Sleep RestrictionNCT06025669
Effects of Nap Restriction on Preschoolers' Empathy, Prosocial Behaviors and Executive Function
A study testing Nap restriction in people with Sleep Restriction, run by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Cross-sectional evidences suggest a relationship between early childhood sleep and cognitive as well as socio-emotional functions. However, the casual relation has not been fully revealed. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 42 to 72 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Sleep Restriction
- What is being tested?
- Nap restriction
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 25 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 6 Sep 2023to 31 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 42 to 72 months
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- healthy, typically developing, Intelligence quotient (IQ) ≥ 85;
- never diagnosed with emotional-behavioral problems;
- sleeping on a regular daily schedule;
- reported napping three or more times every week, ≤ one nap in one day;
- able to fall asleep by themselves.
Who cannot join
- not able to fall asleep alone;
- travel beyond two time zones within 3 months of the study;
- use of medications influencing sleep or alertness;
- reported or diagnosed sleep problems (such as obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), narcolepsy, parasomnia, insomnia, etc.) ;
- history of neurodevelopmental diseases, including developmental delay, epilepsy, chronic medical conditions, lead poisoning and head injuries involving loss of consciousness;
- conceptual age <35 weeks or > 45 weeks;
Show all 9Show fewer
- birth weight < 2,500 grams;
- Children's Behaviors Checklist (CBCL) total score > 70;
- a first-degree family history of diagnosed narcolepsy, psychosis or bipolar disorder.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality
About this study
Cross-sectional evidences suggest a relationship between early childhood sleep and cognitive as well as socio-emotional functions. However, the casual relation has not been fully revealed. The current study aims to perform a randomized lab-based crossover nap restriction study on preschoolers, to determine the effects of sleep restriction on preschoolers empathy, prosocial behaviors as well as executive functions.
Read the detailed description
The study will enroll preschoolers with regular nap habits. Under a randomized repeated-measures crossover design, they follow a strict sleep schedule (≥ 12.5 hours' time in bed every 24 hours) for 5 days, before each of two pseudorandomly assigned afternoon assessments following nap-rested or nap-restricted conditions. Actigraphy is applied to monitor sleep, and occipital alpha power is detected from resting-state EEG to objectively measure sleepiness. Empathy (Empathic for Pain Event-related Potential Paradigm) and prosocial behaviors (Concern for Others Behavioral Paradigm) were measured at each assessment. The effects of nap restriction were analyzed with paired t-test/Wilcoxon matched-pairs sign rank test and repeated-measures ANOVA.
- Conditions
- Sleep Restriction
- Being tested
- Nap restriction
- Keywords
- nap restriction, preschooler, socio-emotional development, executive function, event-related potential
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Nap restrictionBehavioural
There are 2 interventions in the single-arm, that is, the nap rested condition and the nap restriction condition. The sequence of nap intervention followed randomization.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Nap rested and nap restriction | Experimental | There are two conditions in the single-arm, that is, the nap rested condition and the nap restriction condition. The sequence of two conditions is randomized. Receives: Behavioral: Nap restriction |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Voltage of N2 and Late Positive Potential (LPP) components
Child brain electroencephalogram (EEG) signals were collected via a non-invasive electrical brain cap and a wireless signal amplifier during the Empathic for Pain Event-related Potential Paradigm. The paradigm presents 32 pairs of empathic pain-related pictures at each sleep intervention condition (e.g., a hand hit by a hammer). The children are asked to think about "How painful do you think the person in the picture feels?" while looking at each picture. After data processing, the voltages of N2 (i.e. the negative potential at approximately 200 ms poststimulus) and LPP (a protracted slow-wave component elicited by emotional stimuli) are output and compared across sleep conditions.
Measured: 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction
Empathic pain rating
The Empathic for Pain Event-related Potential Paradigm presents 32 pairs of empathic pain-related pictures at each sleep intervention condition (e.g., a hand hit by a hammer). The children are asked to rate on "How pain do you think the person in the picture feels?" with the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating System. The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating System includes 6 faces demonstrating painful expressions, scoring 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 points respectively, with higher scores representing higher levels of vicarious painful feelings. The mean scores of ratings are used to compare the empathy behavioral level across sleep conditions.
Measured: 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction
Secondary outcomes (5)
Executive function - behavior
The Heart and Flower Paradigm is used to measure child executive function. The children are asked to press left button while seeing a heart in the middle of the screen, and to press the right button while seeing a flower in the middle of the screen. The correct rate and response time is used to compare the executive performance across sleep conditions.
Measured: 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction
Executive function - EEG signal
The Heart and Flower Paradigm is used to measure child executive function. The children are asked to press left button while seeing a heart in the middle of the screen, and to press the right button while seeing a flower in the middle of the screen. And the EEG signal are collected simultaneously. The β/Θ ratio of EEG signal is used to compare executive brain functions across sleep conditions.
Measured: 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction
Emotional arousal
During the Concern for Others Paradigm, the child's epidermal electricity level is measured at baseline and during the pain demonstration, and the differences between baseline and during the pain demonstration are used to compare the child's emotional arousal across sleep conditions.
