselkumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 338 participants
- Where
- 64 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 24 Aug 2023to 14 Apr 2025
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All participants must have a diagnosis of plaque psoriasis (with or without psoriatic arthritis) for at least 6 months before first administration of study intervention
- All participants must meet the following disease severity criteria at screening and at baseline: (a) Overall Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) 3 (moderate) plaque psoriasis; (b) Body Surface Area (BSA) 2-15 percent (%) with at least 1 plaque outside of special sites; (c) Involvement of at least 1 special site with at least moderate severity. Qualifying sites include scalp with scalp-specific IGA greater than or equal to (>=) 3, face with facial psoriasis IGA >=3, intertriginous with intertriginous psoriasis IGA >=3, or genital with static physician global assessment of genitalia (sPGA-G) >=3
- All participants be inadequately controlled with or intolerant of at least 1 prior topical therapy (including, but not limited to, corticosteroids, retinoids, vitamin D, or vitamin D/steroid and retinoid/steroid combinations, tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, anthralin/dithranol, coal tar preparations, tapinarof, roflumilast, etcetera) for the treatment of psoriasis at both screening
- All participants be a candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment for psoriasis
Who cannot join
- Has a nonplaque form of psoriasis (example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular) at screening or randomization
- Has current drug-induced psoriasis (for example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium)
- For participants with palmoplantar involvement, confounding diagnoses, including, but not limited, to palmoplantar pustulosis, eczematous dermatitis, contact/irritant dermatitis, acquired keratoderma, etcetera, should be confirmed and excluded
- Participants will not be eligible if they have ever received prior biologic (or biosimilars of) for the treatment of psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA), or any other indications that could impact the assessment of psoriasis. Prior biologics (or biosimilars of) may include, but not limited to, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-inhibitors (for example: adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, or certolizumab or biosimilars), interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors (for example: secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, or bimekizumab), and IL-12/23 inhibitors (for example: ustekinumab), or IL-23 inhibitor (for example: guselkumab, risankizumab or tildrakizumab)
- Has a history of chronic or recurrent infectious disease, including, but not limited to, chronic renal infection, chronic chest infection (for example, bronchiectasis), recurrent urinary tract infection (recurrent pyelonephritis or chronic non-remitting cystitis), fungal infection (mucocutaneous candidiasis), or open, draining, or infected skin wounds or ulcers
Trial locations and contacts
64 sites in 2 countries.
64 sites in 2 countries
United States45 sites
Arlington Center for Dermatology
Arlington, Texas, 76011
Atlanta Biomedical Clinical Research
Atlanta, Georgia, 303331
Bellair Dermatology
Bellaire, Texas, 77401
Bexley dermatology research
Bexley, Ohio, 43209
Total Dermatology
Birmingham, Alabama, 35203
Cahaba Research Inc
Birmingham, Alabama, 35244
TrueBlue Clinical Research
Brandon, Florida, 33511
Metro Boston Clinical Partners
Brighton, Massachusetts, 02135
Accellacare Research of Cary
Cary, North Carolina, 27511
Dermatology and Laser Center of Charleston
Charleston, South Carolina, 29414
Darst Dermatology
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28277
Kindred Hair and Skin Center
Columbia, Maryland, 21045
Remington Davis Inc
Columbus, Ohio, 43215
Florida Academic Dermatology Centers
Coral Gables, Florida, 33134
Modern Research Associates PLLC
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Bare Dermatology
Dallas, Texas, 75235
Menter Dermatology Research Institute
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Revival Research
Doral, Florida, 33122
California Dermatology & Clinical Research Institute
Encinitas, California, 92024
