AzTrials
AzTrials

Stroke, Acute Thrombotic2BE3NCT06034847

Treatment of Persistent Distal Occlusion After Successful Proximal Recanalization in Thrombectomy

A study testing Mechanical thrombectomy in proximal large vessels and Rescue mechanical thrombectomy in distal vessels in people with Stroke, Acute Thrombotic, run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) at 1 site in Canada.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In stroke patients, mechanical thrombectomy is now the standard of care when the stroke is due to large proximal cerebral vessel occlusion. The purpose of the 2BE3 trial is to test whether adjunct rescue treatment of persisting distal occlusions after successful proximal recanalization of the large vessel occlusion… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Stroke, Acute Thrombotic
What is being tested?
Mechanical thrombectomy in proximal large vessels and Rescue mechanical thrombectomy in distal vessels
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Sep 2024to Jan 2029
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • any patient with a large vessel occlusion in the M1 or M2 segment of the MCA (Middle Cerebral Artery), supraclinoid ICA (Internal Carotid Artery), or basilar artery who is a candidate for thrombectomy
  • with a persistent distal occlusion in M2-M4, A1-A5, P1-P5 after successful recanalization of the proximal clot with mechanical thrombectomy and/or IV thrombolysis

Who cannot join

  • poor 3 month prognosis from comorbidities
  • evidence of active bleeding on examination
  • recent surgery with a significant risk of bleeding
  • VKA (Vitamin K Antagonists) oral anticoagulation with INR (International Normalized Ratio) - > 1.7
  • curative heparin or direct oral anticoagulants in previous 48 hours
  • platelet count < 100 000/mm3

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • CHUM - Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal

    Montreal, Quebec, H2X 0A9

Other trials in Canada

About this study

In stroke patients, mechanical thrombectomy is now the standard of care when the stroke is due to large proximal cerebral vessel occlusion. The purpose of the 2BE3 trial is to test whether adjunct rescue treatment of persisting distal occlusions after successful proximal recanalization of the large vessel occlusion can be proposed as an additional intervention to restore reperfusion of affected stroke tissue and improve clinical outcomes.

The rescue therapies will be either mechanical (small stent retrievers and/or small aspiration catheters) or pharmacological (infusion of intra-arterial thrombolytics).

Read more

Patients will be randomized to conservative management (mechanical thrombectomy with or without IV thrombolytics of large proximal vessels) or rescue therapy (mechanical or pharmacological interventions in distal vessels in addition to conservative management). Each patient will be followed for 3 months post-intervention.

The data collected will be clinical assessments and angiographic imaging to evaluate the reperfusion state.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of the 2BE3 trial is to provide a clinical trial context for the use of rescue therapy (mechanical or pharmacological therapies) in patients with persistent distal occlusions after treatment of large vessel occlusions with mechanical thrombectomy and IV thrombolytics. The main hypothesis is that rescue therapy with mechanical or pharmacological therapies, compared with conservative management would result in improved clinical and reperfusion scores at 90 days.

The extent of reperfusion is an interesting therapeutic target because reperfusion status is a strong indicator of clinical outcome: grades of better reperfusion are incrementally associated with better clinical outcomes. Despite increased expertise of neuro-interventional teams and the evolution in thrombectomy devices, incomplete reperfusion occurs in almost half of patients undergoing treatment of large vessel occlusions. Thus, complementary treatments targeting distal occlusions and known as "rescue therapy" have been introduced to reach complete or near complete reperfusion.

The devices and techniques proposed as rescue therapies include small stent retrievers, small aspiration catheters and intra-arterial thrombolytics. Case studies and registries have shown high reperfusion rates and low rates of periprocedural complications; however, there is lack of randomized data to show the impact of rescue therapies on patient outcomes and safety compared to conservative management (treatment of large vessel occlusions only). A randomized clinical trial is therefore needed.

The 2BE3 trial is a simple randomized trial designed to be integrated into daily clinical practice. It will address whether rescue therapies truly offer a safe and more effective alternative to conservative management. Selection criteria are loose in order to be of use to most patients. Endpoints are simple, clinical, meaningful, valuable and resistant to bias. It includes no extra risk or cost of visits beyond what is required in routine care.

The design is multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label study with blinded evaluation (PROBE design). The study population is acute ischemic stroke patients with persistent distal occlusions after treatment of large vessel occlusion with mechanical thrombectomy and/or intravenous thrombolysis. The total number of patients will be 300, 150 in each arm, each followed for 3 months post-intervention.

