Physical InactivityT-VIDANCT06007664
Tele-video to Improve Daily Activity
A study testing Tele-Video to Improve Daily Activity in people with Physical Inactivity, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This pilot study will test the feasibility of pairing a social network-based approach with a 6-week Occupational Therapist (OT)-led intervention administered remotely (via Zoom) to increase physical function and activity among residents of a HUD subsidized independent-living senior housing community. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Physical Inactivity
- What is being tested?
- Tele-Video to Improve Daily Activity
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 8 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 23 Aug 2023to 10 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- resident of the senior housing community of focus
- English-proficient
- ambulatory with or without assistive device (e.g., cane, walker)
Who cannot join
- requiring use of a wheelchair for ambulation;
- requiring highly specialized equipment (e.g., spinal cord injury, leg amputation, wound vacuum assisted closure, heavy leg boot);
- hospitalized within last 3 months;
- has probable dementia (TICSm score <27);
- requiring ongoing complicated treatments (e.g., home oxygen use >2 liters);
- has active mental health condition judged to pose significant barrier to participation; and
- meets CDC recommendations for physical activity (150+ minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity during typical week).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Leveraging Social Networks: a Novel Physical Activity Intervention for Senior Housing
This pilot study will test the feasibility of pairing a social network-based approach with a 6-week Occupational Therapist (OT)-led intervention administered remotely (via Zoom) to increase physical function and activity among residents of a HUD subsidized independent-living senior housing community. The intervention is called Tele-Video to Improve Daily Activity (T-VIDA) and will be administered with two cohorts of residents in a single community. The study has two main goals: 1) To determine if an OT-led program administered remotely over the internet using Zoom is useful in helping residents increase their physical activity; and 2) to determine if involving respected members of the community in the program as Advisory Committee members has an impact on how much other residents participate in program activities and engage in behaviors discussed. The OT intervention will be comprised of a combination of adapted components from multiple evidence-based interventions including individual meetings with an OT and OT-led group sessions. To evaluate the intervention pre- and post-program interviews will be conducted with participants over the phone, and activity monitoring will be conducted after both the pre- and post-program interviews for 7-days using an activity monitoring device. The following hypotheses will be tested: 1) at least 75% (3 of 4) of identified residents will accept the invitation to serve on the Advisory Committee; 2) Advisory Committee Members will attend at least 2 of 3 committee meetings; 3) Participants will on average participate in at least 70% (7 of 10) of intervention activities; 4) Residents knowing one or more committee members at baseline will participate in more intervention activities compared to those who do not; and 5) The influence of knowing a committee member on participation will be greater among residents reporting more pain at baseline compared to those reporting less pain.
- Conditions
- Physical Inactivity
- Being tested
- Tele-Video to Improve Daily Activity
- Keywords
- physical activity, physical function
- Medical subject headings
- Sedentary Behavior, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tele-Video to Improve Daily ActivityBehavioural
Participants will be asked to meet individually with an Occupational Therapist (OT) via Zoom to assess activity performance, establish short-term activity goals, and outline an individualized home exercise program. Participants will also be asked to participate in 4 weekly one hour group sessions via Zoom that will include: 1) education; 2) OT facilitated discussion; and 3) activity demonstration, engagement and feedback. The following topics will be covered: mobility, physical activity, pain management, and energy conservation. Participants will be asked to meet individually with the OT via Zoom for 15-20 minutes weekly to answer questions. At the end, participants will be asked to again meet individually with the OT via Zoom to re-assess activity performance and revisit short-term activity goals and the individualized home exercise program. Advisory Committee Members will be asked to make note of intervention activities during their regular interactions with other participants.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| occupational therapy intervention group | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Tele-Video to Improve Daily Activity |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Process Outcome - Advisory Committee Members Accept Invitation
Number of originally identified potential Advisory Commitee Members who accept the invitation to serve on the committee. Possible scores range from 0 to 1.