University of Conn Health Center
Farmington, Connecticut, 06030
Palmetto Clinical Trial Services, LLC
Fountain Inn, South Carolina, 29644
First OC Dermatology
Fountain Valley, California, 92708
Center for Clinical Studies
Houston, Texas, 77004
Suzanne Bruce and Associates - The Center for Skin Research
Houston, Texas, 77056-4132
Piedmont Plastic Surgery and Dermatology
Huntersville, North Carolina, 28078
Glick Research Institute
Margate, Florida, 33063
Apex Dermatology Mayfield Heights
Mayfield Heights, Ohio, 44124
Miami VA Healthcare System
Miami, Florida, 33124
Frontier Derm Partners CRO, LLC
Mill Creek, Washington, 98102
Nashville Skin: Comprehensive Dermatology Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37212
Tennessee Clinical Research Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37215
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, 10003
Markowitz Medical OptiSkin
New York, New York, 10128
Tory P Sullivan M D PA
North Miami Beach, Florida, 33162
DermCare, LLC
Quincy, Massachusetts, 02169
Practice Wang
Riverside, California, 92505
DermAssociates, PC
Rockville, Maryland, 20850
Lawrence J Green MD LLC
Rockville, Maryland, 20850
Texas Dermatology and Laser Specialists
San Antonio, Texas, 78218
Progressive Clinical Research
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Therapeutics Clinical Research
San Diego, California, 92123
Rehlen, Bartlow, Goodman and Baron Dermatology Group
Santa Ana, California, 92701
Clinical Science Institute
Santa Monica, California, 90404
Acclaim Dermatology
Sugar Land, Texas, 77479
Henry Ford Medical Center
West Bloomfield, Michigan, 48322
Canada19 sites
CCA Medical Research Corporation
Ajax, Ontario, L1S7K8
SimcoDerm Medical and Surgical Dermatology Centre
Barrie, Ontario, L4M 7G1
Beacon Dermatology
Calgary, Alberta, T3E 0B2
Rejuvenation Dermatology Clinic Edmonton Downtown
Edmonton, Alberta, T5J 3S9
Brunswick Dermatology Center
Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 1G9
Dermatrials Research
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 1Y2
Dr Wei Jing Loo Medicine Professional Corporation
London, Ontario, N6H 5L5
North York Research Inc
North York, Ontario, M2M 4J5
JRB Research Inc
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 7X3
The Centre de recherche Saint-Louis
Québec, Quebec, G1W 4R4
Dr. Chih ho Hong Medical
Surrey, British Columbia, V3R 6A7
Enverus Medical
Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 0C6
Canadian Dermatology Center
Toronto, Ontario, M3B 0A7
Toronto Research Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M3H 5Y8
FACET Dermatology
Toronto, Ontario, M4E 2Y9
Research Toronto
Toronto, Ontario, M4W 2N2
K. Papp Clinical Research Inc.
Waterloo, Ontario, N2J 1C4
Winnipeg Clinic
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3C 0N2
Wiseman Dermatology Research Inc.
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3M 3Z4
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3b, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Guselkumab Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Low Body Surface Area (BSA) Moderate Plaque Psoriasis With Special Site Involvement
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab compared to an inactive drug in participants with low body surface area moderate plaque psoriasis and special site involvement.
- Conditions
- Moderate Plaque Psoriasis
- Being tested
- Guselkumab, Placebo
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GuselkumabDrug
Also called CNTO1959, Tremfya
Guselkumab will be administered as subcutaneous injection.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo will be administered as subcutaneous injection.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1: Guselkumab | Experimental | Participants will receive guselkumab by subcutaneous injection with placebo as needed to maintain the blind. Receives: Drug: Guselkumab; Drug: Placebo |
| Group 2: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants will receive placebo by subcutaneous injection then receive guselkumab by subcutaneous injection. Receives: Drug: Guselkumab; Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16
The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 millimeters (mm); 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, greater than (>) 1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Higher score indicated more severe disease.