Measured: 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction
Emotion regulation
During the Concern for Others Paradigm, the child's respiratory sinus arrhythmia level is measured at baseline and during the pain demonstration, and the differences between baseline and during the pain demonstration are used to compare the child's emotion regulation across sleep conditions.
Measured: 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction
Prosocial behavior level
After the Empathic for Pain Event-related Potential Paradigm and Heart and Flower Paradigm are finished. Prosocial behaviors are measured under the Concern for Others Paradigm. Children are introduced to a playroom, where the experimenter plays with the child and "accidentally" hurts herself. The experimenter then demonstrates pain for one minute under standard procedure. Children's behaviors and expressions are recorded, and coded in four aspects: prosocial behaviors (1 to 6 points, higher scores represent higher levels of prosocial behaviors); empathic concern (1 to 4 points, higher scores represent higher levels of empathic concern); hypothesis testing (1 to 4 points, higher scores represent higher levels of hypothesis testing); and avoidance (0 to 1 points, higher scores represent higher levels of avoidance).
Measured: 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Sep 2023
- Study start6 Sep 2023
- Primary completion31 Dec 2023
- Study completion31 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Sleep RestrictionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Guanghai Wang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
- Investigators
- Fan Jiang, PhD, Study director, Shanghai Children's Medical CenterGuanghai Wang, PhD, Principal investigator, Shanghai Children's Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06025669
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SCMCIRB-K2022122-2
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 7 Aug 2023
- Last updated
- 5 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Miller AL, Seifer R, Crossin R, Lebourgeois MK. Toddler's self-regulation strategies in a challenge context are nap-dependent. J Sleep Res. 2015 Jun;24(3):279-87. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12260. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
PubMed 25394169Rong T, Sun X, Zhang Z, Li W, Deng Y, Wang Z, Meng M, Zhu Q, Jiang Y, Zhao J, Zhang Y, Wang G, Jiang F. The association between sleep and empathy in young preschoolers: A population study. J Sleep Res. 2022 Aug;31(4):e13530. doi: 10.1111/jsr.13530. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
PubMed 34904310Decety J, Meidenbauer KL, Cowell JM. The development of cognitive empathy and concern in preschool children: A behavioral neuroscience investigation. Dev Sci. 2018 May;21(3):e12570. doi: 10.1111/desc.12570. Epub 2017 May 18.
PubMed 28523733Roth-Hanania R, Davidov M, Zahn-Waxler C. Empathy development from 8 to 16 months: early signs of concern for others. Infant Behav Dev. 2011 Jun;34(3):447-58. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2011.04.007. Epub 2011 May 20.
PubMed 21600660Adam N, Blaye A, Gulbinaite R, Delorme A, Farrer C. The role of midfrontal theta oscillations across the development of cognitive control in preschoolers and school-age children. Dev Sci. 2020 Sep;23(5):e12936. doi: 10.1111/desc.12936. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
PubMed 31894624Berger RH, Miller AL, Seifer R, Cares SR, LeBourgeois MK. Acute sleep restriction effects on emotion responses in 30- to 36-month-old children. J Sleep Res. 2012 Jun;21(3):235-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2011.00962.x. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
PubMed 21988087
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Nap Restriction on Preschoolers' Empathy, Prosocial Behaviors and Executive Function
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06025669
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SCMCIRB-K2022122-2
- Conditions
- Sleep Restriction
- Keywords
- nap restriction, preschooler, socio-emotional development, executive function, event-related potential
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cross-sectional evidences suggest a relationship between early childhood sleep and cognitive as well as socio-emotional functions. However, the casual relation has not been fully revealed. The current study aims to perform a randomized lab-based crossover nap restriction study on preschoolers, to determine the effects of sleep restriction on preschoolers empathy, prosocial behaviors as well as executive functions.
