Chronic Intractable PainNCT06030284
The True Efficacy of Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Intractable Low Back Pain (TRU-BURST)
A study testing BurstDR-SCS in people with Chronic Intractable Pain, run by Abbott Medical Devices at 5 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this prospective, multi-center, randomized, triple-blind, sham-controlled study with parallel economic evaluation is to test the analgesic superiority of BurstDR-SCS compared to sham stimulation using both traditional patient-reported pain outcome measures and objective physiologic data collected from… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Intractable Pain
- What is being tested?
- BurstDR-SCS
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 20 Apr 2023to 1 Jun 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
General Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject must provide written informed consent prior to any clinical investigation-related procedure.
- Subject is at least 18 years of age or older at the time of enrollment.
- Subject is a potential candidate for trial of an Abbott neuromodulation SCS system for chronic intractable pain and is able to engage in the use of wearables and surveys at least 9 days before commencing their neuromodulation trial period.
- Subject is willing to undergo a temporary trial of the Abbott neuromodulation SCS system lasting at least 7 days.
- Subject's average low back pain intensity is ≥ 6 out of 10 on pain numerical rating scale (NRS).
- Subject has Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS with persistent low back pain for ≥ 6 months following lumbar spine surgery). OR Subject has not had spine or back surgery AND subject has chronic (at least 6 months), refractory axial low back pain with a neuropathic component, AND subject is not a candidate for spine surgery (recommended to have an orthopedic surgeon review patient's imaging and confirm this).
- Subject's leg pain NRS, if present, is less than or equal to back pain NRS.
- Subject is on stable pain medications, as determined by the Investigator, for at least 28 days prior to enrolling in this study and agrees to not change medication dosage without consulting Investigator.
- Subject agrees not to introduce or change other therapies related to pain without consulting investigator (e.g., physical therapy, psychotherapy, medical interventions). Rescue analgesic medication for chronic pain or for non-index pain (e.g., ibuprofen for an ankle sprain) will be allowed but must be reported.
- Subject agrees to report on any healthcare received during the study period.
- Subject is willing to cooperate with all study requirements including completion of office visits, use of the wearable biosensors during daily activities, regular response to electronic surveys via the iPhone, and use of an at-home medication tracking log for tracking analgesic use and at-home healthcare tracking log (according to schedule outlined in section 6.0 of the protocol).
- Subject understands that if they are enrolled, they will receive SCS during the trial period before receiving permanent implant. If they continue to a permanent implant, they will be randomly assigned to either sham stimulation or normal stimulation (50% chance) for a period of 6 months.
- Subject understands that at study completion the implanted SCS system will not be explanted or removed as part of the study, regardless of study outcomes.
General Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject is not willing to receive implant of a primary cell SCS system.
- Subject is taking more than 50 morphine equivalents of opioid per day.
- Subject has an unstable fusion with FBSS.
- Subject's back and/or leg pain is believed to originate from spinal instability/mechanical pain.
- Subject's back and/or leg pain is believed to originate from existing metal work.
- Subject's low back pain is limited to a single focal pain area that suggests mechanical back pain.
- Subject is currently participating, or intends to participate in another clinical investigation investigating pain management or that could present a confound to this study (per the investigator).
- Subject is pregnant or nursing or subject plans pregnancy during the clinical investigation follow-up period. This includes female who is sexually active and not using a reliable form of birth control or being not surgically sterile or subject is listed as a post-menopausal female within less than 1 year.
- Subject is part of a vulnerable population ( as per section 5.2.2.1 of the study protocol).
- Presence of other anatomic or comorbid conditions, or other medical, social, or psychological conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, could limit the subject's ability to participate in the clinical investigation or to comply with follow-up requirements of the clinical investigation.
- Subject has chronic widespread pain or confounding pain that will interfere with reporting of low back and leg pain (e.g. consider any chronic pain in the upper back, neck, head, face, shoulders, arms, or chronic headaches)
- Subject has previously had permanent implantation of another SCS, DRG stimulation, or intrathecal drug delivery system or is scheduled to receive such system in a timeframe that would overlap with this study.
- Subject has already participated in a SCS trial period before enrolling in the study and is now waiting for their permanent implantation.
- Subject engages in a profession or other activity that could be damaging to the wearable sensors, as determined by the investigator.
- Subject has a skin condition that could be exacerbated by use of the wearable biosensors (e.g., skin allergy to metals, plastics), as determined by the investigator.
- Subject has a physical condition that makes it difficult to wear the wearable sensors, as determined by the investigator.
