PainNoVacPainNCT06004258
Reduction of Pain in Childhood Vaccination in the Primary Care Nurse Vaccination Consultation
A study testing Painless Vaccination in people with Pain, run by Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Non-randomized study with control group (CG) with the objective of analyzing the non-pharmacological analgesic efficacy of the "Painless Vaccine" protocol for the reduction of pain during vaccination in the population aged 2 months to 14 years participating in the experimental group (EG) versus traditional vaccination… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 months to 14 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain
- What is being tested?
- Painless Vaccination
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 495 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 21 Jun 2022to 17 Apr 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 months to 14 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Niñas/os de 2 meses a 14 años que acuden a las consultas del Programa de Vacunación infantil de Andalucía.
- Que al menos uno de sus padres/tutores haya firmado el consentimiento informado por representación del menor para participar en este estudio.
- Sin límite por población residencia.
- Que pertenezcan a las poblaciones de estudio (intervención y control).
Who cannot join
- No se han contemplado criterios de exclusión. Se tendrán en cuenta, si surgieran, casos especiales como: niños con TEA grado I-II-III (trastorno del espectro autista), niños con niveles de ansiedad muy altos condicionados por experiencias desagradables previas relacionadas con las agujas (hospitalizaciones, vías, …). Estos casos se serán valorados por el equipo coordinador
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of the Painless Vaccination Protocol Versus Traditional Vaccination Methodology in Reducing Pain in Children Aged 2 Months to 14 Years. A Multicenter, Quasi-experimental (Non-randomized) Controlled Study
Non-randomized study with control group (CG) with the objective of analyzing the non-pharmacological analgesic efficacy of the "Painless Vaccine" protocol for the reduction of pain during vaccination in the population aged 2 months to 14 years participating in the experimental group (EG) versus traditional vaccination (CG).
Read the detailed description
Administration of injectable vaccines is the most prevalent painful procedure in childhood-adolescence. Pain leads to decreased adherence to vaccination programs. There is scientific evidence on effective pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to reduce the pain associated with the act of vaccination. However, their application is scarce in our setting.
The aim of this study is to analyze the perception of pain during vaccination in the population aged 2 months to 14 years participating in the intervention group (IG) versus traditional vaccination (control group, CG).
Quasi-experimental study (non-randomized) with control group. The aforementioned population attending the primary care center for vaccination and whose guardian has given informed consent will be included. After training of the vaccination nurses of the GE and modifications of the environmental decoration, GE receives its vaccine in centers A and B; while in center C, the control group receives it in the traditional way.
The main outcome variables are: pain during and post-vaccination, and the independent variables: age of the child and guardian, sex, type of vaccine and antalgic measures, etc.
Descriptive, bivariate and logistic regression statistical analysis will be performed, following the application criteria of each test. IBM-SPSS-V26 software.
Approved by the Research Bioethics Committee. For the first time in our environment, an experimental study is developed in real practice on non-pharmacological analgesic measures in the process of infant vaccination. The reduction of pain perceived by the user will improve adherence to vaccination programs and other invasive techniques. The use of the "Painless Vaccination" protocol will favor the incorporation of evidence into clinical practice, as well as the adherence of professionals to low cost measures, for the humanization of child care. As a potential limitation, resistance to change by professionals is expected.