Measured: 1 week pre-intervention
Process Outcome - Advisory Committee Member Participation
Number of committee meetings attended by Advisory Committee Members. Possible scores range from 0 to 3.
Measured: Week 5 of intervention
Process Outcome - Individual Activity Participation
Number of individual (one-on-one) intervention activities attended by participants. Possible scores range from 0 to 6.
Measured: Immediately after the intervention, 6 weeks after the intervention started
Process Outcome - Group Activity Participation
Number of group intervention activities attended by participants. Possible scores range from 0 to 4.
Measured: Immediately after the intervention, 6 weeks after the intervention started
Process Outcome - Total Activity Participation
Total number of intervention activities attended by participants (individual and group). Possible scores range from 0 to 10.
Measured: Immediately after the intervention, 6 weeks after the intervention started
Process Outcome - Number Acitivites Via Zoom
Number of activities attended via zoom as opposed to calling in by telephone. Possible scores range from 0 to 10.
Measured: Immediately after the intervention, 6 weeks after the intervention started
Secondary outcomes (10)
Change in Self-reported Physical Activity
We use two items from the Community Health Activities Model Program questionnaire asking if participants in a typical week in the past month: 1) walked fast or briskly for exercise; and 2) did light strength training, i.e., used hand held weights of 5 lbs. or less or elastic bands. The response scale for each of the two items was 0=no or 1=yes. A self-reported physical activity score for is calculated for each participant by summing the number of items participants indicated doing, i.e., indicated yes. The range for the total score ranges from 0 to 2. Change will be measured by creating a difference score between the pre and post intervention self-reported physical activity score. Positive change scores represent a better outcome, i.e., an increase in self-reported physical activity.
Measured: 1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention
Change in Perceived Barriers to Physical Activity
This includes 16 questions/items that measure the degree to which specific things make it more difficult for participants to engage in 30 minutes of moderate intensity physical activity on 5 or more days a week. The response scale for each of the 16 items ranges from 1=not at all more difficult to 4=much more difficult. On this scale, lower values represent a better outcome. A total perceived barriers to physical activity score is calculated by averaging the score of all 16 items. The range for the total score also ranges from 1 to 4. Change will be measured by creating a difference score between the pre and post intervention total scores. Negative change scores represent a better outcome, i.e., a decrease in perceived barriers to physical activity.
Measured: 1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention
Change in Pain Interference
This includes 8 questions/items that measure how much pain interferes with daily activities. The response scale for each the 8 items ranges from 1=not at all to 5=very much. On this scale, lower values represent a better outcome. A total pain interference score is calculated by averaging the score of all 8 items. The range for the total score also ranges from 1 to 5. Change will be measured by creating a difference score between the pre and post intervention total scores. Negative change scores represent a better outcome, i.e., a decrease in pain interference.
Measured: 1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention
Change in Pain Intensity
This includes one question about how participants rate their pain on average using a scale ranging from 0=no pain to 10=the worst imaginable pain. Change will be measured by creating a difference score between the pre and post intervention scores.
Measured: 1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention
Change in Physical Function Difficulty
This includes a modified version of the National Health and Aging Trends Study disability and functioning measure. The measure includes 11 questions/items assessing difficulty performing self-care, mobility, and household activities. The response scale for each of the 11 items asking about difficulty doing these activities ranges from 1=none to 4=a lot. On this scale, lower values represent a better outcome. A total physical function difficulty score is calculated by averaging the score of all 11 items. The range for the total score also ranges from 1 to 4. Change will be measured by creating a difference score between the pre and post intervention total scores. Negative change scores represent a better outcome, i.e., a decrease in physical function difficulty.