- Subject is bedridden.
- Subject has life expectancy of less than 12 months.
- Subject has a current diagnosis of a progressive neurological disorder as determined by the investigator. (e.g. multiple sclerosis, Huntington's disease)
- Subject has a bleeding diathesis such as coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia
- Subject has a current diagnosis of a coagulation disorder or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.
- Subject is immunocompromised and at an increased risk for infection
- Subject has a systemic infection or local infection
- Subject has regular intake of systemic steroids (except inhaled steroids used to treat asthma)
- BMI > 40.
- Subject has an active malignant disease or history of cancer requiring treatment in the last 12 months.
- Evidence of an active disruptive psychological or psychiatric disorder or social condition as determined by the investigator.
- Suspicion or evidence of untreated mental illness, substance abuse, or drug-seeking behavior.
- Subject is involved in an injury claim under active litigation that involves back or leg pain/injury or is receiving or planning to receive worker's compensation payments related to back or leg pain.
- Subject has a diagnosis of spondylolisthesis or scoliosis
Protocol-Specific Screening Exclusion Criteria:
- Urine pregnancy test.
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 2 countries.
5 sites in 2 countries
United Kingdom4 sites
Seacroft Hospital
Leeds
The Walton Centre
Liverpool
Guy's and St. Thomas Hospital
London
St. Bartholomew Hospital
London
Canada1 site
Comprehensive Integrated Pain Program - Interventional Pain Service (CIPP-IPS) (Toronto Western Hospital)
Toronto
About this study
Official title: The True Efficacy of Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Intractable Low Back Pain
The purpose of this prospective, multi-center, randomized, triple-blind, sham-controlled study with parallel economic evaluation is to test the analgesic superiority of BurstDR-SCS compared to sham stimulation using both traditional patient-reported pain outcome measures and objective physiologic data collected from patient-worn biosensors. The endpoints associated with these objectives will be studied across a follow-up period of 6 months.
- Conditions
- Chronic Intractable Pain
- Being tested
- BurstDR-SCS
- Keywords
- ABT-CIP-10453, Spinal Cord Stimulation, TRU-BURST, BurstDR-SCS, FBSS
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BurstDR-SCSDevice
Spinal Cord Stimulation with a BurstDR-SCS system.
BurstDR-SCSDevice
BurstDR-SCS system turned off.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| BurstDR-SCS | Experimental | Subjects implanted with BurstDR-SCS will be included in BurstDR-SCS arm. Receives: Device: BurstDR-SCS |
| Sham control arm | Experimental | Subjects implanted with the BurstDR-SCS system will be included in the Sham control arm Receives: Device: BurstDR-SCS |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in overall back pain severity (NRS) at 6 months compared to sham arm
The pain severity endpoint is based on a review of previous RCTs of SCS and a consideration of IMMPACT (Initiative on Methods, Measurement and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials) and COMET recommendations
Measured: At 6 Months
Change in a composite of physiologic and behavioral features compared to sham arm leading up to 6 months post-permanent implant
Ability to use composite of physiologic and behavioral features (including data from biosensors) to identify treatment responders and physiological data collected from patient-worn biosensors.
Measured: At 6 Months
Secondary outcomes (15)
Change in percentage of patients reporting 50% or more reduction in backpain severity (NRS) at 6 months in treatment vs. sham
Measured: At 6 Months
Change in cumulative proportion of responders for back pain (NRS) in treatment vs. sham
Measured: At 6 Months
Change in pain-related catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale) in treatment vs. sham
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale questionnaire will be completed during selected clinical site visits via the electronic data acquisition portal. These questionnaires will be used for the assessment of study endpoints. The questionnaire includes thirteen statements describing different thoughts and feelings that may be associated with pain. Using the scale 0-4 (0- not at all; 1- to a slight degree; 2- to a moderate degree; 3- to a great degree; and 4- all the time), the patients are expected to indicate the degree to which they have these thoughts and feelings when they're experiencing pain.
Measured: At 6 Months
Change in functional disability (Oswestry Disability Index) in treatment vs. sham
The Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire will be completed during selected clinical site visits via the electronic data acquisition portal. These questionnaires will be used for the assessment of study endpoints. An interpretation of 0% to 20% means minimal disability; 21% to 40% means moderate disability; 41% to 60% means severe disability; 61% to 80% means crippled; and 81%-100% means bed-bound patients.
