Arthritis, RheumatoidPhase 2DAISYNCT06028438
A Study to Evaluate the Nipocalimab and Certolizumab Combination Therapy in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
A Phase 2 study testing Nipocalimab and Certolizumab in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 32 sites in 6 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of combination therapy with nipocalimab and certolizumab compared to certolizumab monotherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- What is being tested?
- Nipocalimab and Certolizumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 103 participants
- Where
- 32 sitesin 6 countries
- Study dates
- 15 Aug 2023to 29 Oct 2024
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and meeting the 2010 American college of rheumatology (ACR) or European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria for RA for at least 3 months before screening
- Has moderate to severe active RA as defined by persistent disease activity with at least 6 of 66 swollen joints and 6 of 68 tender joints at the time of screening and at baseline
- Is positive for anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) or rheumatoid factor (RF) by the central laboratory at the time of screening
- Has C-reactive protein (CRP) greater than or equal to (>=) 0.3 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) by the central laboratory at the time of screening
- If has received prior biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) (or biosimilars) other than anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agent in RA, has demonstrated inadequate response (IR) or intolerance to the therapy based on one of the following:
- IR to at least 1bDMARD (or the biosimilars) other than anti-TNF agents, as assessed by the treating physician, after at least 12 weeks of therapy including but not limited to abatacept, anakinra, tocilizumab, and sarilumab or at least 16 weeks of therapy with rituximab Documented IR may include inadequate improvement or loss in response after initial improvement in joint counts or other parameters of disease activity
Show all 10Show fewer
- Intolerance to bDMARD (or biosimilars) other than anti-TNF agent, as assessed by the treating physician. Documented intolerance includes side effects and injection or infusion reactions
- If has received prior anti-TNF agent (including biosimilars), has demonstrated IR to >=1 anti-TNF agent (including biosimilars), as assessed by the treating physician:
- After at least 12 weeks dosage of etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab (including biosimilars), and/or
- After at least 14 weeks dosage (example, at least 4 doses) of infliximab (including biosimilars) Documented IR may include inadequate improvement or loss in response after initial improvement in joint counts or other parameters of disease activity
Who cannot join
- Has a confirmed or suspected clinical immunodeficiency syndrome not related to treatment of RA or has a family history of congenital or hereditary immunodeficiency unless confirmed absent
- Is (anatomically or functionally) asplenic
- Has experienced myocardial infarction, unstable ischemic heart disease, or stroke less than or equal to (<=) 12 weeks of screening
- Has a diagnosis of congestive heart failure including medically controlled, asymptomatic congestive heart failure
- Has a history of known demyelinating disease such as multiple sclerosis or optic neuritis
Trial locations and contacts
32 sites in 6 countries.
32 sites in 6 countries
United States10 sites
Graves Gilbert Clinic
Bowling Green, Kentucky, 42101
Bay Area Arthritis and Osteoporosis
Brandon, Florida, 33511
Clinical Research of West Florida
Clearwater, Florida, 33765
Altoona Center For Clinical Research
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
Newport Huntington Medical Group
Huntington Beach, California, 92648
Atlanta Research Center for Rheumatology
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Southwest Rheumatology Research LLC
Mesquite, Texas, 75150
Arizona Arthritis and Rheumatology Research PLLC
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032
Integral Rheumatology And Immunology Specialists
Plantation, Florida, 33324
Inland Rheumatology Clinical Trials Inc.
Upland, California, 91786
Argentina7 sites
STAT Research S A
Buenos Aires, C1023AAB
Centro Privado de Medicina Familiar
Buenos Aires, C1417
Sanatorio Agote
Buenos Aires, C1425EOE
Hospital Central Militar Cirujano Mayor Dr Cosme Argerich
Buenos Aires, C1426BOR
Mautalen Salud e Investigacion
CABA, C1128AAF
ARCIS Salud SRL Aprillus asistencia e investigacion
CABA, C1406AGA
Centro de Investigaciones Medicas Tucuman
San Miguel de Tucumán, T4000AXL
Hungary5 sites
Budai Irgalmasrendi Korhaz
Budapest, H-1027
Bekes Varmegyei Kozponti Korhaz Pandy Kalman Tagkorhaz
Gyula, 5700
Porcika Klinika - Vasarhelyi Sarkanyfu Kft.