- Conditions
- Pain
- Being tested
- Painless Vaccination
- Keywords
- Vaccines, Pain Management, Primary Health Care, Infant, Child
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Painless VaccinationOther
Structural adaptation of the vaccination areas and cozy decoration (colorful room, mobiles to hang on the ceiling) Nursing uniforms decorated with children's pictures Introduction of toys, stuffed animals, stamps and reward stickers, drawings and crayons, soothing music in the background
Antalgic measures by age ranges:
0-6M (FLACC scale) Breastfeed for two minutes if infant is breastfeeding Glucose 33% or 50% or if rotavirus vaccination, on mother's pacifier or gloved finger (non-nutritive sucking) Comfort between vaccinations 6-15M (FLACC scale) Position infant sitting on guardian's lap facing forward Distraction techniques: stuffed animals, toys, audiovisual devices 3-6Y (Wong-Baker scale) Involve child, explain Child sits on tutor's lap facing forward Distraction techniques: audiovisual devices, drawings 6-14Y (VAS scale)Always seated. Distraction method: audio-visual devices, breathing
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group (IG) | Experimental | Welcoming the child and his or her guardians Invite them to participate, explain the study, and collect informed consent Recording of vaccinations in the medical record Safety check-list and identification Structural and environmental adaptation of the office Decorated nursing uniforms Use of distracting and rewarding elements according to age Preparation of vaccines out of sight of children Apply antalgic measures according to age and preferences. If the skin is dirty, clean it with physiological saline solution. Administer vaccines from least painful to most painful Only cover the puncture site if there is bleeding. Give post-vaccination recommendations Measure pain before, during and after vaccination with validated scales according to age Receives: Other: Painless Vaccination |
| Control group (CG) | No intervention | The "right 5+2" might be identified (patient, vaccine, interval, dose, route of administration, anatomical site, record) might be identified In infants, a non-pressing but secure breastfeeding position is recommended >3 years old: they sit on the tutor's lap, encouraging their collaboration to hold the child without compressing ensuring to avoid movements, and try to distract them 6-12 years old: they sit in the chair with the tutor sitting next to him/her and they are vaccinated asking for the child's collaboration. If necessary, they might be held to avoid movements Vaccines will be administered following The 2021 Vaccination Protocol Tutors will receive recommendations on adverse effects Queries might be solved The atmosphere of the immunization clinic is similar to the rest of the clinics in the health centre (white walls and no child decoration) The uniform used by the nurses is white and the vaccination techniques are the same as those previously used in these centres |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain immediately after injection
It is expected to reduce by 20% the perception of pain during the vaccination act in the IG with respect to the CG. Defining the success of the interventions with an applicable Moderate-High pain measure from 0-3 (FLACCr Scale value 3-5 and 6), Wong-Baker Scale applicable from 3-7 years (Mild= 2; Moderate= 4-6) and Visual Analog Scale applicable from 6 years (Mild 0-2).
We will proceed to distinguish the number of vaccines received by infants in the different visits/age group and the vaccines themselves, as some are more painful than others. The most painful vaccines: Triple Viral, Pneumococcal 13 and Human Papilloma Virus. The less painful vaccines: Hexavalent, Meningococcal C, and Tetravalent Meningococcal.
Measured: During the vaccination procedure
Pain before leaving the office
It is expected to reduce by 20% the perception of pain during the vaccination act in the IG with respect to the CG. Defining the success of the interventions with an applicable Moderate-High pain measure from 0-3 (FLACCr Scale value 3-5 and 6), Wong-Baker Scale applicable from 3-7 years (Mild= 2; Moderate= 4-6) and Visual Analog Scale applicable from 6 years (Mild 0-2).
We will proceed to distinguish the number of vaccines received by infants in the different visits/age group and the vaccines themselves, as some are more painful than others. The most painful vaccines: Triple Viral, Pneumococcal 13 and Human Papilloma Virus. The less painful vaccines: Hexavalent, Meningococcal C, and Tetravalent Meningococcal.
Measured: During the vaccination procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Aug 2023
- Study start21 Jun 2022
- Primary completion3 Apr 2023
- Study completion17 Apr 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (21)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Quasi-experimental (non-randomized) controlled study
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 495 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Eva Franco García, BSN, Principal investigator, Servicio Andaluz de Salud- Distrito Sanitario Aljarafe-Sevilla Norte
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06004258
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PI_EFG_2022
- Acronym
- NoVacPain
- Status last verified
- Jun 2023
- First submitted
- 16 Aug 2023
- Last updated
- 22 Aug 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control- Public Health Guidance. Revised 2016. Let´s talk about protection. Enchancing childhoot vaccination update.
García Sánchez N, Merino Moína M, García Vera C, Lacarta García I, Carbonell Muñoz L, Pina Marqués B, et al. Alivio del dolor y el estrés al vacunar. Síntesis de la evidencia: recomendaciones del Comité Asesor de Vacunas de la AEP. Pediatría Atención Primaria. 2015;17(68):317-27.
Birnie KA, Noel M, Chambers CT, Uman LS, Parker JA. Psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;10(10):CD005179. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005179.pub4.
PubMed 30284240Taddio A, McMurtry CM, Shah V, Riddell RP, Chambers CT, Noel M, MacDonald NE, Rogers J, Bucci LM, Mousmanis P, Lang E, Halperin SA, Bowles S, Halpert C, Ipp M, Asmundson GJG, Rieder MJ, Robson K, Uleryk E, Antony MM, Dubey V, Hanrahan A, Lockett D, Scott J, Bleeker EV; HELPinKids&Adults. Reducing pain during vaccine injections: clinical practice guideline. CMAJ. 2015 Sep 22;187(13):975-982. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150391. Epub 2015 Aug 24. No abstract available.
PubMed 26303247Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention. Epidemiology and Precention of Vaccine- Preventible Diseases.The Pink Book:Course text book- - 14.ª edición (2021) Epidemiología y Prevención de Enfermedades Prevenibles por Vacunación.