Measured: At 6 Months
Change in patient satisfaction (Patient Global Impression of Change) in treatment vs. sham
The Patient Global Impression of Change questionnaire will be completed during selected clinical site visits via the electronic data acquisition portal. These questionnaires will be used for the assessment of study endpoints. The scale ranges include:
- No change (or condition has gotten worse)
- Almost the same, hardly any change at all
- A little better, but no noticeable change
- Somewhat better, but the change has not made any real difference
- Moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change
- Better and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference
- A great deal better and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference
Measured: At 6 Months
Change in health-related quality of life (EQ5D-5L) in treatment vs. sham
The EQ5D-5L questionnaire will be completed during selected clinical site visits via the electronic data acquisition portal. These questionnaires will be used for the assessment of study endpoints and to estimate health-related quality of life and quality-adjusted life years. It is a 5-level version of the EQ5D. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.
Measured: At 6 Months
Change in health-related quality of life (PROMIS-29+2) in treatment vs. sham
The PROMIS-29+2 questionnaire will be completed during selected clinical site visits via the electronic data acquisition portal. These questionnaires will be used for the assessment of study endpoints. The patients' answers to the PROMIS-29 are scored from 1-5 (with the exception of the NRS). The sum of the PROMIS results in the raw score, which lies between 4 and 20. There is no total score, but each axis forms its own score.
Measured: At 6 Months
Change in emotional functioning improvement (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) in treatment vs. sham
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 will be completed during selected clinical site visits via the electronic data acquisition portal. These questionnaires will be used for the assessment of study endpoints. The Patient Health Questionnaire is a self-administered version of the PRIME-MD diagnostic instrument for common mental disorders. It is the depression module, which scores each of the 9 DSM-IV criteria as "0" (not at all) to "3" (nearly every day).
Measured: At 6 Months
Change in pain interference PROMIS-29+2 domain in treatment vs. sham
The PROMIS-29+2 questionnaire will be completed during selected clinical site visits via the electronic data acquisition portal. These questionnaires will be used for the assessment of study endpoints. The patients' answers to the PROMIS-29 are scored from 1-5 (with the exception of the NRS). The sum of the PROMIS results in the raw score, which lies between 4 and 20. There is no total score, but each axis forms its own score.
Measured: At 6 Months
Change in social roles and activities PROMIS-29+2 domain in treatment vs. sham
The PROMIS-29+2 questionnaire will be completed during selected clinical site visits via the electronic data acquisition portal. These questionnaires will be used for the assessment of study endpoints. The patients' answers to the PROMIS-29 are scored from 1-5 (with the exception of the NRS). The sum of the PROMIS results in the raw score, which lies between 4 and 20. There is no total score, but each axis forms its own score.
Measured: At 6 Months
Change in sleep disturbance PROMIS-29+2 domain in treatment vs. sham
The PROMIS-29+2 questionnaire will be completed during selected clinical site visits via the electronic data acquisition portal. These questionnaires will be used for the assessment of study endpoints. The patients' answers to the PROMIS-29 are scored from 1-5 (with the exception of the NRS). The sum of the PROMIS results in the raw score, which lies between 4 and 20. There is no total score, but each axis forms its own score.
Measured: At 6 Months
Change in on concomitant pain-related medication usage in treatment vs. sham
Importance of keeping pain-related treatments stable (per agreement with physician), including medications, physical therapy, psychotherapy, pain-related treatments (invasive or non-invasive) and interventions.