Measured: Week 16
Secondary outcomes (14)
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16
Percent change from baseline in BSA at Week 16 was reported. A BSA was commonly used measure of severity of skin disease. It was defined as the percentage of surface area of the body involved with the condition being assessed, (that is, plaque psoriasis). BSA was assessed using hand print method where the surface area of the participant's hand including the palm and all 5 digits was used as a guide to estimate 1 percent (%) BSA. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) Total Score at Week 16
Percent change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 16
The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, greater than (>) 1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Higher score indicated more severe disease.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 Response at Week 16
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI 90 score (greater than or equal to [>=] 90% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 Response at Week 16
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-100 score (100% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scalp Specific (ss)-IGA Score of Absence of Disease (0) or Very Mild Disease (1) at Week 16 Among Randomized Participants With Ss-IGA Score >=3 at Baseline
The ss-IGA instrument was used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions were assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness which was scored as: absence of disease = 0, very mild disease = 1, mild disease = 2, moderate disease = 3, and severe disease = 4. A higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Static Physician's Global Assessment of Genitalia (sPGA-G) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Randomized Participants With sPGA-G Score >=3 at Baseline
The sPGA-G was a 6-point scale to assess the severity of genital psoriasis at a given time point. The sPGA-G evaluates erythema, plaque elevation, and scale of genital psoriatic lesions. The severity of genital psoriasis was assessed as clear (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), severe (4), and very severe (5). Higher score indicates more severity. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Intertriginous IGA (i-IGA) Score of Clear (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16 Among Randomized Participants With an i-IGA Score >=3 at Baseline
The IGA used for the full body assessment was adapted with descriptions of disease features that were more consistent with intertriginous psoriasis presentation. The intertriginous areas assessed included the axillary, sub mammary, abdominal fold, inguinal, and intergluteal cleft/peri-anal region (distinct from genital/perineum involvement). The i-IGA was 5-point scale evaluating the severity of plaque psoriasis in the intertriginous area with scores defined as clear (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), and severe (4). A higher score indicated greater disease severity. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Facial IGA (f-IGA) Score of Clear (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16 Among Randomized Participants With f-IGA Score >=3 at Baseline
The standard IGA used for full body evaluation was adapted for assessment of psoriasis on the face only. The f-IGA used a 5-point scale to assess overall facial disease severity, defined as clear (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), and severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe facial psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Symptom and Sign Diary (PSSD) Total Symptom Score at Week 16
The PSSD was a patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. 7-day recall version was used. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the weekly symptom score when at least 3 items (>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales were answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that symptom score = average value*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in PSSD Itch Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a PSSD Itch Score >=4 at Baseline
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 7-day recall version was used. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms(itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. PSSD itch item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly itch score, ranging from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating severe disease. Baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Individual Symptom Scale Score=0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a PSSD Symptom Score >0 at Baseline
The PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. 7-day recall version was used. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the weekly symptom score when at least 3 items (>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales are answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that symptom score = average value*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. TEAE was defined as any event that occurred after the start of initial study agent administration and those AEs that were presented at baseline but worsened in severity after the start of initial study agent administration.
Measured: Group 1: Placebo: From Week 0 to Week 16; Group 1: Placebo followed by Guselkumab 100 mg: From Week 16 to Week 56; Group 2: Guselkumab 100 mg: From Week 0 to Week 56
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. Serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE was defined as any event that occurred after the start of initial study agent administration and those AEs that were presented at baseline but worsened in severity after the start of initial study agent administration.
Measured: Group 1: Placebo: From Week 0 to Week 16; Group 1: Placebo followed by Guselkumab 100 mg: From Week 16 to Week 56; Group 2: Guselkumab 100 mg: From Week 0 to Week 56
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Sep 2023
- Study start24 Aug 2023
- Primary completion14 Apr 2025
- Study completion14 Apr 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Moderate Plaque PsoriasisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Janssen Research & Development, LLCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 338 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Study director, Janssen Research & Development, LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06039189
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR109328
- Other IDs
- CNTO1959PSO3017
- Acronym
- SPECTREM
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 9 Sep 2023
- Last updated
- 1 May 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson \& Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3b, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Guselkumab Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Low Body Surface Area (BSA) Moderate Plaque Psoriasis With Special Site Involvement
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06039189
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SPECTREM / CR109328
- Conditions
- Moderate Plaque Psoriasis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 338 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 24 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 Apr 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 1 May 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab compared to an inactive drug in participants with low body surface area moderate plaque psoriasis and special site involvement.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1: Guselkumab | Experimental | Drug: Guselkumab, Drug: PlaceboParticipants will receive guselkumab by subcutaneous injection with placebo as needed to maintain the blind. |