Hódmezővásárhely, 6800
CMed Rehabilitacios es Diagnosztikai Kozpont
Székesfehérvár, 8000
Vital Medical Center Orvosi es Fogaszati Kozpont
Veszprém, 8200
Poland4 sites
Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 2 im dr Jana Biziela w Bydgoszczy
Bydgoszcz, 85-168
NZOZ Lecznica MAK MED S C
Nadarzyn, 05 830
MICS Centrum Medyczne Warszawa
Warsaw, 00 874
Centrum Medyczne Reuma Park
Warsaw, 02 665
Germany3 sites
Hamburger Rheuma Forschungszentrum II
Hamburg, 20095
Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet
Herne, 44649
Rheumazentrum Ratingen
Ratingen, 40878
United Kingdom3 sites
Western General Hospital
Edinburgh, EH4 2XU
Medway NHS Foundation Trust
Gillingham, ME7 5NY
Kings College Hospital
London, SE5 9RS
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2a Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Parallel, Proof of Concept Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Nipocalimab and Certolizumab Combination Therapy in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Prior Treatment With Advanced Therapies (bDMARD or tsDMARD)
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of combination therapy with nipocalimab and certolizumab compared to certolizumab monotherapy.
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Being tested
- Placebo, Nipocalimab, Certolizumab
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo will be administered intravenously.
NipocalimabDrug
Also called JNJ-80202135, M281
Nipocalimab will be administered intravenously.
CertolizumabDrug
Also called Cimzia
Certolizumab will be administered subcutaneously.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Certolizumab + Placebo | Active comparator | Participants will receive placebo intravenously (IV) and certolizumab dose 1 subcutaneously at Week 0, 2, and 4 followed by placebo IV and certolizumab dose 2 subcutaneously at Weeks 6 to 22. Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: Certolizumab |
| Certolizumab + Nipocalimab | Experimental | Participants will receive nipocalimab IV and certolizumab dose 1 subcutaneously at Week 0, 2, and 4 followed by nipocalimab IV and certolizumab dose 2 subcutaneously at Weeks 6 to 22. Receives: Drug: Nipocalimab; Drug: Certolizumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Index Score 28 Using C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) at Week 12
Change from baseline in DAS28-CRP at Week 12 were reported. The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, and C-reactive protein (CRP; in milligrams per liter [mg/L]). The set of 28 joint count was based on evaluation of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) MCP1 to MCP5, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) PIP1 to PIP5 joints of both the upper right extremity and the upper left extremity as well as the knee joints of lower right and lower left extremities. Score on the DAS28 ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated more disease activity. Negative changes from baseline indicated improvement of arthritis.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 12
Secondary outcomes (8)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response 20 at Week 12
ACR20 response is defined as: greater than or equal to (>=)20 percent (%) improvement from baseline in both swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints), and >=20% improvement from baseline in 3 of 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100 millimeters [mm], 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=excellent and 100= poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no arthritis activity and 100=extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function as measured by Disability Index of Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI; 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas; range: 0-3, 0= no difficulty, 3= inability to perform task in that area), and CRP.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Week 12
Percentage of participants who achieved ACR50 at Week 12 were reported. ACR50 response is defined as: >=50% improvement from baseline in both tender joint count (68 joints) and swollen joint count (66 joints), and >=50% improvement from baseline in 3 of 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=excellent and 100= poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no arthritis activity and 100=extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function as measured by Disability Index of Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI; 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas; range: 0-3, 0= no difficulty, 3= inability to perform task in that area), and CRP.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 Response at Week 12
Percentage of participants who achieved ACR70 response at Week 12 were reported. ACR70 response is defined as: >=70% improvement from baseline in both swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints), and >=70% improvement from baseline in 3 of 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using VAS (0-100 mm, 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=excellent and 100= poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no arthritis activity and 100=extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function as measured by (HAQ-DI) 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas; range: 0-3, 0= no difficulty, 3= inability to perform task in that area), and CRP.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 90 Response at Week 12