Wallace AS, Mantel C, Mayers G, Mansoor O, Gindler JS, Hyde TB. Experiences with provider and parental attitudes and practices regarding the administration of multiple injections during infant vaccination visits: lessons for vaccine introduction. Vaccine. 2014 Sep 15;32(41):5301-10. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.07.076. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
PubMed 25092632García Sánchez N, García SN, Hernández MA. Nuevos retos en vacunación. AEPap (ed.). Curso de Actualización Pediatría, 2017. Madrid: Lúa Ediciones 3.0; 2017. pp. 419-32
Taddio A, Ilersich AF, Ilersich AN, Wells J. From the mouth of babes: Getting vaccinated doesn't have to hurt. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2014 Jul;25(4):196-200. doi: 10.1155/2014/470261.
PubMed 25285123. Pardo Calderón HE, Yataco Chamorro RN. Efectividad de las técnicas no farmacológicas para el alivio del dolor postvacunal en los niños menores de 5 años [Internet]. Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener; 2018. Available from: http://repositorio.uwiener.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/123456789/2166/TITULO - Hilda Erika Pardo Calderón.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
M. Ávila Carrasco a , L. Carbonell Muñoz a, A. Gómez Merino a, M. Méndez Perruca b, M.J. Rodríguez Besada b ¿Pueden los enfermeros de Atención Primaria contribuir en la disminución del dolor al vacunar? .Vacunas Volume 19, Issue 1, January-June 2018, Pages 8- 11
Tomás Rojas J, Benítez Muñoz N, Menéndez Sotillos MI, Portellano Soriano MI, Caballero Aguilera F, Palomares Ojeda L. Vacunación en el Siglo XXI . Menos dolor , mejor ambiente , seguridad y confort. Garnata 91 [Internet]. 2020;22:1-7. Available from: http://www.ciberindex.com/index.php/g91/article/view/e202313/e202313
Miranda C. Sanchez, et col. Tetanalgesia durante la vacunación de lactantes en atención primaria. Biblioteca Las Casa. http//www.index-f.com/lascasas/documentos/lc0874.php.2016.
Harrison D, Reszel J, Bueno M, Sampson M, Shah VS, Taddio A, Larocque C, Turner L. Breastfeeding for procedural pain in infants beyond the neonatal period. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 28;10(10):CD011248. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011248.pub2.
PubMed 27792244Eden, L., et cols.. Minimizar el dolor durante las inyecciones de vacunación infantil: la mejora de la adherencia a los programas de vacunación. https://doi.org/10.2147/PHMT.S50510. 2014
González-María E, Fuentelsaz-Gallego C, Moreno-Casbas T, Gil-Rubio P, Herreros-López P en nombre del grupo de trabajo de la G para el manejo del dolor en niños con cáncer. Guía de Práctica Clínica para el manejo del dolor en niños con cáncer [Internet]. 1a. Madrid, España: Investen; 2013. 142 p. Available from: http://www.criscancer.org
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Aug 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of the Painless Vaccination Protocol Versus Traditional Vaccination Methodology in Reducing Pain in Children Aged 2 Months to 14 Years. A Multicenter, Quasi-experimental (Non-randomized) Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06004258
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NoVacPain / PI_EFG_2022
- Conditions
- Pain
- Keywords
- Vaccines, Pain Management, Primary Health Care, Infant, Child
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 495 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Universitario Virgen MacarenaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 21 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Apr 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Non-randomized study with control group (CG) with the objective of analyzing the non-pharmacological analgesic efficacy of the "Painless Vaccine" protocol for the reduction of pain during vaccination in the population aged 2 months to 14 years participating in the experimental group (EG) versus traditional vaccination (CG).
Detailed description
Administration of injectable vaccines is the most prevalent painful procedure in childhood-adolescence. Pain leads to decreased adherence to vaccination programs. There is scientific evidence on effective pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to reduce the pain associated with the act of vaccination. However, their application is scarce in our setting.
The aim of this study is to analyze the perception of pain during vaccination in the population aged 2 months to 14 years participating in the intervention group (IG) versus traditional vaccination (control group, CG).
Quasi-experimental study (non-randomized) with control group. The aforementioned population attending the primary care center for vaccination and whose guardian has given informed consent will be included. After training of the vaccination nurses of the GE and modifications of the environmental decoration, GE receives its vaccine in centers A and B; while in center C, the control group receives it in the traditional way.
The main outcome variables are: pain during and post-vaccination, and the independent variables: age of the child and guardian, sex, type of vaccine and antalgic measures, etc.
Descriptive, bivariate and logistic regression statistical analysis will be performed, following the application criteria of each test. IBM-SPSS-V26 software.