Measured: 1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention
Change in Self-efficacy in Activity
This includes 10 questions/items that measure participants' confidence in doing a number of activities that will be discussed during the intervention. The response scale for each of the 10 items ranges from 1=not confident at all to 5=completely confident. On this scale, higher values represent a better outcome. A total self-efficacy in activity score is calculated by averaging the score of all 10 items. The range for the total score also ranges from 1 to 5. Change will be measured by creating a difference score between the pre and post intervention total scores. Positive change scores represent a better outcome, i.e., an increase in self-efficacy in activity.
Measured: 1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention
Change in Percentage of Other Participants Known
This will include a measure of the percentage of other participants each participant reports knowing. Possible scores range from 0 to 100. Change will be measured by creating a difference score between the pre and post intervention scores.
Measured: 1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention
Change in Respect Level of Other Participants
This will include a measure of how much respect on average participants have for the other participants that they report knowing. This question will be asked on a scale ranging from 1=respect them very much to 5=don't respect them at all. Change will be measured by creating a difference score between the pre and post intervention scores.
Measured: 1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention
Change in Sedentary Behavior
Participants will be asked to wear an accelerometer for 7 days following participation in pre- and post intervention interviews. Data from the accelerometers will be used to quantify the average amount of time that participants were sedentary per day over the 7 days. Change will be measured by creating a difference score between the pre and post intervention scores.
Measured: 1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention
Change in Number of Steps
Participants will be asked to wear an accelerometer for 7 days following participation in pre- and post intervention interviews. Data from the accelerometers will be used to quantify the average number of steps taken per day over the 7 days. Change will be measured by creating a difference score between the pre and post intervention scores.
Measured: 1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Aug 2023
- Study start23 Aug 2023
- Primary completion26 Nov 2024
- Study completion10 Dec 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Physical InactivityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of MichiganThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 8 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Michigan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Noah J Webster, University of Michigan
- Investigators
- Noah J Webster, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Michigan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06007664
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HUM00224610
- Other IDs
- 1K01AG062754-01A1
- Acronym
- T-VIDA
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 17 Aug 2023
- Last updated
- 13 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Leveraging Social Networks: a Novel Physical Activity Intervention for Senior Housing
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06007664
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- T-VIDA / HUM00224610
- Conditions
- Physical Inactivity
- Keywords
- physical activity, physical function
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 8 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MichiganUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Study start
- 23 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Dec 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 11 Dec 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This pilot study will test the feasibility of pairing a social network-based approach with a 6-week Occupational Therapist (OT)-led intervention administered remotely (via Zoom) to increase physical function and activity among residents of a HUD subsidized independent-living senior housing community. The intervention is called Tele-Video to Improve Daily Activity (T-VIDA) and will be administered with two cohorts of residents in a single community. The study has two main goals: 1) To determine if an OT-led program administered remotely over the internet using Zoom is useful in helping residents increase their physical activity; and 2) to determine if involving respected members of the community in the program as Advisory Committee members has an impact on how much other residents participate in program activities and engage in behaviors discussed. The OT intervention will be comprised of a combination of adapted components from multiple evidence-based interventions including individual meetings with an OT and OT-led group sessions. To evaluate the intervention pre- and post-program interviews will be conducted with participants over the phone, and activity monitoring will be conducted after both the pre- and post-program interviews for 7-days using an activity monitoring device. The following hypotheses will be tested: 1) at least 75% (3 of 4) of identified residents will accept the invitation to serve on the Advisory Committee; 2) Advisory Committee Members will attend at least 2 of 3 committee meetings; 3) Participants will on average participate in at least 70% (7 of 10) of intervention activities; 4) Residents knowing one or more committee members at baseline will participate in more intervention activities compared to those who do not; and 5) The influence of knowing a committee member on participation will be greater among residents reporting more pain at baseline compared to those reporting less pain.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| occupational therapy intervention group | Experimental | Behavioral: Tele-Video to Improve Daily Activity |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- resident of the senior housing community of focus