| Group 2: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Guselkumab, Drug: PlaceboParticipants will receive placebo by subcutaneous injection then receive guselkumab by subcutaneous injection. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- All participants must have a diagnosis of plaque psoriasis (with or without psoriatic arthritis) for at least 6 months before first administration of study intervention
- All participants must meet the following disease severity criteria at screening and at baseline: (a) Overall Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) 3 (moderate) plaque psoriasis; (b) Body Surface Area (BSA) 2-15 percent (%) with at least 1 plaque outside of special sites; (c) Involvement of at least 1 special site with at least moderate severity. Qualifying sites include scalp with scalp-specific IGA greater than or equal to (>=) 3, face with facial psoriasis IGA >=3, intertriginous with intertriginous psoriasis IGA >=3, or genital with static physician global assessment of genitalia (sPGA-G) >=3
- All participants be inadequately controlled with or intolerant of at least 1 prior topical therapy (including, but not limited to, corticosteroids, retinoids, vitamin D, or vitamin D/steroid and retinoid/steroid combinations, tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, anthralin/dithranol, coal tar preparations, tapinarof, roflumilast, etcetera) for the treatment of psoriasis at both screening
- All participants be a candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment for psoriasis
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Has a nonplaque form of psoriasis (example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular) at screening or randomization
- Has current drug-induced psoriasis (for example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium)
- For participants with palmoplantar involvement, confounding diagnoses, including, but not limited, to palmoplantar pustulosis, eczematous dermatitis, contact/irritant dermatitis, acquired keratoderma, etcetera, should be confirmed and excluded
- Participants will not be eligible if they have ever received prior biologic (or biosimilars of) for the treatment of psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA), or any other indications that could impact the assessment of psoriasis. Prior biologics (or biosimilars of) may include, but not limited to, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-inhibitors (for example: adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, or certolizumab or biosimilars), interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors (for example: secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, or bimekizumab), and IL-12/23 inhibitors (for example: ustekinumab), or IL-23 inhibitor (for example: guselkumab, risankizumab or tildrakizumab)
- Has a history of chronic or recurrent infectious disease, including, but not limited to, chronic renal infection, chronic chest infection (for example, bronchiectasis), recurrent urinary tract infection (recurrent pyelonephritis or chronic non-remitting cystitis), fungal infection (mucocutaneous candidiasis), or open, draining, or infected skin wounds or ulcers
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| GuselkumabAlso: CNTO1959, TremfyaGuselkumab will be administered as subcutaneous injection. | Drug | Group 1: Guselkumab, Group 2: Placebo |
| PlaceboPlacebo will be administered as subcutaneous injection. | Drug | Group 1: Guselkumab, Group 2: Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 millimeters (mm); 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, greater than (>) 1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Higher score indicated more severe disease.
14 secondary outcomes
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) Total Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 Response at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 Response at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scalp Specific (ss)-IGA Score of Absence of Disease (0) or Very Mild Disease (1) at Week 16 Among Randomized Participants With Ss-IGA Score >=3 at Baseline
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Static Physician's Global Assessment of Genitalia (sPGA-G) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Randomized Participants With sPGA-G Score >=3 at Baseline
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Intertriginous IGA (i-IGA) Score of Clear (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16 Among Randomized Participants With an i-IGA Score >=3 at Baseline
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Facial IGA (f-IGA) Score of Clear (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16 Among Randomized Participants With f-IGA Score >=3 at Baseline
Time frame: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Symptom and Sign Diary (PSSD) Total Symptom Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in PSSD Itch Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a PSSD Itch Score >=4 at Baseline
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Individual Symptom Scale Score=0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a PSSD Symptom Score >0 at Baseline
Time frame: Week 16
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame: Group 1: Placebo: From Week 0 to Week 16; Group 1: Placebo followed by Guselkumab 100 mg: From Week 16 to Week 56; Group 2: Guselkumab 100 mg: From Week 0 to Week 56
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
Time frame: Group 1: Placebo: From Week 0 to Week 16; Group 1: Placebo followed by Guselkumab 100 mg: From Week 16 to Week 56; Group 2: Guselkumab 100 mg: From Week 0 to Week 56
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 May 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson \& Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu
Related trials for Moderate Plaque Psoriasis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Dose Ranging Study of ORKA-001 in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis
Plaque Psoriasis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CS32582 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
Plaque Psoriasis
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Zasocitinib in Adults With Non-pustular Palmoplantar Psoriasis
Palmoplantar Psoriasis
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study to Investigate the Effectiveness of Tirzepatide (LY3298176) Following Initiation of Ixekizumab (LY2439821) in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque PsO and Obesity or Overweight in Clinical Practice (TOGETHER AMPLIFY-PsO)
Psoriasis, Overweight or Obesity
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
Plaque Psoriasis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial study director
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
64 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Guselkumab in people with Moderate Plaque Psoriasis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 64 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 64 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 May 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16 (time frame: Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 May 2026.