Detailed description
The study will enroll preschoolers with regular nap habits. Under a randomized repeated-measures crossover design, they follow a strict sleep schedule (≥ 12.5 hours' time in bed every 24 hours) for 5 days, before each of two pseudorandomly assigned afternoon assessments following nap-rested or nap-restricted conditions. Actigraphy is applied to monitor sleep, and occipital alpha power is detected from resting-state EEG to objectively measure sleepiness. Empathy (Empathic for Pain Event-related Potential Paradigm) and prosocial behaviors (Concern for Others Behavioral Paradigm) were measured at each assessment. The effects of nap restriction were analyzed with paired t-test/Wilcoxon matched-pairs sign rank test and repeated-measures ANOVA.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Nap rested and nap restriction | Experimental | Behavioral: Nap restrictionThere are two conditions in the single-arm, that is, the nap rested condition and the nap restriction condition. The sequence of two conditions is randomized. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 42 to 72 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- healthy, typically developing, Intelligence quotient (IQ) ≥ 85;
- never diagnosed with emotional-behavioral problems;
- sleeping on a regular daily schedule;
- reported napping three or more times every week, ≤ one nap in one day;
- able to fall asleep by themselves.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- not able to fall asleep alone;
- travel beyond two time zones within 3 months of the study;
- use of medications influencing sleep or alertness;
- reported or diagnosed sleep problems (such as obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), narcolepsy, parasomnia, insomnia, etc.) ;
- history of neurodevelopmental diseases, including developmental delay, epilepsy, chronic medical conditions, lead poisoning and head injuries involving loss of consciousness;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Nap restrictionThere are 2 interventions in the single-arm, that is, the nap rested condition and the nap restriction condition. The sequence of nap intervention followed randomization. | Behavioural | Nap rested and nap restriction |
Primary outcome
Voltage of N2 and Late Positive Potential (LPP) components
Time frame: 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction
Child brain electroencephalogram (EEG) signals were collected via a non-invasive electrical brain cap and a wireless signal amplifier during the Empathic for Pain Event-related Potential Paradigm. The paradigm presents 32 pairs of empathic pain-related pictures at each sleep intervention condition (e.g., a hand hit by a hammer). The children are asked to think about "How painful do you think the person in the picture feels?" while looking at each picture. After data processing, the voltages of N2 (i.e. the negative potential at approximately 200 ms poststimulus) and LPP (a protracted slow-wave component elicited by emotional stimuli) are output and compared across sleep conditions.
Empathic pain rating
Time frame: 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction
The Empathic for Pain Event-related Potential Paradigm presents 32 pairs of empathic pain-related pictures at each sleep intervention condition (e.g., a hand hit by a hammer). The children are asked to rate on "How pain do you think the person in the picture feels?" with the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating System. The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating System includes 6 faces demonstrating painful expressions, scoring 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 points respectively, with higher scores representing higher levels of vicarious painful feelings. The mean scores of ratings are used to compare the empathy behavioral level across sleep conditions.
5 secondary outcomes
Executive function - behavior
Time frame: 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction
Executive function - EEG signal
Time frame: 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction
Emotional arousal
Time frame: 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction
Emotion regulation
Time frame: 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction
Prosocial behavior level
Time frame: 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jan 2024.
- Background: PubMed 25394169Miller AL, Seifer R, Crossin R, Lebourgeois MK. Toddler's self-regulation strategies in a challenge context are nap-dependent. J Sleep Res. 2015 Jun;24(3):279-87. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12260. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
- Background: PubMed 34904310Rong T, Sun X, Zhang Z, Li W, Deng Y, Wang Z, Meng M, Zhu Q, Jiang Y, Zhao J, Zhang Y, Wang G, Jiang F. The association between sleep and empathy in young preschoolers: A population study. J Sleep Res. 2022 Aug;31(4):e13530. doi: 10.1111/jsr.13530. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
- Background: PubMed 28523733Decety J, Meidenbauer KL, Cowell JM. The development of cognitive empathy and concern in preschool children: A behavioral neuroscience investigation. Dev Sci. 2018 May;21(3):e12570. doi: 10.1111/desc.12570. Epub 2017 May 18.
- Background: PubMed 21600660Roth-Hanania R, Davidov M, Zahn-Waxler C. Empathy development from 8 to 16 months: early signs of concern for others. Infant Behav Dev. 2011 Jun;34(3):447-58. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2011.04.007. Epub 2011 May 20.
- Background: PubMed 31894624Adam N, Blaye A, Gulbinaite R, Delorme A, Farrer C. The role of midfrontal theta oscillations across the development of cognitive control in preschoolers and school-age children. Dev Sci. 2020 Sep;23(5):e12936. doi: 10.1111/desc.12936. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
- Background: PubMed 21988087Berger RH, Miller AL, Seifer R, Cares SR, LeBourgeois MK. Acute sleep restriction effects on emotion responses in 30- to 36-month-old children. J Sleep Res. 2012 Jun;21(3):235-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2011.00962.x. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
Related trials for Sleep Restriction
Active, not recruiting
Countermeasures to Circadian Misalignment
Circadian Rhythm Sleep Disorder of Shift Work Type, Metabolic Disease
Not yet recruiting
Study on the Mechanism of Central Obesity Induced by Sleep Restriction and the Therapeutic Effect of n-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid: a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial (COSPA Study)
Sleep Deprivation
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
Sleep and Inflammatory Resolution Pathway
Inflammatory Response, Inflammation
Active, not recruiting
Nested Pilot Study Comparing Two Treatments to Reduce Type 2 Diabetes Risk in At-Risk Delawareans
Prediabetes
Not yet recruiting
Time-Restricted Eating and Personalized Energy-Restricted Diet in Obese Postmenopausal Women
Obesity (BMI Equal to or >30), Postmenopausal Symptoms
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fan Jiang, PhD study director
Shanghai Children's Medical Center
Guanghai Wang, PhD principal investigator
Shanghai Children's Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Nap restriction in people with Sleep Restriction, run by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Voltage of N2 and Late Positive Potential (LPP) components (time frame: 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06025669, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jan 2024.