- English-proficient
- ambulatory with or without assistive device (e.g., cane, walker)
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- requiring use of a wheelchair for ambulation;
- requiring highly specialized equipment (e.g., spinal cord injury, leg amputation, wound vacuum assisted closure, heavy leg boot);
- hospitalized within last 3 months;
- has probable dementia (TICSm score <27);
- requiring ongoing complicated treatments (e.g., home oxygen use >2 liters);
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tele-Video to Improve Daily ActivityParticipants will be asked to meet individually with an Occupational Therapist (OT) via Zoom to assess activity performance, establish short-term activity goals, and outline an individualized home exercise program. Participants will also be asked to participate in 4 weekly one hour group sessions via Zoom that will include: 1) education; 2) OT facilitated discussion; and 3) activity demonstration, engagement and feedback. The following topics will be covered: mobility, physical activity, pain management, and energy conservation. Participants will be asked to meet individually with the OT via Zoom for 15-20 minutes weekly to answer questions. At the end, participants will be asked to again meet individually with the OT via Zoom to re-assess activity performance and revisit short-term activity goals and the individualized home exercise program. Advisory Committee Members will be asked to make note of intervention activities during their regular interactions with other participants. | Behavioural | occupational therapy intervention group |
Primary outcome
Process Outcome - Advisory Committee Members Accept Invitation
Time frame: 1 week pre-intervention
Number of originally identified potential Advisory Commitee Members who accept the invitation to serve on the committee. Possible scores range from 0 to 1.
Process Outcome - Advisory Committee Member Participation
Time frame: Week 5 of intervention
Number of committee meetings attended by Advisory Committee Members. Possible scores range from 0 to 3.
Process Outcome - Individual Activity Participation
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention, 6 weeks after the intervention started
Number of individual (one-on-one) intervention activities attended by participants. Possible scores range from 0 to 6.
Process Outcome - Group Activity Participation
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention, 6 weeks after the intervention started
Number of group intervention activities attended by participants. Possible scores range from 0 to 4.
Process Outcome - Total Activity Participation
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention, 6 weeks after the intervention started
Total number of intervention activities attended by participants (individual and group). Possible scores range from 0 to 10.
Process Outcome - Number Acitivites Via Zoom
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention, 6 weeks after the intervention started
Number of activities attended via zoom as opposed to calling in by telephone. Possible scores range from 0 to 10.
10 secondary outcomes
Change in Self-reported Physical Activity
Time frame: 1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention
Change in Perceived Barriers to Physical Activity
Time frame: 1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention
Change in Pain Interference
Time frame: 1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention
Change in Pain Intensity
Time frame: 1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention
Change in Physical Function Difficulty
Time frame: 1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention
Change in Self-efficacy in Activity
Time frame: 1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention
Change in Percentage of Other Participants Known
Time frame: 1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention
Change in Respect Level of Other Participants
Time frame: 1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention
Change in Sedentary Behavior
Time frame: 1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention
Change in Number of Steps
Time frame: 1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Aug 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Physical Inactivity
Active, not recruiting
Promoting Physical Activity in Older Hispanic/Latino(a) Adults
Sedentary Behavior, Physical Inactivity
Not yet recruiting
Individual Variability in Energy Compensation After a 12-Week Supervised Exercise Intervention
Physical Inactivity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Different Amounts of Plyometric Exercise Without Jumping in Physically Inactive Older Adults
Sedentary Behavior / Physical Inactivity, Aging
Active, not recruiting
E-Bike Commuting and Health in Overweight College Students
Obesity &Amp; Overweight, Sedentary Behaviors
Enrolling by invitation
Effects of a School-Based Physical Activity Intervention on 24-Hour Movement Behaviours and Motor Development in Preschool Children - Study Protocol
Physical Inactivity, Sedentariness
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Noah J Webster, PhD principal investigator
University of Michigan
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Tele-Video to Improve Daily Activity in people with Physical Inactivity, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Dec 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Process Outcome - Advisory Committee Members Accept Invitation (time frame: 1 week pre-intervention). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2026.