AzTrials
AzTrials

Patients Undergoing DMEK With a History of Anterior or Posterior Segment SurgeryDMEK complexesNCT06013462

DMEK Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients With a History of Anterior or Posterior Segment Surgery

An observational study of Patients Undergoing DMEK With a History of Anterior or Posterior Segment Surgery, run by Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild at 1 site in France.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

DMEK (Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty) is a surgical technique used to treat primary or secondary corneal endothelial decompensation. At the Rothschild Foundation, as in many Western referral centers, DMEK is currently the surgical technique of choice for the treatment of primary or secondary corneal… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
15 Mar 2024to Apr 2028
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Group of 80 patients admitted for consultation at the Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild up to one year prior to endothelial transplantation and meeting the above eligibility criteria.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients scheduled for corneal endothelial transplantation in one or both eyes
  • History of vitrectomy, trabeculectomy, large iris defects, anterior synechiae on the eye to be operated on
  • Pseudophakia or aphakia in the eye to be operated on
  • Express consent to participate in the study
  • Affiliated or beneficiary of a social security scheme

Who cannot join

  • Need for combined PKE + EK surgery
  • Primary endothelial decompensation
  • At least one contraindication to endothelial transplantation :
  • Presence of a stromal corneal cleft
  • Inflammatory or degenerative corneal pathology other than endothelial
  • Progressive corneal infection
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Degenerative retinal pathology not allowing visual recovery postoperatively (for the purposes of this study, we accept patients who have had retinal detachment and whose loss of vision is clearly attributable to endothelial decompensation)
  • End-stage glaucoma not allowing visual recovery post-operatively (for this study, we accept patients who have had filtering surgery for glaucoma, which is stabilized at the time of surgery. Decline in vision must be clearly attributable to endothelial decompensation)
  • Medical contraindication to general or local anesthesia
  • Patient under legal protection
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

France1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Fondation Ophtalmologique A de Rothschild

    Paris, 75019

    Alain SAAD

    asaad@for.paris

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: DMEK Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients With a History of Anterior or Posterior Segment Surgery : Serious Complication Rate and Visual Efficacy at 12 Months

DMEK (Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty) is a surgical technique used to treat primary or secondary corneal endothelial decompensation. At the Rothschild Foundation, as in many Western referral centers, DMEK is currently the surgical technique of choice for the treatment of primary or secondary corneal endothelial decompensation.

Technically challenging, it is a relatively tedious surgery to learn, but offers the best visual and refractive results, as well as faster visual and functional recovery in simple cases.

Read more

In patients without anterior or posterior segment surgical history, the complication rate of DMEK, including graft rejection, is similar to that of other endothelial keratoplasty surgical techniques.

However, in specific cases, in patients with a history of ophthalmological surgery such as vitrectomy, trabeculectomy, large iris defects, anterior synechiae, aniridia or aphakia, the scientific literature shows a higher complication rate for DMEK (increased rate of rebulling and graft decompensation).

As a result, other techniques that are less effective on visual results continue to be used for these patients in a large number of centers.

Nonetheless, in our department, DMEK is also performed on these complicated patients.

When it comes to patients with a history of anterior or posterior segment surgery, it seems to us that the surgeons' experience with DMEK allows better visual results than with any other technique, but without any back up regarding the complication rate in the literature.

The main aim of this study is to describe, in patients with a history of anterior or posterior segment surgery undergoing DMEK, the 12-months occurrence rate of at least one serious post-operative complication.

Being tested
Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Descemet Membrane Endothelial KeratoplastyProcedure or surgery

    DMEK (Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty) is a surgical technique used to treat primary or secondary corneal endothelial decompensation.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Occurrence rate of at least one serious DMEK post-op complication

    Composite endpoint made of 4 serious post-op complications :

    • Rebulling : graft detachment of more than one-third of its surface area one week after surgery (on Avanti OCT-cornea), requiring air or gas injection in the anterior chamber.
    • Graft failure : no improvement in pachymetry at three months post-op (Avanti OCT-cornea).
    • Graft rejection : presence of cellular Tyndall in the anterior chamber and/or retro-descemetic precipitates and/or focal or diffuse increase in pachymetry > 20μm (Avanti OCT-cornea and slit-lamp biomicroscopic examination).
    • Macular cystoid edema : presence of intraretinal fluid in the macular area (macular OCT).

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (28)
  1. Rebulling occurrence rate

    Graft detachment of more than one-third of its surface area one week after surgery (on Avanti OCT-cornea), requiring air or gas injection in the anterior chamber.

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Graft failure occurrence rate

    No improvement in pachymetry at three months post-op (Avanti OCT-cornea).

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Graft rejection occurrence rate

    Presence of cellular Tyndall in the anterior chamber and/or retro-descemetic precipitates and/or focal or diffuse increase in pachymetry > 20μm (Avanti OCT-cornea and slit-lamp biomicroscopic examination).

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Macular cystoid edema occurrence rate

    Presence of intraretinal fluid in the macular area (macular OCT).

    Measured: 12 months

  5. Intraocular hypertension occurrence rate

    Intraocular pressure greater than 21mmHg measured by pneumotonometer or applanation tonometer.

    Measured: 12 months

  6. Graft detachment (with or without rebulling) occurrence rate

    Failure of the graft to press against the posterior host corneal stroma (Avanti OCT-cornea and slit-lamp biomicroscopic examination).