Percentage of participants who achieved ACR90 response at Week 12 were reported. ACR90 response is defined as: >=90% improvement from baseline in both swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints), and >=90% improvement from baseline in 3 of 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using VAS (0-100 mm, 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=excellent and 100= poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no arthritis activity and 100=extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function as measured by HAQ-DI (20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas; range: 0-3, 0= no difficulty, 3= inability to perform task in that area), and CRP.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Disease Activity Index Score 28 Using C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) Remission at Week 12
The DAS28 remission is defined as DAS28 -CRP value of less than (<) 2.6 at Week 12. The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, and CRP (in milligrams per liter [mg/L]). The set of 28 joint count was based on evaluation of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) MCP1 to MCP5, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) PIP1 to PIP5 joints of both the upper right extremity and the upper left extremity as well as the knee joints of lower right and lower left extremities. Score on the DAS28 ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated more disease activity. Negative changes from baseline indicated improvement of arthritis.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Disease Activity Index Score 28 Using C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Week 12
Percentage of participants who achieved DAS28-CRP LDA at Week 12 were reported. DAS28 LDA is defined as a DAS28 value of less than or equal to (<=3.2) at a visit. The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, and CRP (in milligrams per liter [mg/L]). The set of 28 joint count was based on evaluation of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) MCP1 to MCP5, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) PIP1 to PIP5 joints of both the upper right extremity and the upper left extremity as well as the knee joints of lower right and lower left extremities. Score on the DAS28 ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated more disease activity. Negative changes from baseline indicated improvement of arthritis.
Measured: Week 12
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 12
Change from baseline in HAQ-DI score at Week 12 were reported. The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire that measures the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living, over the past week. Responses in each functional area were scored on a scale from 0 (indicating no difficulty) to 3 (inability to perform a task in that area). Overall score was computed as the sum of category scores and divided by the number of categories answered, score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 represents very severe, high-dependency disability.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 12
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 12
Change from baseline in CDAI at Week 12 were reported. The CDAI score is a derived score combining 4 disease assessments: tender joint counts (28 joints), swollen joint counts (28 joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA). Change from baseline in CDAI score measured the change in disease activity, where a negative change indicated an improvement, and a positive change indicated a worsening. The total score range is 0-76. Score interpretation: Remission <=2.8; Low Disease Activity CDAI > 2.8 and <=10; Moderate Disease Activity CDAI >10 and <=22; High Disease Activity CDAI > 22.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Sep 2023
- Study start15 Aug 2023
- Primary completion29 Aug 2024
- Study completion29 Oct 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Arthritis, RheumatoidStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Janssen Research & Development, LLCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 103 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Study director, Janssen Research & Development, LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06028438
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR109343
- Other IDs
- 2023-504045-31-00, 80202135ARA2002, 2023
- Acronym
- DAISY
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 1 Sep 2023
- Last updated
- 16 Oct 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson and Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical- trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) project site at yoda.yale.edu
Publications
Taylor PC, Schett G, Huizinga TWJ, Ibrahim F, Zhou B, Huang S, Gambale J, Wang Q, Liva SG, Leu JH, Hubbard JJ, Leonardo S, Panchakshari RA, Loza MJ, Fei K. Nipocalimab and certolizumab combination therapy in participants with active rheumatoid arthritis despite prior treatment with advanced therapies: results from the phase 2a DAISY-RA study. RMD Open. 2026 Mar 4;12(1):e006464. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006464.