Approved by the Research Bioethics Committee. For the first time in our environment, an experimental study is developed in real practice on non-pharmacological analgesic measures in the process of infant vaccination. The reduction of pain perceived by the user will improve adherence to vaccination programs and other invasive techniques. The use of the "Painless Vaccination" protocol will favor the incorporation of evidence into clinical practice, as well as the adherence of professionals to low cost measures, for the humanization of child care. As a potential limitation, resistance to change by professionals is expected.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Quasi-experimental (non-randomized) controlled study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group (IG) | Experimental | Other: Painless VaccinationWelcoming the child and his or her guardians Invite them to participate, explain the study, and collect informed consent Recording of vaccinations in the medical record Safety check-list and identification Structural and environmental adaptation of the office Decorated nursing uniforms Use of distracting and rewarding elements according to age Preparation of vaccines out of sight of children Apply antalgic measures according to age and preferences. If the skin is dirty, clean it with physiological saline solution. Administer vaccines from least painful to most painful Only cover the puncture site if there is bleeding. Give post-vaccination recommendations Measure pain before, during and after vaccination with validated scales according to age |
| Control group (CG) | No intervention | –The "right 5+2" might be identified (patient, vaccine, interval, dose, route of administration, anatomical site, record) might be identified In infants, a non-pressing but secure breastfeeding position is recommended >3 years old: they sit on the tutor's lap, encouraging their collaboration to hold the child without compressing ensuring to avoid movements, and try to distract them 6-12 years old: they sit in the chair with the tutor sitting next to him/her and they are vaccinated asking for the child's collaboration. If necessary, they might be held to avoid movements Vaccines will be administered following The 2021 Vaccination Protocol Tutors will receive recommendations on adverse effects Queries might be solved The atmosphere of the immunization clinic is similar to the rest of the clinics in the health centre (white walls and no child decoration) The uniform used by the nurses is white and the vaccination techniques are the same as those previously used in these centres |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 months to 14 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Niñas/os de 2 meses a 14 años que acuden a las consultas del Programa de Vacunación infantil de Andalucía.
- Que al menos uno de sus padres/tutores haya firmado el consentimiento informado por representación del menor para participar en este estudio.
- Sin límite por población residencia.
- Que pertenezcan a las poblaciones de estudio (intervención y control).
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- No se han contemplado criterios de exclusión. Se tendrán en cuenta, si surgieran, casos especiales como: niños con TEA grado I-II-III (trastorno del espectro autista), niños con niveles de ansiedad muy altos condicionados por experiencias desagradables previas relacionadas con las agujas (hospitalizaciones, vías, …). Estos casos se serán valorados por el equipo coordinador
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Painless VaccinationStructural adaptation of the vaccination areas and cozy decoration (colorful room, mobiles to hang on the ceiling) Nursing uniforms decorated with children's pictures Introduction of toys, stuffed animals, stamps and reward stickers, drawings and crayons, soothing music in the background Antalgic measures by age ranges: 0-6M (FLACC scale) Breastfeed for two minutes if infant is breastfeeding Glucose 33% or 50% or if rotavirus vaccination, on mother's pacifier or gloved finger (non-nutritive sucking) Comfort between vaccinations 6-15M (FLACC scale) Position infant sitting on guardian's lap facing forward Distraction techniques: stuffed animals, toys, audiovisual devices 3-6Y (Wong-Baker scale) Involve child, explain Child sits on tutor's lap facing forward Distraction techniques: audiovisual devices, drawings 6-14Y (VAS scale)Always seated. Distraction method: audio-visual devices, breathing | Other | Intervention group (IG) |
Primary outcome
Pain immediately after injection
Time frame: During the vaccination procedure
It is expected to reduce by 20% the perception of pain during the vaccination act in the IG with respect to the CG. Defining the success of the interventions with an applicable Moderate-High pain measure from 0-3 (FLACCr Scale value 3-5 and 6), Wong-Baker Scale applicable from 3-7 years (Mild= 2; Moderate= 4-6) and Visual Analog Scale applicable from 6 years (Mild 0-2). We will proceed to distinguish the number of vaccines received by infants in the different visits/age group and the vaccines themselves, as some are more painful than others. The most painful vaccines: Triple Viral, Pneumococcal 13 and Human Papilloma Virus. The less painful vaccines: Hexavalent, Meningococcal C, and Tetravalent Meningococcal.