    Measured: 12 months

  7. Surgeon's subjective assessment of surgical complexity

    Evaluation by the main surgeon at the end of the procedure, on a Likert scale from 0 to 10 (0 being normal, uncomplicated surgery and 10 being the maximum level of complexity encountered).

    Measured: Right after the completion of the surgery

  8. Duration of surgical procedure (in minutes)

    The start of the procedure is defined by the placement of the blepharostat and the end of the procedure is defined by the end of the lens dressing.

    Measured: Right after the completion of the surgery

  9. Evolution of visual results (corrected and uncorrected)

    Measurements with optotypes :

    Best monocular visual acuity (decimal scale converted to logMAR)

    Measured: 1 month after surgery

  10. Evolution of visual results (corrected and uncorrected)

    Measurements with optotypes :

    Best monocular visual acuity (decimal scale converted to logMAR)

    Measured: 3 months after surgery

  11. Evolution of visual results (corrected and uncorrected)

    Measurements with optotypes :

    Best monocular visual acuity (decimal scale converted to logMAR)

    Measured: 6 months after surgery

  12. Evolution of visual results (corrected and uncorrected)

    Measurements with optotypes :

    Best monocular visual acuity (decimal scale converted to logMAR)

    Measured: 12 months after surgery

  13. Evolution of refractive results

    Nidek® autorefractometer measurement :

    1. Sphere (in dioptres)
    2. Cylinder (in dioptres)
    3. Spherical equivalent (in dioptres)
    4. Cylinder axis (in degrees)

    Measured: 1 month after surgery

  14. Evolution of refractive results

    Nidek® autorefractometer measurement :

    1. Sphere (in dioptres)
    2. Cylinder (in dioptres)
    3. Spherical equivalent (in dioptres)
    4. Cylinder axis (in degrees)

    Measured: 3 months after surgery

  15. Evolution of refractive results

    Nidek® autorefractometer measurement :

    1. Sphere (in dioptres)
    2. Cylinder (in dioptres)
    3. Spherical equivalent (in dioptres)
    4. Cylinder axis (in degrees)

    Measured: 6 months after surgery

  16. Evolution of refractive results

    Nidek® autorefractometer measurement :

    1. Sphere (in dioptres)
    2. Cylinder (in dioptres)
    3. Spherical equivalent (in dioptres)
    4. Cylinder axis (in degrees)

    Measured: 12 months after surgery

  17. Evolution of endothelial loss

    Measurement by central and peripheral specular microscopy (4 measurements performed nasally, temporally, superiorly and inferiorly). Endothelial loss in each quadrant is defined as a decrease in endothelial count (cells/mm²) expressed as a % relative to the pre-operative measurement.

    Measured: 1 month after surgery

  18. Evolution of endothelial loss

    Measurement by central and peripheral specular microscopy (4 measurements performed nasally, temporally, superiorly and inferiorly). Endothelial loss in each quadrant is defined as a decrease in endothelial count (cells/mm²) expressed as a % relative to the pre-operative measurement.

    Measured: 3 months after surgery

  19. Evolution of endothelial loss

    Measurement by central and peripheral specular microscopy (4 measurements performed nasally, temporally, superiorly and inferiorly). Endothelial loss in each quadrant is defined as a decrease in endothelial count (cells/mm²) expressed as a % relative to the pre-operative measurement.

    Measured: 6 months after surgery

  20. Evolution of endothelial loss

    Measurement by central and peripheral specular microscopy (4 measurements performed nasally, temporally, superiorly and inferiorly). Endothelial loss in each quadrant is defined as a decrease in endothelial count (cells/mm²) expressed as a % relative to the pre-operative measurement.

    Measured: 12 months after surgery

  21. Evolution of corneal thickness

    Corneal thickness in μm measured by OCT - Avanti® type cornea.

    Measured: 1 month after surgery

  22. Evolution of corneal thickness

    Corneal thickness in μm measured by OCT - Avanti® type cornea.

    Measured: 3 months after surgery

  23. Evolution of corneal thickness

    Corneal thickness in μm measured by OCT - Avanti® type cornea.

    Measured: 6 months after surgery

  24. Evolution of corneal thickness

    Corneal thickness in μm measured by OCT - Avanti® type cornea.

    Measured: 12 months after surgery

  25. Evolution of posterior keratometry

    Posterior keratometry in diopters measured by Scheimpflug corneal topography (Pentacam®).

    Measured: 1 month after surgery

  26. Evolution of posterior keratometry

    Posterior keratometry in diopters measured by Scheimpflug corneal topography (Pentacam®).

    Measured: 3 months after surgery

  27. Evolution of posterior keratometry

    Posterior keratometry in diopters measured by Scheimpflug corneal topography (Pentacam®).

    Measured: 6 months after surgery

  28. Evolution of posterior keratometry

    Posterior keratometry in diopters measured by Scheimpflug corneal topography (Pentacam®).

    Measured: 12 months after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Aug 2023
  2. Study start15 Mar 2024
  3. Primary completion14 Mar 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionApr 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06013462
Sponsor's protocol ID
ASD_2023_6
Acronym
DMEK complexes
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
21 Aug 2023
Last updated
8 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Patients Undergoing DMEK With a History of Anterior or Posterior Segment Surgery, run by Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Amélie YAVCHITZ (01.48.03.64.33 ext. +33, ayavchitz@for.paris), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Occurrence rate of at least one serious DMEK post-op complication (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Dec 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in