PubMed 41781163
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Oct 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2a Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Parallel, Proof of Concept Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Nipocalimab and Certolizumab Combination Therapy in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Prior Treatment With Advanced Therapies (bDMARD or tsDMARD)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06028438
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DAISY / CR109343
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 103 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 15 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Oct 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 16 Oct 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of combination therapy with nipocalimab and certolizumab compared to certolizumab monotherapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Certolizumab + Placebo | Active comparator | Drug: Placebo, Drug: CertolizumabParticipants will receive placebo intravenously (IV) and certolizumab dose 1 subcutaneously at Week 0, 2, and 4 followed by placebo IV and certolizumab dose 2 subcutaneously at Weeks 6 to 22. |
| Certolizumab + Nipocalimab | Experimental | Drug: Nipocalimab, Drug: CertolizumabParticipants will receive nipocalimab IV and certolizumab dose 1 subcutaneously at Week 0, 2, and 4 followed by nipocalimab IV and certolizumab dose 2 subcutaneously at Weeks 6 to 22. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and meeting the 2010 American college of rheumatology (ACR) or European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria for RA for at least 3 months before screening
- Has moderate to severe active RA as defined by persistent disease activity with at least 6 of 66 swollen joints and 6 of 68 tender joints at the time of screening and at baseline
- Is positive for anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) or rheumatoid factor (RF) by the central laboratory at the time of screening
- Has C-reactive protein (CRP) greater than or equal to (>=) 0.3 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) by the central laboratory at the time of screening
- If has received prior biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) (or biosimilars) other than anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agent in RA, has demonstrated inadequate response (IR) or intolerance to the therapy based on one of the following:
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Has a confirmed or suspected clinical immunodeficiency syndrome not related to treatment of RA or has a family history of congenital or hereditary immunodeficiency unless confirmed absent
- Is (anatomically or functionally) asplenic
- Has experienced myocardial infarction, unstable ischemic heart disease, or stroke less than or equal to (<=) 12 weeks of screening
- Has a diagnosis of congestive heart failure including medically controlled, asymptomatic congestive heart failure
- Has a history of known demyelinating disease such as multiple sclerosis or optic neuritis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PlaceboPlacebo will be administered intravenously. | Drug | Certolizumab + Placebo |
| NipocalimabAlso: JNJ-80202135, M281Nipocalimab will be administered intravenously. | Drug | Certolizumab + Nipocalimab |
| CertolizumabAlso: CimziaCertolizumab will be administered subcutaneously. | Drug | Certolizumab + Nipocalimab, Certolizumab + Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Index Score 28 Using C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 12
Change from baseline in DAS28-CRP at Week 12 were reported. The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, and C-reactive protein (CRP; in milligrams per liter [mg/L]). The set of 28 joint count was based on evaluation of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) MCP1 to MCP5, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) PIP1 to PIP5 joints of both the upper right extremity and the upper left extremity as well as the knee joints of lower right and lower left extremities. Score on the DAS28 ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated more disease activity. Negative changes from baseline indicated improvement of arthritis.
8 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response 20 at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 Response at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 90 Response at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Disease Activity Index Score 28 Using C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) Remission at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Disease Activity Index Score 28 Using C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 12
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Oct 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41781163Taylor PC, Schett G, Huizinga TWJ, Ibrahim F, Zhou B, Huang S, Gambale J, Wang Q, Liva SG, Leu JH, Hubbard JJ, Leonardo S, Panchakshari RA, Loza MJ, Fei K. Nipocalimab and certolizumab combination therapy in participants with active rheumatoid arthritis despite prior treatment with advanced therapies: results from the phase 2a DAISY-RA study. RMD Open. 2026 Mar 4;12(1):e006464. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006464.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson and Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical- trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) project site at yoda.yale.edu
Related trials for Arthritis, Rheumatoid
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial study director
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
32 sites in 6 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Nipocalimab and Certolizumab in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 32 sites in 6 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 32 sites in United States, Argentina, Hungary, Poland, Germany and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Oct 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Index Score 28 Using C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) at Week 12 (time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06028438, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2025.