Pain before leaving the office
Time frame: During the vaccination procedure
It is expected to reduce by 20% the perception of pain during the vaccination act in the IG with respect to the CG. Defining the success of the interventions with an applicable Moderate-High pain measure from 0-3 (FLACCr Scale value 3-5 and 6), Wong-Baker Scale applicable from 3-7 years (Mild= 2; Moderate= 4-6) and Visual Analog Scale applicable from 6 years (Mild 0-2). We will proceed to distinguish the number of vaccines received by infants in the different visits/age group and the vaccines themselves, as some are more painful than others. The most painful vaccines: Triple Viral, Pneumococcal 13 and Human Papilloma Virus. The less painful vaccines: Hexavalent, Meningococcal C, and Tetravalent Meningococcal.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Aug 2023.
- BackgroundEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control- Public Health Guidance. Revised 2016. Let´s talk about protection. Enchancing childhoot vaccination update.
- Results publicationGarcía Sánchez N, Merino Moína M, García Vera C, Lacarta García I, Carbonell Muñoz L, Pina Marqués B, et al. Alivio del dolor y el estrés al vacunar. Síntesis de la evidencia: recomendaciones del Comité Asesor de Vacunas de la AEP. Pediatría Atención Primaria. 2015;17(68):317-27.
- Results publication: PubMed 30284240Birnie KA, Noel M, Chambers CT, Uman LS, Parker JA. Psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;10(10):CD005179. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005179.pub4.
- Results publication: PubMed 26303247Taddio A, McMurtry CM, Shah V, Riddell RP, Chambers CT, Noel M, MacDonald NE, Rogers J, Bucci LM, Mousmanis P, Lang E, Halperin SA, Bowles S, Halpert C, Ipp M, Asmundson GJG, Rieder MJ, Robson K, Uleryk E, Antony MM, Dubey V, Hanrahan A, Lockett D, Scott J, Bleeker EV; HELPinKids&Adults. Reducing pain during vaccine injections: clinical practice guideline. CMAJ. 2015 Sep 22;187(13):975-982. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150391. Epub 2015 Aug 24. No abstract available.
- Results publicationCenters for Diseases Control and Prevention. Epidemiology and Precention of Vaccine- Preventible Diseases.The Pink Book:Course text book- - 14.ª edición (2021) Epidemiología y Prevención de Enfermedades Prevenibles por Vacunación.
- Results publication: PubMed 25092632Wallace AS, Mantel C, Mayers G, Mansoor O, Gindler JS, Hyde TB. Experiences with provider and parental attitudes and practices regarding the administration of multiple injections during infant vaccination visits: lessons for vaccine introduction. Vaccine. 2014 Sep 15;32(41):5301-10. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.07.076. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
- Results publicationGarcía Sánchez N, García SN, Hernández MA. Nuevos retos en vacunación. AEPap (ed.). Curso de Actualización Pediatría, 2017. Madrid: Lúa Ediciones 3.0; 2017. pp. 419-32
- Results publication: PubMed 25285123Taddio A, Ilersich AF, Ilersich AN, Wells J. From the mouth of babes: Getting vaccinated doesn't have to hurt. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2014 Jul;25(4):196-200. doi: 10.1155/2014/470261.
- Results publication. Pardo Calderón HE, Yataco Chamorro RN. Efectividad de las técnicas no farmacológicas para el alivio del dolor postvacunal en los niños menores de 5 años [Internet]. Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener; 2018. Available from: http://repositorio.uwiener.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/123456789/2166/TITULO - Hilda Erika Pardo Calderón.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
- Results publicationM. Ávila Carrasco a , L. Carbonell Muñoz a, A. Gómez Merino a, M. Méndez Perruca b, M.J. Rodríguez Besada b ¿Pueden los enfermeros de Atención Primaria contribuir en la disminución del dolor al vacunar? .Vacunas Volume 19, Issue 1, January-June 2018, Pages 8- 11
- Results publicationTomás Rojas J, Benítez Muñoz N, Menéndez Sotillos MI, Portellano Soriano MI, Caballero Aguilera F, Palomares Ojeda L. Vacunación en el Siglo XXI . Menos dolor , mejor ambiente , seguridad y confort. Garnata 91 [Internet]. 2020;22:1-7. Available from: http://www.ciberindex.com/index.php/g91/article/view/e202313/e202313
- Results publicationMiranda C. Sanchez, et col. Tetanalgesia durante la vacunación de lactantes en atención primaria. Biblioteca Las Casa. http//www.index-f.com/lascasas/documentos/lc0874.php.2016.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eva Franco García, BSN principal investigator
Servicio Andaluz de Salud- Distrito Sanitario Aljarafe-Sevilla Norte
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Painless Vaccination in people with Pain, run by Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain immediately after injection (time frame: During the vaccination procedure). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06004258, which also lists 21 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Aug 2023.