Measured: At 6 Months
Change in overall leg pain severity (NRS) at 6 months compared to sham arm in patients who reported baseline chronic leg pain
Measured: At 6 Months
Change in percentage of patients reporting 50% or more reduction in leg pain severity (NRS) at 6 months in treatment vs. sham in patients who reported baseline chronic leg pain
Measured: At 6 Months
Change in cumulative proportion of responders for leg pain (NRS) in treatment vs. sham in patients who reported baseline chronic leg pain
Measured: At 6 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Sep 2023
- Study start20 Apr 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Jun 2023
- Study completion1 Jun 2023
Why it stopped: Decision was taken to consider other opportunities for collecting sham-controlled data for BurstDR SCS.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Chronic Intractable PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Abbott Medical DevicesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott Medical Devices
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Dr. Stefano Palmisani, Principal investigator
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06030284
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ABT-CIP-10453
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 11 Aug 2023
- Last updated
- 3 Nov 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Nov 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The True Efficacy of Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Intractable Low Back Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06030284
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ABT-CIP-10453
- Conditions
- Chronic Intractable Pain
- Keywords
- ABT-CIP-10453, Spinal Cord Stimulation, TRU-BURST, BurstDR-SCS, FBSS
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Decision was taken to consider other opportunities for collecting sham-controlled data for BurstDR SCS.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott Medical DevicesIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 20 Apr 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this prospective, multi-center, randomized, triple-blind, sham-controlled study with parallel economic evaluation is to test the analgesic superiority of BurstDR-SCS compared to sham stimulation using both traditional patient-reported pain outcome measures and objective physiologic data collected from patient-worn biosensors. The endpoints associated with these objectives will be studied across a follow-up period of 6 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| BurstDR-SCS | Experimental | Device: BurstDR-SCSSubjects implanted with BurstDR-SCS will be included in BurstDR-SCS arm. |
| Sham control arm | Experimental | Device: BurstDR-SCSSubjects implanted with the BurstDR-SCS system will be included in the Sham control arm |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BurstDR-SCSSpinal Cord Stimulation with a BurstDR-SCS system. | Device | BurstDR-SCS |
| BurstDR-SCSBurstDR-SCS system turned off. | Device | Sham control arm |
Primary outcome
Change in overall back pain severity (NRS) at 6 months compared to sham arm
Time frame: At 6 Months
The pain severity endpoint is based on a review of previous RCTs of SCS and a consideration of IMMPACT (Initiative on Methods, Measurement and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials) and COMET recommendations
Change in a composite of physiologic and behavioral features compared to sham arm leading up to 6 months post-permanent implant
Time frame: At 6 Months
Ability to use composite of physiologic and behavioral features (including data from biosensors) to identify treatment responders and physiological data collected from patient-worn biosensors.
15 secondary outcomes
Change in percentage of patients reporting 50% or more reduction in backpain severity (NRS) at 6 months in treatment vs. sham
Time frame: At 6 Months
Change in cumulative proportion of responders for back pain (NRS) in treatment vs. sham
Time frame: At 6 Months
Change in pain-related catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale) in treatment vs. sham
Time frame: At 6 Months
Change in functional disability (Oswestry Disability Index) in treatment vs. sham
Time frame: At 6 Months
Change in patient satisfaction (Patient Global Impression of Change) in treatment vs. sham
Time frame: At 6 Months
Change in health-related quality of life (EQ5D-5L) in treatment vs. sham
Time frame: At 6 Months
Change in health-related quality of life (PROMIS-29+2) in treatment vs. sham
Time frame: At 6 Months
Change in emotional functioning improvement (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) in treatment vs. sham
Time frame: At 6 Months
Change in pain interference PROMIS-29+2 domain in treatment vs. sham
Time frame: At 6 Months
Change in social roles and activities PROMIS-29+2 domain in treatment vs. sham
Time frame: At 6 Months
Change in sleep disturbance PROMIS-29+2 domain in treatment vs. sham
Time frame: At 6 Months
Change in on concomitant pain-related medication usage in treatment vs. sham
Time frame: At 6 Months
Change in overall leg pain severity (NRS) at 6 months compared to sham arm in patients who reported baseline chronic leg pain
Time frame: At 6 Months
Change in percentage of patients reporting 50% or more reduction in leg pain severity (NRS) at 6 months in treatment vs. sham in patients who reported baseline chronic leg pain
Time frame: At 6 Months
Change in cumulative proportion of responders for leg pain (NRS) in treatment vs. sham in patients who reported baseline chronic leg pain
Time frame: At 6 Months
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Nov 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Intractable Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Post Market Evaluation of Real World Outcomes and Durability to Support Implantable Inceptiv™ Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy
Chronic Pain, Intractable Pain
Not yet recruiting
Transcutaneous Genital Nerves Stimulation for the Treatment of Refractory Chronic Pelvic and Genital Pain in Women.
Refractory Visceral Pelvic Pain, Refractory Genital Pain
Active, not recruitingObservational study
REDUCER-I: An Observational Study of the Neovasc Reducer™ System
Angina Pectoris, Angina Pectoris, Stable
Recruiting
Managing Pain Using Optimized Sequences by Adjusting Parameters With Independent Current Control
Chronic Pain, Intractable Pain
Recruiting
Insula Neuromodulation for Chronic Neuropathic Pain
Neuropathic Pain, Chronic Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dr. Stefano Palmisani principal investigator
5 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing BurstDR-SCS in people with Chronic Intractable Pain, run by Abbott Medical Devices at 5 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in United Kingdom, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in overall back pain severity (NRS) at 6 months compared to sham arm (time frame: At 6 Months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Nov 2023.