Being tested
Mechanical thrombectomy in proximal large vessels, Rescue mechanical thrombectomy in distal vessels
Keywords
Large vessel occlusion, Persistent distal occlusion, Mechanical thrombectomy, Intra-arterial thrombolytics
Medical subject headings
Thrombotic Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mechanical thrombectomy in proximal large vesselsDevice

    mechanical thrombectomy with retrievable stents to remove clots in proximal large vessels, combined or not with distal aspiration, combined or not with IV thrombolytics

  • Rescue mechanical thrombectomy in distal vesselsDevice

    In addition to mechanical thrombectomy in proximal large vessels, mechanical thrombectomy in distal vessels with small stent retrievers combined or not with contact aspiration, or intra-arterial perfusion of thrombolytics such as tPA or uPA or tenecpeplase

Study groups in NCT06034847
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Conservative managementActive comparatorMechanical thrombectomy of large vessel occlusions with or without administration of IV thrombolytics
Receives: Device: Mechanical thrombectomy in proximal large vessels
Rescue therapyActive comparatorIn addition to conservative management, rescue therapy in distal occlusions consisting of either mechanical thrombectomy with small stent retrievers with or without contact aspiration, or intra-arterial pharmacotherapy with tPA (tissue Plasminogen Activator), uPA (urokinase Plasminogen Activator) or tenecteplase.
Receives: Device: Mechanical thrombectomy in proximal large vessels; Device: Rescue mechanical thrombectomy in distal vessels

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2. The modified Rankin score goes from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death). Higher scores mean a worse outcome

    proportion of patients with a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2

    Measured: 90 days

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. score on the modified Rankin Scale. The modified Rankin score goes from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death). Higher scores mean a worse outcome

    score on the modified Rankin Scale

    Measured: 90 days

  2. Rate of functional independence

    Functional independence is defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2

    Measured: 90 days

  3. Change in NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Score) score. The scale goes from 0 to 42; higher scores indicated worse outcomes.

    Difference between the NIHSS score at Registration and at 24 hours post-intervention

    Measured: 24 hours

  4. Rate of NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Score) score improvement. The scale goes from 0 to 42; higher scores indicated worse outcomes.

    Rate of decrease of 4 points or more in NIHSS score

    Measured: 24 hours

  5. Rate of improved global ipsilateral hemispheric reperfusion

    blinded assessment of reperfusion on angiogram as measured by the modified TICI (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction) scale. The scale goes from 0 to 3; higher scores indicate better outcomes

    Measured: at end of procedure

  6. Rate of reperfusion

    assessed by the modified TICI (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction) scale on angiogram. The scale goes from 0 to 3; higher scores indicate better outcomes

    Measured: at end of procedure

  7. Rate of complete reperfusion

    a modified TICI (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction) score of 3 on angiogram. The scale goes from 0 to 3; higher scores indicate better outcomes

    Measured: at end of procedure

  8. Procedure time

    elapsed time from arterial puncture to last angiogram

    Measured: at end of procedure

  9. Number of thrombectomy passes

    Number of thrombectomy passes to achieve final reperfusion

    Measured: at end of procedure

  10. Mortality rate

    Rate of mortality

    Measured: 24 hours and 90 days

  11. Rate of procedural complications

    defined as: vascular perforation, arterial dissection, new territory emboli, access site complication requiring surgical repair, subarachnoid hemorrhage

    Measured: at end of procedure

  12. Rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage

    hemorrhage on CT or MRI according to the Heidelberg classification associated with a 4 point or greater worsening on the NIHSS score. The Heidelberg classification goes from 1 to 3d; higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

    Measured: 24 hours

  13. Rate of any intracranial hemorrhage

    hemorrhage on CT or MRI according to the Heidelberg classification. The Heidelberg classification goes from 1 to 3d; higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

    Measured: 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Sep 2023
  2. Study startSep 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion5 Nov 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2029 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Change for a phase II design

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06034847
Sponsor's protocol ID
2024-11741
Acronym
2BE3
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
5 Sep 2023
Last updated
29 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: there is no plan to share individual participant data

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Mechanical thrombectomy in proximal large vessels and Rescue mechanical thrombectomy in distal vessels in people with Stroke, Acute Thrombotic, run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2. The modified Rankin score goes from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death). Higher scores mean a worse outcome (time frame: 90 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in