AzTrials
AzTrials

CataractCOMEDINCT06002399

Bilateral Monofocal Versus Monofocal-EDOF IOL Implantation: Quality of Vision Comparison

A study testing cataract surgery in people with Cataract, run by Vrije Universiteit Brussel at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare visual quality after cataract surgery between two groups: bilateral monofocal intraocular lenses (IOL) and monofocal and contralateral extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOL implantation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 90 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cataract
What is being tested?
cataract surgery
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
10 Nov 2023to 31 Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients aged between 50 and 90 years with bilateral cataract without concomitant exclusion criteria

Who cannot join

  • prior refractive surgery
  • patients with corneal opacities, retinopathy, opticopathy, glaucoma, uveitis and amblyopia
  • patients with corneal astigmatism greater than 3 diopters (D)
  • patients with expected postoperative astigmatism higher than 0.50D
  • prior ocular surgery in the last six months
  • patients with prior unilateral cataract surgery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • UZ Brussel

    Brussels, Brussel Hoofdstedelijk Gewest, 1090

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Combining a Monofocal With an EDOF IOL: Is There an Improvement in Quality of Vision After Cataract Surgery Over Bilateral Monofocal IOL Implantation.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare visual quality after cataract surgery between two groups: bilateral monofocal intraocular lenses (IOL) and monofocal and contralateral extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOL implantation. The main question it aims to answer is:

  • does the combination of both monofocal and EDOF IOLs presents an advantage over bilateral monofocal IOL implantation in the daily life of patients undergoing cataract surgery without the disadvantages of bilateral EDOF IOL implantation?
Read more

Participants will:

  • be randomised in either bilateral monofocal group or monofocal and EDOF group
  • undergo visual acuity testing with and without correction at all distances
  • be asked to complete a quality of vision questionnaire
  • undergo non-invasive examinations to measure residual astigmatism, contrast sensitivity, straylight, optical aberrations, reading spead.
Conditions
Cataract
Being tested
cataract surgery
Medical subject headings
Cataract

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • cataract surgeryDevice

    cataract surgery

Study groups in NCT06002399
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bilateral monofocal intraocular lensOtherStandard treatment
Receives: Device: cataract surgery
Monofocal and contralateral extended depth-of-focus intraocular lensExperimentalExperimental treatment
Receives: Device: cataract surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Difference in binocular photopic distance corrected intermediate visual acuity between both groups using Radner chart.

    Difference in binocular photopic distance corrected intermediate visual acuity between both groups using Radner chart.

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Aug 2023
  2. Study start10 Nov 2023
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2025
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06002399
Sponsor's protocol ID
23219_EDOF study
Acronym
COMEDI
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
15 Aug 2023
Last updated
27 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Termote K, Van Schoor R, Krolo I, Oellerich S, Cools W, Delbeke H, Ni Dhubhghaill S. Combination of a monofocal and one type of extended depth-of-focus (zonal refractive) intraocular lens (COMEDI) in bilateral cataract surgery protocol: a monocentric, randomised, parallel group trial in cataract surgery. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug 5;9(1):e001572. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001572.

    PubMed 39103234

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing cataract surgery in people with Cataract, run by Vrije Universiteit Brussel at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Difference in binocular photopic distance corrected intermediate visual acuity between both groups using Radner chart. (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06002399, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in